ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Development (Cambridge, England)
2021 Dec 15
Negretti, NM;Plosa, EJ;Benjamin, JT;Schuler, BA;Habermann, AC;Jetter, CS;Gulleman, P;Bunn, C;Hackett, AN;Ransom, M;Taylor, CJ;Nichols, D;Matlock, BK;Guttentag, SH;Blackwell, TS;Banovich, NE;Kropski, JA;Sucre, JMS;
PMID: 34927678 | DOI: 10.1242/dev.199512
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol.
2017 Sep 29
Gafeer MM, Hosny Mohammed K, Ormenisan-Gherasim C, Choudhary F, Siddiqui MT, Cohen C.
PMID: 28968265 | DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000595
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Programmed death receptor and programmed death ligand (PD-L1) are immunoregulatory proteins. Nonsmall cell lung cancer bypasses the immune system through the induction of protumorigenic immunosuppressive changes. The better understanding of immunology and antitumor immune responses has brought the promising development of novel immunotherapy agents like programmed death receptor checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of PD-L1 in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), comparing 2 different technologies: immunohistochemistry (IHC) by 2 methods versus RNA in situ hybridization (RISH).
METHODOLOGY:
In total, 20 cases of ADC of the lung and 4 samples of metastatic colon ADC were selected. Evaluation of PD-L1 expression was performed by IHC and RISH. RISH was performed using RNAscope. Both methods were scored in tumor cells and quantified using combined intensity and proportion scores.
RESULTS:
Eight of 20 (40%) lung ADC and 2 of 4 (50%) colon ADC were positive for PD-L1 with Cell Signaling IHC, and 65% lung ADC were positive by Dako IHC (13/20). All 4 cases of colon ADC were negative. When evaluated by RISH, 12 lung ADC (60%) and 1 colon ADC (25%) were PD-L1 positive.
CONCLUSIONS:
RNAscope probes provide sensitive and specific detection of PD-L1 in lung ADC. Both IHC methods (Cell Signaling and Dako) show PD-L1 expression, with the Dako method more sensitive (40% vs. 65%). This study illustrates the utility of RISH and Cell Signaling IHC as complementary diagnostic tests, and Food and Drug Administration approved Dako IHC as a companion diagnostic test.
Science Translational Medicine
2022 Jun 07
Frere, J;Serafini, R;Pryce, K;Zazhytska, M;Oishi, K;Golynker, I;Panis, M;Zimering, J;Horiuchi, S;Hoagland, D;Møller, R;Ruiz, A;Kodra, A;Overdevest, J;Canoll, P;Borczuk, A;Chandar, V;Bram, Y;Schwartz, R;Lomvardas, S;Zachariou, V;tenOever, B;
| DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abq3059
Cell reports
2022 Mar 01
Jeon, H;Lee, H;Kwon, DH;Kim, J;Tanaka-Yamamoto, K;Yook, JS;Feng, L;Park, HR;Lim, YH;Cho, ZH;Paek, SH;Kim, J;
PMID: 35235786 | DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110439
Hepatol Int
2019 Dec 12
Bakheet AMH, Zhao C, Chen JN, Zhang JY, Huang JT, Du Y, Gong LP, Bi YH, Shao CK
PMID: 31832976 | DOI: 10.1007/s12072-019-10006-z
The Journal of experimental medicine
2022 Sep 05
Kaiser, FMP;Gruenbacher, S;Oyaga, MR;Nio, E;Jaritz, M;Sun, Q;van der Zwaag, W;Kreidl, E;Zopf, LM;Dalm, VASH;Pel, J;Gaiser, C;van der Vliet, R;Wahl, L;Rietman, A;Hill, L;Leca, I;Driessen, G;Laffeber, C;Brooks, A;Katsikis, PD;Lebbink, JHG;Tachibana, K;van der Burg, M;De Zeeuw, CI;Badura, A;Busslinger, M;
PMID: 35947077 | DOI: 10.1084/jem.20220498
Neuron
2021 May 21
Pribiag, H;Shin, S;Wang, EH;Sun, F;Datta, P;Okamoto, A;Guss, H;Jain, A;Wang, XY;De Freitas, B;Honma, P;Pate, S;Lilascharoen, V;Li, Y;Lim, BK;
PMID: 34048697 | DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.002
Cell Rep.
2018 Jan 09
Chevée M, Robertson JJ, Cannon GH, Brown SP, Goff LA.
PMID: 29320739 | DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.046
Single-cell RNA sequencing has generated catalogs of transcriptionally defined neuronal subtypes of the brain. However, the cellular processes that contribute to neuronal subtype specification and transcriptional heterogeneity remain unclear. By comparing the gene expression profiles of single layer 6 corticothalamic neurons in somatosensory cortex, we show that transcriptional subtypes primarily reflect axonal projection pattern, laminar position within the cortex, and neuronal activity state. Pseudotemporal ordering of 1,023 cellular responses to sensory manipulation demonstrates that changes in expression of activity-induced genes both reinforced cell-type identity and contributed to increased transcriptional heterogeneity within each cell type. This is due to cell-type biased choices of transcriptional states following manipulation of neuronal activity. These results reveal that axonal projection pattern, laminar position, and activity state define significant axes of variation that contribute both to the transcriptional identity of individual neurons and to the transcriptional heterogeneity within each neuronal subtype.
Elife.
2018 Oct 30
Cembrowski MS, Wang L, Lemire AL, Copeland M, DiLisio SF, Clements J, Spruston N.
PMID: 30375971 | DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37701
In the hippocampus, the classical pyramidal cell type of the subiculum acts as a primary output, conveying hippocampal signals to a diverse suite of downstream regions. Accumulating evidence suggests that the subiculum pyramidal cell population may actually be comprised of discrete subclasses. Here, we investigated the extent and organizational principles governing pyramidal cell heterogeneity throughout the mouse subiculum. Using single-cell RNA-seq, we find that the subiculum pyramidal cell population can be deconstructed into eight separable subclasses. These subclasses were mapped onto abutting spatial domains, ultimately producing a complex laminar and columnar organization with heterogeneity across classical dorsal-ventral, proximal-distal, and superficial-deep axes. We further show that these transcriptomically defined subclasses correspond to differential protein products and can be associated with specific projection targets. This work deconstructs the complex landscape of subiculum pyramidal cells into spatially segregated subclasses that may be observed, controlled, and interpreted in future experiments.
Cell reports
2021 Nov 23
Donohue, JD;Amidon, RF;Murphy, TR;Wong, AJ;Liu, ED;Saab, L;King, AJ;Pae, H;Ajayi, MT;Anderson, GR;
PMID: 34818557 | DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110031
Oncotarget.
2018 Jan 02
Soo RA, Lim JSY, Asuncion BR, Fazreen Z, Herrera MC, Omar MFM, Phuong NHD, Seet JE, Amanuel B, Iacopetta B, Byrne D, Hendry S, Fox S, Soong R.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23827
Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is potentially predictive of clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of reported PD-L1 IHC assays and investigate factors influencing variability. Consecutive sections from 20 non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) comprising resection, core biopsy, cytology and pleural fluid samples underwent IHC with 5 different antibody/autostainer combinations: 22C3/Link48, 28-8/BOND-MAX, E1L3N/BOND-MAX, SP142/BenchMark and SP263/BenchMark. PD-L1 RNA levels were assessed using RNAscope. The frequency of positive cases using scoring thresholds from clinical trials was 72%, 33%, 61%, 56%, and 33% for the 5 IHC protocols respectively, and 33% for RNAscope. Pairwise agreement on the classification of cases as positive or negative for PD-L1 expression ranged from 61%-94%. On a continuous scale, the lowest correlation was between 28-8/BOND-MAX and SP142/BenchMark (R2=0.25) and highest was between 22C3/Link48 and E1L3N/BOND-MAX (R2=0.71). When cases were ordered according to tumor cell (TC)%, a similar ranking of cases across IHC protocols could be observed, albeit with different quanta and limits of detection. Single-slide OPAL 7-color fluorescence IHC analysis revealed a high degree of co-localization of staining from the 5 PD-L1 antibodies. Using SP142 antibody in a BOND-MAX protocol led to increased TC% quanta, while retaining a similar ranking of samples according to TC%. The results of this study highlight tumor PD-L1 status can vary significantly according to IHC protocol. Protocol-dependent staining intensities and nominated thresholds for positivity contribute to this variability, while the antibody used appears to be less of a factor.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com