Contact Us / Request a Quote Download Manuals
Advanced Cell Diagnostics Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Search form

Please sign in
  • Log In
  • Register
  • How to Order
  • What to Buy
0 My Cart
X

You have no items in your shopping cart.

Menu
X
  • Products +
    RNAscope™/BaseScope™/ miRNAscope™
    +
    • Assay Selection Guide
    Target Probes
    +
    • All About Probes
    • Catalog Probes
    • Probe Sets
    • New Probe Request
    Manual Assays
    +
    RNAscope™ Chromogenic
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Duplex Assay
    RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex v2 Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent V2
    BaseScope™
    • Overview
    • BaseScope™ Assay Red
    • BaseScope™ Duplex Assay
    miRNAscope™
    • Overview
    • miRNAscope™ Assay red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA Assay
    DNAscope™
    • Overview
    • DNAscope™ Duplex Assay
    Automated Assays
    +
    For Lunaphore COMET™
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex Pro for COMET™
    For Leica systems
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Duplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiomic LS Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Fluorescent Multiplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-BROWN
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-RED
    • BaseScope™ LS Reagent Kit – RED
    • miRNAscope LS Reagent Kit Red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA LS Assay
    Roche DISCOVERY ULTRA system
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal HRP
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal AP
    • RNAscope™ VS Duplex Assay
    • BaseScope™ VS Reagent Kit – RED
    RNA-Protein Co-Detection Assay
    +
    • RNAscope HiPlex-IMC™ Co-Detection
    • Integrated Codetection Assay
    • Sequential RNA Protein Detection
    Software
    +
    • Overview
    • Aperio RNA ISH Algorithm
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Controls & Accessories
    +
    • RNAscope™
    • BaseScope™
    • miRNAscope™
    • Accessories
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Instructions
    • What to Buy
  • Services +
    Professional Assay Services
    +
    • Our Services
    • Multiomic Services
    • Biomarker Assay Development
    • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
    • Clinical Assay Development
    • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
    • Image Analysis
    Benefits
    +
    • Your Benefits
    • Certified Providers
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Process
    • Contact Services
  • Areas of Research +
    Most Popular
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Whole-Mount
    • Anatomic Pathology Panels
    • Neuroscience
    • Inflammation
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • Stem Cell
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Liver Research
    • Cardiovascular & Skeletal Muscle Research
    Cell & Gene Therapy
    +
    • Gene Therapy
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • siRNA/ASO
    • Cell Therapy
    Cancer
    +
    • Breast Cancer
    • EGFRvIII Splice Variant
    • HPV Related Cancer
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Lung Cancer
    • PDx
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Point Mutation
    • CDR3 for TCR
    Viral
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • HIV & SIV
    • Infectious Disease
    • Zika Virus
    Pathways
    +
    • AKT
    • JAK STAT
    • WNT B-Catenin
    Neuroscience
    +
    Neuroscience
    • Neural Development
    • Neuronal Cell Types
    • Learning and Memory
    • G-protein-coupled Receptors & Ion Channels
    • Post-mortem Brain Tissue
    Other
    +
    • Circular RNA
    • Gene Fusions
    • HT Transcript Validation
    • Long Non-coding RNA
    • RNAseq Validation
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Splice Variant
    • miRNA
    RNA & Protein
    +
    • Antibody Challenges
    • Dual ISH + IHC Methods
    • No Antibodies
    • RNA & Protein Analysis
    Customer Innovations
    +
    • Dual RNA+DNA ISH
    • Very old FFPE ISH
    • Wholemount ISH
    Animal Models
    +
    • Any Species
    • Mouse Model
    • Preclincal Safety
  • Technology +
    Overview
    +
    • How it Works
    • Data Image Gallery
    • Technology Video
    • Webinars
    RNA Detection
    +
    • Why RNA?
    • RNA ISH and IHC
    Pretreatment Options
    +
    • RNAscope™ Pretreatment
    • PretreatPro™
    Spotlights
    +
    • Researchers Spotlights
    • RNA & DNA
    • WISH
    • FFPE
    • Testimonials
    Publications, Guides & Posters
    +
    • Search publications
    • RNAscope™ Reference Guide
    • RNAscope™ Data Analysis Guide
    • Download RNAscope™ Posters
  • Support +
    Overview
    +
    • Get Started
    • How to Order
    • Distributors
    • Contact Support
    Troubleshooting
    +
    • Troubleshooting Guide
    • FAQs
    • User Manuals, SDS and Product Inserts
    • Documents and Downloads
    Imaging Resource
    +
    • Image Analysis
    • Image Registration Software
    • QuPath
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Learn More
    +
    • Webinars
    • Training Videos
  • Partners +
    Partners
    +
    • Overview
    Partners Directory
    +
    Automation Partners
    • Leica Biosystem
    • Roche Diagnostics
    Workflow Partners
    • NanoString
    Software Partners
    • indica labs
    Become a Partner
    +
    • Learn How
  • Diagnostics +
    Diagnostics
    +
    • Diagnostics
    • Literature
    • Diagnostics ASR Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Detection
    • Companion Diagnostics
  • Image Calendar +
    Image Calendar
    +
    • Image Contest
    • Data Image Gallery
Search

Probes for INS

ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.

  • Probes for INS (0)
  • Kits & Accessories (0)
  • Support & Documents (0)
  • Publications (186)
  • Image gallery (0)
Refine Probe List

Content for comparison

Gene

  • HPV E6/E7 (68) Apply HPV E6/E7 filter
  • HPV (18) Apply HPV filter
  • HPV-HR18 (14) Apply HPV-HR18 filter
  • TBD (12) Apply TBD filter
  • HPV18 (6) Apply HPV18 filter
  • 18 (5) Apply 18 filter
  • 31 (5) Apply 31 filter
  • HPV16 (4) Apply HPV16 filter
  • HPV16/18 (4) Apply HPV16/18 filter
  • MmuPV1 (4) Apply MmuPV1 filter
  • HPV-HR16 (4) Apply HPV-HR16 filter
  • HPV HR18 (4) Apply HPV HR18 filter
  • HPV E6 / E7 (4) Apply HPV E6 / E7 filter
  • 33 (4) Apply 33 filter
  • 35 (4) Apply 35 filter
  • 39 (4) Apply 39 filter
  • 45 (4) Apply 45 filter
  • 51 (4) Apply 51 filter
  • 52 (4) Apply 52 filter
  • 56 (4) Apply 56 filter
  • 58 (4) Apply 58 filter
  • 59 (4) Apply 59 filter
  • HPV HR7 (3) Apply HPV HR7 filter
  • E7 (3) Apply E7 filter
  • 26 (3) Apply 26 filter
  • E6/E7 (3) Apply E6/E7 filter
  • HPV 16 (3) Apply HPV 16 filter
  • 53 (3) Apply 53 filter
  • 66 (3) Apply 66 filter
  • 68 (3) Apply 68 filter
  • 73 (3) Apply 73 filter
  • 82 (3) Apply 82 filter
  • HPV16 E6/E7 (2) Apply HPV16 E6/E7 filter
  • HPV- E6 / E7 (2) Apply HPV- E6 / E7 filter
  • HR-HPV (2) Apply HR-HPV filter
  • Wnt16 (1) Apply Wnt16 filter
  • Axin2 (1) Apply Axin2 filter
  • EBV (1) Apply EBV filter
  • HPV31 (1) Apply HPV31 filter
  • HPV33 (1) Apply HPV33 filter
  • HPV35 (1) Apply HPV35 filter
  • HPV52 (1) Apply HPV52 filter
  • HPV58 (1) Apply HPV58 filter
  • HPV-HR7 (1) Apply HPV-HR7 filter
  • CPV16-E6/E7 (1) Apply CPV16-E6/E7 filter
  • E6 (1) Apply E6 filter
  • HER2 (1) Apply HER2 filter
  • Cd207 (1) Apply Cd207 filter
  • Krt10 (1) Apply Krt10 filter
  • Fabp5 (1) Apply Fabp5 filter

Product

  • RNAscope 2.0 Assay (34) Apply RNAscope 2.0 Assay filter
  • RNAscope (32) Apply RNAscope filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay (22) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 LS Assay (10) Apply RNAscope 2.5 LS Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Red assay (8) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Red assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 VS Assay (5) Apply RNAscope 2.5 VS Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Reagent Kit - BROWN (4) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Reagent Kit - BROWN filter
  • RNAscope ISH Probe High Risk HPV (3) Apply RNAscope ISH Probe High Risk HPV filter
  • RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay (2) Apply RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay filter
  • TBD (2) Apply TBD filter
  • DNAscope HD Duplex Reagent Kit (1) Apply DNAscope HD Duplex Reagent Kit filter

Research area

  • (-) Remove HPV filter HPV (186)
  • Cancer (158) Apply Cancer filter
  • Infectious Disease (99) Apply Infectious Disease filter
  • Infectious (4) Apply Infectious filter
  • Bone (1) Apply Bone filter
  • Contraceptives (1) Apply Contraceptives filter
  • Epidermodysplasia verruciformis (1) Apply Epidermodysplasia verruciformis filter
  • Immunotherapy (1) Apply Immunotherapy filter
  • Infectious Disease: Epstein-Barr virus (1) Apply Infectious Disease: Epstein-Barr virus filter
  • MPV (1) Apply MPV filter
  • Neuroscience (1) Apply Neuroscience filter
  • Other: Methods (1) Apply Other: Methods filter
  • Protocols (1) Apply Protocols filter
  • Reproduction (1) Apply Reproduction filter
  • therapeutics (1) Apply therapeutics filter

Category

  • Publications (186) Apply Publications filter
Human papillomavirus-related mixed non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the palatine tonsil with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: Report of a case

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology

2016 Oct 21

Ma Y, Patil N, Gagner JP, Miles BA.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2016.09.010

Increased testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) in oropharyngeal carcinomas has broadened the range of HPV-associated malignancies identified at this site. While HPV-related oropharyngeal non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) are known to have a better prognosis than their non-HPV counterparts, HPV positivity may not alter the aggressive nature of HPV-associated small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCNEC). We report a unique case of a mixed non-keratinizing type HPV-associated tonsillar SCC with SCNEC differentiation, and provide a comparison with the rare reported cases of such mixed carcinomas in the literature. Our patient is only the second such case positive for HPV genotype 18 and the only case in which this HPV-related mixed tonsillar tumor occurred in a patient with small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (SLL/CLL). The case discussion supports the concept that HPV positivity does not confer a better prognosis in such mixed non-keratinizing type SCC with SCNEC. Our report also alerts pathologists to the need to evaluate for the possibility of a coexisting neuroendocrine component when oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is diagnosed, as its presence will affect the patients’ clinical management and prognosis

WNT ligands control initiation and progression of human papillomavirus-driven squamous cell carcinoma

Oncogene.

2018 Apr 17

Zimmerli D, Cecconi V, Valenta T, Hausmann G, Cantù C, Restivo G, Hafner J, Basler K, van den Broek M.
PMID: 29662191 | DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0244-x

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the most common cancer in immunosuppressed patients. Despite indications suggesting that HPV promotes genomic instability during cSCC development, the molecular pathways underpinning HPV-driven cSCC development remain unknown. We compared the transcriptome of HPV-driven mouse cSCC with normal skin and observed higher amounts of transcripts for Porcupine and WNT ligands in cSCC, suggesting a role for WNT signaling in cSCC progression. We confirmed increased Porcupine expression in human cSCC samples. Blocking the secretion of WNT ligands by the Porcupine inhibitor LGK974 significantly diminished initiation and progression of HPV-driven cSCC. Administration of LGK974 to mice with established cSCC resulted in differentiation of cancer cells and significant reduction of the cancer stem cell compartment. Thus, WNT/β-catenin signaling is essential for HPV-driven cSCC initiation and progression as well as for maintaining the cancer stem cell niche. Interference with WNT secretion may thus represent a promising approach for therapeutic intervention.

HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and radiomics: a new era?

Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology

2023 Feb 27

Caprini, E;D'Agnese, G;Brennan, PA;Rahimi, S;
PMID: 36847112 | DOI: 10.1111/jop.13419

The increase of the incidence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) dependent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is alarming, although we have greatly progressed in the classification and staging of this disease. We now know that OPSCC-HPV+ is a sub-type of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with favourable prognosis and good response to therapy that needs a proper system of classification and staging. Thus, in routine practice it is essential to test patients for the presence of HPV. The most popular technique to assess HPV status is immunohistochemistry on biopsy samples with p16, which is an excellent surrogate for high-risk HPV infection. Another highly sensitive and specific tissue-based technique for the detection of HPV is RNAscope In Situ Hybridization (ISH) that has a prohibitive cost, limiting its use in routine practice. Radiomic is an artificial intelligence based non-invasive method of computational analysis of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and ultrasound images. A growing body of evidence suggest that radiomics is able to characterise and detect early relapse after treatment, and enable development of tailored therapy of HPV-positive OPSCC. In this review, we summarise the last findings of radiomic applied to HPV-associated OPSCC.This article is protected by
HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA In Situ Hybridization: Validation Against PCR, DNA In Situ Hybridization, and p16 Immunohistochemistry in 102 Samples of Cervical, Vulvar, Anal, and Head and Neck Neoplasia.

Am J Surg Pathol.

2017 May 01

Mills AM, Dirks DC, Poulter MD, Mills SE, Stoler MH.
PMID: 28403015 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000800

Dysregulated expression of oncogenic types of E6 and E7 is necessary for human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven carcinogenesis. An HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) assay covering 18 common high-risk types ("HR-RISH," aka HR-HPV RNA18 ISH) has not been extensively studied in the anogenital tract or validated on automated technology. We herein compare HR-RISH to DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR), p16 immunohistochemistry, and a previously available HPV DNA ISH assay in HPV-related anogenital and head and neck (H&N) neoplasia. A total of 102 squamous intraepithelial lesions (16 CIN1, 25 CIN3, 3 AIN1, 12 AIN3, 9 VIN3)/invasive squamous cell carcinomas (17 cervical, 2 anal, 18 H&N) as well as 10 normal and 15 reactive cervix samples were collected. HR-RISH, DNA ISH, and p16 immunohistochemistry were performed on whole formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. RNA ISH for 6 low-risk HPV types (LR-RISH) was also performed. RNA and DNA ISH assays used automated systems. HR-HPV PCR was performed on morphology-directed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded punches. HR-RISH was ≥97% sensitive for PCR+ and p16+ neoplasia, as well as morphologically defined anogenital high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/invasive squamous cell carcinoma. HR-RISH was also positive in 78% of anogenital low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, including 81% of CIN1. Furthermore, a subset of PCR-negative/invalid and p16-negative lesions was positive for HR-RISH. Only 1 problematic reactive cervix sample and no normal cervix samples stained. These results demonstrate that HR-RISH is a robust method for the detection of HR-HPV-related neoplasia and provides insight into HPV pathobiology. Performance meets or exceeds that of existing assays in anogenital and H&N lesions and may play a role in resolving diagnostically challenging CIN1 versus reactive cases.

HPV E6/E7 mRNA In Situ Hybridization in the Diagnosis of Cervical Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (LSIL)

Am J Surg Pathol.

2017 Nov 03

Mills AM, Coppock JD, Willis BC, Stoler MH.
PMID: 29112014 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000974

Cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) (aka cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 [CIN1]) can present considerable diagnostic challenges and are associated with poor interobserver reproducibility and overdiagnosis. Furthermore, ancillary studies such as p16 immunohistochemistry have shown little utility in resolving the LSIL versus negative/reactive differential. Human papillomavirus (HPV) RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has shown promise as a diagnostic aid in this setting, but has not been studied in a large case series. We herein investigate high-risk and low-risk HPV RNA ISH in 126 cervical biopsies originally diagnosed as LSIL/CIN1 and compare HPV RNA ISH results to expert-adjudicated morphologic diagnosis to assess whether this assay can help routine cases attain the existing "gold standard" of morphologic consensus diagnosis. We also assess whether this criterion standard can be further improved by integration of HPV RNA ISH results. A consensus diagnosis of intraepithelial lesion (CIN1) was confirmed in 61% of cases, whereas 57% were HPV RNA. HPV-RNA positivity was 84% sensitive and 86% specific for an expert-adjudicated diagnosis of CIN1. Conversely, consensus diagnosis was 90% sensitive and 78% specific for the presence of HPV RNA. Integrating RNA ISH into morphologic review led to further reclassification of 10% of cases, resulting in 95% sensitivity and 98% specificity of HPV RNA ISH for a CIN1 diagnosis and 98% sensitivity and 92% specificity of CIN1 for the presence of HPV RNA. These findings suggest that judicious use of HPV RNA ISH can improve the accuracy of LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis for morphologically ambiguous cases.

In situ hybridization for high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA is a superior method for detecting transcriptionally active HPV in oropharyngeal cancer.

Hum Pathol

2019 May 20

Randén-Brady R, Carpén T, Jouhi L, Syrjänen S, Haglund C, Tarkkanen J, Remes S, Mäkitie A, Mattila PS, Silén S, Hagström J.
PMID: 31121191 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.05.006

Current human papillomavirus (HPV) detection methods in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) have varying sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to compare different HPV-detection methods against the test used in clinical practice, ie, p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and to evaluate whether another HPV-detection test additional to p16 IHC would be worthwhile in OPSCC specimens. The study cohort comprised 357 consecutive OPSCC patients during two time periods: 2000-2009 and 2012-2016. From tumor tissue slides, HPV mRNA via in situ hybridization (ISH), HPV DNA via ISH and HPV DNA via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were detected. The results of these methods were compared with p16 IHC results. Additionally, clinicopathological factors were compared with the methods studied. The sensitivity of HPV mRNA ISH, HPV DNA ISH and HPV DNA PCR were 93.4%, 86.3%, and 83.5%, respectively. The corresponding specificity was 92.4%, 95.3%, and 89.1%, respectively. The negative predictive value for p16 IHC was highest (89.0%) when using mRNA ISH, and followed by DNA ISH (83.5%). ISH for high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA was found to be a highly specific and sensitive method for detecting HPV in OPSCC. As p16 protein may be overexpressed due to HPV-independent mechanisms, all p16 IHC-positive OPSCCs should be considered for retesting using mRNA ISH in order to verify transcriptionally active HPV. This is especially critical when considering de-escalated treatment approaches for patients with HPV-positive tumors and still maintaining favorable outcomes for this subgroup of patients

Utility of high-risk HPV RNA chromogenic in situ hybridization in cytology smears and liquid-based preparations from metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Cancer cytopathology

2022 Nov 09

Velez Torres, JM;Alkathery, T;Tjendra, Y;Zuo, Y;Kerr, DA;Gomez-Fernandez, C;
PMID: 36350307 | DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22659

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) status is critical for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Patients often present with enlarged cervical nodes, and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is frequently the initial diagnostic procedure. Although p16 is the most widely used surrogate marker, problems with interpretation can limit its utility in FNAC. HR-HPV RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has emerged as a specific way to assess HPV status on cell block preparations of cervical nodes. The authors evaluated the utility of HR-HPV ISH in conventional smears and liquid-based cytology (LBC) preparations of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).Thirty-one aspirates of proven, HPV-related SCC (confirmed by p16 and/or HR-HPV ISH in corresponding surgical specimens) were selected. Ten aspirates of HPV-negative SCC were also retrieved. HR-HPV ISH was performed on 27 smears and 14 LBC preparations. All results were scored as positive, equivocal, or negative.Eighty-four percent of metastatic, HPV-related SCCs were positive for HR-HPV RNA ISH, with high number of signals (n = 19) and low number of signals (n = 7), whereas five HPV-related SCCs were equivocal. All metastatic, HPV-negative SCCs were negative for HR-HPV ISH.HR-HPV ISH can be reliably performed on smears or LBC preparations, particularly when cell blocks are unavailable or paucicellular. Results were easy to interpret when high numbers of signals were present but were challenging in aspirates with low or rare number of signals. The current study suggests that HR-HPV ISH could be used as the initial testing modality for determining HPV status in FNAC specimens of metastatic SCC.
The prognostic role of sex, race, and human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Cancer.

2017 Feb 27

Fakhry C, Westra WH, Wang SJ, van Zante A, Zhang Y, Rettig E, Yin LX, Ryan WR, Ha PK, Wentz A, Koch W, Richmon JD, Eisele DW, D'Souza G.
PMID: 28241096 | DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30353

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a well-established prognostic marker for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). Because of the limited numbers of women and nonwhites in studies to date, sex and racial/ethnic differences in prognosis have not been well explored. In this study, survival differences were explored by the tumor HPV status among 1) patients with OPSCCs by sex and race and 2) patients with nonoropharyngeal (non-OP) head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCCs).

METHODS:

This retrospective, multi-institution study included OPSCCs and non-OP HNSCCs of the oral cavity, larynx, and nasopharynx diagnosed from 1995 to 2012. Race/ethnicity was categorized as white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, Asian non-Hispanic, and Hispanic of any race. Tumors were centrally tested for p16 overexpression and the presence of HPV by HPV16 DNA and high-risk HPV E6/E7 messenger RNA in situ hybridization. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

The study population included 239 patients with OPSCC and 621 patients with non-OP HNSCC with a median follow-up time of 3.5 years. After adjustments for the tumor HPV status, age, current tobacco use, and stage, the risk of death was lower for women versus men with OPSCC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.55; P = .04). The results were similar with p16. In contrast, for non-OP HNSCCs, HPV positivity, p16 positivity, and sex were not associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS:

For OPSCC, there are differences in survival by sex, even after the tumor HPV status has been taken into account. For non-OP HNSCC, the HPV status and the p16 status are not of prognostic significance.

p16 immunohistochemistry in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison of antibody clones using patient outcomes and high-risk human papillomavirus RNA status.

Mod Pathol.

2017 Jun 16

Shelton J, Purgina BM, Cipriani NA, Dupont WD, Plummer D, Lewis JS Jr.
PMID: 28621317 | DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.31

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas have a more favorable prognosis than HPV-negative ones. p16 immunohistochemistry has been recommended as a prognostic test in clinical practice. Several p16 antibodies are available, and their performance has not been directly compared. We evaluated three commercially available p16 antibody clones (E6H4, JC8 and G175-405) utilizing 199 cases of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma from a tissue microarray, read by three pathologists with three different cutoffs for positivity: any staining, >50% and >75%. Positive predictive values for high-risk HPV status by RNA in situ hybridization for the E6H4, JC8 and G175-405 clones were 98%, 100% and 99% at the 75% cutoff, but negative predictive values were much more variable at 86%, 69% and 56%, respectively. These improved using the 50% cutoff, becoming similar for all three antibodies. Intensity varied substantially, with 85% of E6H4, 72% of JC8 and 67% of G175-405 showing strong (3+) intensity. With Kaplan-Meier survival plots at the 75% cutoff, the E6H4 clone showed the largest differential in disease specific and overall survival between p16-positive and -negative results. Decreasing the cutoff to 50% increased correlation with HPV in situ hybridization and improved the survival differential for the JC8 and G175-405 clones without worsening of performance for the E6H4 clone. Interobserver agreement was also assessed by kappa scores and was highest for the E6H4 clone. Overall, these study results show modest but important performance differences between the three different p16 antibody clones, suggesting that the E6H4 clone performs best because of strongest staining intensity, greatest differential in outcomes between positive and negative results, lowest interobserver variability, and lowest background, nonspecific staining. The results also suggest that a 75% cutoff is very functional but that, in this patient population with high HPV incidence, 50% and any staining cutoffs may be more effective, particularly for the non-E6H4 clones.

The role of human papillomavirus in p16 positive oral cancers.

J Oral Pathol Med.

2017 Oct 11

Belobrov S, Cornall AM, Young RJ, Koo K, Angel C, Wiesenfeld D, Rischin D, Garland SM, McCullough M.
PMID: 29024035 | DOI: 0.1111/jop.12649

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to identify the presence and frequency of human papillomavirus (HPV) nucleic acid in p16-positive oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs), to assess whether the virus was transcriptionally active and to assess the utility of p16 overexpression as a surrogate marker for HPV in OSCC.

METHODS:

Forty-six OSCC patients treated between 2007 and 2011 with available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens were included. Twenty-three patients were positive for p16 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and these were matched with 23 patients with p16-negative tumours. Laser capture microdissection of the FFPE OSCC tissues was undertaken to isolate invasive tumour tissue. DNA was extracted and tested for high-risk HPV types using a PCR-ELISA method based on the L1 SPF10 consensus primers, and a real-time PCR method targeting HPV-16 and HPV-18 E6 region. Genotyping of HPV-positive cases was performed using a reverse line blot hybridization assay (Inno-LiPA). RNAScope® (a chromogenic RNA in situ hybridization assay) was utilized to detect E6/E7 mRNA of known high-risk HPV types for detection of transcriptionally active virus.

RESULTS:

HPV DNA was found in 3 OSCC cases, all of which were p16 IHC-positive. Two cases were genotyped as HPV-16 and one as HPV-33. Only one of the HPV-16 cases was confirmed to harbour transcriptionally active virus via HPV RNA ISH.

CONCLUSION:

We have shown that the presence of transcriptionally active HPV rarely occurs in OSCC and that p16 is not an appropriate surrogate marker for HPV in OSCC cases. We propose that non-viral mechanisms are responsible for the majority of IHC p16 overexpression in OSCC.

Nonuniform Distribution of High-risk Human Papillomavirus in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Oropharynx

Am J Surg Pathol.

2017 Dec 01

Gelwan E, Malm IJ, Khararjian A, Fakhry C, Bishop JA, Westra WH.
PMID: 28877058 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000929

The oral cavity and oropharynx have historically been viewed as a single anatomic compartment of the head and neck. The practice of combining the oral cavity and oropharynx has recently been revised, largely owing to the observation that human papillomavirus (HPV)-related carcinogenesis has a strong predilection for the oropharynx but not the oral cavity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether HPV is evenly distributed across squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx including those sites that do not harbor tonsillar tissues such as the soft palate. A search of the medical records of the Johns Hopkins Hospital identified 32 primary squamous cell carcinomas of the soft palate (n=31) and posterior pharyngeal wall (n=1). All were evaluated with p16 immunohistochemistry and high-risk HPV in situ hybridization (ISH) (29 by RNA ISH and 3 by DNA ISH). For comparison, we also reviewed the medical records to obtain the HPV status of patients who had undergone HPV testing of primary tonsillar carcinomas over the same time interval as part of their clinical care. High-risk HPV as detected by ISH was present in just 1 (3.1%) of the 32 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, including 1 of 2 p16-positive carcinomas. The difference in HPV detection rates between tonsillar and nontonsillar sites was significant (1/32, 3.1% vs. 917/997, 92%; P<0.0001). HPV is not frequently detected in squamous cell carcinomas arising from nontonsillar regions of the oropharynx. Indeed, squamous cell carcinomas of the soft palate more closely resemble those arising in the oral cavity than those arising in areas of the oropharynx harboring tonsillar tissue. This finding not only further sharpens our understanding of site-specific targeting by HPV, but may have practical implications regarding HPV testing and even the way the oral vault is oncologically compartmentalized to partition HPV-positive from HPV-negative cancers.

Oral Human Papillomavirus Infection and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Rural Northwest Cameroon.

SAGE Publications (2019)

2019 Jan 04

Rettig EM, Gooi Z, Bardin R, Bogale M, Rooper L, Acha E, Koch WM.
| DOI: 10.1177/2473974X18818415

Abstract Objective. Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the precursor for a growing subset of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) in the developed world. This study was designed to characterize oral HPV infection and OPSCC in a region with high rates of HPV-driven cervical cancer. Study Design. Cross-sectional cohort study, retrospective case series. Setting. Northwest Cameroon referral hospital. Subjects and Methods. Individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus attending an outpatient clinic were evaluated for oral HPV infection with oral swabs or rinses that were tested for 51 HPV types. HNSCCs diagnosed and/or treated at the same hospital from 2011 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to ascertain demographic and tumor characteristics, and available OPSCCs were tested for HPV. Results. The oral HPV infection study population comprised 101 participants. Most (69%) were female and neversmokers (84%). Participants had median 4 lifetime sexual partners (interquartile range, 3-7; range, 1-100). Five participants (5%) had oral HPV infection; one had 2 HPV types. HPV types detected were HPV68 (n = 2), HPV82 (n = 2), HPV32 (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). No significant demographic or behavioral differences were detected among individuals with vs without oral HPV infection. OPSCCs comprised just 8% (n = 11) of 131 HNSCCs in the retrospective study population. Two of 7 OPSCCs were HPV positive. Conclusion. The low prevalence of OPSCC observed in northwest Cameroon together with the rarity of oral HPV infection suggests low rates of HPV-driven oropharyngeal carcinogenesis in the region. Future research should examine how geographic differences in oral HPV infection are influenced by cultural norms and affect HPV-OPSCC epidemiology

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »
X
Description
sense
Example: Hs-LAG3-sense
Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe.
Intron#
Example: Mm-Htt-intron2
Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection
Pool/Pan
Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G)
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts
No-XSp
Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm
Does not cross detect with the species (Sp)
XSp
Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm
designed to cross detect with the species (Sp)
O#
Example: Mm-Islr-O1
Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms
CDS
Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS
Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only
EnEmProbe targets exons n and m
En-EmProbe targets region from exon n to exon m
Retired Nomenclature
tvn
Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1
Designed to target transcript variant n
ORF
Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF
Probe targets open reading frame
UTR
Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3
Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only
5UTR
Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR
Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only
3UTR
Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR
Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only
Pan
Example: Pool
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts

Enabling research, drug development (CDx) and diagnostics

Contact Us
  • Toll-free in the US and Canada
  • +1877 576-3636
  • 
  • 
  • 
Company
  • Overview
  • Leadership
  • Careers
  • Distributors
  • Quality
  • News & Events
  • Webinars
  • Patents
Products
  • RNAscope or BaseScope
  • Target Probes
  • Controls
  • Manual assays
  • Automated Assays
  • Accessories
  • Software
  • How to Order
Research
  • Popular Applications
  • Cancer
  • Viral
  • Pathways
  • Neuroscience
  • Other Applications
  • RNA & Protein
  • Customer Innovations
  • Animal Models
Technology
  • Overview
  • RNA Detection
  • Spotlight Interviews
  • Publications & Guides
Assay Services
  • Our Services
  • Biomarker Assay Development
  • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
  • Clinical Assay Development
  • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
  • Image Analysis
  • Your Benefits
  • How to Order
Diagnostics
  • Diagnostics
  • Companion Diagnostics
Support
  • Getting started
  • Contact Support
  • Troubleshooting Guide
  • FAQs
  • Manuals, SDS & Inserts
  • Downloads
  • Webinars
  • Training Videos

Visit Bio-Techne and its other brands

  • bio-technie
  • protein
  • bio-spacific
  • rd
  • novus
  • tocris
© 2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.
  • Terms and Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • Email Preferences
  • 
  • 
  • 

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic use. Refer to appropriate regulations. RNAscope is a registered trademark; and HybEZ, EZ-Batch and DNAscope are trademarks of Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. ©2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.

 

Contact Us / Request a Quote
Download Manuals
Request a PAS Project Consultation
Order online at
bio-techne.com
OK
X
Contact Us

Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.

For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below

  • Contact Sales
  • Contact Support
  • Contact Services
  • Offices

Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:

7707 Gateway Blvd.  
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798

 

Bio-Techne

19 Barton Lane  
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420

 

Advanced Cell Diagnostics China

20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051

021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn

For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com

See Distributors
×

You have already Quick ordered an Item in your cart . If you want to add a new item , Quick ordered Item will be removed form your cart. Do You want to continue?

OK Cancel
Need help?

How can we help you?