Probes for INS

Hedgehog signaling is essential for bone formation, including functioning as a means for the growth plate to drive skeletal mineralization. However, the mechanisms regulating hedgehog signaling specifically in bone-forming osteoblasts are largely unknown. Here, we identified SLIT and NTRK-like protein-5(Slitrk5), a transmembrane protein with few identified functions, as a negative regulator of hedgehog signaling in osteoblasts. Slitrk5 is selectively expressed in osteoblasts and loss of Slitrk5 enhanced osteoblast differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Loss of SLITRK5 in vitro leads to increased hedgehog signaling and overexpression of SLITRK5 in osteoblasts inhibits the induction of targets downstream of hedgehog signaling. Mechanistically, SLITRK5 binds to hedgehog ligands via its extracellular domain and interacts with PTCH1 via its intracellular domain. SLITRK5 is present in the primary cilium, and loss of SLITRK5 enhances SMO ciliary enrichment upon SHH stimulation. Thus, SLITRK5 is a negative regulator of hedgehog signaling in osteoblasts that may be attractive as a therapeutic target to enhance bone formation.

Relevance of mineralized nodules in two-dimensional (2D) osteoblast/osteocyte cultures to bone biology, pathology, and engineering is a decades old question, but a comprehensive answer appears to be still wanting. Bone-like cells, extracellular matrix (ECM), and mineral were all reported but so were non-bone-like ones. Many studies described seemingly bone-like cell-ECM structures based on similarity to few select bone features _in vivo_, yet no studies examined multiple bone features simultaneously and none systematically studied all types of structures coexisting in the same culture. Here, we report such comprehensive analysis of 2D cultures based on light and electron microscopies, Raman microspectroscopy, gene expression, and _in situ_ mRNA hybridization. We demonstrate that 2D cultures of primary cells from mouse calvaria do form _bona fide_ bone. Cells, ECM, and mineral within it exhibit morphology, structure, ultrastructure, composition, spatial-temporal gene expression pattern, and growth consistent with intramembranous ossification. However, this bone is just one of at least five different types of cell-ECM structures coexisting in the same 2D culture, which vary widely in their resemblance to bone and ability to mineralize. We show that the other two mineralizing structures may represent abnormal (disrupted) bone and cartilage-like formation with chondrocyte-to-osteoblast trans differentiation. The two non-mineralizing cell-ECM structures may mimic periosteal cambium and pathological, non-mineralizing osteoid. Importantly, the most commonly used culture conditions (10 mM β-glycerophosphate) induce artificial mineralization of all cell-ECM structures, which then become barely distinguishable. We therefore discuss conditions and approaches promoting formation of _bona fide_ bone and simple means for distinguishing it from the other cell-ECM structures. Our findings may improve osteoblast differentiation and function analyses based on 2D cultures and extend applications of these cultures to general bone biology and tissue engineering research.

Background: Recruitment and proliferation of osteoprogenitors during the reversal-resorption phase, and their differentiation into mature bone-forming osteoblasts is crucial for initiation of bone formation during bone remodeling. This study investigates the osteoprogenitors’ gradual recruitment, proliferation, and differentiation into bone-forming osteoblasts within intracortical remodeling events of healthy adolescent humans. Methods: The study was conducted on cortical bone specimens from 11 healthy adolescent humans. The osteoprogenitor recruitment route and differentiation into osteoblasts were backtracked using immunostainings and in situ hybridizations with osteoblastic markers (CD271, osterix, collage type 1 and 3). The osteoblastic cell populations were defined based on the pore surfaces and their proliferation index (Ki67), density, and number/circumference were estimated in multiplex-immunofluorescence (Ki67, TRAcP, CD34, SMA) stained sections. Results: During the reversal-resorption phase, osteoclasts are intermixed with osteoblastic reversal cells (COL3A1 high CD271 high COL1A1 low Osterix neg ), which are considered to be spatiotemporal osteoprogenitors of bone-forming osteoblasts. Initiation of bone formation requires a critical density of these osteoblastic reversal cells (43±9 cells/mm), which is reached though proliferation (4.4±0.5% proliferative) and even more so through recruitment of osteoprogenitors, but challenged by the ongoing expansion of the canal circumference. These osteoprogenitors most likely originate from osteoblastic bone lining cells and mainly osteoblastic lumen cells, which expand their population though proliferation (4.6±0.3%) and vascular recruitment. These lumen cells resemble canopy cells above trabecular remodeling sites, and like canopy cells they extend above bone-forming osteoblasts where they may rejuvenate the osteoblast population during bone formation. Conclusion: Initiation of bone formation during intracortical remodeling requires a critical density osteoblastic reversal cells, which is reached though proliferation and recruitment of local osteoprogenitors: bone lining cells and osteoblastic lumen cells.