Probes for P16

Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). The immunohistochemical (IHC) test for p16INK4a (p16) is highly correlated with HR-HPV expression in other SCCs. To investigate whether the expression of p16 IHC or HR-HPV is associated with survival in PSCC, we conducted a single institution analysis of 143 patients with a diagnosis of PSCC and, available tissue were tested for p16 IHC staining patterns, histological subtype, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) by an experienced pathologist. HR-HPV status using the Cobas PCR Assay or the RNAScope high-risk HPV in situ hybridization kit were also assessed. Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics of clinico-pathologic variables. Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate median overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and correlated with HPV, p16, and other study variables. Patients with p16+ tumors had a significantly longer median CSS in comparison to the p16- group (p = 0.004), with respective 5-year CSS probability of 88% (95% CI; 0.84, 1) versus 58% (95% CI; 0.55, 0.76; p = 0.004). HPV status did not predict survival outcomes. Multivariable analysis with respect to OS and CSS, showed that p16+ status was associated with a lower risk of death (HR = 0.36, 95%CI; 0.20-0.67, p = 0.001), and improved CSS (HR = 0.20, 95% CI; 0.07-0.54, p = 0.002) after adjusting for covariates. In conclusion, tumor p16 status via IHC was an easy to perform independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS that correlates with HR-HPV expression.

Abstract BACKGROUND: The majority of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinomas are squamous cell carcinomas; however, there are rare reports of HPV-associated neuroendocrine carcinomas (HPV-NECs) in the upper aerodigestive tract. The aim of this study was to characterize the diagnostic features of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases of head and neck HPV-NEC. METHODS: Cytology cases of HPV-NEC were identified over a 3-year period from 2 institutions. Clinical, cytomorphologic, and ancillary test results were evaluated. RESULTS: Five FNA cases of HPV-NEC were identified from 4 patients with cervical lymph node metastases with primaries in the oropharynx (n = 2), nasopharynx (n = 1), and larynx (n = 1). Three cases showed mixed small cell and large cell neuroendocrine morphologies; 1 case was a small cell carcinoma, and the last case appeared as a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. All tumors were strongly positive for synaptophysin and p16 and negative for p63/p40. Two cases tested for INSM1 showed diffuse nuclear staining. HPV was confirmed by in situ hybridization in 4 cases, and HPV-18 was detected by polymerase chain reaction in the fifth case. Retinoblastoma (Rb) staining was moderate to weak (5/5), and p53 was weakly positive (5/5). CONCLUSIONS: Head and neck HPV-NEC is a rare, aggressive entity that can show mixed small and large cell features and p16 upregulation; p53 and Rb are variable with limited diagnostic utility. Because p16 positivity can be nonspecific, confirmatory HPV testing is required and may be helpful in determining the primary site for neuroendocrine carcinoma of an unknown primary. The accurate diagnosis of HPV-NEC is also important because of its worse prognosis in comparison with HPV-associated squamous cell carcinoma.

Although both the 2014 and 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria require unequivocal glandular and squamous differentiation for a diagnosis of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC), in practice, ASC diagnoses are often made in tumors that lack unequivocal squamous and/or glandular differentiation. Considering the ambiguous etiologic, morphologic, and clinical features and outcomes associated with ASCs, we sought to redefine these tumors. We reviewed slides from 59 initially diagnosed ASCs (including glassy cell carcinoma and related lesions) to confirm an ASC diagnosis only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. Select cases underwent immunohistochemical profiling as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by in situ hybridization. Of the 59 cases originally classified as ASCs, 34 retained their ASC diagnosis, 9 were reclassified as pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas, 10 as invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with other components (such as HPV-associated mucinous, usual-type, or ASCs), and 4 as HPV-associated usual or mucinous adenocarcinomas with benign-appearing squamous metaplasia. Two glassy adenocarcinomas were reclassified as poorly differentiated HPV-associated carcinomas based on morphology and immunophenotype. There were no significant immunophenotypic differences between ASCs and pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with regard to HPV and other markers including p16 expression. Although limited by a small sample size, survival outcomes seemed to be similar between all groups. ASCs should be diagnosed only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. The 2 putative glassy cell carcinomas studied did not meet our criteria for ASC and categorizing them as such should be reconsidered.