ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for P16 for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Human Pathology
2017 Mar 14
Mendez-Pena JE, Sadow PM, Vania Nose VN, Hoang MP.
PMID: 28302536 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.02.021
Detection of active human papillomavirus (HPV) is clinically important, as its presence has been shown to correlate with favorable clinical outcomes and better response to treatment in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Using a clinical automated platform, we compared the performance of commercially available HPV DNA and RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) probes in archival tissues of 57 SCC. Importantly, a clinical automated platform gives 1) consistent and reproducible results for HPV ISH and 2) better standardization across clinical laboratories. Compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results, RNA ISH exhibited 93% concordance versus 81% of DNA ISH. RNA ISH was more sensitive than DNA ISH (100% versus 88%), and more specific (87% versus 74%). When only accounting for 2-3+ positivity, sensitivity was 92% for RNA ISH versus 73% for DNA ISH, highlighting the ease of interpretation. p16 exhibited 96% sensitivity while specificity was only 55%. In 3 cases both RNA and DNA ISH were positive while PCR results were negative, suggesting that ISH methods might be a more sensitive method. Performing on a clinical automated platform, RNA ISH is sensitive in determining high-risk HPV status in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues and has the potential of being a standalone clinical test.
Head Neck. 2018 Dec 14.
2018 Dec 14
Ruuskanen M, Irjala H, Minn H, Vahlberg T, Randen-Brady R, Hagström J, Syrjänen S, Leivo I.
PMID: 30549170 | DOI: 10.1002/hed.25450
Virchows Archiv (2015): 1-9.
Hauck F, Oliveira-Silva M, Dreyer JH, Ferreira Perrusi VJ, Arcuri RA, Hassan R, Bonvicino CR, Barros MHM, Niedobitek G.
PMID: 25820374 | DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1761-4
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb 27.
Stoddard DG Jr, Keeney MG, Gao G, Smith DI, García JJ, O'Brien EK.
PMID: 25724573 | DOI: 0194599815571285.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Sep;138(9):1193-202.
Patel KR, Liu TC, Vaccharajani N, Chapman WC, Brunt EM.
PMID: 25171414 | DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.001
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91142
Evans MF, Peng Z, Clark KM, Adamson CSC, Ma XJ, Wu X, Wang H, Luo Y, Cooper K
PMID: 24625757 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091142.eCollection2014.
Am J Surg Pathol.
2017 Nov 03
Mills AM, Coppock JD, Willis BC, Stoler MH.
PMID: 29112014 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000974
Cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) (aka cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 [CIN1]) can present considerable diagnostic challenges and are associated with poor interobserver reproducibility and overdiagnosis. Furthermore, ancillary studies such as p16 immunohistochemistry have shown little utility in resolving the LSIL versus negative/reactive differential. Human papillomavirus (HPV) RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has shown promise as a diagnostic aid in this setting, but has not been studied in a large case series. We herein investigate high-risk and low-risk HPV RNA ISH in 126 cervical biopsies originally diagnosed as LSIL/CIN1 and compare HPV RNA ISH results to expert-adjudicated morphologic diagnosis to assess whether this assay can help routine cases attain the existing "gold standard" of morphologic consensus diagnosis. We also assess whether this criterion standard can be further improved by integration of HPV RNA ISH results. A consensus diagnosis of intraepithelial lesion (CIN1) was confirmed in 61% of cases, whereas 57% were HPV RNA. HPV-RNA positivity was 84% sensitive and 86% specific for an expert-adjudicated diagnosis of CIN1. Conversely, consensus diagnosis was 90% sensitive and 78% specific for the presence of HPV RNA. Integrating RNA ISH into morphologic review led to further reclassification of 10% of cases, resulting in 95% sensitivity and 98% specificity of HPV RNA ISH for a CIN1 diagnosis and 98% sensitivity and 92% specificity of CIN1 for the presence of HPV RNA. These findings suggest that judicious use of HPV RNA ISH can improve the accuracy of LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis for morphologically ambiguous cases.
Am J Surg Pathol.
2017 Dec 01
Gelwan E, Malm IJ, Khararjian A, Fakhry C, Bishop JA, Westra WH.
PMID: 28877058 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000929
The oral cavity and oropharynx have historically been viewed as a single anatomic compartment of the head and neck. The practice of combining the oral cavity and oropharynx has recently been revised, largely owing to the observation that human papillomavirus (HPV)-related carcinogenesis has a strong predilection for the oropharynx but not the oral cavity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether HPV is evenly distributed across squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx including those sites that do not harbor tonsillar tissues such as the soft palate. A search of the medical records of the Johns Hopkins Hospital identified 32 primary squamous cell carcinomas of the soft palate (n=31) and posterior pharyngeal wall (n=1). All were evaluated with p16 immunohistochemistry and high-risk HPV in situ hybridization (ISH) (29 by RNA ISH and 3 by DNA ISH). For comparison, we also reviewed the medical records to obtain the HPV status of patients who had undergone HPV testing of primary tonsillar carcinomas over the same time interval as part of their clinical care. High-risk HPV as detected by ISH was present in just 1 (3.1%) of the 32 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, including 1 of 2 p16-positive carcinomas. The difference in HPV detection rates between tonsillar and nontonsillar sites was significant (1/32, 3.1% vs. 917/997, 92%; P<0.0001). HPV is not frequently detected in squamous cell carcinomas arising from nontonsillar regions of the oropharynx. Indeed, squamous cell carcinomas of the soft palate more closely resemble those arising in the oral cavity than those arising in areas of the oropharynx harboring tonsillar tissue. This finding not only further sharpens our understanding of site-specific targeting by HPV, but may have practical implications regarding HPV testing and even the way the oral vault is oncologically compartmentalized to partition HPV-positive from HPV-negative cancers.
Cancer Cytopathol.
2018 Nov 23
Allison DB, Rooper LM, Mustafa S, Maleki Z, Wakely PE Jr, Ali SZ.
PMID: 30468701 | DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22078
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the oropharynx is an epidemiologically and clinically distinct form of SqCC that is associated with an improved prognosis. However, HPV-related small cell carcinoma of the oropharynx is a rare and newly described variant that is associated with aggressive clinical behavior and poor outcomes. To date, fewer than 2 dozen reports of this entity exist in the literature, and there is no discussion of cytopathologic features. This article reports 6 cases and discusses the salient cytomorphologic findings, ancillary studies, and challenges when this entity is encountered.
METHODS:
Anatomic pathology archives were searched to identify patients with a diagnosis of HPV-related small cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Medical records were reviewed to document the following: age, sex, smoking status, other relevant clinical history, primary location, treatment, and clinical outcome. Both p16 and high-risk HPV in situ hybridization (ISH) studies were positive in at least 1 specimen from each patient. The pathologic diagnoses, cytomorphologic characteristics, immunocytochemical stains, and HPV ISH studies were reviewed and recorded for all available cases.
RESULTS:
Six patients with 11 cytopathology specimens of HPV-related small cell carcinoma of the oropharynx were identified. The mean age was 61.3 years, and all patients died with widely metastatic disease (mean, 23 months; range, 12-48 months). Mixed small cell carcinoma and SqCC components were present in half of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS:
The identification of a small cell component can be reliably performed with cytology preparations and is crucial because this (and not the HPV status) determines the prognosis.
Ann Oncol.
2018 Aug 08
Sathasivam HP, Santambrogio A, Andoniadou CL, Robinson M, Thavaraj S.
PMID: 30101315 | DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy313
JAMA Network Open
2018 Aug 03
Rajendra S, Xuan W, Merrett N, Sharma P, Sharma P, Pavey D, Yang T, Santos LD, Sharaiha O, Pande G, Peter Cosman P, Wu X, Wang B.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1054
Abstract
Importance
High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) has been associated with Barrett dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Nevertheless, the prognostic significance of esophageal tumor HPV status is unknown.
Objective
To determine the association between HPV infection and related biomarkers in high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma and survival.
Design, Setting, and Participants
Retrospective case-control study. The hypothesis was that HPV-associated esophageal tumors would show a favorable prognosis (as in viral-positive head and neck cancers). Pretreatment biopsies were used for HPV DNA determination via polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization for E6 and E7 messenger RNA (mRNA), and immunohistochemistry for the proteins p16INK4A and p53. Sequencing of TP53 was also undertaken. The study took place at secondary and tertiary referral centers, with 151 patients assessed for eligibility and 9 excluded. The study period was from December 1, 2002, to November 28, 2017.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Among 142 patients with high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma (126 [88.7%] male; mean [SD] age, 66.0 [12.1] years; 142 [100%] white), 37 were HPV positive and 105 were HPV negative. Patients who were HPV positive mostly had high p16INK4A expression, low p53 expression, and wild-type TP53. There were more Tis, T1, and T2 tumors in HPV-positive patients compared with HPV-negative patients (75.7% vs 54.3%; difference, 21.4%; 95% CI, 4.6%-38.2%; P = .02). Mean DFS was superior in the HPV-positive group (40.3 vs 24.1 months; difference, 16.2 months; 95% CI, 5.7-26.8; P = .003) as was OS (43.7 vs 29.8 months; difference, 13.9 months; 95% CI, 3.6-24.3; P = .009). Recurrence or progression was reduced in the HPV-positive cohort (24.3% vs 58.1%; difference, −33.8%; 95% CI, −50.5% to −17.0%; P < .001) as was distant metastasis (8.1% vs 27.6%; difference, −19.5%; 95% CI, −31.8% to −7.2%; P = .02) and death from esophageal adenocarcinoma (13.5% vs 36.2%; difference, −22.7%; 95% CI, −37.0% to −8.3%; P = .01). Positive results for HPV and transcriptionally active virus were both associated with a superior DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.67; P = .002 and HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88; P = .02, respectively [log-rank test]). Positivity for E6 and E7 mRNA, high p16INK4Aexpression, and low p53 expression were not associated with improved DFS. On multivariate analysis, superior DFS was demonstrated for HPV (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85; P = .02), biologically active virus (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.86; P = .02), E6 and E7 mRNA (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.96; P = .04), and high p16 expression (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.89; P = .02).
Conclusions and Relevance
Barrett high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients who are positive for HPV are distinct biological entities with a favorable prognosis compared with viral-negative esophageal tumors. Confirmation of these findings in larger cohorts with more advanced disease could present an opportunity for treatment de-escalation in the hope of reducing toxic effects without deleteriously affecting survival.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com