Probes for P16

It is now established that HPV plays a role in the development of a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), notably oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). However, it is not clear which test one should use to detect HPV in oropharyngeal (OP) and non-OP SCCs. In this study, using 348 HNSCCs (126 OP SCCs and 222 non-OP SCCs), we evaluated diagnostic performances of different HPV tests in OP and non-OP SCCs: PCR, p16 immunostaining, in situ hybridization targeting DNA (DNA-CISH) and RNA (RNA-CISH), combined p16 + DNA-CISH, and combined p16 + RNA-CISH. HPV DNA (PCR) was detected in 26% of all tumors (44% of OP SCCs and 17% of non-OP SCCs). For OP SCCs, RNA-CISH was the most sensitive standalone test (88%), but p16 + RNA-CISH was even more sensitive (95%). Specificities were the same for RNA-CISH and DNA-CISH (97%) but it was better for p16 + RNA-CISH (100%). For non-OP SCCs, all tests had sensitivities below 50%, and RNA-CISH, DNA-CISH and p16 + DNA-CISH had respectively 100%, 97% and 99% specificities. As a standalone test, RNA-CISH is the most performant assay to detect HPV in OP SCCs, and combined p16 + RNA-CISH test slightly improves its performances. However, RNA-CISH has the advantage of being one single test. Like p16 and DNA-CISH, RNA-CISH performances are poor in non-OP SCCs to detect HPV, and combining tests does not improve performances.

HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma (HMSC) is associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Using HR-HPV mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH), we reported six new HMSC cases and compared their histopathology with that of sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Using p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HR-HPV ISH, we retrospectively identified six HMSC cases. All HMSC cases were positive for HR-HPV mRNA ISH and p16 IHC. Two HMSC cases had overlying atypical squamous epithelium and one also had invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). All HMSC were SOX10-positive whereas the overlying atypical squamous epithelium and the SCC were SOX10-negative. One atypical HMSC-like case was also identified which was positive for HR-HPV mRNA ISH, HR-HPV DNA ISH, SOX10 IHC, but negative for p16 IHC. This study showed that HR-HPV mRNA ISH was a useful tool to diagnose HMSC and had stronger signals than HR-HPV DNA ISH. HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA could be identified in the overlying atypical squamous epithelium as well as the invasive SCC. A combination of p16 and SOX10 IHC will be a useful screening panel for HMSC followed by confirmatory HR-HPV mRNA ISH test.

Objectives

Evaluation of human papillomavirus (HPV) status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has become increasingly important for prognostication and clinical trial enrollment. This assessment is confounded in OPSCCs that are p16 positive by immunohistochemistry (IHC) but HPV negative by DNA in situ hybridization (DISH). This study evaluates whether E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization (RISH) can detect transcriptionally active HPV in these problematic cases.

Materials and methods

Eighty-two head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases that had previously undergone p16 IHC and HPV DISH were evaluated with two RISH platforms and a second-generation DISH probe. The study included 21 p16+/DISH+ concordant cases, 19 p16−/DISH− concordant cases, and 42 p16+/DISH− discordant cases.

Results

RISH identified E6/E7 mRNA in 37 (88%) p16+/DISH− cases, 21 (100%) p16+/DISH+ cases, and 0 (0%) p16−/DISH− cases. RISH signals were clearly visible at low to medium magnification in 97% of positive cases, facilitating almost-perfect inter-observer reproducibility. The performance of the manual and automated RISH platforms were equivalent (kappa = 0.915). Only 29% of carcinomas that demonstrated E6/E7 mRNA transcriptional activity were positive using the 2nd generation DISH probe.

Conclusions

HPV RISH is a highly sensitive and specific platform that can clarify the HPV status of those perplexing OPSCCs that are p16 positive by IHC but HPV negative by DISH. Moreover, it is easy to interpret, readily adaptable to the clinical laboratory, and provides direct evidence of HPV transcriptional activity. E6/E7 RISH should be considered as a first-line platform for determination of HPV status in OPSCCs.

HPV-related and HPV-unrelated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are two distinct entities according to the Union for International Cancer Control, with a better prognosis conferred to HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. However, variable clinical outcomes are observed among patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, which is a surrogate marker of HPV infection. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of RNA CISH against E6 and E7 transcripts (HPV RNA CISH) to predict such variability. We retrospectively included 50 histologically confirmed p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (p16 positive immunostaining was defined by a strong staining in 70% or more of tumor cells). HPV RNA CISH staining was assessed semi-quantitatively to define two scores: RNA CISH “low” and RNA CISH “high”. Negative HPV RNA CISH cases were scored as RNA CISH “low”. This series contained 29 RNA CISH low cases (58%) and 21 RNA CISH high cases (42%). Clinical and pathologic baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. RNA CISH high staining was associated with a better overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.033 and p = 0.042, respectively). Other recorded parameters had no prognostic value. In conclusion, HPV RNA CISH might be an independent prognostic marker in p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas and might help guide therapeutics.

Abstract

Background

Accurate identification of HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a major issue and none of the current diagnostic approaches is ideal. An in situ hybridization (ISH) assay that detects high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA, called the RNAscope HPV-test, has been recently developed. Studies have suggested that this assay may become a standard to define HPV-status.

Methods

To further assess this test, we compared its performance against the strategies that are used in routine clinical practice: p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a single test and algorithms combining p16-IHC with HPV-DNA identification by PCR (algorithm-1) or ISH (algorithm-2).

Results

105 OPC specimens were analyzed. The prevalence of HPV-positive samples varied considerably: 67% for p16-IHC, 54% for algorithm-1, 61% for algorithm-2 and 59% for the RNAscope HPV-test. Discrepancies between the RNAscope HPV-test and p16-IHC, algorithm-1 and 2 were noted in respectively 13.3%, 13.1%, and 8.6%.

The 4 diagnostic strategies were able to identify 2 groups with different prognosis according to HPV-status, as expected. However, the greater survival differential was observed with the RNAscope HPV-test [HR: 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07–0.51, p = 0.001] closely followed by algorithm-1 (HR: 0.23, 95% CI, 0.08–0.66, p = 0.006) and algorithm-2 (HR: 0.26, 95% CI, 0.1–0.65, p = 0.004). In contrast, a weaker association was found when p16-IHC was used as a single test (HR: 0.33, 95% CI, 0.13–0.81, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the RNAscope HPV-test and p16-based algorithms perform better that p16 alone to identify OPC that are truly driven by HPV-infection. The RNAscope HPV-test has the advantage of being a single test.