Probes for TP53

Full size image [/article/10.1007/s42764-021-00038-x/figures/1] The findings described above support the statement that HPV infection is common, but, in comparison, cervical cancer is quite rare, leading to the conclusion that HPV infection alone is not sufficient to produce cancer, as tumor development and progression require the contribution of multiple factors. Among the risk factors for cancer development and progression in women infected with HR HPV are the determinants of persistent infection, as it is well established that only women in whom HR HPV infection persists are at risk for cervical lesions that may progress to cancer (Banister et al. 2015 and references therein). HPV persistence has also been linked to HPV-mediated disease in men (Bettampadi et al. 2020 [/article/10.1007/s42764-021-00038-x#ref-CR16]). This is an important area of study, because in principle, if we were able to determine at a single visit whether or not an incident HR HPV infection will persist, we could target HPV-mediated cancer surveillance resources to the people who present with persistent infection. Our own (unpublished) findings support the concept that women with persistent HPV infection fail to mount a strong immune response to HPV. In turn, immune responses to HPV are likely to be influenced by HLA and SNP profiles, both of which have been linked with cervical cancer susceptibility (Chen et al. 2014; Das Gosh et al. 2017). Among the many SNPs that have relevance for cervical cancer development, the Arg/Pro TP53 polymorphism at codon 72 has received considerable attention, as the homozygote Arg/Arg phenotype is associated with a higher risk of developing cervical cancer, at least in certain populations (Ojeda et al. 2003; Chuery et al. 2017). TP53 codon 72 polymorphism has been connected with higher HPV E6/E7 expression, which appears to correlate with the Arg/Arg genotype (Chuery et al. 2017). Despite the continuing controversies in this area, there is evidence that this particular polymorphism plays a role in cervical cancer development, albeit with additional intervening factors that may modulate its impact in different populations.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the cervix are rare aggressive tumors associated with poor prognosis and only limited treatment options. Although there is some literature on molecular underpinnings of cervical small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCNECs), detailed morphologic and associated molecular characteristics of cervical NENs remains to be elucidated. Herein, 14 NENs (SCNEC: 6, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma [LCNEC]: 6, neuroendocrine tumor [NET]: 2), including 5 admixed with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated adenocarcinoma (carcinoma admixed with neuroendocrine carcinoma) were analyzed. All except 3 SCNECs were HPV16/18 positive. TP53 (3) and/or RB1 (4) alterations (3 concurrent) were only seen in SCNECs (4/6) and were enriched in the HPV16/18-negative tumors. The other most common molecular changes in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) overlapping with those reported in the literature for cervical carcinomas involved PI3K/MAPK pathway (4) and MYC (4) and were seen in both SCNECs and LCNECs. In contrast, the 2 NETs lacked any significant alterations. Two LCNECs admixed with adenocarcinoma had enough material to sequence separately each component. In both pathogenic alterations were shared between the 2 components, including ERBB2 amplification in one and an MSH6 mutation with MYC amplification in the other. Overall, these findings suggest that cervical HPV-associated NETs are genomically silent and high-grade NECs (regardless of small or large cell morphology) share molecular pathways with common cervical carcinomas as it has been reported in the endometrium and are different from NECs at other sites. Molecular analysis of these highly malignant neoplasms might inform the clinical management for potential therapeutic targets.