ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for SLC17A7 for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Nature communications
2023 Jun 15
Oh, H;Lee, S;Oh, Y;Kim, S;Kim, YS;Yang, Y;Choi, W;Yoo, YE;Cho, H;Lee, S;Yang, E;Koh, W;Won, W;Kim, R;Lee, CJ;Kim, H;Kang, H;Kim, JY;Ku, T;Paik, SB;Kim, E;
PMID: 37321992 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39203-z
Molecular psychiatry
2023 Jun 26
Cho, H;Yoo, T;Moon, H;Kang, H;Yang, Y;Kang, M;Yang, E;Lee, D;Hwang, D;Kim, H;Kim, D;Kim, JY;Kim, E;
PMID: 37365244 | DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02129-5
Nature communications
2023 Apr 17
Becker, LJ;Fillinger, C;Waegaert, R;Journée, SH;Hener, P;Ayazgok, B;Humo, M;Karatas, M;Thouaye, M;Gaikwad, M;Degiorgis, L;Santin, MDN;Mondino, M;Barrot, M;Ibrahim, EC;Turecki, G;Belzeaux, R;Veinante, P;Harsan, LA;Hugel, S;Lutz, PE;Yalcin, I;
PMID: 37069164 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37878-y
Nature communications
2022 Aug 27
Kim, H;Kim, D;Cho, Y;Kim, K;Roh, JD;Kim, Y;Yang, E;Kim, SS;Ahn, S;Kim, H;Kang, H;Bae, Y;Kim, E;
PMID: 36030255 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32748-5
Nature neuroscience
2022 Jun 16
Cutando, L;Puighermanal, E;Castell, L;Tarot, P;Belle, M;Bertaso, F;Arango-Lievano, M;Ango, F;Rubinstein, M;Quintana, A;Chédotal, A;Mameli, M;Valjent, E;
PMID: 35710984 | DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01092-8
Mol Psychiatry.
2018 Jan 08
Gunduz-Cinar O, Brockway E, Lederle L, Wilcox T, Halladay LR, Ding Y, Oh H, Busch EF, Kaugars K, Flynn S, Limoges A, Bukalo O, MacPherson KP, Masneuf S, Pinard C, Sibille E, Chesler EJ, Holmes A.
PMID: 29311651 | DOI: 10.1038/s41380-017-0003-3
Recent years have seen advances in our understanding of the neural circuits associated with trauma-related disorders, and the development of relevant assays for these behaviors in rodents. Although inherited factors are known to influence individual differences in risk for these disorders, it has been difficult to identify specific genes that moderate circuit functions to affect trauma-related behaviors. Here, we exploited robust inbred mouse strain differences in Pavlovian fear extinction to uncover quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with this trait. We found these strain differences to be resistant to developmental cross-fostering and associated with anatomical variation in basolateral amygdala (BLA) perineuronal nets, which are developmentally implicated in extinction. Next, by profiling extinction-driven BLA expression of QTL-linked genes, we nominated Ppid (peptidylprolyl isomerase D, a member of the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) protein family) as an extinction-related candidate gene. We then showed that Ppid was enriched in excitatory and inhibitory BLA neuronal populations, but at lower levels in the extinction-impaired mouse strain. Using a virus-based approach to directly regulate Ppid function, we demonstrated that downregulating BLA-Ppid impaired extinction, while upregulating BLA-Ppid facilitated extinction and altered in vivo neuronal extinction encoding. Next, we showed that Ppid colocalized with the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in BLA neurons and found that the extinction-facilitating effects of Ppid upregulation were blocked by a GR antagonist. Collectively, our results identify Ppid as a novel gene involved in regulating extinction via functional actions in the BLA, with possible implications for understanding genetic and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying risk for trauma-related disorders.
Curr Biol.
2018 Aug 16
Atlan G, Terem A, Peretz-Rivlin N, Sehrawat K, Gonzales BJ, Pozner G, Tasaka G, Goll Y, Refaeli R, Zviran O, Lim BK, Groysman M, Goshen I, Mizrahi A, Nelken I, Citri A.
PMID: 30122531 | DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.068
A barrage of information constantly assaults our senses, of which only a fraction is relevant at any given point in time. However, the neural circuitry supporting the suppression of irrelevant sensory distractors is not completely understood. The claustrum, a circuit hub with vast cortical connectivity, is an intriguing brain structure, whose restrictive anatomy, thin and elongated, has precluded functional investigation. Here, we describe the use of Egr2-CRE mice to access genetically defined claustral neurons. Utilizing conditional viruses for anterograde axonal labeling and retrograde trans-synaptic tracing, we validated this transgenic model for accessing the claustrum and extended the known repertoire of claustral input/output connectivity. Addressing the function of the claustrum, we inactivated CLEgr2+ neurons, chronically as well as acutely, in mice performing an automated two-alternative forced-choice behavioral task. Strikingly, inhibition of CLEgr2+ neurons did not significantly impact task performance under varying delay times and cue durations, but revealed a selective role for the claustrum in supporting performance in the presence of an irrelevant auditory distractor. Further investigation of behavior, in the naturalistic maternal pup-retrieval task, replicated the result of sensitization to an auditory distractor following inhibition of CLEgr2+ neurons. Initiating investigation into the underlying mechanism, we found that activation of CLEgr2+ neurons modulated cortical sensory processing, suppressing tone representation in the auditory cortex. This functional study, utilizing selective genetic access, implicates the claustrum in supporting resilienceto distraction, a fundamental aspect of attention.
Neurobiology of Stress
2023 Jul 01
Khom, S;Borgonetti, V;Vozella, V;Kirson, D;Rodriguez, L;Gandhi, P;Bianchi, P;Snyder, A;Vlkolinsky, R;Bajo, M;Oleata, C;Ciccocioppo, R;Roberto, M;
| DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2023.100547
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
2023 Feb 05
Su, Y;Xu, J;Zhu, Z;Yu, H;Nudell, V;Dash, B;Moya, EA;Ye, L;Nimmerjahn, A;Sun, X;
PMID: 36778350 | DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.04.527145
J Neurosci.
2016 Jun 22
Warren BL, Mendoza MP, Cruz FC, Leao RM, Caprioli D, Rubio FJ, Whitaker LR, McPherson KB, Bossert JM, Shaham Y, Hope BT.
PMID: 27335401 | DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0140-16.2016
J Neurosci.
2017 Feb 17
Ziminski J, Hessler S, Margetts-Smith G, Sieburg MC, Crombag HS, Koya E.
PMID: 28213443 | DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3766-16.2017
Cues that predict the availability of food rewards influence motivational states and elicit food-seeking behaviors. If a cue no longer predicts food availability, animals may adapt accordingly by inhibiting food seeking responses. Sparsely activated sets of neurons, coined neuronal ensembles, have been shown to encode the strength of reward-cue associations. While alterations in intrinsic excitability have been shown to underlie many learning and memory processes, little is known about these properties specifically on cue-activated neuronal ensembles. We examined the activation patterns of cue-activated orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell ensembles using wild-type and Fos-GFP mice following appetitive conditioning with sucrose and extinction learning. We also investigated the neuronal excitability of recently activated, GFP+ neurons in these brain areas using whole-cell electrophysiology in brain slices. Exposure to a sucrose cue elicited activation of neurons in both the NAc shell and OFC. In the NAc shell, but not the OFC, these activated GFP+ neurons were more excitable than surrounding GFP- neurons. Following extinction, the number of neurons activated in both areas was reduced and activated ensembles in neither area exhibited altered excitability. These data suggest that learning-induced alterations in the intrinsic excitability of neuronal ensembles is regulated dynamically across different brain areas. Furthermore, we show that changes in associative strength modulate the excitability profile of activated ensembles in the NAc shell.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTSparsely distributed sets of neurons called 'neuronal ensembles' encode learned associations about food and cues predictive of its availability. Widespread changes in neuronal excitability have been observed in limbic brain areas after associative learning, but little is known about the excitability changes that occur specifically on neuronal ensembles that encode appetitive associations. Here we reveal that sucrose cue exposure recruited a more excitable ensemble in the nucleus accumbens, but not orbitofrontal cortex compared to their surrounding neurons. This excitability difference was not observed when the cue's salience was diminished following extinction learning. These novel data provide evidence that the intrinsic excitability of appetitive memory-encoding ensembles is differentially regulated across brain areas and dynamically adapts to changes in associative strength.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com