Movérare-Skrtic, S;Voelkl, J;Nilsson, KH;Nethander, M;Luong, TTD;Alesutan, I;Li, L;Wu, J;Horkeby, K;Lagerquist, MK;Koskela, A;Tuukkanen, J;Tobias, JH;Lerner, UH;Henning, P;Ohlsson, C;
PMID: 37023531 | DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104546
Global sclerostin inhibition reduces fracture risk efficiently but has been associated with cardiovascular side effects. The strongest genetic signal for circulating sclerostin is in the B4GALNT3 gene region, but the causal gene is unknown. B4GALNT3 expresses the enzyme beta-1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 that transfers N-acetylgalactosamine onto N-acetylglucosaminebeta-benzyl on protein epitopes (LDN-glycosylation).To determine if B4GALNT3 is the causal gene, B4galnt3-/- mice were developed and serum levels of total sclerostin and LDN-glycosylated sclerostin were analysed and mechanistic studies were performed in osteoblast-like cells. Mendelian randomization was used to determine causal associations.B4galnt3-/- mice had higher circulating sclerostin levels, establishing B4GALNT3 as a causal gene for circulating sclerostin levels, and lower bone mass. However, serum levels of LDN-glycosylated sclerostin were lower in B4galnt3-/- mice. B4galnt3 and Sost were co-expressed in osteoblast-lineage cells. Overexpression of B4GALNT3 increased while silencing of B4GALNT3 decreased the levels of LDN-glycosylated sclerostin in osteoblast-like cells. Mendelian randomization demonstrated that higher circulating sclerostin levels, genetically predicted by variants in the B4GALNT3 gene, were causally associated with lower BMD and higher risk of fractures but not with higher risk of myocardial infarction or stroke. Glucocorticoid treatment reduced B4galnt3 expression in bone and increased circulating sclerostin levels and this may contribute to the observed glucocorticoid-induced bone loss.B4GALNT3 is a key factor for bone physiology via regulation of LDN-glycosylation of sclerostin. We propose that B4GALNT3-mediated LDN-glycosylation of sclerostin may be a bone-specific osteoporosis target, separating the anti-fracture effect of global sclerostin inhibition, from indicated cardiovascular side effects.Found in acknowledgements.
International Journal of Biological Sciences
Yoon, D;Kim, E;Cho, S;Jung, S;Lee, K;Park, K;Lee, J;Kim, S;
| DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.74895
To understand the subcellular localization of RUNX2 and two lncRNAs, LINC02035 and LOC100130207, immunocytochemistry (for RUNX2 protein) and RNA _in situ_ hybridization assays (for both lncRNAs) were performed using human primary chondrocytes isolated from knee cartilage of OA patients. We confirmed that the RUNX2 protein was strongly detected in the nucleus of chondrocytes isolated from damaged cartilage (Figure 4A). The fractionated western blot results also showed that the RUNX2 protein was detected only in the nucleus of chondrocytes isolated from damaged cartilage (Figure 4B). To further understand the molecular mechanisms of the lncRNAs LINC02035 and LOC100130207, we performed an _in situ_ assay using primary chondrocytes derived from patients, because primary chondrocytes are a valuable model for studying OA pathogenesis. The results showed that both LINC02035 and LOC100130207 were highly expressed in chondrocytes isolated from the knee cartilage of patients with OA (Figure 4C). We then evaluated the mRNA levels and subcellular localization of both lncRNAs to elucidate their site of action using a commercially available kits in primary chondrocytes isolated from intact or damaged cartilage tissues. The results showed that both lncRNAs were more upregulated in primary chondrocytes isolated from damaged cartilage tissue than in intact cartilage tissue (Figure 4D). In primary chondrocytes, LINC02035 and LOC100130207 were merely detected in the cytoplasm of human primary chondrocytes and both lncRNAs were localized to nucleus (Figure 4E). Likewise, we also studied the subcellular localization of both lncRNAs in TC28a2 cells. The results showed that LINC02035 and LOC100130207 were evenly distributed in the nucleus and cytoplasm of normal chondrocytes (Figure 4F, left). However, both lncRNAs were preferentially localized to the nucleus and to a lesser extent to the cytoplasm after TC28a2 cells were treated with hypertrophic medium or TNF-α (Figure 4F, middle and right). To investigate whether RUNX2 is regulated at the post-translational level during hypertrophic changes in chondrocytes, human primary chondrocytes or TC28a2 cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. The results showed that the protein level of RUNX2 was dose-dependently increased by MG132 treatment (Figure 4G-H), indicating that the upregulation of RUNX2 in osteoarthritic or hypertrophic chondrocytes occurs at the post-translational level. To examine whether both lncRNAs are involved in the stabilization of RUNX2 protein during hypertrophic differentiation and the inflammatory response in chondrocytes, IP was conducted to confirm the ubiquitination of RUNX2 protein. First, we investigated how the ubiquitination of RUNX2 protein is regulated during hypertrophic differentiation or the inflammatory response of chondrocytes, and as a result, it was confirmed that ubiquitination of RUNX2 was reduced by hypertrophic medium or TNF-α treatment (Figure 4I). However, ubiquitination of RUNX2 protein was clearly increased in TC28a2 cells transfected with siRNAs targeting LINC02035 or LOC100130207, even though the cells were treated with hypertrophic medium or TNF-α (Figure 4J-K). These results suggest that both lncRNAs upregulated during hypertrophic differentiation and the inflammatory response in chondrocytes contribute to the stabilization of the RUNX2 protein.