Probes for INS

RXFP4 is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in the relaxin family. It has recently been recognised that this receptor and its cognate ligand INSL5 may have a role in the regulation of food intake, gut motility, and other functions relevant to metabolic health and disease.  Recent data from reporter-mice showed co-location of Rxfp4 and serotonin (5-HT) in the lower gut. We used human single cell RNA sequence data (scRNASeq) and immunohistochemistry to show that RXFP4 is in a subset of gut enterochromaffin cells that produce 5-HT in humans. We also used RNAScope to show co-location Rxfp4 mRNA and 5-HT in mouse colon, confirming prior findings. To understand how RXFP4 might regulate serotonin production we developed a cell model using Colo320 cells, a human gut-derived immortalised cell line that produces and releases serotonin.  Overexpression of RXFP4 in these cells resulted in a constitutive decrease in cAMP levels in both the basal state and in cells treated with forskolin.  Treatment of cells with two RXFP4 agonists, INSL5 derived peptide INSL5-A13 and small molecule compound-4, further reduced cAMP levels. This was paralleled by a reduction in expression of mRNA for TPH1, the enzyme controlling the rate limiting step in the production of serotonin.  Overexpression of RXFP4 also attenuated the cAMP-induced release of serotonin from Colo320 cells.  Together this demonstrates that serotonin producing enterochromaffin cells are the major site of RXFP4 expression in the gut and that RXFP4 can have inhibitory functional impacts on cAMP production as well as TPH1 expression and serotonin release.

Both mast cells and microbiota play important roles in the pathogenesis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), however the precise mechanisms are unknown. Using microbiota-humanized IBS mouse model, we show that colonic mast cells and mast cells co-localized with neurons were higher in mice colonized with IBS microbiota compared with those with healthy control (HC) microbiota. In situ hybridization showed presence of IBS, but not control microbiota, in the lamina propria and RNAscope demonstrated frequent co-localization of IBS bacteria and mast cells. TLR4 and H4 receptor expression was higher in mice with IBS microbiota, and in peritoneal-derived and bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) stimulated with IBS bacterial supernatant, which also increased BMMCs degranulation, chemotaxis, adherence and histamine release. While both TLR4 and H4 receptor inhibitors prevented BMMCs degranulation, only the latter attenuated their chemotaxis. We provide novel insights into the mechanisms, which contribute to gut dysfunction and visceral hypersensitivity in IBS.

Introduction: Four randomized controlled trials studying fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in active ulcerative colitis (UC) patients showed variable success rates. The efficacy of FMT appears to be influenced by various factors including donor- and procedure-specific characteristics. Aim: We hypothesized that the outcome of FMT in patients with active UC could be improved by donor preselection on microbiota level, by using a strict anaerobic approach, and by repeated FMT administration. Methods: The RESTORE-UC trial (NCT03110289) was a national, multi-centric double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial. Active UC patients (Total Mayo score 4-10 with endoscopic sub-score > or = 2) were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive 4 anaerobic-prepared superdonor (S) FMT or autologous (A) FMT by permutated blocks (2- 4) and stratified for weight, concomitant steroid use, and therapy refractoriness. S-FMTs were selected after a rigorous screening excluding samples with Bacteroides 2 enterotype, high abundances of Fusobacterium, Escherichia coli and Veillonella and the lowest microbial loads (Q1). A futility analysis after 66% (n=72) of inclusions was planned per protocol including a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis using non-responder imputation (NRI) for patients receiving at least one FMT. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (Total Mayo ≤ 2, with no subscore >1) at week 8. Secondary outcomes included steroid-free PRO-2 remission (Combined Mayo subscores of ≤1 for rectal bleeding plus stool frequency) and response (≥3 points or/and ≥50% reduction from baseline in combined Mayo subscores for rectal bleeding plus stool frequency) and steroid-free endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1) and response (Mayo endoscopy subscore ≤1 and ≥1 point reduction from baseline). Results: Between March 2017-2021, 72 patients signed the ICF and 66 were randomly allocated to S-FMT (n=30) or A-FMT (N=36) and received at least one FMT. Both study arms were matched for baseline characteristics, yet a trend (p= 0,07) towards higher concomitant biological use in the S-FMT arm was observed. A remarkably high proportion of patients were previously exposed to biologicals (58.3% and 60.0% for the A-FMT and S-FMT group respectively). In the S-FMT and the A-FMT respectively 4 and 5 patients terminated the trial early due to worsening of colitis (4 in both arms) or FMT enema intolerance (1 A-FMT). They were included in the mITT analysis using NRI, showing after 66% of intended inclusions, the primary endpoint was reached in 3/30 (mITT with NRI 10.0%) S-FMT and 5/31 (13.9%) patients randomized to A-FMT (p=0.72). As the predefined minimum difference of 5% between both treatment arms was not attained, the study was stopped due to futility. Steroid-free PRO-2 remission was achieved in 7/30 (23,3%) patients on S-FMT and 10/36 (27,8%) on A-FMT (p= 0,78). Steroid-free PRO-2 response was attained by respectively 9/30 (30,0%) patients in the S-FMT arm and 12/36 (33,3%) patients in the A-FMT arm (p= 0,80). Steroid-free endoscopic response and remission were noted in 5/30 (16,7%) assigned to the S-FMT arm compared with 7/36 (19,4%) allocated to the A-FMT arm (p= 1.0). Of note, no patients on concomitant biologicals reached the primary endpoint, and there were 2 serious adverse events in the A-FMT arm: dysuria requiring hospitalization and worsening of UC requiring colectomy. Conclusions: In this double-blind sham-controlled trial comparing repeated administrations of anaerobic-prepared S-FMT with A-FMT in patients with active UC, no significant difference in steroid-free remission rates at week 8 were observed. The FMT procedure was generally well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed.

Introduction: Four randomized controlled trials studying fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in active ulcerative colitis (UC) patients showed variable success rates. The efficacy of FMT appears to be influenced by various factors including donor- and procedure-specific characteristics. Aim: We hypothesized that the outcome of FMT in patients with active UC could be improved by donor preselection on microbiota level, by using a strict anaerobic approach, and by repeated FMT administration. Methods: The RESTORE-UC trial (NCT03110289) was a national, multi-centric double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial. Active UC patients (Total Mayo score 4-10 with endoscopic sub-score > or = 2) were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive 4 anaerobic-prepared superdonor (S) FMT or autologous (A) FMT by permutated blocks (2- 4) and stratified for weight, concomitant steroid use, and therapy refractoriness. S-FMTs were selected after a rigorous screening excluding samples with Bacteroides 2 enterotype, high abundances of Fusobacterium, Escherichia coli and Veillonella and the lowest microbial loads (Q1). A futility analysis after 66% (n=72) of inclusions was planned per protocol including a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis using non-responder imputation (NRI) for patients receiving at least one FMT. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (Total Mayo ≤ 2, with no subscore >1) at week 8. Secondary outcomes included steroid-free PRO-2 remission (Combined Mayo subscores of ≤1 for rectal bleeding plus stool frequency) and response (≥3 points or/and ≥50% reduction from baseline in combined Mayo subscores for rectal bleeding plus stool frequency) and steroid-free endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1) and response (Mayo endoscopy subscore ≤1 and ≥1 point reduction from baseline). Results: Between March 2017-2021, 72 patients signed the ICF and 66 were randomly allocated to S-FMT (n=30) or A-FMT (N=36) and received at least one FMT. Both study arms were matched for baseline characteristics, yet a trend (p= 0,07) towards higher concomitant biological use in the S-FMT arm was observed. A remarkably high proportion of patients were previously exposed to biologicals (58.3% and 60.0% for the A-FMT and S-FMT group respectively). In the S-FMT and the A-FMT respectively 4 and 5 patients terminated the trial early due to worsening of colitis (4 in both arms) or FMT enema intolerance (1 A-FMT). They were included in the mITT analysis using NRI, showing after 66% of intended inclusions, the primary endpoint was reached in 3/30 (mITT with NRI 10.0%) S-FMT and 5/31 (13.9%) patients randomized to A-FMT (p=0.72). As the predefined minimum difference of 5% between both treatment arms was not attained, the study was stopped due to futility. Steroid-free PRO-2 remission was achieved in 7/30 (23,3%) patients on S-FMT and 10/36 (27,8%) on A-FMT (p= 0,78). Steroid-free PRO-2 response was attained by respectively 9/30 (30,0%) patients in the S-FMT arm and 12/36 (33,3%) patients in the A-FMT arm (p= 0,80). Steroid-free endoscopic response and remission were noted in 5/30 (16,7%) assigned to the S-FMT arm compared with 7/36 (19,4%) allocated to the A-FMT arm (p= 1.0). Of note, no patients on concomitant biologicals reached the primary endpoint, and there were 2 serious adverse events in the A-FMT arm: dysuria requiring hospitalization and worsening of UC requiring colectomy. Conclusions: In this double-blind sham-controlled trial comparing repeated administrations of anaerobic-prepared S-FMT with A-FMT in patients with active UC, no significant difference in steroid-free remission rates at week 8 were observed. The FMT procedure was generally well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed.

Canonically, complement is a serum-based host defense system that protects against systemic microbial invasion. Little is known about the production and function of complement components on mucosal surfaces. Here we show gut complement component 3 (C3), central to complement function, is regulated by the composition of the microbiota in healthy humans and mice, leading to host-specific gut C3 levels. Stromal cells in intestinal lymphoid follicles (LFs) are the predominant source of intestinal C3. During enteric infection with Citrobacter rodentium or enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, luminal C3 levels increase significantly and are required for protection. C. rodentium is remarkably more invasive to the gut epithelium of C3-deficient mice than of wild-type mice. In the gut, C3-mediated phagocytosis of C. rodentium functions to clear pathogens. Our study reveals that variations in gut microbiota determine individuals†intestinal mucosal C3 levels, dominantly produced by LF stromal cells, which directly correlate with protection against enteric infection.Gut complement component 3 (C3) is induced by the microbiome in healthy humans and mice at a microbiota-specific level.Gut stromal cells located in intestinal lymphoid follicles are a major source of luminal C3 During enteric infections with Citrobacter rodentium or enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, gut luminal C3 levels increase and are required for protection. C. rodentium is significantly more invasive of the gut epithelium in C3-deficient mice when compared to WT mice. In the gut, C3-mediated opsonophagocytosis of C. rodentium functions to clear pathogens.

The pattern-recognition receptor NOD2 senses bacterial muropeptides to regulate host immunity and maintain homeostasis. Loss-of-function mutations in NOD2 are associated with Crohn's disease (CD), but how the variations in microbial factors influence NOD2 signaling and host pathology is elusive. We demonstrate that the Firmicutes peptidoglycan remodeling enzyme, DL-endopeptidase, increased the NOD2 ligand level in the gut and impacted colitis outcomes. Metagenomic analyses of global cohorts (n = 857) revealed that DL-endopeptidase gene abundance decreased globally in CD patients and negatively correlated with colitis. Fecal microbiota from CD patients with low DL-endopeptidase activity predisposed mice to colitis. Administering DL-endopeptidase, but not an active site mutant, alleviated colitis via the NOD2 pathway. Therapeutically restoring NOD2 ligands with a DL-endopeptidase-producing Lactobacillus salivarius strain or mifamurtide, a clinical analog of muramyl dipeptide, exerted potent anti-colitis effects. Our study suggests that the depletion of DL-endopeptidase contributes to CD pathogenesis through NOD2 signaling, providing a therapeutically modifiable target.

Ingested food and water stimulate sensory systems in the oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal areas before absorption1,2. These sensory signals modulate brain appetite circuits in a feed-forward manner3-5. Emerging evidence suggests that osmolality sensing in the gut rapidly inhibits thirst neurons upon water intake. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how peripheral sensory neurons detect visceral osmolality changes, and how they modulate thirst. Here we use optical and electrical recording combined with genetic approaches to visualize osmolality responses from sensory ganglion neurons. Gut hypotonic stimuli activate a dedicated vagal population distinct from mechanical-, hypertonic- or nutrient-sensitive neurons. We demonstrate that hypotonic responses are mediated by vagal afferents innervating the hepatic portal area (HPA), through which most water and nutrients are absorbed. Eliminating sensory inputs from this area selectively abolished hypotonic but not mechanical responses in vagal neurons. Recording from forebrain thirst neurons and behavioural analyses show that HPA-derived osmolality signals are required for feed-forward thirst satiation and drinking termination. Notably, HPA-innervating vagal afferents do not sense osmolality itself. Instead, these responses are mediated partly by vasoactive intestinal peptide secreted after water ingestion. Together, our results reveal visceral hypoosmolality as an important vagal sensory modality, and that intestinal osmolality change is translated into hormonal signals to regulate thirst circuit activity through the HPA pathway.

Neuroepithelial crosstalk is critical for gut physiology. However, the mechanisms by which sensory neurons communicate with epithelial cells to mediate gut barrier protection at homeostasis and during inflammation are not well understood. Here, we find that Nav1.8+CGRP+ nociceptor neurons are juxtaposed with and signal to intestinal goblet cells to drive mucus secretion and gut protection. Nociceptor ablation led to decreased mucus thickness and dysbiosis, while chemogenetic nociceptor activation or capsaicin treatment induced mucus growth. Mouse and human goblet cells expressed Ramp1, receptor for the neuropeptide CGRP. Nociceptors signal via the CGRP-Ramp1 pathway to induce rapid goblet cell emptying and mucus secretion. Notably, commensal microbes activated nociceptors to control homeostatic CGRP release. In the absence of nociceptors or epithelial Ramp1, mice showed increased epithelial stress and susceptibility to colitis. Conversely, CGRP administration protected nociceptor-ablated mice against colitis. Our findings demonstrate a neuron-goblet cell axis that orchestrates gut mucosal barrier protection.