ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Sci Transl Med
2020 Feb 19
Wang Z1, Jiang C1, He Q1, Matsuda M1, Han Q1, Wang K1, Bang S1, Ding H2, Ko MC2,3, Ji RR4,5,6.
PMID: 32075945 | DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw6471
eNeuro
2023 Jun 22
Paliarin, F;Duplantis, C;Jones, AF;Cucinello-Ragland, J;Basavanhalli, S;Blaze, E;Doré, E;Neel, AI;Sun, H;Chen, R;Edwards, S;Gilpin, NW;Messing, RO;Maiya, R;
PMID: 37364995 | DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0043-23.2023
Journal of neuroscience research
2021 May 06
Cooper, AH;Hedden, NS;Corder, G;Lamerand, SR;Donahue, RR;Morales-Medina, JC;Selan, L;Prasoon, P;Taylor, BK;
PMID: 33957003 | DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24846
eNeuro
2017 Mar 17
Samineni VK, Grajales-Reyes JG, Copits BA, O’Brien DE, Trigg SL, Gomez AM, Bruchas MR, Gereau RW.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0129-16.2017
The ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) constitutes a major descending pain modulatory system and is a crucial site for opioid-induced analgesia. A number of previous studies have demonstrated that glutamate and GABA play critical opposing roles in nociceptive processing in the vlPAG. It has been suggested that glutamatergic neurotransmission exerts antinociceptive effects, whereas GABAergic neurotransmission exert pro-nociceptive effects on pain transmission, through descending pathways. The inability to exclusively manipulate subpopulations of neurons in the PAG has prevented direct testing of this hypothesis. Here we demonstrate the different contributions of genetically-defined glutamatergic and GABAergic vlPAG neurons in nociceptive processing by employing cell type-specific chemogenetic approaches in mice. Global chemogenetic manipulation of vlPAG neuronal activity suggests that vlPAG neural circuits exert tonic suppression of nociception, consistent with previous pharmacological and electrophysiological studies. However, selective modulation of GABAergic or glutamatergic neurons demonstrates an inverse regulation of nociceptive behaviors by these cell populations. Selective chemogenetic activation of glutamatergic neurons, or inhibition of GABAergic neurons, in vlPAG suppresses nociception. In contrast, inhibition of glutamatergic neurons, or activation of GABAergic neurons, in vlPAG facilitates nociception. Our findings provide direct experimental support for a model in which excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the PAG bidirectionally modulate nociception.
Significance Statement The PAG is a midbrain region critical for the modulation of pain. However, the roles played by the distinct cell types within the PAG in nociceptive processing are poorly understood. This work addresses the divergent roles of glutamatergic and GABAergic PAG neuronal subpopulations in nociceptive processing. We demonstrate that activation of glutamatergic neurons or inhibition of GABAergic neurons suppresses nociception. Whereas inhibition of glutamatergic neuronal activity or activation of GABAergic neuronal activity potentiates nociception. This report identifies distinct roles for these neuronal populations in modulating nociceptive processing.
Mol Psychiatry
2019 May 29
Shi MM, Fan KM, Qiao YN, Xu JH, Qiu LJ, Li X, Liu Y, Qian ZQ, Wei CL, Han J, Fan J, Tian YF, Ren W, Liu ZQ.
PMID: 31142818 | DOI: 10.1038/s41380-019-0435-z
Stressful life events induce abnormalities in emotional and cognitive behaviour. The endogenous opioid system plays an essential role in stress adaptation and coping strategies. In particular, the µ-opioid receptor (μR), one of the major opioid receptors, strongly influences memory processing in that alterations in μR signalling are associated with various neuropsychiatric disorders. However, it remains unclear whether μR signalling contributes to memory impairments induced by acute stress. Here, we utilized pharmacological methods and cell-type-selective/non-cell-type-selective μR depletion approaches combined with behavioural tests, biochemical analyses, and in vitro electrophysiological recordings to investigate the role of hippocampal μR signalling in memory-retrieval impairment induced by acute elevated platform (EP) stress in mice. Biochemical and molecular analyses revealed that hippocampal μRs were significantly activated during acute stress. Blockage of hippocampal μRs, non-selective deletion of μRs or selective deletion of μRs on GABAergic neurons (μRGABA) reversed EP-stress-induced impairment of memory retrieval, with no effect on the elevation of serum corticosterone after stress. Electrophysiological results demonstrated that stress depressed hippocampal GABAergic synaptic transmission to CA1 pyramidal neurons, thereby leading to excitation/inhibition (E/I) imbalance in a μRGABA-dependent manner. Pharmaceutically enhancing hippocampal GABAAreceptor-mediated inhibitory currents in stressed mice restored their memory retrieval, whereas inhibiting those currents in the unstressed mice mimicked the stress-induced impairment of memory retrieval. Our findings reveal a novel pathway in which endogenous opioids recruited by acute stress predominantly activate μRGABA to depress GABAergic inhibitory effects on CA1 pyramidal neurons, which subsequently alters the E/I balance in the hippocampus and results in impairment of memory retrieval.
J Neurosci.
2019 Apr 08
Parekh PK, Logan RW, Ketchesin KD, Becker-Krail D, Shelton MA, Hildebrand MA, Barko K, Huang YH, McClung CA.
PMID: 30962277 | DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2233-18.2019
The circadian transcription factor neuronal PAS domain 2 (NPAS2) is linked to psychiatric disorders associated with altered reward sensitivity. The expression of Npas2 is preferentially enriched in the mammalian forebrain, including the nucleus accumbens (NAc), a major neural substrate of motivated and reward behavior. Previously, we demonstrated that down-regulation of NPAS2 in the NAc reduces the conditioned behavioral response to cocaine in mice. We also showed that Npas2 is preferentially enriched in dopamine receptor 1 containing medium spiny neurons (D1R-MSNs) of the striatum. To extend these studies, we investigated the impact of NPAS2 disruption on accumbal excitatory synaptic transmission and strength, along with the behavioral sensitivity to cocaine reward in a cell-type specific manner. Viral-mediated knockdown of Npas2 in the NAc of male and female C57BL/6J mice increased the excitatory drive onto MSNs. Using Drd1a-tdTomato mice in combination with viral knockdown, we determined these synaptic adaptations were specific to D1R-MSNs relative to non-D1R-MSNs. Interestingly, NAc-specific knockdown of Npas2 blocked cocaine-induced enhancement of synaptic strength and glutamatergic transmission specifically onto D1R-MSNs. Lastly, we designed, validated, and employed a novel Cre-inducible short-hairpin RNA virus for MSN-subtype specific knockdown of Npas2 Cell-type specific Npas2 knockdown in D1R-MSNs, but not D2R-MSNs, in the NAc reduced cocaine conditioned place preference. Together, our results demonstrate that NPAS2 regulates excitatory synapses of D1R-MSNs in the NAc and cocaine reward-related behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTDrug addiction is a widespread public health concern often comorbid with other psychiatric disorders. Disruptions of the circadian clock can predispose or exacerbate substance abuse in vulnerable individuals. We demonstrate a role for the core circadian protein, NPAS2, in mediating glutamatergic neurotransmission at medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), a region critical for reward processing. We find that NPAS2 negatively regulates functional excitatory synaptic plasticity in the NAc and is necessary for cocaine-induced plastic changes in MSNs expressing the dopamine 1 receptor (D1R). We further demonstrate disruption of NPAS2 in D1R-MSNs produces augmented cocaine preference. These findings highlight the significance of cell-type specificity in mechanisms underlying reward regulation by NPAS2 and extend our knowledge of its function.
Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms
2022 Jun 01
Berezin, C;Bergum, N;Luchini, K;Curdts, S;Korkis, C;Vigh, J;
| DOI: 10.1016/j.nbscr.2022.100078
Pain.
2018 Aug 01
Severino A, Chen W, Hakimian JK, Kieffer BL, Gaveriaux-Ruff C, Walwyn W, Marvizón JCG.
PMID: 29677019 | DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001247
The latent sensitization model of chronic pain reveals that recovery from some types of long-term hyperalgesia is an altered state in which nociceptive sensitization persists but is suppressed by the ongoing activity of analgesic receptors such as μ-opioid receptors (MORs). To determine whether these MORs are the ones present in nociceptive afferents, we bred mice expressing Cre-recombinase under the Nav1.8 channel promoter (Nav1.8cre) with MOR-floxed mice (flMOR). These Nav1.8cre/flMOR mice had reduced MOR expression in primary afferents, as revealed by quantitative PCR, in situ hybridization, and immunofluorescence colocalization with the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide. We then studied the recovery from chronic pain of these mice and their flMOR littermates. When Nav1.8cre/flMOR mice were injected in the paw with complete Freund adjuvant they developed mechanical hyperalgesia that persisted for more than 2 months, whereas the responses of flMOR mice returned to baseline after 3 weeks. We then used the inverse agonist naltrexone to assess ongoing MOR activity. Naltrexone produced a robust reinstatement of hyperalgesia in control flMOR mice, but produced no effect in the Nav1.8/flMOR males and a weak reinstatement of hyperalgesia in Nav1.8/flMOR females. Naltrexone also reinstated swelling of the hind paw in flMOR mice and female Nav1.8cre/flMOR mice, but not male Nav1.8cre/flMOR mice. The MOR agonist DAMGO inhibited substance P release in flMOR mice but not Nav1.8cre/flMOR mice, demonstrating a loss of MOR function at the central terminals of primary afferents. We conclude that MORs in nociceptive afferents mediate an ongoing suppression of hyperalgesia to produce remission from chronic pain.
The Journal of comparative neurology
2023 May 21
Biancardi, V;Yang, X;Ding, X;Passi, D;Funk, GD;Pagliardini, S;
PMID: 37211631 | DOI: 10.1002/cne.25497
eNeuro
2020 Feb 10
Maynard KR, Kardian A, Hill JL, Mai Y, Barry B, Hallock HL, Jaffe AE, Martinowich K
PMID: 31941661 | DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0310-19.2019
Cells
2023 May 17
Murlanova, K;Jouroukhin, Y;Novototskaya-Vlasova, K;Huseynov, S;Pletnikova, O;Morales, M;Guan, Y;Kamiya, A;Bergles, D;Dietz, D;Pletnikov, M;
| DOI: 10.3390/cells12101412
Nature communications
2023 Feb 24
Iwasaki, M;Lefevre, A;Althammer, F;Clauss Creusot, E;Łąpieś, O;Petitjean, H;Hilfiger, L;Kerspern, D;Melchior, M;Küppers, S;Krabichler, Q;Patwell, R;Kania, A;Gruber, T;Kirchner, MK;Wimmer, M;Fröhlich, H;Dötsch, L;Schimmer, J;Herpertz, SC;Ditzen, B;Schaaf, CP;Schönig, K;Bartsch, D;Gugula, A;Trenk, A;Blasiak, A;Stern, JE;Darbon, P;Grinevich, V;Charlet, A;
PMID: 36828816 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36641-7
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com