ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Am J Surg Pathol.
2018 Jun 01
Xing D, Zheng G, Schoolmeester JK, Li Z, Pallavajjala A, Haley L, Conner MG, Vang R, Hung CF, Wu TC, Ronnett BM.
PMID: 29505425 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001042
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) of the uterine cervix is a rare but extremely aggressive tumor. While high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is involved at an early stage of oncogenesis in many tumors, additional driving events have been postulated to facilitate the progression of SCNECs. Identification of oncogenic drivers could guide targeted therapy of this neoplasm. Clinicopathologic features of 10 cervical SCNECs are reported. Analyses included immunohistochemical evaluation of p16, p53, synaptophysin, and chromogranin expression; in situ hybridizations and polymerase chain reaction for high-risk HPV and/or HPV 18; and next-generation sequencing based on a 637-gene panel. The patients ranged in age from 28 to 68 years (mean, 45.6 y; median, 40.5 y). All tumors had diffuse p16 and synaptophysin expression. All but 1 tumor was positive for chromogranin (extent of staining ranged from focal to diffuse). HPV 18 was detected in 6 tumors and HPV 35 in 1 tumor. At least 1 driver mutation was detected in 8 tumors. Four cases harbored TP53 somatic mutations, 3 of which correlated with an aberrant p53 staining pattern. Four PIK3CA mutations (p.G106A, p.N345T, p.E545K, and p.E545D) were detected in 3 tumors, 2 of which also harbored TP53 mutations. Oncogenic driver mutations involving KRAS, Erbb2, c-Myc, NOTCH1, BCL6, or NCOA3 were detected in 4 tumors. Mutations in caretaker tumor suppressors PTEN, RB1, BRCA1, BRCA2, and ARID1B were also identified in 4 tumors that commonly coharbored activating oncogenic mutations. Targeted next-generation gene sequencing identified genetic alterations involving the MAPK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and TP53/BRCA pathways in SCNECs. The presence of genetic alterations that are amenable to targeted therapy in SCNECs offers the potential for individualized management strategies for treatment of this aggressive tumor.
Infectious agents and cancer
2021 Mar 31
Zito Marino, F;Sabetta, R;Pagliuca, F;Brunelli, M;Aquino, G;Perdonà, S;Botti, G;Facchini, G;Fiorentino, F;Di Lauro, G;De Sio, M;De Vita, F;Toni, G;Borges Dos Reis, R;Neder, L;Franco, R;
PMID: 33789689 | DOI: 10.1186/s13027-021-00361-8
J Mol Histol.
2018 May 14
Tamma R, Annese T, Ruggieri S, Marzullo A, Nico B, Ribatti D.
PMID: 29761299 | DOI: 10.1007/s10735-018-9777-0
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Several studies on angiogenic blocking agents in gastric cancer revealing promising results by the use of monoclonal antibodies against VEGFA or its receptor VEGFR2 or against VEGFA activating pathway. The validation of biomarkers useful to better organize the clinical trials involving anti-angiogenic therapies is crucial. Molecular markers such as RNA are increasingly used for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy guidance as in the case of the targeted therapies concerning the inhibition of angiogenesis. The aim of this study is to set the conditions for evaluating the expression of VEGFA and VEGFR2 in gastric cancer specimens and in healthy gastric mucosa by the use of RNAscope, a novel RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) method that allows the visualization of a specific gene expression in individual cells. We found the increased expression of VEGFA in the tubular glands and VEGFR2 in the endothelium of gastric cancer samples mainly in the T2, T3 and T4 stages of tumor progression as compared to the healthy controls. These results obtained by the application of this highly sensitive method for oligonucleotide detection the role of angiogenesis in gastric cancer progression already highlighted by conventional immunohistochemical methods, and offer significant promise as a new platform for developing and implementing RNA-based molecular diagnostics also in the conditions in which immunohistochemistry is not applicable.
Mod Pathol.
2018 Sep 11
Caliò A, Brunelli M, Segala D, Pedron S, Doglioni C, Argani P, Martignoni G.
PMID: 30206412 | DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0128-1
Amplification of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) has been recently reported in TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinomas regardless the level of TFEB amplification. We sought to determine VEGFA amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and VEGFA mRNA expression by in situ hybridization (RNAscope 2.5) in a series of 10 renal cell carcinomas with TFEB gene alterations, either amplification and/or rearrangement (t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma). TFEB gene rearrangement was demonstrated in eight cases, whereas the remaining two cases showed a high level of TFEB (> 10 copies of fluorescent signals) gene amplification without evidence of rearrangement. Among the eight t(6;11) renal cell carcinomas (TFEB-rearranged cases), one case displayed a high level of TFEB gene amplification and two showed increased TFEB gene copy number (3-4 copies of fluorescent signals). Those three cases behaved aggressively. By FISH, VEGFA was amplified in all three cases with TFEB amplification and increased VEGFA gene copy number was observed in the two aggressive cases t(6;11) renal cell carcinomas with an overlapping increased number of TFEB fluorescent signals. Overall, VEGFA mRNA expression was observed in 8 of 10 cases (80%); of these 8 cases, 3 cases showed high-level TFEB amplification, one case showed TFEB rearrangement with increased TFEB gene copy number, whereas four showed TFEB gene rearrangement without increased copy number. In summary, VEGFA amplification/increased gene copy number and VEGFA mRNA expression occur in TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinoma, but also in a subset of t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma demonstrating aggressive behavior, and in unamplified conventional t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma suggesting VEGFA as potential therapeutic target in these neoplasms even in the absence of TFEB amplification. We finally propose that all the renal tumors showing morphological characteristics suggesting t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma and all unclassified renal cell carcinomas, either high grade or low grade, should immunohistochemically be evaluated for cathepsin K and/or Melan-A and if one of them is positive, tested for TFEB gene alteration and VEGFA gene amplification.
J Pathol.
2017 Apr 18
Ni C, Ma P, Qu L, Wu F, Hao J, Wang R, Lu Y, Yang W, Erben U, Qin Z.
PMID: 28418194 | DOI: 10.1002/path.4907
Angiostasis mediated by IFNγ is a key mechanism of anti-tumor immunity; however, the effect of IFNγ on host VEGFA-expressing cells during tumor progression is still elusive. Here, we developed transgenic mice with IFNγ receptor (IFNγR) expression under control of the Vegfa promoter (V-γR). In these mice, the IFNγ responsiveness of VEGFA -expressing cells led to a dramatic growth suppression of transplanted lung carcinoma cells. Surprisingly, increased mortality and tumor metastasis were observed in the tumor-bearing V-γR mice, in comparison to the control wild type and IFNγR-deficient mice. Further study showed that perivascular cells were VEGFA-expressing cells and potential IFNγ targets. In vivo, tumor vascular perfusion and pericyte association with blood vessels were massively disrupted in V-γR mice. In vitro, IFNγ inhibited TGF-β-signaling through upregulating SMAD7 and therefore, down-regulated N-cadherin expression in pericytes. Importantly, IFNγ neutralization in vivo using a monoclonal antibody reduced tumor metastasis. Together, the results suggest that IFNγR-mediated dissociation of perivascular cells from blood vessels contributes to the acceleration of tumor metastasis. Thus the inhibition of tumor growth via IFNγ-induced angiostasis might also accelerate tumor metastasis.
Journal of molecular biology
2023 Apr 20
Riepler, L;Frommelt, LS;Wilmschen-Tober, S;Mbuya, W;Held, K;Volland, A;von Laer, D;Geldmacher, C;Kimpel, J;
PMID: 37086948 | DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168096
Cancer medicine
2021 Jun 23
Musangile, FY;Matsuzaki, I;Okodo, M;Shirasaki, A;Mikasa, Y;Iwamoto, R;Takahashi, Y;Kojima, F;Murata, SI;
PMID: 34164940 | DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4091
Head Neck Pathol. 2018 Nov 29.
2018 Nov 29
Rooper LM, McCuiston AM, Westra WH, Bishop JA.
PMID: 30498968 | DOI: 10.1007/s12105-018-0990-7
Human Pathology
2022 Oct 01
Inoue, A;Matsumoto, T;Ito, Y;Saegusa, M;Takahashi, H;
| DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.10.008
Am J Surg Pathol.
2018 Jan 01
Bishop JA, Cowan ML, Shum CH, Westra WH.
PMID: 28877061 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000932
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common salivary gland malignancy. Recent studies have shown that most MECs harbor gene fusions involving MAML2-an alteration that appears to be specific for MEC, a finding that could be diagnostically useful. While most cases of MEC are histologically straightforward, uncommon variants can cause considerable diagnostic difficulty. We present 2 variants of MEC for which MAML2 studies were crucial in establishing a diagnosis: a previously undescribed ciliated variant, and the recently described Warthin-like variant. All cases of ciliated and Warthin-like MEC were retrieved from the archives of The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization for MAML2 was performed on all cases. One ciliated MEC and 6 Warthin-like MECs were identified. The ciliated MEC presented as a 4.6 cm cystic lymph node metastasis originating from the tongue base in a 47-year-old woman. The Warthin-like MECs presented as parotid masses ranging in size from 1.2 to 3.3 (mean, 2.7 cm) in 4 women and 2 men. The ciliated MEC consisted of macrocystic spaces punctuated by tubulopapillary proliferations of squamoid cells and ciliated columnar cells. The Warthin-like MECs were comprised of cystic spaces lined by multilayered oncocytic to squamoid cells surrounded by a circumscribed cuff of lymphoid tissue with germinal centers. In these cases, the Warthin-like areas dominated the histologic picture. Conventional MEC, when present, represented a minor tumor component. MAML2 rearrangements were identified in all cases. Warthin-like MEC, and now a ciliated form of MEC, are newly described variants of a common salivary gland carcinoma. Unfamiliarity with these novel forms, unanticipated cellular features (eg, cilia), and morphologic overlap with mundane benign processes (eg, developmental ciliated cysts, Warthin tumor) or other carcinomas (eg, ciliated human papillomavirus-related carcinoma) may render these variants susceptible to misdiagnosis. These unusual variants appear to consistently harbor MAML2 fusions-a finding that establishes a clear link to conventional MEC and provides a valuable adjunct in establishing the diagnosis.
Dis Esophagus.
2018 Jun 21
Wong MYW, Wang B, Yang A, Khor A, Xuan W, Rajendra S.
PMID: 29931323 | DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy051
Given the comparable strains of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) present in a subset of Barrett's dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma as in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and the anatomical proximity of both lesions, we hypothesized that oral sex may increase the risk of Barrett's dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma. Therefore, we compared the sexual behavior of patients with Barrett's dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma and controls (hospital, reflux, and Barrett's metaplasia) to explore a plausible mechanism of viral transmission to the lower esophagus. A hospital-based case-control study involving 36 Barrett's dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma subjects and 55 controls with known HPV DNA status and markers of transcriptional activity i.e p16INK4A and E6/E7 mRNA of the esophageal epithelium was conducted to evaluate differences in sexual history (if any). Barrett's dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma patients were more likely than controls to be positive for HPV DNA (18 of 36, 50% vs. 6/55, 11%, p for trend <0.0001), be male (P = 0.001) and in a relationship (P = 0.02). Viral genotypes identified were HPV 16 (n = 14), 18 (n = 2), 11 (n = 1) and 6 (n = 1). HPV exposure conferred a significantly higher risk for Barrett's dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma as compared with hospital/reflux/Barrett's metaplasia controls (OR = 6.8, 95% CI: 2.1-23.1, adjusted P = 0.002). On univariate analysis, ≥6 lifetime oral sex partners were significantly associated with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma (OR, 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2-13.7, P = 0.046). After adjustment for confounders, HPV exposure and men with ≥2 lifetime sexual partners were at significant risk for Barrett's dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma. If these initial findings can be confirmed in larger studies, it could lead to effective prevention strategies in combating some of the exponential increase in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the West.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol.
2017 Aug 02
Drumheller B, Cohen C, Lawson D, Siddiqui MT.
PMID: 28777152 | DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000550
Detection of human papilloma virus (HPV)-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is important, as HPV-associated HNSCCs respond better to therapy. The RNAscope HPV-test is a novel RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) technique which strongly stains transcripts of E6 and E7 mRNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, with the potential to replace the indirect immunohistochemical (IHC) marker for p16 protein. A direct clinical comparison between p16 IHC and an automated RNA ISH using 18 probes has not been established. Samples from 27 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded HNSCC cases from the Emory University Hospital archives were stained using 18 individual RNA ISH probes for high-risk HPV (RNAscope 2.5 LS Probe ) on a Leica autostainer (Buffalo Grove, IL) and were compared with p16 IHC. Two pathologists reviewed and reached a consensus on all interpretations. The RNAscope technique was positive in 89% (24/27) and the p16 IHC was positive in 78% (21/27). The RNAscope was negative in 11.1% of samples (3/27) and the p16 IHC-negative in 22.2% (6/27). The RNA ISH detected 100% of the p16-positive IHC-stained slides and had a concordance of 88.9% (24/27). This easy to interpret automated staining method for 18 high-risk HPV genotypes is a feasible replacement for the indirect p16 IHC method.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com