ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Eur J Cancer.
2016 Jul 28
Wartenberg M, Centeno I, Haemmig S, Vassella E, Zlobec I, Galván JA, Neuenschwander M, Schlup C, Gloor B, Lugli A, Perren A, Karamitopoulou E.
PMID: 27475963 | DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.013
Cancer Res.
2016 Aug 19
Sommer A, Kopitz C, Schatz CA, Nising CF, Mahlert C, Lerchen HG, Stelte-Ludwig B, Hammer S, Greven S, Schumacher J, Braun M, Zierz R, Wittemer-Rump S, Harrenga A, Dittmer F, Reetz F, Apeler H, Jautelat R, Huynh H, Ziegelbauer K, Kreft B.
PMID: 27543601 | DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0180
The fibroblast growth factor receptor FGFR2 is overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors, including breast, gastric and ovarian tumors, where it offers a potential therapeutic target. In this study, we present evidence of the preclinical efficacy of BAY 1187982, a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). It consists of a fully human FGFR2 monoclonal antibody (mAb BAY 1179470), which is specific for the FGFR2 isoforms FGFR2-IIIb and FGFR2-IIIc, conjugated through a non-cleavable linker to a novel derivative of the microtubule-disrupting cytotoxic drug auristatin (FGFR2-ADC). In FGFR2-expressing cancer cell lines, this FGFR2-ADC exhibited potency in the low nM to sub-nM range and was more than 100-fold selective against FGFR2-negative cell lines. High expression levels of FGFR2 in cells correlated with efficient internalization, efficacy and cytotoxic effects in vitro. Pharmacokinetic analyses in mice bearing FGFR2-positive NCI-H716 tumors indicated that the toxophore metabolite of FGFR2-ADC was enriched more than 30-fold in tumors compared to healthy tissues. Efficacy studies demonstrated that FGFR2-ADC treatment leads to a significant tumor growth inhibition or tumor regression of cell line-based or patient-derived xenograft models of human gastric or breast cancer. Further, FGFR2 amplification or mRNA overexpression predicted high efficacy in both of these types of in vivo model systems. Taken together, our results strongly support the clinical evaluation of BAY 1187982 in cancer patients, and a Phase I study (NCT02368951) has been initiated.
Pathobiology.
2015 Oct 31
Han N, Kim MA, Lee HS, Kim WH.
PMID: 26516773 | DOI: -
Eur Urol Focus.
2017 Aug 27
Necchi A, Raggi D, Volpi CC, Giannatempo P, Colecchia M, Gloghini A.
PMID: 28855072 | DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.08.002
Frontiers in endocrinology
2021 Aug 12
Adam, P;Kircher, S;Sbiera, I;Koehler, VF;Berg, E;Knösel, T;Sandner, B;Fenske, WK;Bläker, H;Smaxwil, C;Zielke, A;Sipos, B;Allelein, S;Schott, M;Dierks, C;Spitzweg, C;Fassnacht, M;Kroiss, M;
PMID: 34475850 | DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.712107
Human Pathology
2017 May 10
Ronen S, Abbott DW, Kravtsov O, Abdelkader A, Xub Y, Banerjee A, Iczkowski KA.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.024
The presence and extent of cribriform pattern of prostate cancer portend recurrence and cancer death. Therelative expressions within this morphology of the prognostically adverse loss of PTEN, and the downstream inactivation of cell cycle inhibitor p27/Kip1 had been uncertain. In this study, we examined 52 cases of cribriform cancer by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PTEN, p27, and CD44 variant (v)7/8, and a subset of 17 casesby chromogenic in situ hybridization (ISH) using probe for PTEN or CDKN1B (gene for p27). The fractions of epithelial pixels positive by IHC and ISH were digitally assessed for benign acini, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and 8 morphological patterns of cancer. Immunostaining results demonstrated that: 1. PTEN loss was significant for fused small acini, cribriform-central cells, small cribriform acini, and Gleason grade 5 cells in comparison with other acini. 2. p27 loss was significant only for cribriform-peripheral cells; and borderline-significant for fused small acini in comparison with benign acini. 3. CD44v7/8 showed expression loss in cribriform-peripheral cells; other comparisons were not significant. ISH showed thatcribriform cancer had significant PTEN loss normalized to benign acini (P < .02), while Gleason 3 cancer or fused small acini did not. With CDKN1B, the degree of signal loss among various cancer morphologies was insignificant. In conclusion, molecular disparities emerged between the fused small acini and cribriform patterns of Gleason 4 cancer. PTEN or p27 loss as prognostic factors demand distinct assessment in the varieties of Gleason 4 cancer, and in the biphenotypic peripheral versus central populations in cribriform structures.
Gastric Cancer
2017 Aug 29
Kuboki Y, Schatz CA, Koechert K, Schubert S, Feng J, Wittemer-Rump S, Ziegelbauer K, Krahn T, Kawano Nagatsuma A, Ochiai A.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1007/s10120-017-0758-x
Abstract
Background
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR2) has been proposed as a target in gastric cancer. However, appropriate methods to select patients for anti-FGFR2 therapies have not yet been established.
Methods
We used in situ techniques to investigate FGFR2 mRNA expression and gene amplification in a large cohort of 1036 Japanese gastric cancer patients. FGFR2 mRNA expression was determined by RNAscope. FGFR2 gene amplification was determined by dual-color in situ hybridization (DISH).
Results
We successfully analyzed 578 and 718 samples by DISH and RNAscope, respectively; 2% (12/578) showed strong FGFR2 gene amplification (FGFR2:CEN10 >10); moderate FGFR2gene amplification (FGFR2:CEN10 <10; ≥2) was detected in 8% (47/578); and high FGFR2 mRNA expression of score 4 (>10 dots/cell and >10% of positive cells with dot clusters under a 20× objective) was seen in 4% (29/718). For 468 samples, both mRNA and DISH data were available. FGFR2 mRNA expression levels were associated with gene amplification; FGFR2 mRNA levels were highest in the highly amplified samples (n = 12). All highly amplified samples showed very strong FGFR2 mRNA expression (dense clusters of the signal visible under a 1× objective). Patients with very strong FGFR2 mRNA expression showed more homogeneous FGFR2 mRNA expression compared to patients with lower FGFGR2 mRNA expression. Gastric cancer patients with tumors that had an FGFR2 mRNA expression score of 4 had shorter RFS compared with score 0–3 patients.
Conclusion
RNAscope and DISH are suitable methods to evaluate FGFR2 status in gastric cancer. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue slides allowed evaluation of the intratumor heterogeneity of these FGFR2 biomarkers.
Oncotarget.
2016 Apr 20
Deevi RK, McClements J, McCloskey KD, Fatehullah A, Tkocz D, Javadi A, Higginson R, Marsh Durban V, Jansen M, Clarke A, Loughrey MB, Campbell FC.
PMID: 27119498 | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8863
Development of cribriform morphology (CM) heralds malignant change in human colon but lack of mechanistic understanding hampers preventive therapy. This study investigated CM pathobiology in three-dimensional (3D) Caco-2 culture models of colorectal glandular architecture, assessed translational relevance and tested effects of 1,25(OH)2D3,theactive form of vitamin D. CM evolution was driven by oncogenic perturbation of the apical polarity (AP) complex comprising PTEN, CDC42 and PRKCZ (phosphatase and tensin homolog, cell division cycle 42 and protein kinase C zeta). Suppression of AP genes initiated a spatiotemporal cascade of mitotic spindle misorientation, apical membrane misalignment and aberrant epithelial configuration. Collectively, these events promoted "Swiss cheese-like" cribriform morphology (CM) comprising multiple abnormal "back to back" lumens surrounded by atypical stratified epithelium, in 3D colorectal gland models. Intestinal cancer driven purely by PTEN-deficiency in transgenic mice developed CM and in human CRC, CM associated with PTEN and PRKCZ readouts. Treatment of PTEN-deficient 3D cultures with 1,25(OH)2D3 upregulated PTEN, rapidly activated CDC42 and PRKCZ, corrected mitotic spindle alignment and suppressed CM development. Conversely, mutationally-activated KRAS blocked1,25(OH)2D3 rescue of glandular architecture. We conclude that 1,25(OH)2D3 upregulates AP signalling to reverse CM in a KRAS wild type (wt), clinically predictive CRC model system. Vitamin D could be developed as therapy to suppress inception or progression of a subset of colorectal tumors.
Oncotarget.
2018 Aug 14
Fromme JE, Schmitz K, Wachter A, Grzelinski M, Zielinski D, Koppel C, Conradi LC, Homayounfar K, Hugo T, Hugo S, Lukat L, Rüschoff J, Ströbel P, Ghadimi M, Beißbarth T, Reuter-Jessen K, Bleckmann A, Schildhaus HU.
PMID: 30181810 | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25941
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer related deaths. Patients with oligometastatic liver disease represent a clinical subgroup with heterogeneous course. Until now, biomarkers to characterize outcome and therapeutic options have not been fully established.
METHODS:
We investigated the prevalence of FGFR alterations in a total of 140 primary colorectal tumors and 63 liver metastases of 55 oligometastatic CRC patients. FGF receptors (FGFR1-4) and their ligands (FGF3, 4 and 19) were analyzed for gene amplifications and rearrangements as well as for RNA overexpression in situ. Results were correlated with clinico-pathologic data and molecular subtypes.
RESULTS:
Primary tumors showed FGFR1 (6.3%) and FGF3,4,19 (2.2%) amplifications as well as FGFR1 (10.1%), FGFR2 (5.5%) and FGFR3 (16.2%) overexpression. In metastases, we observed FGFR1 amplifications (4.8%) as well as FGFR1 (8.5%) and FGFR3 (14.9%) overexpression. Neither FGFR2-4 amplifications nor gene rearrangements were observed. FGFR3 overexpression was significantly associated with shorter overall survival in metastases (mOS 19.9 vs. 47.4 months, HR=3.14, p=0.0152), but not in primary CRC (HR=1.01, p=0.985). Although rare, also FGFR1 amplification was indicative of worse outcome (mOS 12.6 vs. 47.4 months, HR=8.83, p=0.00111).
CONCLUSIONS:
We provide the so far most comprehensive analysis of FGFR alterations in primary and metastatic CRC. We describe FGFR3 overexpression in 15% of CRC patients with oligometastatic liver disease as a prognosticator for poor outcome. Recently FGFR3 overexpression has been shown to be a potential therapeutic target. Therefore, we suggest focusing on this subgroup in upcoming clinical trials with FGFR-targeted therapies.
Genes Dev. 2014 Dec 29.
Li N, Zhang Y, Han X, Liang K, Wang J, Feng L, Wang W, Songyang Z, Lin C, Yang L, Yu Y, Chen J.
PMID: 25547115
Human Pathology.
2015 Sep 23
Bingham B, Ong CW, James J, Maxwell P, Waugh D, Salto-Tellez M, McQuaid S.
PMID: - | DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2015.09.009
Immunohistochemical staining for Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) does not have either an acceptable standard protocol or concordance of scoring between pathologists. Evaluation of PTEN mRNA with a unique and verified sequence probe may offer a realistic alternative providing a robust and reproducible protocol. In this study we have evaluated an in situ hybridization (ISH) protocol for PTEN mRNA using RNAScope technology and compared it with a standard protocol for PTEN immunohistochemistry (IHC). PTEN mRNA expression by ISH was consistently more sensitive than PTEN IHC with 56% of samples on a mixed tumour tissue microarray (TMA) showing high expressionby ISH compared to 42% by IHC. On a prostate TMA 49% of cases showed high expression by ISH compared to 43% by IHC. Variations in PTEN mRNA expression within malignant epithelium were quantifiable using image analysis on the prostate TMAs. Within tumours clear over expression of PTEN mRNA on malignant epithelium compared to benign epithelium was frequently observed and quantified. The use of Spot Studio software in the mixed tumour TMA allowed for clear demonstration of varying levels of PTEN mRNA between tumour samples by the mRNA methodology. This was evident by the quantifiable differences between distinct oropharyngeal tumours (upto 3 fold increase in average number of spots per cell between 2 cases). mRNA detection of PTEN or other biomarkers, for which optimal or standardized immunohistochemical techniques are not available, represents a means by which heterogeneity of expression within focal regions of tumour can be explored with more confidence.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com