ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Clin Cancer Res.
2016 May 10
Guedes L, Morais C, Almutairi F, Haffner MC, Zheng Q, Isaacs JT, Antonarakis ES, Lu C, Tsai H, Luo J, De Marzo AM, Lotan TL.
PMID: 27166397 | DOI: -
RNA expression of androgen receptor splice variants may be a biomarker of resistance to novel androgen deprivation therapies in castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We analytically validated an RNA in situ hybridization (RISH) assay for total AR and AR-V7 for use in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) prostate tumors.
We used prostate cell lines and xenografts to validate chromogenic RISH to detect RNA containing AR exon 1 (AR-E1, surrogate for total AR RNA species) and cryptic exon 3 (AR-CE3, surrogate for AR-V7 expression). RISH signals were quantified in FFPE primary tumors and CRPC specimens, comparing to known AR and AR-V7 status by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR.
The quantified RISH results correlated significantly with total AR and AR-V7 levels by RT-PCR in cell lines, xenografts and autopsy metastases. Both AR-E1 and AR-CE3 RISH signals were localized in nuclear punctae in addition to the expected cytoplasmic speckles. Compared to admixed benign glands, AR-E1 expression was significantly higher in primary tumor cells with a median fold increase of 3.0 and 1.4 in two independent cohorts (p<0.0001 and p=0.04, respectively). While AR-CE3 expression was detectable in primary prostatic tumors, levels were substantially higher in a subset of CRPC metastases and cell lines, and were correlated with AR-E1 expression.
RISH for AR-E1 and AR-CE3 is an analytically valid method to examine total AR and AR-V7 RNA levels in FFPE tissues. Future clinical validation studies are required to determine whether AR RISH is a prognostic or predictive biomarker in specific clinical contexts.
PLoS One.
2018 Jun 01
Kim H, Kwon HJ, Park SY, Park Y, Park E, Chung JH.
PMID: 29856861 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198634
In this study, we present the clinicopathological features associated with PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression in a large Asian cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assessed the prognostic implications of PD-L1 expression, particularly in early stage NSCLC. We retrospectively analyzed 687 NSCLC specimens (476 adenocarcinoma and 211 squamous cell carcinoma) using tissue microarray. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using Dako 22C3 pharmDx assay and PDL1 mRNA was measured using RNA in situ hybridization (RISH). The overall prevalence of PD-L1 protein expression was 25.2% in tumor cells and PDL1 mRNA expression was 11.9%. There was a strong positive correlation between PD-L1 IHC and RISH results (Spearman's rho = 0.6, p<0.001). In adenocarcinoma, PD-L1 protein and mRNA expressions significantly correlated with poorly differentiated histologic subtype (p<0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). PD-L1 expression was also associated with genetic alteration in adenocarcinoma. High PD-L1 expression level was associated with EGFR-naïve and KRAS-mutant subgroup (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). With a 1% cut-off value, PD-L1 protein expression showed a short overall survival duration in early stage adenocarcinoma with marginal significance (p = 0.05, Hazard ratio = 1.947). Our study revealed that PD-L1 expression varied with histologic subtype and genomic alteration status in lung adenocarcinoma, and activation of the PD-L1 pathway may be a poor prognostic factor especially in early stage lung adenocarcinoma. In addition, PDL1 RISH showed promising results in predicting PD-L1 protein expression in NSCLC.
Veterinary sciences
2021 Jun 29
Aresu, L;Marconato, L;Martini, V;Fanelli, A;Licenziato, L;Foiani, G;Melchiotti, E;Nicoletti, A;Vascellari, M;
PMID: 34209830 | DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8070120
Prostate.
2018 May 30
Markowski MC, Hubbard GK, Hicks JL, Zheng Q, King A, Esopi D, Rege A, Yegnasubramanian S, Bieberich CJ, De Marzo AM.
PMID: 29851094 | DOI: 10.1002/pros.23657
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Loss or mutation of PTEN alleles at 10q23 in combination with 8q24 amplification (encompassing MYC) are common findings in aggressive, human prostate cancer. Our group recently developed a transgenic murine model of prostate cancer involving prostate-specific Pten deletion and forced expression of MYC under the control of the Hoxb13 promoter. MYC overexpression cooperated with Pten loss to recapitulate lethal, human prostate cancer.
METHOD:
We now report on the generation of two mouse prostate cancer cell lines, BMPC1 and BMPC2, derived from a lymph node, and liver metastasis, respectively.
RESULTS:
Both cell lines demonstrate a phenotype consistent with adenocarcinoma and grew under standard tissue culture conditions. Androgen receptor (AR) protein expression is minimal (BMPC1) or absent (BMPC2) consistent with AR loss observed in the BMPC mouse model of invasive adenocarcinoma. Growth in media containing charcoal-stripped serum resulted in an increase in AR mRNA in BMPC1 cells with no effect on protein expression, unless androgens were added, in which case AR protein was stabilized, and showed nuclear localization. AR expression in BMPC2 cells was not effected by growth media or treatment with androgens. Treatment with an anti-androgen/castration or androgen supplemented media did not affect in vitro or in vivo growth of either cell line, irrespective of nuclear AR detection.
DISCUSSION:
These cell lines are a novel model of androgen-insensitive prostatic adenocarcinoma driven by MYC over-expression and Pten loss.
Nat Commun
2020 Mar 10
Demircioglu F, Wang J, Candido J, Costa ASH, Casado P, de Luxan Delgado B, Reynolds LE, Gomez-Escudero J, Newport E, Rajeeve V, Baker AM, Roy-Luzarraga M, Graham TA, Foster J, Wang Y, Campbell JJ, Singh R, Zhang P, Schall TJ, Balkwill FR, Sosabowski J, Cutillas PR, Frezza C, Sancho P, Hodivala-Dilke K
PMID: 32157087 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15104-3
Hum Pathol.
2018 Sep 26
Yang RK, Zhao P, Lu C, Luo J, Hu R.
PMID: 30267779 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.09.009
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been used to treat salivary duct carcinoma (SDC). The androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7) has been detected in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and implicated in resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies. Given the potential role of AR/AR-V7 in SDC treatment, this study focuses on AR/AR-V7 expression in SDC specimens collected prior to ADT. RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect total AR and AR-V7 were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded SDC specimens from 23 patients. Full length AR (AR-FL) and AR-V7 transcripts were quantified in a subset of tumors by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Twenty SDCs were positive for total AR by ISH and IHC. Among AR positive SDCs, 70% (14/20) were positive for AR-V7 mRNA by ISH, while 15% (3/20) were positive for AR-V7 protein by IHC. The three SDCs which expressed the highest levels of AR-V7 were all from female patients; one of them expressed significant amount of AR-V7 and barely detectable AR-FL transcripts by RT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry expression of Forkhead box protein A1, prostate-specific antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, NKX3.1 was observed in some SDCs regardless of patient gender. Five SDCs demonstrated strong human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. We conclude that treatment-naïve SDCs may express AR-V7 at levels comparable to or even exceeding the levels detected in CRPC. Our data support the feasibility to incorporate AR-V7 assessment via ISH and/or IHC in the ongoing clinical trials evaluating the therapeutic benefit of AR targeted therapies in SDC patients.
British Journal of Haematology
2017 Apr 03
Wang Z, Cook JR.
PMID: 28369778 | DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14670
Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) is recognized as a distinct clinicopathological entity in the current World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms (Swerdlow et al, 2016). Gene expression profiling studies have confirmed a distinct signature in PMLBCL that differs from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS) and partially overlaps with that found in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (Savage et al, 2003; Bea et al, 2005). In routine clinical practice, however, distinguishing between PMLBCL and DLBCL, NOS is frequently difficult, due partly to a paucity of sensitive and specific biomarkers (Martelli et al, 2008; Dorfman et al, 2012). Recent studies have shown that PMLBCL shows frequent copy number alterations or translocations involving the CD274 (PD-L1) or PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2) genes at chromosome 9p24.1, leading to overexpression of CD274 (PD-L1) and, especially, PDCD1LG (PD-L2) proteins (Shi et al, 2014; Twa & Steidl, 2015). Anti-PDCD1LG2 antibodies suitable for immunohistochemical analysis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue are not currently commercially available, limiting the utility of this potential marker for routine diagnostic practice. In this study, we have performed RNA in situ hybridization (RISH) for CD274 and PDCD1LG2 RNA expression, using a standard automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) platform, and have compared the results to IHC using a commercially available anti-CD274 antibody.
Blood
2023 Feb 07
Stewart, BJ;Fergie, M;Young, M;Jones, C;Sachdeva, A;Blain, AE;Bacon, CM;Rand, V;Ferdinand, JR;James, KR;Mahbubani, KT;Hook, CE;Jonas, N;Coleman, N;Saeb-Parsy, K;Collin, M;Clatworthy, M;Behjati, S;Carey, CD;
PMID: 36758207 | DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022015575
European Urology
2016 Apr 23
Jonathan Welti J, Rodrigues DN, Sharp A, Sun S, Lorentea D, Riisnaes R, Figueiredo I, Zafeiriou Z, Rescigno P, de Bono JS, Plymate SR.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.049
PLoS One.
2019 Apr 15
Duncan DJ, Scott M, Scorer P, Barker C.
PMID: 30986253 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215393
Four immunohistochemistry (IHC) diagnostic assays have been approved for tumour PD-L1 protein assessment in the clinic. However, mRNA detection by in situ hybridisation (ISH) could be utilised as an alternative to protein detection. Detecting spatial changes in gene expression provides vital prognostic and diagnostic information, particularly in immune oncology where the phenotype, cellular infiltration and immune activity status may be associated with patient survival. Translation of mRNA expression to a clinically relevant cut off or threshold is challenging due to variability between assays and the detection of different analytes. These studies aim to confirm the suitability of formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections for use with RNA ISH. A comparison of mRNA expression and protein expression may inform the suitability of mRNA as a patient selection biomarker in a similar manner to IHC and provide evidence of a suitable scoring algorithm. Ninety patient samples, thirty for each indication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC), previously assessed using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay were chosen to represent a wide dynamic range of percentage tumour cell staining (TCIHC). Expression of mRNA was assessed by ISH using the RNAScope 2.5 assay and probe CD274/PD-L1 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) including kit provided positive and negative control probes. Brightfield whole slide images of tissues were captured. The percentage of tumour cells with PD-L1 mRNA expression (%TCmRNA) and mean punctate dots/tumour cell were determined using image analysis. Differences in RNA expression between the IHC derived TCIHC≥25% and <25% groups were assessed using t-tests. For each indication, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified thresholds for patient classification using %TCmRNA and dots/tumour cell, with reference to TCIHC≥25%. Eighty-six samples were successfully tested; 3 failed due to insufficient control probe staining, 1 due to lack of tumour. Percent TCmRNA staining using RNAScope demonstrated statistical significance (at α = 0.05) in the PD-L1 high (TCIHC ≥25%) vs the PD-L1 low (TCIHC <25%) groups for NSCLC, HNSCC, and UC. The number of punctate dots/tumour cell was significantly higher in the PD-L1 high vs the PD-L1 low groups for NSCLC and HNSCC but not UC. For %TCmRNA; ROC analysis identified thresholds of: NSCLC 18.0%, HNSCC 31.8%, UC 25.8%. For dots/tumour cell, thresholds were: NSCLC 0.26, HNSCC 0.53, UC 0.45. Routine tissue fixation and processing is suitable for RNA detection using RNAScope. PD-L1 mRNA extent and level is associated with PD-L1 status determined by IHC. Threshold optimisation for %TCmRNA and mean dots/tumour cell results in high specificity to IHC PD-L1 classification, but only moderate sensitivity.
Nucleic acids research
2021 Dec 23
Somasekharan, SP;Saxena, N;Zhang, F;Beraldi, E;Huang, JN;Gentle, C;Fazli, L;Thi, M;Sorensen, PH;Gleave, M;
PMID: 34939643 | DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1247
Cancer Res.
2018 Aug 22
Xiao L, Tien JC, Vo J, Tan M, Parolia A, Zhang Y, Wang L, Qiao Y, Shukla S, Wang X, Zheng H, Su F, Jing X, Luo E, Delekta A, Juckette KM, Xu A, Cao X, Alva AS, Kim Y, Macleod AR, Chinnaiyan AM.
PMID: 30135193 | DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0941
Advanced prostate cancer initially responds to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but the disease inevitably recurs as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Although CRPC initially responds to abiraterone and enzalutamide, the disease invariably becomes non-responsive to these agents. Novel approaches are required to circumvent resistance pathways and extend survival, but the mechanisms underlying resistance remain poorly defined. Our group previously showed the histone lysine-N-methyltransferase EZH2 to be overexpressed in prostate cancer and quantitatively associated with progression and poor prognosis. In this study, we screened a library of epigenetic inhibitors for their ability to render CRPC cells sensitive to enzalutamide and found that EZH2 inhibitors specifically potentiated enzalutamide-mediated inhibition of proliferation. Moreover, we identified antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) as a novel drug strategy to ablate EZH2 and AR expression, which may have advantageous properties in certain settings. RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, and ATAC-seq demonstrated that EZH2 inhibition altered the AR cistrome to significantly upregulate AR signaling, suggesting an enhanced dependence of CRPC cells on this pathway following inhibition of EZH2. Combination treatment with ASO targeting EZH2 and AR transcripts inhibited prostate cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo better than single agents. In sum, this study identifies EZH2 as a critical epigenetic regulator of ADT resistance and defines ASO-based co-targeting of EZH2 and AR as a promising strategy for treatment of CRPC.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com