Probes for INS

Abstract

Prostate cancer remains dependent on androgen receptor signaling even after castration. Aberrant androgen receptor signaling in castration resistant prostate cancer is mediated by mechanisms such as alterations in the androgen receptor and activation of interacting signaling pathways. Clinical evidence confirms that resistance to the next generation anti-androgen, enzalutamide, may be mediated to a large extent by alternative splicing of the androgen receptor to generate constitutively active splice variants such as AR-V7. The splice variants AR-V7 and Arv567es have been implicated in the resistance to not only enzalutamide, but also to abiraterone and other conventional therapeutics such as taxanes. Numerous studies including ours suggest that splicing factors such as hnRNPA1 promote the generation of AR-V7, thus contributing to enzalutamide resistance in prostate cancer cells. In the present study, we discovered that quercetin, a naturally occurring polyphenolic compound, reduces the expression of hnRNPA1, and consequently, that of AR-V7. The suppression of AR-V7 by quercetin resensitizes enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells to treatment with enzalutamide. Our results indicate that quercetin downregulates hnRNPA1 expression, downregulates the expression of AR-V7, antagonizes androgen receptor signaling, and resensitizes enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells to enzalutamide treatment in vivo in mouse xenografts. These findings demonstrate that suppressing the alternative splicing of the androgen receptor may have important implications in overcoming the resistance to next-generation anti-androgen therapy.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been used to treat salivary duct carcinoma (SDC). The androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7) has been detected in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and implicated in resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies. Given the potential role of AR/AR-V7 in SDC treatment, this study focuses on AR/AR-V7 expression in SDC specimens collected prior to ADT. RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect total AR and AR-V7 were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded SDC specimens from 23 patients. Full length AR (AR-FL) and AR-V7 transcripts were quantified in a subset of tumors by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Twenty SDCs were positive for total AR by ISH and IHC. Among AR positive SDCs, 70% (14/20) were positive for AR-V7 mRNA by ISH, while 15% (3/20) were positive for AR-V7 protein by IHC. The three SDCs which expressed the highest levels of AR-V7 were all from female patients; one of them expressed significant amount of AR-V7 and barely detectable AR-FL transcripts by RT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry expression of Forkhead box protein A1, prostate-specific antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, NKX3.1 was observed in some SDCs regardless of patient gender. Five SDCs demonstrated strong human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. We conclude that treatment-naïve SDCs may express AR-V7 at levels comparable to or even exceeding the levels detected in CRPC. Our data support the feasibility to incorporate AR-V7 assessment via ISH and/or IHC in the ongoing clinical trials evaluating the therapeutic benefit of AR targeted therapies in SDC patients.

Pan-fibroblast growth-factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors hold promise in FGFR-altered patients, but such alterations are rare in advanced urothelial carcinoma. In order to assess whether we may increase the number of eligible patients by using different molecular techniques for detecting alterations, we pooled the results of the centralised FGFR mutation/translocation assays that were performed in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratories within multiple phase 2 trials. At our centre, the same tissue blocks were used to analyse FGFR1-3 messenger RNA expression through messenger RNA in situ hybridisation (ISH; RNAscope 2.5 assay). From October 2016 to March 2017, 52 cases were analysed. Seventeen patients (32.7%) had an upper tract primary tumour. Ten patients (19.2%) had FGFR DNA alterations. Twenty-nine (55.8%) had positive ISH analysis: N=17 score 3, N=12 score 4. Of note, concordance between the two tests was obtained in seven out of 10 patients. Sixty percent of mutated patients had an upper tract primary tumour versus 31% of ISH-positive patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY:

We found three-fold higher frequency of fibroblast growth-factor receptor alterations at the RNA versus DNA level in advanced urothelial carcinoma, with a different distribution according to the method used and the site of the primary tumour. The evaluation of the therapeutic response to pan-fibroblast growth-factor receptor inhibitors according to the method of assessment is warranted.

Treatment with androgen-targeted therapies can induce upregulation of epithelial plasticity pathways. Epithelial plasticity is known to be important for metastatic dissemination and therapeutic resistance. The goal of this study is to elucidate the functional consequence of induced epithelial plasticity on AR regulation during disease progression to identify factors important for treatment-resistant and metastatic prostate cancer. We pinpoint the epithelial plasticity transcription factor, Snail, at the nexus of enzalutamide resistance and prostate cancer metastasis both in preclinical models of prostate cancer and in patients. In patients, Snail expression is associated with Gleason 9-10 high-risk disease and is strongly overexpressed in metastases as compared to localized prostate cancer. Snail expression is also elevated in enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells compared to enzalutamide-sensitive cells, and downregulation of Snail re-sensitizes enzalutamide-resistant cells to enzalutamide. While activation of Snail increases migration and invasion, it is also capable of promoting enzalutamide resistance in enzalutamide-sensitive cells. This Snail-mediated enzalutamide resistance is a consequence of increased full-length AR and AR-V7 expression and nuclear localization. Downregulation of either full-length AR or AR-V7 re-sensitizes cells to enzalutamide in the presence of Snail, thus connecting Snail-induced enzalutamide resistance directly to AR biology. Finally, we demonstrate that Snail is capable of mediating-resistance through AR even in the absence of AR-V7. These findings imply that increased Snail expressionduring progression to metastatic disease may prime cells for resistance to AR-targeted therapies by promoting AR activity in prostate cancer.

Background: FGFR1 copy number gain (CNG) occurs in head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) and is used for patient selection in FGFR-specific inhibitor clinical trials. This study explores FGFR1 mRNA and protein levels in HNSCC cell lines, primary tumors and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) as predictors of sensitivity to the FGFR inhibitor, NVP-BGJ398. Methods: FGFR1 status, expression levels and BGJ398 sensitive growth were measured in 12 HNSCC cell lines. Primary HNSCCs (n=353) were assessed for FGFR1 CNG and mRNA levels and HNSCC TCGA data were interrogated as an independent sample set. HNSCC PDXs (n=39) were submitted to FGFR1 copy number detection and mRNA assays to identify putative FGFR1-dependent tumors. Results: Cell line sensitivity to BGJ398 is associated with FGFR1 mRNA and protein levels, not FGFR1 CNG. 31% of primary HNSCC tumors expressed FGFR1 mRNA, 18% exhibited FGFR1 CNG, 35% of amplified tumors were also positive for FGFR1 mRNA. This relationship was confirmed with the TCGA dataset. Using high FGFR1 mRNA for selection, 2 HNSCC PDXs were identified, one of which also exhibited FGFR1 CNG. The non-amplified tumor with high mRNA levels exhibited in vivo sensitivity to BGJ398. Conclusion: FGFR1 expression associates with BGJ398 sensitivity in HNSCC cell lines and predicts TKI sensitivity in PDXs. Our results support FGFR1 mRNA or protein expression, rather than FGFR1 CNG as a predictive biomarker for the response to FGFR inhibitors in a subset of patients suffering from HNSCC.