ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Histopathology.
2016 Dec 24
Zidar N, Langner C, Odar K, Hošnjak L, Kamarádová K, Daum O, Pollheimer MJ, Košorok P, Poljak M.
PMID: 28012208 | DOI: 10.1111/his.13158
Histopathology.
2016 Dec 30
Andreasen S, Bishop J, Hansen TV, Westra WH, Bilde A, von Buchwald C, Kiss K.
PMID: 28035703 | DOI: 10.1111/his.13162
Cancer.
2018 Apr 30
Windon MJ, D'Souza G, Rettig EM, Westra WH, van Zante A, Wang SJ, Ryan WR, Mydlarz WK, Ha PK, Miles BA, Koch W, Gourin C, Eisele DW, Fakhry C.
PMID: 29710393 | DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31385
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasing among older adults. It is unknown whether these trends can be explained by human papillomavirus (HPV) and whether HPV-related tumors remain associated with an improved prognosis among older patients.
METHODS:
In a retrospective study of OPSCCs diagnosed from 1995 to 2013 at 2 National Comprehensive Cancer Network-designated cancer centers, p16 immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization (ISH) for HPV-16, high-risk DNA, and/or E6/E7 RNA were performed. The median age at diagnosis was compared by p16 and ISH tumor status. Trends in age were analyzed with nonparametric trends. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS:
Among 239 patients, 144 (60%) were p16-positive. During 1998-2013, the median age increased among p16-positive patients (Ptrend = .01) but not among p16-negative patients (Ptrend = .71). The median age of p16-positive patients increased from 53 years (interquartile range [IQR] in 1995-2000, 45-65 years) to 58 years (IQR for 2001-2013, 53-64 years). Among patients ≥ 65 years old, the proportion of OPSCCs that were p16-positive increased from 41% during 1995-2000 to 75% during 2007-2013 (Ptrend = .04). Among all age groups, including older patients, a p16-positive tumor status conferred improved overall survival in comparison with a p16-negative status.
CONCLUSIONS:
The median age at diagnosis for HPV-related OPSCC is increasing as the proportion of OPSCCs caused by HPV rises among older adults. The favorable survival conferred by an HPV-positive tumor status persists in older adults. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Human pathology
2022 Dec 22
Tekin, B;Guo, R;Cheville, JC;Canete-Portillo, S;Sanchez, DF;Fernandez-Nestosa, MJ;Dasari, S;Menon, S;Herrera Hernandez, L;Jimenez, RE;Erickson, LA;Cubilla, AL;Gupta, S;
PMID: 36566905 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.12.012
British journal of cancer, 108(6):1332–1339.
Schache AG, Liloglou T, Risk JM, Jones TM, Ma XJ, Wang H, Bui S, Luo Y, Sloan P, Shaw RJ, Robinson M (2013).
PMID: 23412100 | DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.63.
Mod Pathol.
2015 Sep 25
Mirghani H, Casiraghi O, Amen F, He M, Ma XJ, Saulnier P, Lacroix L, Drusch F, Ben Lakdhar A, Saint Guily JL, Badoual C, Scoazec JY, Vielh P.
PMID: 26403782 | DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.113
Accurate screening of HPV-driven head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is a critical issue. Although there are commercial direct and indirect assays for HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, none are ideal. Recently, a novel RNA in situ hybridization test (the RNAscope HPV-test) has been developed for the detection of high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. However, validation of this assay against the 'gold standard' (identification of high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA in fresh-frozen tissue by quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR) has only been reported by one team. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from 50 patients with tonsil or tongue base carcinoma were tested using the RNAscope HPV-test, p16 immunohistochemistry, and chromogenic in situ hybridization for high-risk HPV-DNA. The results were compared with those of qRT-PCR on matched fresh-frozen samples. Compared with the reference test, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of the RNAscope HPV-test and of p16 immunohistochemistry were 93%, 94%, 96%, 88% and 96%, 93%, 96%, and 93%, respectively. Five cases were discrepant between the RNAscope HPV-test and p16-immunohistochemisrty. The RNAscope HPV-test demonstrated excellent analytical performance against the 'gold standard' and is easier to interpret than chromogenic in situ hybridization. p16-immunohistochemistry also performed very well, however its main weakness is that it is an indirect marker of the presence of HPV. These data suggest that the RNAscope HPV-test is a promising test that could be developed as a clinical standard for the precise identification of HPV-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Modern Pathology
2018 Jun 20
Augustin J, Mandavit M, Outh-Gauer S, Grard O, Gasne C, Lépine C, Mirghani H, Hans S, Bonfils P, Denize T, Bruneval P, Bishop JA, Fontugne J, Péré H, Tartour E, Badoual C.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0090-y
HPV-related and HPV-unrelated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are two distinct entities according to the Union for International Cancer Control, with a better prognosis conferred to HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. However, variable clinical outcomes are observed among patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, which is a surrogate marker of HPV infection. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of RNA CISH against E6 and E7 transcripts (HPV RNA CISH) to predict such variability. We retrospectively included 50 histologically confirmed p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (p16 positive immunostaining was defined by a strong staining in 70% or more of tumor cells). HPV RNA CISH staining was assessed semi-quantitatively to define two scores: RNA CISH “low” and RNA CISH “high”. Negative HPV RNA CISH cases were scored as RNA CISH “low”. This series contained 29 RNA CISH low cases (58%) and 21 RNA CISH high cases (42%). Clinical and pathologic baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. RNA CISH high staining was associated with a better overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.033 and p = 0.042, respectively). Other recorded parameters had no prognostic value. In conclusion, HPV RNA CISH might be an independent prognostic marker in p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas and might help guide therapeutics.
Oral Oncology
2016 Oct 15
Mirghani H, Casiraghi O, Guerlain J, Amen F, He MX, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Mourareau C, Drusch F, Lakdhar AB, Melkane A, St Guily L, Badoual C, Scoazec JY, Borget I, Aupérin A, Dalstein V, Vielh P.
PMID: - | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.10.009
Accurate identification of HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a major issue and none of the current diagnostic approaches is ideal. An in situ hybridization (ISH) assay that detects high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA, called the RNAscope HPV-test, has been recently developed. Studies have suggested that this assay may become a standard to define HPV-status.
To further assess this test, we compared its performance against the strategies that are used in routine clinical practice: p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a single test and algorithms combining p16-IHC with HPV-DNA identification by PCR (algorithm-1) or ISH (algorithm-2).
105 OPC specimens were analyzed. The prevalence of HPV-positive samples varied considerably: 67% for p16-IHC, 54% for algorithm-1, 61% for algorithm-2 and 59% for the RNAscope HPV-test. Discrepancies between the RNAscope HPV-test and p16-IHC, algorithm-1 and 2 were noted in respectively 13.3%, 13.1%, and 8.6%.
The 4 diagnostic strategies were able to identify 2 groups with different prognosis according to HPV-status, as expected. However, the greater survival differential was observed with the RNAscope HPV-test [HR: 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07–0.51, p = 0.001] closely followed by algorithm-1 (HR: 0.23, 95% CI, 0.08–0.66, p = 0.006) and algorithm-2 (HR: 0.26, 95% CI, 0.1–0.65, p = 0.004). In contrast, a weaker association was found when p16-IHC was used as a single test (HR: 0.33, 95% CI, 0.13–0.81, p = 0.02).
Our findings suggest that the RNAscope HPV-test and p16-based algorithms perform better that p16 alone to identify OPC that are truly driven by HPV-infection. The RNAscope HPV-test has the advantage of being a single test.
Head and neck pathology, ;7(3):250–257.
Watson RF, Chernock RD, Wang X, Liu W, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Wang H, El-Mofty SK, Lewis JS Jr (2013).
PMID: 23536041 | DOI: 10.1007/s12105-013-0438-z.
J Oral Pathol Med.
2018 Sep 06
David Lu XJ, Liu KYP, Soares RC, Thomson T, Prisman E, Wu J, Poh CF.
PMID: 30191616 | DOI: 10.1111/jop.12779
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
There is increasing evidence that high-risk human papillomavirus plays significant role in oropharyngeal cancer; however, there is lack of knowledge on the interplay between the virus and its downstream related molecules and their possible prognostic values. The objectives of the study are to better understand the interplay of the HR-HPV and its associated downstream molecules and to evaluate potential biomarkers for patient outcomes.
METHODS:
We conducted a retrospective study with available formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from 244 oropharyngeal cancer patients that received curative radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy from 2000 to 2008. In addition to chart review, we performed HPV DNA and RNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for p53, the retinoblastoma protein, p16, and cyclin D1 analysis. Cox-proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to determine the prognostic markers for clinical outcomes.
RESULTS:
Patients averaged 57.3±9.4 year-old and were mostly males (76.2%) and ever-smokers (76.2%). All patients received curative radiotherapy and 44.3% received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. We detected the human papillomavirus in 77.9% of study patients. Ever-smokers, more advanced tumor stage, and receiving radiotherapy only had poorer 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and loco-regional recurrence. Cases with positive human papillomavirus and p53 overexpression had poorer disease-specific survival. Cases without human papillomavirus, but cyclin D1 overexpression, was associated with poorer 5-year overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our data suggests that additional p53 and cyclin D1 testing may benefit oropharyngeal cancer patients with known human papillomavirus status.
Human Pathology
2017 Oct 06
Volpi CC, Ciniselli CM, Gualeni AV, Plebani M, Alfieri S, Verderio P, Locati L, Perrone F, Quattronea P, Carbone A, Pilotti S, Gloghini A.
PMID: 28993274 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.09.011
The aim of this study is comparing two in situ hybridization (ISH) detection methods for human papilloma virus (HPV) 16 E6/E7 mRNA, i.e. the RNAscope™ 2.0 High Definition (HD) and the upgraded RNAscope™ 2.5 HD version. The RNAscope™ 2.5 HD has recently replaced the RNAscope™ 2.0 HD detection kit. Therefore, this investigation starts from the need to analytically validate the new mRNA ISH assay and, possibly, to refine the current algorithm for HPV detection in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with the final goal to apply it to daily laboratory practice. The study was based on HPV status and on generated data, interpreted by a scoring algorithm. The results highlighted that the compared RNAscope HPV tests had a good level of interchangeability and enabled to identify OSCC that are truly driven by high risk-HPV infection. This was also supported by the comparison of the RNAscope HPV test with HPV E6/E7 mRNA real time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), in a fraction of cases where material for HPV E6/E7 mRNA real time RT-PCR was available. Furthermore, the algorithm that associates p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) with the identification of HPV mRNA by RNAscope was more effective than the one that associated p16 IHC with the identification of HPV DNA by ISH.
WCRJ 2015; 2 (1): e497
Gloghini A, Volpi CC, Gualeni AV, Cortellazzi B, Perrone F, Pilotti S.
PMID: //www.wcrj.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/WCRJ-2015-2-1-e497-Gloghini-WCRJ.pdf
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com