ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
PLoS One.
2018 Jun 01
Kim H, Kwon HJ, Park SY, Park Y, Park E, Chung JH.
PMID: 29856861 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198634
In this study, we present the clinicopathological features associated with PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression in a large Asian cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assessed the prognostic implications of PD-L1 expression, particularly in early stage NSCLC. We retrospectively analyzed 687 NSCLC specimens (476 adenocarcinoma and 211 squamous cell carcinoma) using tissue microarray. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using Dako 22C3 pharmDx assay and PDL1 mRNA was measured using RNA in situ hybridization (RISH). The overall prevalence of PD-L1 protein expression was 25.2% in tumor cells and PDL1 mRNA expression was 11.9%. There was a strong positive correlation between PD-L1 IHC and RISH results (Spearman's rho = 0.6, p<0.001). In adenocarcinoma, PD-L1 protein and mRNA expressions significantly correlated with poorly differentiated histologic subtype (p<0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). PD-L1 expression was also associated with genetic alteration in adenocarcinoma. High PD-L1 expression level was associated with EGFR-naïve and KRAS-mutant subgroup (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). With a 1% cut-off value, PD-L1 protein expression showed a short overall survival duration in early stage adenocarcinoma with marginal significance (p = 0.05, Hazard ratio = 1.947). Our study revealed that PD-L1 expression varied with histologic subtype and genomic alteration status in lung adenocarcinoma, and activation of the PD-L1 pathway may be a poor prognostic factor especially in early stage lung adenocarcinoma. In addition, PDL1 RISH showed promising results in predicting PD-L1 protein expression in NSCLC.
Veterinary sciences
2021 Jun 29
Aresu, L;Marconato, L;Martini, V;Fanelli, A;Licenziato, L;Foiani, G;Melchiotti, E;Nicoletti, A;Vascellari, M;
PMID: 34209830 | DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8070120
Nat Commun
2020 Mar 10
Demircioglu F, Wang J, Candido J, Costa ASH, Casado P, de Luxan Delgado B, Reynolds LE, Gomez-Escudero J, Newport E, Rajeeve V, Baker AM, Roy-Luzarraga M, Graham TA, Foster J, Wang Y, Campbell JJ, Singh R, Zhang P, Schall TJ, Balkwill FR, Sosabowski J, Cutillas PR, Frezza C, Sancho P, Hodivala-Dilke K
PMID: 32157087 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15104-3
British Journal of Haematology
2017 Apr 03
Wang Z, Cook JR.
PMID: 28369778 | DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14670
Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) is recognized as a distinct clinicopathological entity in the current World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms (Swerdlow et al, 2016). Gene expression profiling studies have confirmed a distinct signature in PMLBCL that differs from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS) and partially overlaps with that found in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (Savage et al, 2003; Bea et al, 2005). In routine clinical practice, however, distinguishing between PMLBCL and DLBCL, NOS is frequently difficult, due partly to a paucity of sensitive and specific biomarkers (Martelli et al, 2008; Dorfman et al, 2012). Recent studies have shown that PMLBCL shows frequent copy number alterations or translocations involving the CD274 (PD-L1) or PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2) genes at chromosome 9p24.1, leading to overexpression of CD274 (PD-L1) and, especially, PDCD1LG (PD-L2) proteins (Shi et al, 2014; Twa & Steidl, 2015). Anti-PDCD1LG2 antibodies suitable for immunohistochemical analysis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue are not currently commercially available, limiting the utility of this potential marker for routine diagnostic practice. In this study, we have performed RNA in situ hybridization (RISH) for CD274 and PDCD1LG2 RNA expression, using a standard automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) platform, and have compared the results to IHC using a commercially available anti-CD274 antibody.
Blood
2023 Feb 07
Stewart, BJ;Fergie, M;Young, M;Jones, C;Sachdeva, A;Blain, AE;Bacon, CM;Rand, V;Ferdinand, JR;James, KR;Mahbubani, KT;Hook, CE;Jonas, N;Coleman, N;Saeb-Parsy, K;Collin, M;Clatworthy, M;Behjati, S;Carey, CD;
PMID: 36758207 | DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022015575
PLoS One.
2019 Apr 15
Duncan DJ, Scott M, Scorer P, Barker C.
PMID: 30986253 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215393
Four immunohistochemistry (IHC) diagnostic assays have been approved for tumour PD-L1 protein assessment in the clinic. However, mRNA detection by in situ hybridisation (ISH) could be utilised as an alternative to protein detection. Detecting spatial changes in gene expression provides vital prognostic and diagnostic information, particularly in immune oncology where the phenotype, cellular infiltration and immune activity status may be associated with patient survival. Translation of mRNA expression to a clinically relevant cut off or threshold is challenging due to variability between assays and the detection of different analytes. These studies aim to confirm the suitability of formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections for use with RNA ISH. A comparison of mRNA expression and protein expression may inform the suitability of mRNA as a patient selection biomarker in a similar manner to IHC and provide evidence of a suitable scoring algorithm. Ninety patient samples, thirty for each indication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC), previously assessed using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay were chosen to represent a wide dynamic range of percentage tumour cell staining (TCIHC). Expression of mRNA was assessed by ISH using the RNAScope 2.5 assay and probe CD274/PD-L1 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) including kit provided positive and negative control probes. Brightfield whole slide images of tissues were captured. The percentage of tumour cells with PD-L1 mRNA expression (%TCmRNA) and mean punctate dots/tumour cell were determined using image analysis. Differences in RNA expression between the IHC derived TCIHC≥25% and <25% groups were assessed using t-tests. For each indication, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified thresholds for patient classification using %TCmRNA and dots/tumour cell, with reference to TCIHC≥25%. Eighty-six samples were successfully tested; 3 failed due to insufficient control probe staining, 1 due to lack of tumour. Percent TCmRNA staining using RNAScope demonstrated statistical significance (at α = 0.05) in the PD-L1 high (TCIHC ≥25%) vs the PD-L1 low (TCIHC <25%) groups for NSCLC, HNSCC, and UC. The number of punctate dots/tumour cell was significantly higher in the PD-L1 high vs the PD-L1 low groups for NSCLC and HNSCC but not UC. For %TCmRNA; ROC analysis identified thresholds of: NSCLC 18.0%, HNSCC 31.8%, UC 25.8%. For dots/tumour cell, thresholds were: NSCLC 0.26, HNSCC 0.53, UC 0.45. Routine tissue fixation and processing is suitable for RNA detection using RNAScope. PD-L1 mRNA extent and level is associated with PD-L1 status determined by IHC. Threshold optimisation for %TCmRNA and mean dots/tumour cell results in high specificity to IHC PD-L1 classification, but only moderate sensitivity.
Cancer cell
2023 Jun 12
Ramachandran, M;Vaccaro, A;van de Walle, T;Georganaki, M;Lugano, R;Vemuri, K;Kourougkiaouri, D;Vazaios, K;Hedlund, M;Tsaridou, G;Uhrbom, L;Pietilä, I;Martikainen, M;van Hooren, L;Olsson Bontell, T;Jakola, AS;Yu, D;Westermark, B;Essand, M;Dimberg, A;
PMID: 37172581 | DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.04.010
J Thorac Oncol.
2016 Sep 14
Yu H, Batenchuk C, Badzio A, Boyle TA, Czapiewski P, Chan DC, Lu X, Gao D, Ellison K, Kowalewski AA, Rivard CJ, Dziadziuszko R, Zhou C, Hussein M, Richards D, Wilks S, Monte M, Edenfield W, Goldschmidt J, Page R, Ulrich B, Waterhouse D, Close S, Jassem J,
PMID: 27639678 | DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.09.002
This article does not have an abstract to display.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com