ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
eNeuro
2023 Jun 22
Paliarin, F;Duplantis, C;Jones, AF;Cucinello-Ragland, J;Basavanhalli, S;Blaze, E;Doré, E;Neel, AI;Sun, H;Chen, R;Edwards, S;Gilpin, NW;Messing, RO;Maiya, R;
PMID: 37364995 | DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0043-23.2023
Molecular Metabolism (2019)
2019 Jan 24
Pan W, Allison MB, Sabatini P, Rupp A, Adams J, Patterson C, Jones JC, Olson DP, Myers MG.
| DOI: doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2019.01.007
Virchows Arch.
2017 Jan 09
Jang BG, Lee C, Kim HS, Shin MS, Cheon MS, Kim JW, Kim WH.
PMID: 28070642 | DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-2061-3
Mammalian epidermis, which is composed of hair follicles, sebaceous glands, and interfollicular epidermis, is maintained by discrete stem cells. In vivo lineage tracing demonstrated that murine LGR5 cells are mainly responsible for hair follicle regeneration whereas LGR6 cells generate sebaceous glands and interfollicular epidermis. However, little is known about their expression in the human skin tumors. In this study, we investigated the expression profile of LGR5 and LGR6 in a variety of human skin tumors including basaloid tumors with follicular differentiation (94 basal cell carcinomas, 18 trichoepitheliomas, 3 basaloid follicular hamartomas, and 12 pilomatricomas) and tumors with ductal differentiation (7 eccrine poromas, 8 hidradenomas, and 5 spiradenomas). LGR5 expression was highest in basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) followed by trichoepitheliomas (TEs) and basaloid follicular hamartomas. LGR6 had the same expression pattern as LGR5, even though its expression was lower. Interestingly, LGR6 expression was detected in stromal cells around the tumor and papillary mesenchymal bodies of TEs but not in stromal cells of BCCs, suggesting different characteristics of tumor-associated fibroblasts between TEs and BCCs. It was unexpected to find that pilomatricomas exclusively expressed LGR6, and its expression was limited to the basaloid cells. Notably, LGR6-positive cells were observed in sweat gland ductal cells in normal skin. This might explain, in part, the finding that LGR6 expression was relatively higher in basaloid tumors with ductal differentiation than in those with follicular differentiation. In particular, spiradenomas displayed the same distribution pattern of LGR6 as normal sweat glands, suggesting the possibility of LGR6-positive cells as tumor stem cells. In conclusion, we documented the different expression patterns of stem cell markers, LGR5 and LGR6 in various skin tumors. These data may provide important insights to understand the origin and development of basaloid skin tumors.
eNeuro
2017 Mar 17
Samineni VK, Grajales-Reyes JG, Copits BA, O’Brien DE, Trigg SL, Gomez AM, Bruchas MR, Gereau RW.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0129-16.2017
The ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) constitutes a major descending pain modulatory system and is a crucial site for opioid-induced analgesia. A number of previous studies have demonstrated that glutamate and GABA play critical opposing roles in nociceptive processing in the vlPAG. It has been suggested that glutamatergic neurotransmission exerts antinociceptive effects, whereas GABAergic neurotransmission exert pro-nociceptive effects on pain transmission, through descending pathways. The inability to exclusively manipulate subpopulations of neurons in the PAG has prevented direct testing of this hypothesis. Here we demonstrate the different contributions of genetically-defined glutamatergic and GABAergic vlPAG neurons in nociceptive processing by employing cell type-specific chemogenetic approaches in mice. Global chemogenetic manipulation of vlPAG neuronal activity suggests that vlPAG neural circuits exert tonic suppression of nociception, consistent with previous pharmacological and electrophysiological studies. However, selective modulation of GABAergic or glutamatergic neurons demonstrates an inverse regulation of nociceptive behaviors by these cell populations. Selective chemogenetic activation of glutamatergic neurons, or inhibition of GABAergic neurons, in vlPAG suppresses nociception. In contrast, inhibition of glutamatergic neurons, or activation of GABAergic neurons, in vlPAG facilitates nociception. Our findings provide direct experimental support for a model in which excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the PAG bidirectionally modulate nociception.
Significance Statement The PAG is a midbrain region critical for the modulation of pain. However, the roles played by the distinct cell types within the PAG in nociceptive processing are poorly understood. This work addresses the divergent roles of glutamatergic and GABAergic PAG neuronal subpopulations in nociceptive processing. We demonstrate that activation of glutamatergic neurons or inhibition of GABAergic neurons suppresses nociception. Whereas inhibition of glutamatergic neuronal activity or activation of GABAergic neuronal activity potentiates nociception. This report identifies distinct roles for these neuronal populations in modulating nociceptive processing.
Cell Death Differ
2020 Apr 27
De Cian MC, Gregoire EP, Le Rolle M, Lachambre S, Mondin M, Bell S, Guigon CJ, Chassot AA, Chaboissier MC
PMID: 32341451 | DOI: 10.1038/s41418-020-0547-7
J Neurosci.
2019 Apr 08
Parekh PK, Logan RW, Ketchesin KD, Becker-Krail D, Shelton MA, Hildebrand MA, Barko K, Huang YH, McClung CA.
PMID: 30962277 | DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2233-18.2019
The circadian transcription factor neuronal PAS domain 2 (NPAS2) is linked to psychiatric disorders associated with altered reward sensitivity. The expression of Npas2 is preferentially enriched in the mammalian forebrain, including the nucleus accumbens (NAc), a major neural substrate of motivated and reward behavior. Previously, we demonstrated that down-regulation of NPAS2 in the NAc reduces the conditioned behavioral response to cocaine in mice. We also showed that Npas2 is preferentially enriched in dopamine receptor 1 containing medium spiny neurons (D1R-MSNs) of the striatum. To extend these studies, we investigated the impact of NPAS2 disruption on accumbal excitatory synaptic transmission and strength, along with the behavioral sensitivity to cocaine reward in a cell-type specific manner. Viral-mediated knockdown of Npas2 in the NAc of male and female C57BL/6J mice increased the excitatory drive onto MSNs. Using Drd1a-tdTomato mice in combination with viral knockdown, we determined these synaptic adaptations were specific to D1R-MSNs relative to non-D1R-MSNs. Interestingly, NAc-specific knockdown of Npas2 blocked cocaine-induced enhancement of synaptic strength and glutamatergic transmission specifically onto D1R-MSNs. Lastly, we designed, validated, and employed a novel Cre-inducible short-hairpin RNA virus for MSN-subtype specific knockdown of Npas2 Cell-type specific Npas2 knockdown in D1R-MSNs, but not D2R-MSNs, in the NAc reduced cocaine conditioned place preference. Together, our results demonstrate that NPAS2 regulates excitatory synapses of D1R-MSNs in the NAc and cocaine reward-related behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTDrug addiction is a widespread public health concern often comorbid with other psychiatric disorders. Disruptions of the circadian clock can predispose or exacerbate substance abuse in vulnerable individuals. We demonstrate a role for the core circadian protein, NPAS2, in mediating glutamatergic neurotransmission at medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), a region critical for reward processing. We find that NPAS2 negatively regulates functional excitatory synaptic plasticity in the NAc and is necessary for cocaine-induced plastic changes in MSNs expressing the dopamine 1 receptor (D1R). We further demonstrate disruption of NPAS2 in D1R-MSNs produces augmented cocaine preference. These findings highlight the significance of cell-type specificity in mechanisms underlying reward regulation by NPAS2 and extend our knowledge of its function.
Nature biotechnology
2022 Jan 13
Kleshchevnikov, V;Shmatko, A;Dann, E;Aivazidis, A;King, HW;Li, T;Elmentaite, R;Lomakin, A;Kedlian, V;Gayoso, A;Jain, MS;Park, JS;Ramona, L;Tuck, E;Arutyunyan, A;Vento-Tormo, R;Gerstung, M;James, L;Stegle, O;Bayraktar, OA;
PMID: 35027729 | DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-01139-4
Physiol Behav. 2014 Apr 2. pii: S0031-9384(14)00173-5.
Smith JA, Wang L, Hiller H, Taylor CT, de Kloet AD, Krause EG.
PMID: 24704193 | DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.027.
The Journal of comparative neurology
2023 May 21
Biancardi, V;Yang, X;Ding, X;Passi, D;Funk, GD;Pagliardini, S;
PMID: 37211631 | DOI: 10.1002/cne.25497
eNeuro
2020 Feb 10
Maynard KR, Kardian A, Hill JL, Mai Y, Barry B, Hallock HL, Jaffe AE, Martinowich K
PMID: 31941661 | DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0310-19.2019
Nature communications
2023 Feb 24
Iwasaki, M;Lefevre, A;Althammer, F;Clauss Creusot, E;Łąpieś, O;Petitjean, H;Hilfiger, L;Kerspern, D;Melchior, M;Küppers, S;Krabichler, Q;Patwell, R;Kania, A;Gruber, T;Kirchner, MK;Wimmer, M;Fröhlich, H;Dötsch, L;Schimmer, J;Herpertz, SC;Ditzen, B;Schaaf, CP;Schönig, K;Bartsch, D;Gugula, A;Trenk, A;Blasiak, A;Stern, JE;Darbon, P;Grinevich, V;Charlet, A;
PMID: 36828816 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36641-7
Nature neuroscience
2022 Jun 16
Cutando, L;Puighermanal, E;Castell, L;Tarot, P;Belle, M;Bertaso, F;Arango-Lievano, M;Ango, F;Rubinstein, M;Quintana, A;Chédotal, A;Mameli, M;Valjent, E;
PMID: 35710984 | DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01092-8
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com