Contact Us / Request a Quote Download Manuals
Advanced Cell Diagnostics Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Search form

Please sign in
  • Log In
  • Register
  • How to Order
  • What to Buy
0 My Cart
X

You have no items in your shopping cart.

Menu
X
  • Products +
    RNAscope™/BaseScope™/ miRNAscope™
    +
    • Assay Selection Guide
    Target Probes
    +
    • All About Probes
    • Catalog Probes
    • Probe Sets
    • New Probe Request
    Manual Assays
    +
    RNAscope™ Chromogenic
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Duplex Assay
    RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex v2 Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent V2
    BaseScope™
    • Overview
    • BaseScope™ Assay Red
    • BaseScope™ Duplex Assay
    miRNAscope™
    • Overview
    • miRNAscope™ Assay red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA Assay
    DNAscope™
    • Overview
    • DNAscope™ Duplex Assay
    Automated Assays
    +
    For Lunaphore COMET™
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex Pro for COMET™
    For Leica systems
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Duplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiomic LS Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Fluorescent Multiplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-BROWN
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-RED
    • BaseScope™ LS Reagent Kit – RED
    • miRNAscope LS Reagent Kit Red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA LS Assay
    Roche DISCOVERY ULTRA system
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal HRP
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal AP
    • RNAscope™ VS Duplex Assay
    • BaseScope™ VS Reagent Kit – RED
    RNA-Protein Co-Detection Assay
    +
    • RNAscope HiPlex-IMC™ Co-Detection
    • Integrated Codetection Assay
    • Sequential RNA Protein Detection
    Software
    +
    • Overview
    • Aperio RNA ISH Algorithm
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Controls & Accessories
    +
    • RNAscope™
    • BaseScope™
    • miRNAscope™
    • Accessories
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Instructions
    • What to Buy
  • Services +
    Professional Assay Services
    +
    • Our Services
    • Multiomic Services
    • Biomarker Assay Development
    • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
    • Clinical Assay Development
    • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
    • Image Analysis
    Benefits
    +
    • Your Benefits
    • Certified Providers
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Process
    • Contact Services
  • Areas of Research +
    Most Popular
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Whole-Mount
    • Anatomic Pathology Panels
    • Neuroscience
    • Inflammation
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • Stem Cell
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Liver Research
    • Cardiovascular & Skeletal Muscle Research
    Cell & Gene Therapy
    +
    • Gene Therapy
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • siRNA/ASO
    • Cell Therapy
    Cancer
    +
    • Breast Cancer
    • EGFRvIII Splice Variant
    • HPV Related Cancer
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Lung Cancer
    • PDx
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Point Mutation
    • CDR3 for TCR
    Viral
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • HIV & SIV
    • Infectious Disease
    • Zika Virus
    Pathways
    +
    • AKT
    • JAK STAT
    • WNT B-Catenin
    Neuroscience
    +
    Neuroscience
    • Neural Development
    • Neuronal Cell Types
    • Learning and Memory
    • G-protein-coupled Receptors & Ion Channels
    • Post-mortem Brain Tissue
    Other
    +
    • Circular RNA
    • Gene Fusions
    • HT Transcript Validation
    • Long Non-coding RNA
    • RNAseq Validation
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Splice Variant
    • miRNA
    RNA & Protein
    +
    • Antibody Challenges
    • Dual ISH + IHC Methods
    • No Antibodies
    • RNA & Protein Analysis
    Customer Innovations
    +
    • Dual RNA+DNA ISH
    • Very old FFPE ISH
    • Wholemount ISH
    Animal Models
    +
    • Any Species
    • Mouse Model
    • Preclincal Safety
  • Technology +
    Overview
    +
    • How it Works
    • Data Image Gallery
    • Technology Video
    • Webinars
    RNA Detection
    +
    • Why RNA?
    • RNA ISH and IHC
    Pretreatment Options
    +
    • RNAscope™ Pretreatment
    • PretreatPro™
    Spotlights
    +
    • Researchers Spotlights
    • RNA & DNA
    • WISH
    • FFPE
    • Testimonials
    Publications, Guides & Posters
    +
    • Search publications
    • RNAscope™ Reference Guide
    • RNAscope™ Data Analysis Guide
    • Download RNAscope™ Posters
  • Support +
    Overview
    +
    • Get Started
    • How to Order
    • Distributors
    • Contact Support
    Troubleshooting
    +
    • Troubleshooting Guide
    • FAQs
    • User Manuals, SDS and Product Inserts
    • Documents and Downloads
    Imaging Resource
    +
    • Image Analysis
    • Image Registration Software
    • QuPath
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Learn More
    +
    • Webinars
    • Training Videos
  • Partners +
    Partners
    +
    • Overview
    Partners Directory
    +
    Automation Partners
    • Leica Biosystem
    • Roche Diagnostics
    Workflow Partners
    • NanoString
    Software Partners
    • indica labs
    Become a Partner
    +
    • Learn How
  • Diagnostics +
    Diagnostics
    +
    • Diagnostics
    • Literature
    • Diagnostics ASR Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Detection
    • Companion Diagnostics
  • Image Calendar +
    Image Calendar
    +
    • Image Contest
    • Data Image Gallery
Search

Probes for INS

ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.

  • Probes for INS (0)
  • Kits & Accessories (0)
  • Support & Documents (0)
  • Publications (12)
  • Image gallery (0)
Refine Probe List

Content for comparison

Gene

  • (-) Remove PD-L1 filter PD-L1 (11)
  • SARS-CoV-2 (8) Apply SARS-CoV-2 filter
  • TBD (6) Apply TBD filter
  • Ifng (3) Apply Ifng filter
  • CD3E (2) Apply CD3E filter
  • CD4 (2) Apply CD4 filter
  • CXCL12 (2) Apply CXCL12 filter
  • HPV-HR18 (2) Apply HPV-HR18 filter
  • HPV E6/E7 (2) Apply HPV E6/E7 filter
  • IFN-g (2) Apply IFN-g filter
  • scFV (2) Apply scFV filter
  • CD274 (1) Apply CD274 filter
  • CD68 (1) Apply CD68 filter
  • (-) Remove IL17A filter IL17A (1)
  • CD3D (1) Apply CD3D filter
  • TNFSF14 (1) Apply TNFSF14 filter
  • PTPRC (1) Apply PTPRC filter
  • EGFR (1) Apply EGFR filter
  • Trem2 (1) Apply Trem2 filter
  • Pik3cg (1) Apply Pik3cg filter
  • Dkk2 (1) Apply Dkk2 filter
  • Msln (1) Apply Msln filter
  • PECAM1 (1) Apply PECAM1 filter
  • PRLR (1) Apply PRLR filter
  • MKI67 (1) Apply MKI67 filter
  • PDCD1 (1) Apply PDCD1 filter
  • PVT1 (1) Apply PVT1 filter
  • HEXIM1 (1) Apply HEXIM1 filter
  • LAIR1 (1) Apply LAIR1 filter
  • Inhba (1) Apply Inhba filter
  • Cd24a (1) Apply Cd24a filter
  • SPHK1 (1) Apply SPHK1 filter
  • CIITA (1) Apply CIITA filter
  • NLRP3 (1) Apply NLRP3 filter
  • Ghsr (1) Apply Ghsr filter
  • Ccl17 (1) Apply Ccl17 filter
  • IL-8 (1) Apply IL-8 filter
  • TNF-α (1) Apply TNF-α filter
  • IFN-γ (1) Apply IFN-γ filter
  • CD11b (1) Apply CD11b filter
  • PDL1 (1) Apply PDL1 filter
  • PD-l2 (1) Apply PD-l2 filter
  • Ramp1 (1) Apply Ramp1 filter
  • Hspa1b (1) Apply Hspa1b filter
  • GPRC5D (1) Apply GPRC5D filter
  • CD3 (1) Apply CD3 filter
  • Cd8 (1) Apply Cd8 filter
  • CAR-3 (1) Apply CAR-3 filter
  • TCR (1) Apply TCR filter
  • PD1 (1) Apply PD1 filter

Product

  • RNAscope 2.0 Assay (6) Apply RNAscope 2.0 Assay filter
  • RNAscope (1) Apply RNAscope filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Red assay (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Red assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 LS Assay (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 LS Assay filter

Research area

  • (-) Remove Immunotherapy filter Immunotherapy (12)
  • Cancer (11) Apply Cancer filter
  • Immuno-Oncology (1) Apply Immuno-Oncology filter
  • Vaccines (1) Apply Vaccines filter

Category

  • Publications (12) Apply Publications filter
Integrative Analysis of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 DNA, mRNA, and Protein Status and their Clinicopathological Correlation in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Histopathology. 2018 Oct 4.

2018 Oct 04

Sun C, Jia Y, Wang W, Bi R, Wu L, Bai Q, Zhou X.
PMID: 30286249 | DOI: 10.1111/his.13765

Abstract AIMS: The Protein expression of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been recognized a poor prognostic biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aim to detect PD-L1 DNA and mRNA status, and explore whether they contribute to protein expression and their clinicopathological correlation in DLBCL. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the study, we detected PD-L1 status in three different levels by Fluorescence in situ hybridization, RNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in 287 DLBCL samples with follow-ups, respectively. Their correlation and clinical pathological relevance was further analyzed. Our results showed that 1.7% (3/175) patients had PD-L1 amplification, 19.9% (57/287) PD-L1 mRNA high expression and 11.8% (34/287) high protein expression. Both mRNA and protein high expression of PD-L1 was significantly elevated in non-GCB than that in GCB DLBCL (P<0.05). In addition, the patients with PD-L1 mRNA or protein high expression but not DNA amplification have significantly poorer overall survival (OS) than that with PD-L1 low expression (P<0.05). Furthermore, we found that PD-L1 mRNA and protein expression are highly correlated (P=0.012), which was observed in all three samples with PD-L1 DNA amplification. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 DNA amplification is a rare event, PD-L1 mRNA mainly contribute to the protein high expression, and the latter two will serve as important biomarkers for predicting prognosis and selecting patients for immunotherapy in DLBCL.
Programmed death-ligand-1 expression in advanced gastric cancer detected with RNA in situ hybridization and its clinical significance.

Oncotarget.

2016 May 15

Yuan J, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Li N, Tian T, Li Y, Li Y, Li Z, Lai Y, Gao J, Shen L.
PMID: 27191996 | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9381

PD-L1 expression may be a predictive marker for anti-PD-1 therapeutic efficacy. No standard detection method of PD-L1 expression was available for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), which would be investigated in this study using RNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Patients (N = 165) with AGC treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital from October 2008 to February 2013 were retrospectively studied. Tissue samples prior to chemotherapy were assessed for PD-L1 expression using RNA in situ hybridization (an RNAscope assay) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The correlations of PD-L1 expression to patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were statistically analyzed. PD-L1 mRNA signals were located in tumor compartments or the mesenchyme in a brown dotted or clustered pattern, and PD-L1 mRNA expression in gastric cancer was heterogeneous. PD-L1-positive expressions were observed in 33.9% (56/165) and 35.1% (46/131) patients in mRNA level and protein level, respectively. A positive relationship was found between PD-L1 mRNA and PD-L1 protein, and compared to IHC, RNAscope assay could provide an intuitional and quantitative data with potential clinical application. No statistically significant differences occurred between PD-L1 expression and clinical response to chemotherapy, or survival. However, we found that PD-L1 expression was higher in intestinal type than in diffuse type. These findings suggested that the RNAscope assay may be a promising method for patient assessment in gastric cancer clinical trials, which would be illustrated in further study.

HDAC inhibition potentiates immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer

Oncotarget.

2017 Dec 12

Terranova-Barberio M, Thomas S, Ali N, Pawlowska N, Park J, Krings G, Rosenblum MD, Budillon A, Munster PN.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23169

ABSTRACT

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a more aggressive and difficult subtype of breast cancer where responses to chemotherapy occur, but toxicity is significant and resistance often follows. Immunotherapy has shown promising results in various types of cancer, including breast cancer. Here, we investigated a new combination strategy where histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are applied with immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve immunotherapy responses in TNBC.

Testing different epigenetic modifiers, we focused on the mechanisms underlying HDACi as priming modulators of immunotherapy. Tumor cells were co-cultured with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and flow cytometric immunophenotyping was performed to define the role of epigenetic priming in promoting tumor antigen presentation and immune cell activation. We found that HDACi up-regulate PD-L1 mRNA and protein expression in a time-dependent manner in TNBC cells, but not in hormone responsive cells. Focusing on TNBC, HDACi up-regulated PD-L1 and HLA-DR on tumor cells when co-cultured with PBMCs and down-regulated CD4+ Foxp3+ Treg in vitro. HDACi significantly enhanced the in vivo response to PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade in the triple-negative 4T1 breast cancer mouse model, the only currently available experimental system with functional resemblance to human TNBC. This resulted in a significant decrease in tumor growth and increased survival, associated with increased T cell tumor infiltration and a reduction in CD4+Foxp3+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Overall, our results suggest a novel role for HDAC inhibition in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and identify a promising therapeutic strategy, supporting its further clinical evaluation for TNBC treatment.

PD-L1 expression in lung adenosquamous carcinomas compared with the more common variants of non-small cell lung cancer.

Sci Rep.

2017 Apr 07

Shi X, Wu S, Sun J, Liu Y, Zeng X, Liang Z.
PMID: 28387300 | DOI: 10.1038/srep46209

Lung adenosquamous cell carcinomas (ASCs) is a rare variant of NSCLC with a poorer prognosis and fewer treatment option than the more common variants. PD-L1 expression is reported to be the predictor of clinical response in trials of NSCLC. In our study, PD-L1 expression was evaluated via immunohistochemistry using a specific monoclonal antibody (SP263), and PD-L1 mRNA expression was evaluated via in situ hybridization. This study included 51 ASCs, 133 lung adenocarcinomas, and 83 lung squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Similar results were obtained for PD-L1 expression measured at the mRNA and protein level (k coefficient, 0.851, P = 1.000). PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in the squamous versus glandular component of the 36 ASCs in which the components were analyzed separately. The PD-L1 expression rate was similar in the squamous cell component of ASCs and lung SCC (38.89% vs. 28.92%, P = 0.293), so does the adenocarcinoma component of ASCs and lung adenocarcinomas (11.11% vs 13.53%, P = 1.000). PD-L1 expression correlated significantly with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.016), but not with EGFR, KRAS, and ALK mutations in lung ASCs. Anit-PD-L1 is a promising treatment option in lung ASC cases in which PD-L1 upregulated and EGFR mutations are present.

Vaccination with Mycoplasma pneumoniae membrane lipoproteins induces IL-17A driven neutrophilia that mediates Vaccine-Enhanced Disease

NPJ vaccines

2022 Jul 29

Mara, AB;Gavitt, TD;Tulman, ER;Miller, JM;He, W;Reinhardt, EM;Ozyck, RG;Goodridge, ML;Silbart, LK;Szczepanek, SM;Geary, SJ;
PMID: 35906257 | DOI: 10.1038/s41541-022-00513-w

Bacterial lipoproteins are an often-underappreciated class of microbe-associated molecular patterns with potent immunomodulatory activity. We previously reported that vaccination of BALB/c mice with Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp) lipid-associated membrane proteins (LAMPs) resulted in lipoprotein-dependent vaccine enhanced disease after challenge with virulent Mp, though the immune responses underpinning this phenomenon remain poorly understood. Herein, we report that lipoprotein-induced VED in a mouse model is associated with elevated inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, and KC in lung lavage fluid and with suppurative pneumonia marked by exuberant neutrophilia in the pulmonary parenchyma. Whole-lung-digest flow cytometry and RNAScope analysis identified multiple cellular sources for IL-17A, and the numbers of IL-17A producing cells were increased in LAMPs-vaccinated/Mp-challenged animals compared to controls. Specific IL-17A or neutrophil depletion reduced disease severity in our VED model-indicating that Mp lipoproteins induce VED in an IL-17A-dependent manner and through exuberant neutrophil recruitment. IL-17A neutralization reduced levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and KC, indicating that IL-17A preceded other inflammatory cytokines. Surprisingly, we found that IL-17A neutralization impaired bacterial clearance, while neutrophil depletion improved it-indicating that, while IL-17A appears to confer both maladaptive and protective responses, neutrophils play an entirely maladaptive role in VED. Given that lipoproteins are found in virtually all bacteria, the potential for lipoprotein-mediated maladaptive inflammatory responses should be taken into consideration when developing vaccines against bacterial pathogens.
PD-L1 expression and CD274 gene alteration in triple-negative breast cancer: implication for prognostic biomarker.

Springerplus.

2016 Jun 21

Guo L, Li W, Zhu X, Ling Y, Qiu T, Dong L, Fang Y, Yang H, Ying J.
PMID: 27390646 | DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2513-x

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To estimate the therapeutic potential of PD-L1 inhibition in breast cancer, we evaluated the prevalence and significance of PD-L1 protein expression with a validated antibody and CD274 gene alternation in a large cohort of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and correlated with clinicopathological data and patients overall survival.

METHODS:

Immunohistochemistry and in situ mRNA hybridization was used to detect PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression in tumor tissues from 183 TNBC patients respectively. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was performed on PD-L1 strong expression samples to assess copy number on chromosome 9p24.1 of CD274 gene.

RESULTS:

Expression of PD-L1 by immune cells was observed in 4.9 % of TNBC, while expression by tumor cells accounted for 8.7 %. There was a high concordance in PD-L1 protein expression and PDL1 mRNA expression. Samples with PD-L1 strong expression were found to have a CD274 gene copy number gain. PD-L1 expression was correlated with higher tumor grade, but was independent of menopausal status, lymph nodes metastasis, histological subtype and tumor size. In addition, we used precise stratification of PD-L1 expression on tumor or immune cells of certain breast cancer subtype and suggested that patients with PD-L1 expression in basal-like tumors by immune cells or with CD274 gene copy number gain had a longer disease-specific overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings may promote the more precise analysis of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and aid the selection of patients who may benefit from immune therapy.

The significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in resected lung adenocarcinoma.

Oncotarget

2017 Jan 27

Wu S, Shi X, Sun J, Liu Y, Luo Y, Liang Z, Wang J, Zeng X.
PMID: 28145884 | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14851

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Lung adenocarcinoma (AD) is a common variant of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1) are promising immunotherapy targets and its expression may be an important biomarker of predicting clinical response. In this study, we evaluated PD-L1 expression in conjunction with clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in resected lung adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS:

This study included 133 cases of lung adenocarcinoma. PD-L1 expression rate in lung adenocarcinoma was 16.5% at the mRNA level and 13.5% at the protein level, and the kappa coefficient of the two examination methods was 0.824 (P = 0.219, highly correlated). PD-L1 was highly expressed in male patients and smokers with lung adenocarcinoma (P = 0.019 and 0.002, respectively), while no associations were identified between PD-L1 expression and age, tumor size, clinical stage, positive pleural invasion, lymph node metastasis, or therapy methods. Overexpression of PD-L1 was a significant indicator of shorter recurrence free survival time and overall survival (P = 0.000 and 0.000, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that PD-L1 expression was an independent risk factor for poor recurrence free survival and overall survival (P = 0.009 and 0.016, respectively).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Expression of PD-L1 was examined with immunohistochemistry, using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) rabbit monoclonal antibody. mRNA levels of PD-L1 were evaluated using in situ hybridization.

CONCLUSIONS:

PD-L1 overexpression is more frequently observed in male patients and smokers in lung adenocarcinoma. PD-L1 expression is an indicator of worse prognosis in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Concordance study of PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic bladder carcinomas: comparison of four commonly used antibodies and RNA expression

Mod Pathol.

2017 Dec 22

Tretiakova M, Fulton R, Kocherginsky M, Long T, Ussakli C, Antic T, Gown A.
PMID: 29271413 | DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.188

Therapy with anti-PD-L1 immune check-point inhibitors is approved for several cancers, including advanced urothelial carcinomas. PD-L1 prevalence estimates vary widely in bladder cancer, and lack of correlation between expression and clinical outcomes and immunotherapyresponse may be attributed to methodological differences of the immunohistochemical reagents and procedures. We characterized PD-L1 expression in 235 urothelial carcinomas including 79 matched pairs of primary and metastatic cancers using a panel of four PD-L1 immunoassays in comparison with RNAscope assay using PD-L1-specific probe (CD274). The antibody panel included three FDA-approved clones (22C3 for pembrolizumab, 28.8 for nivolumab, SP142 for atezolizumab), and a commonly used clone E1L3N. Manual scoring of tissue microarrays was performed in each of 235 tumors (624 tissue cores) and compared to an automated image analysis. Expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells by ≥1 marker was detected in 41/142 (28.9%) primary tumors, 13/77 (16.9%) lymph nodes, and 2/16 (12.5%) distant metastases. In positive cases, high PD-L1 expression (>50% cells) was detected in 34.1% primary and 46.7% metastases. Concordant PD-L1 expression status was present in 71/79 (89.9%) cases of matched primary and metastatic urothelial carcinomas. PD-L1 sensitivity ranked from highest to lowest as follows: RNAscope, clone 28.8, 22C3, E1L3N, and SP142. Pairwise concordance correlation coefficients between the four antibodies in 624 tissue cores ranged from 0.76 to 0.9 for tumor cells and from 0.30 to 0.85 for immune cells. RNA and protein expression levels showed moderate to high agreement (0.72-0.87). Intra-tumor expression heterogeneity was low for both protein and RNA assays (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.86-0.94). Manual scores were highly concordant with automated Aperio scores (0.94-0.97). A significant subset of 56/235 (23.8%) urothelial carcinomas stained positive for PD-L1 with high concordance between all four antibodies and RNA ISH assay. Despite some heterogeneity in staining, the overall results are highly concordant suggesting diagnostic equivalence of tested assays.

Increased expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in human pituitary tumors.

Oncotarget.

2016 Sep 15

Mei Y, Bi WL, Greenwald NF, Du Z, Agar NY, Kaiser UB, Woodmansee WW, Reardon DA, Freeman GJ, Fecci PE, Laws ER Jr, Santagata S, Dunn GP, Dunn IF.
PMID: 27655724 | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12088

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Subsets of pituitary tumors exhibit an aggressive clinical courses and recur despite surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Because modulation of the immune response through inhibition of T-cell checkpoints has led to durable clinical responses in multiple malignancies, we explored whether pituitary adenomas express immune-related biomarkers that could suggest suitability for immunotherapy. Specifically, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has emerged as a potential biomarker whose expression may portend more favorable responses to immune checkpoint blockade therapies. We thus investigated the expression of PD-L1 in pituitary adenomas.

METHODS:

PD-L1 RNA and protein expression were evaluated in 48 pituitary tumors, including functioning and non-functioning adenomas as well as atypical and recurrent tumors. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte populations were also assessed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS:

Pituitary tumors express variable levels of PD-L1 transcript and protein. PD-L1 RNA and protein expression were significantly increased in functioning (growth hormone and prolactin-expressing) pituitary adenomas compared to non-functioning (null cell and silent gonadotroph) adenomas. Moreover, primary pituitary adenomas harbored higher levels of PD-L1 mRNA compared to recurrent tumors. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were observed in all pituitary tumors and were positively correlated with increased PD-L1 expression, particularly in the functional subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Human pituitary adenomas harbor PD-L1 across subtypes, with significantly higher expression in functioning adenomas compared to non-functioning adenomas. This expression is accompanied by the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. These findings suggest the existence of an immune response to pituitary tumors and raise the possibility of considering checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in cases refractory to conventional management.

Clinicopathologic implications of immune classification by PD-L1 expression and CD8-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in stage II and III gastric cancer patients

Oncotarget

2017 Feb 17

Koh J, Ock CY, Kim JW, Nam SK, Kwak Y, Yun S, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH, Kim WH, Lee HS.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15465

We co-assessed PD-L1 expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in gastric cancer (GC), and categorized into 4 microenvironment immune types. Immunohistochemistry (PD-L1, CD8, Foxp3, E-cadherin, and p53), PD-L1 mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH), microsatellite instability (MSI), and EBV ISH were performed in 392 stage II/III GCs treated with curative surgery and fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy, and two public genome databases were analyzed for validation. PD-L1+ was found in 98/392 GCs (25.0%). The proportions of immune types are as follows: PD-L1+/CD8High, 22.7%; PD-L1−/CD8Low, 22.7%; PD-L1+/CD8Low, 2.3%; PD-L1−/CD8High, 52.3%. PD-L1+/CD8High type accounted for majority of EBV+ and MSI-high (MSI-H) GCs (92.0% and 66.7%, respectively), and genome analysis from public datasets demonstrated similar pattern. PD-L1−/CD8High showed the best overall survival (OS) and PD-L1−/CD8Low the worst (P < 0.001). PD-L1 expression alone was not associated with OS, however, PD-L1−/CD8High type compared to PD-L1+/CD8High was independent favorable prognostic factor of OS by multivariate analysis (P = 0.042). Adaptation of recent molecular classification based on EBV, MSI, E-cadherin, and p53 showed no significant survival differences. These findings support the close relationship between PD-L1/CD8 status based immune types and EBV+, MSI-H GCs, and their prognostic significance in stage II/III GCs.

Development of a Prototype Immunohistochemistry Assay to Measure Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression in Tumor Tissue.

Arch Pathol Lab Med.

2016 Nov 01

Dolled-Filhart M, Locke D, Murphy T, Lynch F, Yearley JH, Frisman D, Pierce R, Weiner R, Wu D, Emancipator K.
PMID: 27788043 | DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0544-OA

Abstract

CONTEXT:

- With the abundance of therapeutics targeted against programmed death receptor-1 and its ligand (PD-L1) that are currently approved or in clinical development, there is interest in identifying those patients most likely to respond to these drugs. Expression of PD-L1 may be an indicator of an initial and robust inflammatory response to the presence of tumor cells. Therefore, tumors that express PD-L1 may be the most likely to respond to therapies that interrupt the negative feedback mechanism that leads to PD-L1 upregulation.

OBJECTIVE:

- To develop a prototype immunohistochemistry assay using the anti-PD-L1 antibody clone 22C3.

DESIGN:

- The assay was developed and optimized using commercially available reagents and archival tumor-bank tissue.

RESULTS:

- The optimized immunohistochemistry method had high precision and reproducibility. Using the prototype assay in 142 non-small cell lung cancer and 79 melanoma archival tumor-bank tissue samples, PD-L1 staining was observed at the plasma membrane of nucleated tumor and nontumor cells and, in some cases, as a distinct lichenoid pattern at the tumor-stroma border. Using a preliminary scoring method, 56% (80 of 142) of non-small cell lung cancer and 53% (42 of 79) of melanoma samples were defined as PD-L1+ based on a modified H-score of 1 or more or the presence of a distinctive staining pattern at the tumor-stroma interface.

CONCLUSIONS:

- The immunohistochemistry assay using the anti-PD-L1 antibody 22C3 merits further investigation in clinical trials and prevalence assessments to further understand the prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression in cancer.

Diagnostic Utility of PD-L1 Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Immunohistochemistry and RNA In Situ Hybridization.

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol.

2017 Sep 29

Gafeer MM, Hosny Mohammed K, Ormenisan-Gherasim C, Choudhary F, Siddiqui MT, Cohen C.
PMID: 28968265 | DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000595

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Programmed death receptor and programmed death ligand (PD-L1) are immunoregulatory proteins. Nonsmall cell lung cancer bypasses the immune system through the induction of protumorigenic immunosuppressive changes. The better understanding of immunology and antitumor immune responses has brought the promising development of novel immunotherapy agents like programmed death receptor checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of PD-L1 in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), comparing 2 different technologies: immunohistochemistry (IHC) by 2 methods versus RNA in situ hybridization (RISH).

METHODOLOGY:

In total, 20 cases of ADC of the lung and 4 samples of metastatic colon ADC were selected. Evaluation of PD-L1 expression was performed by IHC and RISH. RISH was performed using RNAscope. Both methods were scored in tumor cells and quantified using combined intensity and proportion scores.

RESULTS:

Eight of 20 (40%) lung ADC and 2 of 4 (50%) colon ADC were positive for PD-L1 with Cell Signaling IHC, and 65% lung ADC were positive by Dako IHC (13/20). All 4 cases of colon ADC were negative. When evaluated by RISH, 12 lung ADC (60%) and 1 colon ADC (25%) were PD-L1 positive.

CONCLUSIONS:

RNAscope probes provide sensitive and specific detection of PD-L1 in lung ADC. Both IHC methods (Cell Signaling and Dako) show PD-L1 expression, with the Dako method more sensitive (40% vs. 65%). This study illustrates the utility of RISH and Cell Signaling IHC as complementary diagnostic tests, and Food and Drug Administration approved Dako IHC as a companion diagnostic test.

X
Description
sense
Example: Hs-LAG3-sense
Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe.
Intron#
Example: Mm-Htt-intron2
Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection
Pool/Pan
Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G)
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts
No-XSp
Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm
Does not cross detect with the species (Sp)
XSp
Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm
designed to cross detect with the species (Sp)
O#
Example: Mm-Islr-O1
Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms
CDS
Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS
Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only
EnEmProbe targets exons n and m
En-EmProbe targets region from exon n to exon m
Retired Nomenclature
tvn
Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1
Designed to target transcript variant n
ORF
Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF
Probe targets open reading frame
UTR
Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3
Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only
5UTR
Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR
Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only
3UTR
Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR
Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only
Pan
Example: Pool
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts

Enabling research, drug development (CDx) and diagnostics

Contact Us
  • Toll-free in the US and Canada
  • +1877 576-3636
  • 
  • 
  • 
Company
  • Overview
  • Leadership
  • Careers
  • Distributors
  • Quality
  • News & Events
  • Webinars
  • Patents
Products
  • RNAscope or BaseScope
  • Target Probes
  • Controls
  • Manual assays
  • Automated Assays
  • Accessories
  • Software
  • How to Order
Research
  • Popular Applications
  • Cancer
  • Viral
  • Pathways
  • Neuroscience
  • Other Applications
  • RNA & Protein
  • Customer Innovations
  • Animal Models
Technology
  • Overview
  • RNA Detection
  • Spotlight Interviews
  • Publications & Guides
Assay Services
  • Our Services
  • Biomarker Assay Development
  • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
  • Clinical Assay Development
  • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
  • Image Analysis
  • Your Benefits
  • How to Order
Diagnostics
  • Diagnostics
  • Companion Diagnostics
Support
  • Getting started
  • Contact Support
  • Troubleshooting Guide
  • FAQs
  • Manuals, SDS & Inserts
  • Downloads
  • Webinars
  • Training Videos

Visit Bio-Techne and its other brands

  • bio-technie
  • protein
  • bio-spacific
  • rd
  • novus
  • tocris
© 2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.
  • Terms and Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • Email Preferences
  • 
  • 
  • 

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic use. Refer to appropriate regulations. RNAscope is a registered trademark; and HybEZ, EZ-Batch and DNAscope are trademarks of Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. ©2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.

 

Contact Us / Request a Quote
Download Manuals
Request a PAS Project Consultation
Order online at
bio-techne.com
OK
X
Contact Us

Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.

For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below

  • Contact Sales
  • Contact Support
  • Contact Services
  • Offices

Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:

7707 Gateway Blvd.  
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798

 

Bio-Techne

19 Barton Lane  
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420

 

Advanced Cell Diagnostics China

20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051

021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn

For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com

See Distributors
×

You have already Quick ordered an Item in your cart . If you want to add a new item , Quick ordered Item will be removed form your cart. Do You want to continue?

OK Cancel
Need help?

How can we help you?