Probes for INS

Liprin-α1 is a scaffold protein involved in cell adhesion, motility, and invasion in malignancies. Liprin-α1 inhibits the expression of metastatic suppressor CD82 in cancers such as oral carcinoma, and the expression of these proteins has been known to correlate negatively. The role of these proteins has not been previously studied in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related head and neck cancers. Our aim was to assess the clinical and prognostic role of liprin-α1 and CD82 in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in comparison to HPV-negative OPSCC.The data included 139 OPSCC patients treated at the Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) during 2012-2016. Immunohistochemistry was utilized in HPV determination and in biomarker assays. Overall survival (OS) was used in the survival analysis.Stronger expression of liprin-α1 in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was linked to lower cancer stage (p < 0.001) and HPV positivity (p < 0.001). Additionally, we found an association between elevated expression of liprin-α1 and weak expression of CD82 in tumor cells (p = 0.029). In survival analysis, we found significant correlation between favorable OS and stronger expression of liprin-α1 in TILs among the whole patient cohort (p < 0.001) and among HPV-positive patients (p = 0.042).Increased liprin-α1 expression in the TILs is associated with favorable prognosis in OPSCC, especially among HPV-positive patients.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes nearly 80% of oropharynx cancers diagnosed in the United States, with incidence increasing each year. Analysis of cfDNA in plasma and oral rinse has the potential to detect these cases earlier than their typical presentation, but their utility and the best method to detect HPV in plasma and oral rinse samples is unknown.We directly compared next generation sequencing (NGS), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for their ability to detect HPV16 DNA in plasma and oral rinse from 66 patients diagnosed with HPV16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (HPV16-OPC).HPV DNA detection by NGS and ddPCR in plasma samples both had good sensitivity (70%) for HPV16-OPC compared to 20.6% sensitivity by qPCR (p < 0.001). In oral rinse, NGS demonstrated a superior sensitivity of 75.0% as compared to both ddPCR (8.3%, p < 0.001) and qPCR (2.1%, p < 0.001). In a limited cohort of follow up patients, HPV levels detected in plasma by NGS but not ddPCR or qPCR reflected disease remission or progression.These results suggest that NGS has the best sensitivity for detecting HPV in both plasma and oral rinse and may play a role in monitoring patients for disease recurrence. Additional studies are needed to define the specificity of NGS for similar patient cohorts.

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is a risk factor for the development of several head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). However, there have been few reports of high-risk HPV infection in temporal bone squamous cell carcinomas (TBSCCs), and thus the prevalence and clinicopathologic significance of high-risk HPV in TBSCCs are still unclear. We retrospectively collected 131 TBSCCs and analyzed them for transcriptionally active high-risk HPV infection using messenger RNA in situ hybridization; we also assessed the utility of p16-immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Rb-IHC to predict HPV infection. Eighteen (13.7%) of the 131 TBSCCs were positive for p16-IHC, and five of them were positive for high-risk HPV infection (the estimated high-risk HPV positivity rate was 3.8% [5/131]). Interestingly, all five HPV-positive patients were male and had TBSCC on the right side. In the p16-IHC+/HPV+ cases (n = 5), the Rb-IHC showed a partial loss pattern (n = 4) or complete loss pattern (n = 1). In contrast, all p16-IHC-negative cases (n = 113) showed an Rb-IHC preserved pattern. The positive predictive value (PPV) of p16-IHC positivity for high-risk HPV infection was low at 27.8%, while the combination of p16-IHC+/Rb-IHC partial loss pattern showed excellent reliability with a PPV of 100%. The prognostic significance of high-risk HPV infection remained unclear. High-risk HPV-related TBSCC is an extremely rare but noteworthy subtype.

The diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia is based on the degree of architectural and cytologic atypia in the squamous epithelium. The conventional grading system of mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia is considered by many the gold standard in predicting the risk of malignant transformation. Unfortunately, some low-grade lesions, with or without dysplasia, progress to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in short periods. As a result, we are proposing a new approach to characterize oral dysplastic lesions that will help identify lesions at high risk for malignant transformation. We included a total of 203 cases of oral epithelial dysplasia, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, lichenoid, and commonly observed mucosal reactive lesions to evaluate their p53 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining patterns. We identified 4 wild-type patterns, including scattered basal, patchy basal/parabasal, null-like/basal sparing, mid-epithelial/basal sparing, and 3 abnormal p53 patterns, including overexpression basal/parabasal only, overexpression basal/parabasal to diffuse, and null. All cases of lichenoid and reactive lesions exhibited scattered basal or patchy basal/parabasal patterns, whereas human papillomavirus-associated oral epithelial dysplasia demonstrated null-like/basal sparing or mid-epithelial/basal sparing patterns. Of the oral epithelial dysplasia cases, 42.5% (51/120) demonstrated an abnormal p53 IHC pattern. p53 abnormal oral epithelial dysplasia was significantly more likely to progress to invasive SCC when compared with p53 wild-type oral epithelial dysplasia (21.6% vs 0%, P < .0001). Furthermore, p53 abnormal oral epithelial dysplasia was more likely to have dyskeratosis and/or acantholysis (98.0% vs 43.5%, P < .0001). We propose the term p53 abnormal oral epithelial dysplasia to highlight the importance of utilizing p53 IHC stain to recognize lesions that are at high risk of progression to invasive disease, irrespective of the histologic grade, and propose that these lesions should not be graded using the conventional grading system to avoid delayed management.

Sinonasal adenosquamous carcinoma is rare, and there are almost no studies detailing morphology or characterizing their genetic driver events. Further, many authors have termed sinonasal tumors with combined squamous carcinoma and glands as mucoepidermoid carcinoma but none have analyzed for the presence of MAML2 rearrangement.Cases from 2014 to 2020 were collected and diagnosed using World Health Organization criteria. They were tested for p16 expression by immunohistochemistry (70% cut-off), DEK::AFF2 fusion by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and AFF2 immunohistochemistry, MAML2 rearrangement by FISH, and low- and high-risk HPV by RNA ISH and reverse transcription PCR, respectively. Detailed morphology and clinical features were reviewed.There were 7 male (64%) and 4 female (36%) patients with a median age of 69 years, most Caucasian (10 of 11 or 91%). Most had tobacco exposure (8/11, 73%) and most presented with epistaxis, a visible nasal mass, and/or facial pain. Several had a precursor papillomas (3 of 11, 27%). The squamous component had variable keratinization, 5 of 11 (46%) of which would be described as keratinizing, 3 non-keratinizing, and 2 with mixed features. All had gland formation, by definition, and 2 of 11 (18%) had ciliated tumor cells. None of the 11 cases had MAML2 rearrangement and one had DEK::AFF2 fusion with associated positive nuclear AFF2 protein immunostaining. Most were p16 positive (7 of 11, 64%) and all 7 of these were hrHPV positive either by RNA ISH or RT-PCR. Two of the p16-negative tumors were positive for lrHPV by RNA ISH. Treatment included surgery alone (4 of 11, 36%), surgery with adjuvant radiation (5 of 11, 45%), and surgery with radiation and chemotherapy (2 of 11, 18%). Four of 11 patients (36%) suffered disease recurrence, two requiring re-operation and who were disease free at last follow-up, one receiving additional chemotherapy and who was alive with disease. The other elected to undergo palliative therapy and died of disease.Sinonasal adenosquamous carcinoma is a somewhat heterogeneous tumor not infrequently arising ex papilloma and having various drivers including high- and low-risk HPV and rarely DEK::AFF2 fusion. The prognosis appears favorable when proper treatment is possible.