Contact Us / Request a Quote Download Manuals
Advanced Cell Diagnostics Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Search form

Please sign in
  • Log In
  • Register
  • How to Order
  • What to Buy
0 My Cart
X

You have no items in your shopping cart.

Menu
X
  • Products +
    RNAscope™/BaseScope™/ miRNAscope™
    +
    • Assay Selection Guide
    Target Probes
    +
    • All About Probes
    • Catalog Probes
    • Probe Sets
    • New Probe Request
    Manual Assays
    +
    RNAscope™ Chromogenic
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Duplex Assay
    RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex v2 Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent V2
    BaseScope™
    • Overview
    • BaseScope™ Assay Red
    • BaseScope™ Duplex Assay
    miRNAscope™
    • Overview
    • miRNAscope™ Assay red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA Assay
    DNAscope™
    • Overview
    • DNAscope™ Duplex Assay
    Automated Assays
    +
    For Lunaphore COMET™
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex Pro for COMET™
    For Leica systems
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Duplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiomic LS Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Fluorescent Multiplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-BROWN
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-RED
    • BaseScope™ LS Reagent Kit – RED
    • miRNAscope LS Reagent Kit Red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA LS Assay
    Roche DISCOVERY ULTRA system
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal HRP
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal AP
    • RNAscope™ VS Duplex Assay
    • BaseScope™ VS Reagent Kit – RED
    RNA-Protein Co-Detection Assay
    +
    • RNAscope HiPlex-IMC™ Co-Detection
    • Integrated Codetection Assay
    • Sequential RNA Protein Detection
    Software
    +
    • Overview
    • Aperio RNA ISH Algorithm
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Controls & Accessories
    +
    • RNAscope™
    • BaseScope™
    • miRNAscope™
    • Accessories
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Instructions
    • What to Buy
  • Services +
    Professional Assay Services
    +
    • Our Services
    • Multiomic Services
    • Biomarker Assay Development
    • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
    • Clinical Assay Development
    • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
    • Image Analysis
    Benefits
    +
    • Your Benefits
    • Certified Providers
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Process
    • Contact Services
  • Areas of Research +
    Most Popular
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Whole-Mount
    • Anatomic Pathology Panels
    • Neuroscience
    • Inflammation
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • Stem Cell
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Liver Research
    • Cardiovascular & Skeletal Muscle Research
    Cell & Gene Therapy
    +
    • Gene Therapy
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • siRNA/ASO
    • Cell Therapy
    Cancer
    +
    • Breast Cancer
    • EGFRvIII Splice Variant
    • HPV Related Cancer
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Lung Cancer
    • PDx
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Point Mutation
    • CDR3 for TCR
    Viral
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • HIV & SIV
    • Infectious Disease
    • Zika Virus
    Pathways
    +
    • AKT
    • JAK STAT
    • WNT B-Catenin
    Neuroscience
    +
    Neuroscience
    • Neural Development
    • Neuronal Cell Types
    • Learning and Memory
    • G-protein-coupled Receptors & Ion Channels
    • Post-mortem Brain Tissue
    Other
    +
    • Circular RNA
    • Gene Fusions
    • HT Transcript Validation
    • Long Non-coding RNA
    • RNAseq Validation
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Splice Variant
    • miRNA
    RNA & Protein
    +
    • Antibody Challenges
    • Dual ISH + IHC Methods
    • No Antibodies
    • RNA & Protein Analysis
    Customer Innovations
    +
    • Dual RNA+DNA ISH
    • Very old FFPE ISH
    • Wholemount ISH
    Animal Models
    +
    • Any Species
    • Mouse Model
    • Preclincal Safety
  • Technology +
    Overview
    +
    • How it Works
    • Data Image Gallery
    • Technology Video
    • Webinars
    RNA Detection
    +
    • Why RNA?
    • RNA ISH and IHC
    Pretreatment Options
    +
    • RNAscope™ Pretreatment
    • PretreatPro™
    Spotlights
    +
    • Researchers Spotlights
    • RNA & DNA
    • WISH
    • FFPE
    • Testimonials
    Publications, Guides & Posters
    +
    • Search publications
    • RNAscope™ Reference Guide
    • RNAscope™ Data Analysis Guide
    • Download RNAscope™ Posters
  • Support +
    Overview
    +
    • Get Started
    • How to Order
    • Distributors
    • Contact Support
    Troubleshooting
    +
    • Troubleshooting Guide
    • FAQs
    • User Manuals, SDS and Product Inserts
    • Documents and Downloads
    Imaging Resource
    +
    • Image Analysis
    • Image Registration Software
    • QuPath
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Learn More
    +
    • Webinars
    • Training Videos
  • Partners +
    Partners
    +
    • Overview
    Partners Directory
    +
    Automation Partners
    • Leica Biosystem
    • Roche Diagnostics
    Workflow Partners
    • NanoString
    Software Partners
    • indica labs
    Become a Partner
    +
    • Learn How
  • Diagnostics +
    Diagnostics
    +
    • Diagnostics
    • Literature
    • Diagnostics ASR Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Detection
    • Companion Diagnostics
  • Image Calendar +
    Image Calendar
    +
    • Image Contest
    • Data Image Gallery
Search

Probes for INS

ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.

  • Probes for INS (0)
  • Kits & Accessories (0)
  • Support & Documents (0)
  • Publications (16)
  • Image gallery (0)
Refine Probe List

Content for comparison

Gene

  • TBD (1413) Apply TBD filter
  • Lgr5 (151) Apply Lgr5 filter
  • SARS-CoV-2 (136) Apply SARS-CoV-2 filter
  • Gad1 (90) Apply Gad1 filter
  • vGlut2 (80) Apply vGlut2 filter
  • HPV E6/E7 (78) Apply HPV E6/E7 filter
  • Slc17a6 (77) Apply Slc17a6 filter
  • Axin2 (74) Apply Axin2 filter
  • SLC32A1 (74) Apply SLC32A1 filter
  • FOS (73) Apply FOS filter
  • Sst (65) Apply Sst filter
  • TH (63) Apply TH filter
  • VGAT (58) Apply VGAT filter
  • Gad2 (54) Apply Gad2 filter
  • tdTomato (54) Apply tdTomato filter
  • DRD2 (53) Apply DRD2 filter
  • Slc17a7 (52) Apply Slc17a7 filter
  • GLI1 (51) Apply GLI1 filter
  • PVALB (47) Apply PVALB filter
  • egfp (46) Apply egfp filter
  • ZIKV (46) Apply ZIKV filter
  • DRD1 (42) Apply DRD1 filter
  • GFAP (39) Apply GFAP filter
  • COL1A1 (38) Apply COL1A1 filter
  • Crh (37) Apply Crh filter
  • Chat (37) Apply Chat filter
  • V-nCoV2019-S (37) Apply V-nCoV2019-S filter
  • Pomc (34) Apply Pomc filter
  • PDGFRA (33) Apply PDGFRA filter
  • Il-6 (33) Apply Il-6 filter
  • Cre (33) Apply Cre filter
  • AGRP (32) Apply AGRP filter
  • PECAM1 (32) Apply PECAM1 filter
  • Npy (32) Apply Npy filter
  • Wnt5a (31) Apply Wnt5a filter
  • CXCL10 (31) Apply CXCL10 filter
  • GLP1R (31) Apply GLP1R filter
  • Sox9 (29) Apply Sox9 filter
  • CD68 (28) Apply CD68 filter
  • Penk (28) Apply Penk filter
  • PD-L1 (28) Apply PD-L1 filter
  • ACTA2 (27) Apply ACTA2 filter
  • SHH (27) Apply SHH filter
  • VGluT1 (27) Apply VGluT1 filter
  • OLFM4 (26) Apply OLFM4 filter
  • GFP (26) Apply GFP filter
  • Rbfox3 (25) Apply Rbfox3 filter
  • MALAT1 (24) Apply MALAT1 filter
  • SOX2 (24) Apply SOX2 filter
  • Ccl2 (24) Apply Ccl2 filter

Product

  • RNAscope 2.0 Assay (5) Apply RNAscope 2.0 Assay filter
  • RNAscope (4) Apply RNAscope filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 VS Assay (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 VS Assay filter
  • RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay (1) Apply RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay filter

Research area

  • Cancer (15) Apply Cancer filter
  • HPV (1) Apply HPV filter
  • Infectious Disease (1) Apply Infectious Disease filter
  • Inflammation (1) Apply Inflammation filter

Category

  • Publications (16) Apply Publications filter
HER-2 and EGFR mRNA Expression and Its Relationship with Versican in Malignant Matrix-Producing Tumors of the Canine Mammary Gland.

PLoS One.

2016 Aug 04

Damasceno KA, Ferreira E, Estrela-Lima A, Gamba Cde O, Miranda FF, Alves MR, Rocha RM, de Barros AL, Cassali GD.
PMID: 27490467 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160419

Versican expression promotes tumor growth by destabilizing focal cell contacts, thus impeding cell adhesion and facilitating cell migration. It not only presents or recruits molecules to the cell surface, but also modulates gene expression levels and coordinates complex signal pathways. Previously, we suggested that the interaction between versican and human epidermal growth factor receptors may be directly associated with tumor aggressiveness. Thus, the expression of EGFR and HER-2 in these neoplasms may contribute to a better understanding of the progression mechanisms in malignant mammary tumors. The purpose of this study was to correlate the gene and protein expressions of EGFR and HER2 by RNA In Situ Hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively, and their relationship with the versican expression in carcinomas in mixed tumors and carcinosarcomas of the canine mammary gland. The results revealed that EGFR mRNA expression showed a significant difference between in situ and invasive carcinomatous areas in low and high versican expression groups. Identical results were observed in HER-2 mRNA expression. In immunohistochemistry analysis, neoplasms with low versican expression showed greater EGFR immunostaining in the in situ areas than in invasive areas, even as the group presenting high versican expression displayed greater EGFR and HER-2 staining in in situ areas. Significant EGFR and HER-2 mRNA and protein expressions in in situ carcinomatous sites relative to invasive areas suggest that these molecules play a role during the early stages of tumor progression.

In situ analysis of HER2 mRNA in gastric carcinoma: comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization, dual-color silver in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. 

Human pathology, 44(4):487–94.

Kim MA, Jung JE, Lee HE, Yang HK, Kim WH (2013)
PMID: 23084583 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.06.022.

The importance of anti-HER2 therapy has focused attention on the ability of clinical assays to correctly assign HER2 amplification status. In the present study, we evaluated HER2 mRNA expression using a new mRNA in situ detection technique called RNAscope in 211 cases of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded gastric carcinoma. In addition, we compared the results with the conventional methods of immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and dual-color silver in situ hybridization. RNA in situ hybridization (in situ hybridization) showed that 162 cases (76.8%) were score 0, 5 cases (2.4%) were score 1, 10 cases (4.7%) were score 2, 13 cases (6.2%) were score 3, and 21 cases (10.0%) were score 4. HER2 transcription levels were found to be significantly related to pT class, pN class, and tumor recurrence. mRNA expression was well correlated with protein overexpression and gene amplification; 20 cases out of 23 with DNA amplification showed a score of 4 in RNA in situ hybridization (P < .001). Three cases showed false negative and one case showed false positive results by in situ hybridization. More studies are needed to determine whether the in situ hybridization method can identify additional patients that may benefit from anti-HER2 therapy or exclude those who may be resistant to anti-HER2 therapy.
Automated Quantitative RNA in situ Hybridization for Resolution of Equivocal and Heterogeneous ERBB2 (HER2) Status in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 15(2), 210–219.

Wang Z, Portier BP, Gruver AM, Bui S, Wang H, Su N, Vo HT, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Budd GT, Tubbs RR (2013).
PMID: 23305906 | DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.10.003.

Patient management based on HER2 status in breast carcinoma is an archetypical example of personalized medicine but remains hampered by equivocal testing and intratumoral heterogeneity. We developed a fully automated, quantitative, bright-field in situ hybridization technique (RNAscope), applied it to quantify single-cell HER2 mRNA levels in 132 invasive breast carcinomas, and compared the results with those by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Food and Drug Administration-approved methods, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), IHC, chromogenic in situ hybridization, and dual in situ hybridization. Both RNAscope and qPCR were 97.3% concordant with FISH in cases in which FISH results were unequivocal. RNAscope was superior to qPCR in cases with intratumoral heterogeneity or equivocal FISH results. This novel assay may enable ultimate HER2 status resolution as a reflex test for current testing algorithms. Quantitative in situ RNA measurement at the single-cell level may be broadly applicable in companion diagnostic applications.
Quantitative analysis of HER2 mRNA expression by RNA in situ hybridization in canine mammary gland tumors: Comparison with immunohistochemistry analysis

PLosS One

2020 Feb 14

Seung BJ, Cho SH, Kim SH, Lim HY, Sur JH
PMID: 32059046 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229031

Spontaneously occurring canine mammary gland tumors share many features with human breast cancer, including biological behavior and histologic features. Compared to transgenic murine model, canine models have advantages including naturally occurring models of human diseases and cancer. In humans, breast cancer is divided into molecular subtypes based on ER, PR, and HER2 expression. In contrast with humans, few studies have evaluated these subtypes in canine mammary gland tumors, including expression of HER2. HER2 expression in canine mammary tissues has been further complicated by controversy regarding the antibody's specificity. This study aimed to investigate c-erbB2 mRNA expression in retrospective formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples, using RNA in situ hybridization with a novel quantitative assay and to compare this method with immunohistochemistry. Using 48 canine mammary tumor samples and 14 non-neoplastic canine mammary tissues, RNA in situ hybridization was performed with RNAscopeᆴ using a canine-specific target gene probe (ERBB2), and quantitative measurement was performed using the housekeeping gene (POLR2A) to calculate the target gene/housekeeping gene ratio. The ratio of ERBB2/POLR2A was quantified using open-source image analysis programs and compared with the immunohistochemistry results. A significant correlation was observed between the HER2 immunohistochemistry score and ERBB2/POLR2A RNA in situ hybridization (P < 0.001). When the HER2 immunohistochemistry score was 3+, significantly higher expression of HER2 mRNA was observed by RNA in situ hybridization. Interestingly, HER2 mRNA was also observed in non-neoplastic mammary tissues by RNA in situ hybridization. This assay potentially facilitates the reliable quantification of mRNA expression levels in retrospective formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of HER2 in canine mammary gland tumors and to implement clinical trials in dogs
HER2 Status in Colorectal Cancer: Its Clinical Significance and the Relationship between HER2 Gene Amplification and Expression.

PLoS One. 2014 May 30;9(5):e98528.

Seo AN, Kwak Y, Kim DW, Kang SB, Choe G, Kim WH, Lee HS.
PMID: 24879338 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098528

This study aimed at determining the incidence and clinical implications of HER2 status in primary colorectal cancer (CRC). HER2 status was investigated in two retrospective cohorts of 365 consecutive CRC patients (cohort 1) and 174 advanced CRC patients with synchronous or metachronous distant metastasis (cohort 2). HER2 status was determined by performing dual-color silver in-situ hybridization (SISH), mRNA in-situ hybridization (ISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The incidence of HER2 protein overexpression (IHC 2+/3+) was approximately 6% (22 of 365 in cohort 1; 10 of 174 in cohort 2). HER2 gene amplification was observed in 5.8% of the patients from cohort 1 and 6.3% of the patients from cohort 2. HER2 gene amplification was more frequently observed in CRCs located in the rectum than in the right and left colon (P = 0.013 in cohort 1; P = 0.009 in cohort 2). HER2 status, determined by IHC, ISH, and dual-color SISH, was not significantly associated with aggressive CRC behaviour or patients' prognosis in both the cohorts. Of the combined cohort with a total of 539 cases, the concordance rate was 95.5% between dual-color SISH and IHC detection methods. On excluding equivocally immunostained cases (IHC 2+), the concordance rate was 97.7%. HER2 mRNA overtranscription, detected by ISH, significantly correlated with protein overexpression and gene amplification (P<0.001). HER2 gene amplification was identified in a minority of CRC patients with high concordance rates between dual-color SISH and IHC detection methods. Although HER2 status did not predict patients' prognosis, our findings may serve as a basis for future studies on patient selection for HER2 targeted therapy.
"HER2免疫组织化学结果不确定的乳腺癌原位 mRNA 表达特征 HER2 mRNA expression in breast cancers with equivocal immunohistochemical results using in situ mRNA hybridization"

Chinese Journal of Pathology

2015 Nov 30

Shafei W, Yuanyuan L, Ying J, Yufeng L, Quancai C, Zhiyong L, Xuan Z.
PMID: - | DOI: -

Objective:
To investigate in situ mRNA expression of HER 2 oncogene in breast cancers with equivocal immunohistochemical results , and to explore the potential feasibility of RNAscope technique in evaluating HER2 status in breast cancers .Methods Sixty-nine FFPE samples of invasive ductal breast cancer with equivocal HER 2 immunohistochemistry results ( IHC 2+) were collected from surgical excisions from Peking Union Medical College Hospital between June 2010 and June 2013.HER2 status and in situ mRNA expression were tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization ( FISH) and RNAscope respectively using tissue microarray constructed from tumor paraffin blocks .The results of HER2 mRNA expression were scored 0 to 4 ( from low to high levels ) according to mRNA expression in 100 cancer cells .HER2 mRNA expression was evaluated in two groups of patients , with positive and negative FISH results .Results Twenty-three of the 69 samples were FISH positive, including 16 samples that were scored 4 by RNAscope (70%,16/23), 6 samples were scored 3 ( 26%,6/23 ) and one sample was scored 2 ( 4%,1/23 ) .High in situ mRNA expression (score 4 or 3) were observed in 96%of HER2 FISH positive samples.All of samples that were scored 4 by RNAscope were FISH positive .Forty-six samples were FISH negative , including 17 samples that were scored 3 by RNAscope (37%,17/46), 25 samples were scored 2 (54%,25/46), and 4 samples were scored 1 (9%,4/46).Conclusions Breast cancer with HER2 IHC 2 +could be further classified according to in situ mRNA expression status .Among them, RNAscope score of 4 could be one of the interpretation criteria for re-testing IHC 2+samples.In situ detection of HER2 mRNA may be an additional candidate method of confirmation for HER 2 gene amplification or protein overexpression , and has potential&nbsp;clinical utility.

HER2 gene status and mRNA expression in immunohistochemistry 1+ breast cancer

Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi.

2018 Jul 08

Wu SF, Liu YY, Liu XD, Jiang Y, Luo YF, Cui QC, Liang ZY, Zeng X.
PMID: 29996317 | DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2018.07.008.

Objective: To investigate human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) gene status and in situ mRNA expression in breast cancers with immunohistochemistry(IHC) 1+ , and to reveal HER2 positive rate in these patients to provide reference data for obtaining precise HER2 results and modifying relevant clinical strategy to breast cancer. Methods: Sixty-five IHC 1+ formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST) were collected by surgical operation at Peking Union Medical College Hospital during 2011 to 2013. HER2 status and in situ mRNA expression were tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and RNAscope, respectively, by using tissue microarray. Metastatic lymph node was re-tested by FISH if HER2 status was equivocal or negative and with high expression of mRNA in the primary lesion. Results: Four of 65 samples (6.2%) were FISH positive, which included 2 cases of HER2/CEP17>2 and average HER2 copy number>4 and 2 cases of HER2/CEP17<2 and average HER2 copy number>6. In the 4 samples of HER2 positive, 2 patients showed high in situ mRNA expression (3 scores by RNAscope), 2 patients showed moderate in situ mRNA expression (2 scores by RNAscope). In addition, 3 specimens with HER2/CEP17>2 and average HER2 copy number<4 were found in all patients, which included 2 cases of high in situ mRNA expression (3 and 4 scores by RNAscope) and 1 cases of moderate in situ mRNA expression (2 scores by RNAscope). There was no significant association between HER2 status or mRNA expression and clinicopathological characteristics, including tumor size, histopathological differentiation, lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion (P>0.05). Conclusions: A small number of HER2 IHC 1+ patients exist mRNA expression by using FISH method, which suggested that these patients might benefit from anti-HER2 therapy potentially. Since the importance for patients with breast cancers to develop diagnostic and therapeutic strategies from accurate molecular typing, further studies based on a larger cohort are needed to validate our findings.

Advances in mass cytometry and its applicability to digital pathology in clinical-translational cancer research

Advances in Laboratory Medicine / Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio

2021 Nov 24

Cereceda, K;Jorquera, R;Villarroel-Espíndola, F;
| DOI: 10.1515/almed-2021-0075

The development and subsequent adaptation of mass cytometry for the histological analysis of tissue sections has allowed the simultaneous spatial characterization of multiple components. This is useful to find the correlation between the genotypic and phenotypic profile of tumor cells and their environment in clinical-translational studies. In this revision, we provide an overview of the most relevant hallmarks in the development, implementation and application of multiplexed imaging in the study of cancer and other conditions. A special focus is placed on studies based on imaging mass cytometry (IMC) and multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI). The purpose of this review is to help our readers become familiar with the verification techniques employed on this tool and outline the multiple applications reported in the literature. This review will also provide guidance on the use of IMC or MIBI in any field of biomedical research.
Assessment of HER2 in Gastric Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma and its Prognostic Significance

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc

2023 Feb 23

Wang, S;Zhou, X;Niu, S;Chen, L;Zhang, H;Chen, H;Zhou, F;
PMID: 36841435 | DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100148

As the most common type of HPV-independent (HPVI) endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs), gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinomas (GEAs) account for approximately 10% of all ECAs Although anti-HER2 therapy has been proven effective in many cancers, it has not been utilized in ECAs including GEAs, which is at least partly due to the lack of a well-defined guideline. Limited available data regarding HER2 in GEAs and ECAs have considerable variations likely caused by variations in tumor types selection, testing methods, and scoring criteria. Here, we selected 58 GEA cases to examine the HER2 status using IHC and FISH and to investigate the prognostic value and their association with other known or potential prognostic factors. When strong complete or lateral/basolateral membranous reactivity in ≥10% tumor cells was used to define HER2 positivity, relatively high prevalence of HER2 overexpression (17.2%, 10/58) and amplification (15.5%, 9/58), as well as high IHC-FISH concordance rate (90%, 9/10) was found in GEAs. A lateral/basolateral staining pattern ('U-shaped') was observed, at least focally, in the majority of HER2-positive (3+) and equivocal (2+) tumors. Notably, considerable heterogeneity of HER2 expression was observed in HER2 positive and equivocal cases (80.0% and 83.3%, respectively). HER2 overexpression and amplification were associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.047 and p=0.032, respectively). PD-L1 expression was associated with worse PFS (p=0.032), while mutant type p53 demonstrated no prognostic significance. Our work laid a solid foundation for the eventual development of a future standard HER testing guideline for GEAs.
RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. 

The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 14(1), 22–29.

Wang, F, Flanagan, J, Su N, Wang LC, Bui S, Nielson A, Wu X, Vo HT, Ma XJ, Luo Y. (2012).
PMID: 22166544 | DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.08.002.

In situ analysis of biomarkers is highly desirable in molecular pathology because it allows the examination of biomarker status within the histopathological context of clinical specimens. Immunohistochemistry and DNA in situ hybridization (ISH) are widely used in clinical settings to assess protein and DNA biomarkers, respectively, but clinical use of in situ RNA analysis is rare. This disparity is especially notable when considering the abundance of RNA biomarkers discovered through whole-genome expression profiling. This is largely due to the high degree of technical complexity and insufficient sensitivity and specificity of current RNA ISH techniques. Here, we describe RNAscope, a novel RNA ISH technology with a unique probe design strategy that allows simultaneous signal amplification and background suppression to achieve single-molecule visualization while preserving tissue morphology. RNAscope is compatible with routine formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens and can use either conventional chromogenic dyes for bright-field microscopy or fluorescent dyes for multiplex analysis. Unlike grind-and-bind RNA analysis methods such as real-time RT-PCR, RNAscope brings the benefits of in situ analysis to RNA biomarkers and may enable rapid development of RNA ISH-based molecular diagnostic assays.
Enrichment and Molecular Analysis of Breast Cancer Disseminated Tumor Cells from Bone Marrow Using Microfiltration

PLoS One

2017 Jan 27

Pillai SG, Zhu P, Siddappa CM, Adams DL, Li S, Makarova OV, Amstutz P, Nunley R, Tang CM, Watson MA, Aft RL.
PMID: 28129357 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170761

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Molecular characterization of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow (BM) of breast cancer (BC) patients has been hindered by their rarity. To enrich for these cells using an antigen-independent methodology, we have evaluated a size-based microfiltration device in combination with several downstream biomarker assays.

METHODS:

BM aspirates were collected from healthy volunteers or BC patients. Healthy BM was mixed with a specified number of BC cells to calculate recovery and fold enrichment by microfiltration. Specimens were pre-filtered using a 70 μm mesh sieve and the effluent filtered through CellSieve microfilters. Captured cells were analyzed by immunocytochemistry (ICC), FISH for HER-2/neu gene amplification status, and RNA in situ hybridization (RISH). Cells eluted from the filter were used for RNA isolation and subsequent qRT-PCR analysis for DTC biomarker gene expression.

RESULTS:

Filtering an average of 14×106 nucleated BM cells yielded approximately 17-21×103 residual BM cells. In the BC cell spiking experiments, an average of 87% (range 84-92%) of tumor cells were recovered with approximately 170- to 400-fold enrichment. Captured BC cells from patients co-stained for cytokeratin and EpCAM, but not CD45 by ICC. RNA yields from 4 ml of patient BM after filtration averaged 135ng per 10 million BM cells filtered with an average RNA Integrity Number (RIN) of 5.3. DTC-associated gene expression was detected by both qRT-PCR and RISH in filtered spiked or BC patient specimens but, not in control filtered normal BM.

CONCLUSIONS:

We have tested a microfiltration technique for enrichment of BM DTCs. DTC capture efficiency was shown to range from 84.3% to 92.1% with up to 400-fold enrichment using model BC cell lines. In patients, recovered DTCs can be identified and distinguished from normal BM cells using multiple antibody-, DNA-, and RNA-based biomarker assays.

Abstract OT1-03-01: A phase 1, first in human (FIH) study of adenovirally transduced autologous macrophages engineered to contain an anti-HER2 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) in subjects with HER2 overexpressing solid tumors

Cancer Research

2022 Feb 15

Abdou, Y;Barton, D;Ronczka, A;Cushing, D;Klichinsky, M;Binder, K;
| DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-ot1-03-01

Adoptive T cell therapies have led to remarkable advances among patients with hematologic malignancies, but not in those with solid tumors. Macrophages are actively recruited into, and abundantly present in the solid tumor microenvironment (sTME). Tumor- associated macrophages typically evince immunosuppressive behavior, but when engineered to be proinflammatory, may be an ideal vector to administer adoptive cellular therapy in solid tumors. Furthermore, insertion of a CAR on the macrophages confers the ability to selectively recognize and phagocytose antigen overexpressing cancer cells. Additionally, CAR macrophages reprogram the sTME and present neoantigens to T cells, leading to epitope spreading and immune memory. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression promotes tumorigenesis and is seen in many cancers, including but not limited to breast and gastroesophageal cancers (Table 1). CT-0508 is a cell product comprised of autologous monocyte-derived pro-inflammatory macrophages expressing an anti-HER2 CAR. Pre-clinical studies have shown that CT-0508 induced targeted cancer cell phagocytosis while sparing normal cells, decreasing tumor burden and prolonging survival in relevant models. CT-0508 cells were safe and effective in a semi-immunocompetent mouse model of human HER2 overexpressing ovarian cancer. This is a FIH Phase 1 study to evaluate safety, tolerability, cell manufacturing feasibility, trafficking, and preliminary evidence of efficacy of investigational product CT-0508 in approximately 18 subjects with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic solid tumors overexpressing HER2, who have failed available therapies including anti-HER2 therapies where indicated.Filgrastim is being used to mobilize autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells for monocyte collection by apheresis. The CT-0508 CAR macrophage product is manufactured, prepared and cryopreserved from mobilized peripheral blood monocytes. The study is enrolling Group 1 subjects, who receive CT-0508 infusion split over D1, 3 and 5. Subjects will be continually assessed for acute and cumulative toxicity. Dose limiting toxicities will be observed and addressed by a Safety Review Committee. Group 2 subjects will follow, and will receive the full CT-0508 infusion on D1. Pre and post treatment biopsies and blood samples will be collected to investigate correlates of safety (immunogenicity), trafficking (PCR, RNA scope), CT-0508 persistence in blood and in the tumor, target antigen engagement, TME modulation (single cell RNA sequencing), immune response (TCR sequencing) and others. Clinical trial registry number: NCT04660929 Table 1.HER2 Positivity Frequencies Across Tumor TypesTumor typeHER2 positivity (%)ReferenceBladder cancer8-70Gandour-Edwards et al, 2002;Caner et al, 2008;Laé et al, 2010; Fleischmann et al, 2011;Charfi et al, 2013;Yan et al, 2015Breast cancer11.0-25.0Varga et al, 2013;Stenehjem et al, 2014Cervical cancer2.8-3.9Chavez-Blanco et al, 2004;Yan et al, 2015Colorectal cancer1.6-5.0Schuell et al, 2006;Ingold Heppner et al, 2014;Seo et al, 2014Esophageal cancer12.0-14.0König et al, 2013;Yoon et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma6.3-9.0Yoshikawa et al, 2008;Yan et al, 2015Gallbladder cancer9.8-12.8Roa et al, 2014;Yan et al, 2015Gastric adenocarcinoma7.0-34.0Rüschoff et al, 2012;Hofmann et al, 2008Ovarian cancer26Slamon et al, 1989Salivary mucoepidermoid carcinomas17.6Glisson et al, 2004Salivary duct carcinoma30-40Skálová et al, 2003; Cornolti et al, 2007; Nardi et al, 2013Testicular cancer2.4Yan et al, 2015Uterine cancer3.0Yan et al, 2015 Citation Format: Yara George Abdou, Debora Barton, Amy Ronczka, Daniel Cushing, Michael Klichinsky, Kim Reiss Binder. A phase 1, first in human (FIH) study of adenovirally transduced autologous macrophages engineered to contain an anti-HER2 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) in subjects with HER2 overexpressing solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-01.

Pages

  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
X
Description
sense
Example: Hs-LAG3-sense
Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe.
Intron#
Example: Mm-Htt-intron2
Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection
Pool/Pan
Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G)
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts
No-XSp
Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm
Does not cross detect with the species (Sp)
XSp
Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm
designed to cross detect with the species (Sp)
O#
Example: Mm-Islr-O1
Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms
CDS
Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS
Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only
EnEmProbe targets exons n and m
En-EmProbe targets region from exon n to exon m
Retired Nomenclature
tvn
Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1
Designed to target transcript variant n
ORF
Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF
Probe targets open reading frame
UTR
Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3
Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only
5UTR
Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR
Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only
3UTR
Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR
Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only
Pan
Example: Pool
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts

Enabling research, drug development (CDx) and diagnostics

Contact Us
  • Toll-free in the US and Canada
  • +1877 576-3636
  • 
  • 
  • 
Company
  • Overview
  • Leadership
  • Careers
  • Distributors
  • Quality
  • News & Events
  • Webinars
  • Patents
Products
  • RNAscope or BaseScope
  • Target Probes
  • Controls
  • Manual assays
  • Automated Assays
  • Accessories
  • Software
  • How to Order
Research
  • Popular Applications
  • Cancer
  • Viral
  • Pathways
  • Neuroscience
  • Other Applications
  • RNA & Protein
  • Customer Innovations
  • Animal Models
Technology
  • Overview
  • RNA Detection
  • Spotlight Interviews
  • Publications & Guides
Assay Services
  • Our Services
  • Biomarker Assay Development
  • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
  • Clinical Assay Development
  • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
  • Image Analysis
  • Your Benefits
  • How to Order
Diagnostics
  • Diagnostics
  • Companion Diagnostics
Support
  • Getting started
  • Contact Support
  • Troubleshooting Guide
  • FAQs
  • Manuals, SDS & Inserts
  • Downloads
  • Webinars
  • Training Videos

Visit Bio-Techne and its other brands

  • bio-technie
  • protein
  • bio-spacific
  • rd
  • novus
  • tocris
© 2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.
  • Terms and Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • Email Preferences
  • 
  • 
  • 

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic use. Refer to appropriate regulations. RNAscope is a registered trademark; and HybEZ, EZ-Batch and DNAscope are trademarks of Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. ©2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.

 

Contact Us / Request a Quote
Download Manuals
Request a PAS Project Consultation
Order online at
bio-techne.com
OK
X
Contact Us

Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.

For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below

  • Contact Sales
  • Contact Support
  • Contact Services
  • Offices

Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:

7707 Gateway Blvd.  
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798

 

Bio-Techne

19 Barton Lane  
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420

 

Advanced Cell Diagnostics China

20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051

021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn

For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com

See Distributors
×

You have already Quick ordered an Item in your cart . If you want to add a new item , Quick ordered Item will be removed form your cart. Do You want to continue?

OK Cancel
Need help?

How can we help you?