Contact Us / Request a Quote Download Manuals
Advanced Cell Diagnostics Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Search form

Please sign in
  • Log In
  • Register
  • How to Order
  • What to Buy
0 My Cart
X

You have no items in your shopping cart.

Menu
X
  • Products +
    RNAscope™/BaseScope™/ miRNAscope™
    +
    • Assay Selection Guide
    Target Probes
    +
    • All About Probes
    • Catalog Probes
    • Probe Sets
    • New Probe Request
    Manual Assays
    +
    RNAscope™ Chromogenic
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Duplex Assay
    RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex v2 Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent V2
    BaseScope™
    • Overview
    • BaseScope™ Assay Red
    • BaseScope™ Duplex Assay
    miRNAscope™
    • Overview
    • miRNAscope™ Assay red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA Assay
    DNAscope™
    • Overview
    • DNAscope™ Duplex Assay
    Automated Assays
    +
    For Lunaphore COMET™
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex Pro for COMET™
    For Leica systems
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Duplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiomic LS Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Fluorescent Multiplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-BROWN
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-RED
    • BaseScope™ LS Reagent Kit – RED
    • miRNAscope LS Reagent Kit Red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA LS Assay
    Roche DISCOVERY ULTRA system
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal HRP
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal AP
    • RNAscope™ VS Duplex Assay
    • BaseScope™ VS Reagent Kit – RED
    RNA-Protein Co-Detection Assay
    +
    • RNAscope HiPlex-IMC™ Co-Detection
    • Integrated Codetection Assay
    • Sequential RNA Protein Detection
    Software
    +
    • Overview
    • Aperio RNA ISH Algorithm
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Controls & Accessories
    +
    • RNAscope™
    • BaseScope™
    • miRNAscope™
    • Accessories
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Instructions
    • What to Buy
  • Services +
    Professional Assay Services
    +
    • Our Services
    • Multiomic Services
    • Biomarker Assay Development
    • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
    • Clinical Assay Development
    • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
    • Image Analysis
    Benefits
    +
    • Your Benefits
    • Certified Providers
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Process
    • Contact Services
  • Areas of Research +
    Most Popular
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Whole-Mount
    • Anatomic Pathology Panels
    • Neuroscience
    • Inflammation
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • Stem Cell
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Liver Research
    • Cardiovascular & Skeletal Muscle Research
    Cell & Gene Therapy
    +
    • Gene Therapy
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • siRNA/ASO
    • Cell Therapy
    Cancer
    +
    • Breast Cancer
    • EGFRvIII Splice Variant
    • HPV Related Cancer
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Lung Cancer
    • PDx
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Point Mutation
    • CDR3 for TCR
    Viral
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • HIV & SIV
    • Infectious Disease
    • Zika Virus
    Pathways
    +
    • AKT
    • JAK STAT
    • WNT B-Catenin
    Neuroscience
    +
    Neuroscience
    • Neural Development
    • Neuronal Cell Types
    • Learning and Memory
    • G-protein-coupled Receptors & Ion Channels
    • Post-mortem Brain Tissue
    Other
    +
    • Circular RNA
    • Gene Fusions
    • HT Transcript Validation
    • Long Non-coding RNA
    • RNAseq Validation
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Splice Variant
    • miRNA
    RNA & Protein
    +
    • Antibody Challenges
    • Dual ISH + IHC Methods
    • No Antibodies
    • RNA & Protein Analysis
    Customer Innovations
    +
    • Dual RNA+DNA ISH
    • Very old FFPE ISH
    • Wholemount ISH
    Animal Models
    +
    • Any Species
    • Mouse Model
    • Preclincal Safety
  • Technology +
    Overview
    +
    • How it Works
    • Data Image Gallery
    • Technology Video
    • Webinars
    RNA Detection
    +
    • Why RNA?
    • RNA ISH and IHC
    Pretreatment Options
    +
    • RNAscope™ Pretreatment
    • PretreatPro™
    Spotlights
    +
    • Researchers Spotlights
    • RNA & DNA
    • WISH
    • FFPE
    • Testimonials
    Publications, Guides & Posters
    +
    • Search publications
    • RNAscope™ Reference Guide
    • RNAscope™ Data Analysis Guide
    • Download RNAscope™ Posters
  • Support +
    Overview
    +
    • Get Started
    • How to Order
    • Distributors
    • Contact Support
    Troubleshooting
    +
    • Troubleshooting Guide
    • FAQs
    • User Manuals, SDS and Product Inserts
    • Documents and Downloads
    Imaging Resource
    +
    • Image Analysis
    • Image Registration Software
    • QuPath
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Learn More
    +
    • Webinars
    • Training Videos
  • Partners +
    Partners
    +
    • Overview
    Partners Directory
    +
    Automation Partners
    • Leica Biosystem
    • Roche Diagnostics
    Workflow Partners
    • NanoString
    Software Partners
    • indica labs
    Become a Partner
    +
    • Learn How
  • Diagnostics +
    Diagnostics
    +
    • Diagnostics
    • Literature
    • Diagnostics ASR Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Detection
    • Companion Diagnostics
  • Image Calendar +
    Image Calendar
    +
    • Image Contest
    • Data Image Gallery
Search

Probes for INS

ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.

  • Probes for INS (0)
  • Kits & Accessories (0)
  • Support & Documents (0)
  • Publications (88)
  • Image gallery (0)
Refine Probe List

Content for comparison

Gene

  • TBD (1413) Apply TBD filter
  • Lgr5 (151) Apply Lgr5 filter
  • SARS-CoV-2 (136) Apply SARS-CoV-2 filter
  • Gad1 (90) Apply Gad1 filter
  • vGlut2 (80) Apply vGlut2 filter
  • (-) Remove HPV E6/E7 filter HPV E6/E7 (78)
  • Slc17a6 (77) Apply Slc17a6 filter
  • Axin2 (74) Apply Axin2 filter
  • SLC32A1 (74) Apply SLC32A1 filter
  • FOS (73) Apply FOS filter
  • Sst (65) Apply Sst filter
  • TH (63) Apply TH filter
  • VGAT (58) Apply VGAT filter
  • Gad2 (54) Apply Gad2 filter
  • tdTomato (54) Apply tdTomato filter
  • DRD2 (53) Apply DRD2 filter
  • Slc17a7 (52) Apply Slc17a7 filter
  • GLI1 (51) Apply GLI1 filter
  • PVALB (47) Apply PVALB filter
  • egfp (46) Apply egfp filter
  • ZIKV (46) Apply ZIKV filter
  • DRD1 (42) Apply DRD1 filter
  • GFAP (39) Apply GFAP filter
  • COL1A1 (38) Apply COL1A1 filter
  • Crh (37) Apply Crh filter
  • Chat (37) Apply Chat filter
  • V-nCoV2019-S (37) Apply V-nCoV2019-S filter
  • Pomc (34) Apply Pomc filter
  • PDGFRA (33) Apply PDGFRA filter
  • Il-6 (33) Apply Il-6 filter
  • Cre (33) Apply Cre filter
  • AGRP (32) Apply AGRP filter
  • PECAM1 (32) Apply PECAM1 filter
  • Npy (32) Apply Npy filter
  • Wnt5a (31) Apply Wnt5a filter
  • CXCL10 (31) Apply CXCL10 filter
  • GLP1R (31) Apply GLP1R filter
  • Sox9 (29) Apply Sox9 filter
  • CD68 (28) Apply CD68 filter
  • Penk (28) Apply Penk filter
  • PD-L1 (28) Apply PD-L1 filter
  • ACTA2 (27) Apply ACTA2 filter
  • SHH (27) Apply SHH filter
  • VGluT1 (27) Apply VGluT1 filter
  • OLFM4 (26) Apply OLFM4 filter
  • GFP (26) Apply GFP filter
  • Rbfox3 (25) Apply Rbfox3 filter
  • MALAT1 (24) Apply MALAT1 filter
  • SOX2 (24) Apply SOX2 filter
  • Ccl2 (24) Apply Ccl2 filter

Product

  • RNAscope 2.0 Assay (30) Apply RNAscope 2.0 Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay (6) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 LS Assay (4) Apply RNAscope 2.5 LS Assay filter
  • RNAscope (3) Apply RNAscope filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 VS Assay (3) Apply RNAscope 2.5 VS Assay filter
  • RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay (3) Apply RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay filter
  • RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay (2) Apply RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay filter
  • RNAscope ISH Probe High Risk HPV (2) Apply RNAscope ISH Probe High Risk HPV filter
  • TBD (2) Apply TBD filter
  • BASEscope Assay RED (1) Apply BASEscope Assay RED filter
  • RNAscope HiPlex v2 assay (1) Apply RNAscope HiPlex v2 assay filter

Research area

  • Cancer (75) Apply Cancer filter
  • HPV (68) Apply HPV filter
  • Infectious Disease (61) Apply Infectious Disease filter
  • Neuroscience (9) Apply Neuroscience filter
  • Immunotherapy (2) Apply Immunotherapy filter
  • Anxiety (1) Apply Anxiety filter
  • Bioinformatics (1) Apply Bioinformatics filter
  • Cross Species Evolution (1) Apply Cross Species Evolution filter
  • Development (1) Apply Development filter
  • Evolution (1) Apply Evolution filter
  • Other: Methods (1) Apply Other: Methods filter
  • Protocols (1) Apply Protocols filter
  • Transcriptomics (1) Apply Transcriptomics filter
  • Wakefulness (1) Apply Wakefulness filter

Category

  • Publications (88) Apply Publications filter
HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA In Situ Hybridization: Validation Against PCR, DNA In Situ Hybridization, and p16 Immunohistochemistry in 102 Samples of Cervical, Vulvar, Anal, and Head and Neck Neoplasia.

Am J Surg Pathol.

2017 May 01

Mills AM, Dirks DC, Poulter MD, Mills SE, Stoler MH.
PMID: 28403015 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000800

Dysregulated expression of oncogenic types of E6 and E7 is necessary for human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven carcinogenesis. An HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) assay covering 18 common high-risk types ("HR-RISH," aka HR-HPV RNA18 ISH) has not been extensively studied in the anogenital tract or validated on automated technology. We herein compare HR-RISH to DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR), p16 immunohistochemistry, and a previously available HPV DNA ISH assay in HPV-related anogenital and head and neck (H&N) neoplasia. A total of 102 squamous intraepithelial lesions (16 CIN1, 25 CIN3, 3 AIN1, 12 AIN3, 9 VIN3)/invasive squamous cell carcinomas (17 cervical, 2 anal, 18 H&N) as well as 10 normal and 15 reactive cervix samples were collected. HR-RISH, DNA ISH, and p16 immunohistochemistry were performed on whole formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. RNA ISH for 6 low-risk HPV types (LR-RISH) was also performed. RNA and DNA ISH assays used automated systems. HR-HPV PCR was performed on morphology-directed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded punches. HR-RISH was ≥97% sensitive for PCR+ and p16+ neoplasia, as well as morphologically defined anogenital high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/invasive squamous cell carcinoma. HR-RISH was also positive in 78% of anogenital low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, including 81% of CIN1. Furthermore, a subset of PCR-negative/invalid and p16-negative lesions was positive for HR-RISH. Only 1 problematic reactive cervix sample and no normal cervix samples stained. These results demonstrate that HR-RISH is a robust method for the detection of HR-HPV-related neoplasia and provides insight into HPV pathobiology. Performance meets or exceeds that of existing assays in anogenital and H&N lesions and may play a role in resolving diagnostically challenging CIN1 versus reactive cases.

HPV E6/E7 mRNA In Situ Hybridization in the Diagnosis of Cervical Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (LSIL)

Am J Surg Pathol.

2017 Nov 03

Mills AM, Coppock JD, Willis BC, Stoler MH.
PMID: 29112014 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000974

Cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) (aka cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 [CIN1]) can present considerable diagnostic challenges and are associated with poor interobserver reproducibility and overdiagnosis. Furthermore, ancillary studies such as p16 immunohistochemistry have shown little utility in resolving the LSIL versus negative/reactive differential. Human papillomavirus (HPV) RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has shown promise as a diagnostic aid in this setting, but has not been studied in a large case series. We herein investigate high-risk and low-risk HPV RNA ISH in 126 cervical biopsies originally diagnosed as LSIL/CIN1 and compare HPV RNA ISH results to expert-adjudicated morphologic diagnosis to assess whether this assay can help routine cases attain the existing "gold standard" of morphologic consensus diagnosis. We also assess whether this criterion standard can be further improved by integration of HPV RNA ISH results. A consensus diagnosis of intraepithelial lesion (CIN1) was confirmed in 61% of cases, whereas 57% were HPV RNA. HPV-RNA positivity was 84% sensitive and 86% specific for an expert-adjudicated diagnosis of CIN1. Conversely, consensus diagnosis was 90% sensitive and 78% specific for the presence of HPV RNA. Integrating RNA ISH into morphologic review led to further reclassification of 10% of cases, resulting in 95% sensitivity and 98% specificity of HPV RNA ISH for a CIN1 diagnosis and 98% sensitivity and 92% specificity of CIN1 for the presence of HPV RNA. These findings suggest that judicious use of HPV RNA ISH can improve the accuracy of LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis for morphologically ambiguous cases.

The prognostic role of sex, race, and human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Cancer.

2017 Feb 27

Fakhry C, Westra WH, Wang SJ, van Zante A, Zhang Y, Rettig E, Yin LX, Ryan WR, Ha PK, Wentz A, Koch W, Richmon JD, Eisele DW, D'Souza G.
PMID: 28241096 | DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30353

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a well-established prognostic marker for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). Because of the limited numbers of women and nonwhites in studies to date, sex and racial/ethnic differences in prognosis have not been well explored. In this study, survival differences were explored by the tumor HPV status among 1) patients with OPSCCs by sex and race and 2) patients with nonoropharyngeal (non-OP) head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCCs).

METHODS:

This retrospective, multi-institution study included OPSCCs and non-OP HNSCCs of the oral cavity, larynx, and nasopharynx diagnosed from 1995 to 2012. Race/ethnicity was categorized as white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, Asian non-Hispanic, and Hispanic of any race. Tumors were centrally tested for p16 overexpression and the presence of HPV by HPV16 DNA and high-risk HPV E6/E7 messenger RNA in situ hybridization. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

The study population included 239 patients with OPSCC and 621 patients with non-OP HNSCC with a median follow-up time of 3.5 years. After adjustments for the tumor HPV status, age, current tobacco use, and stage, the risk of death was lower for women versus men with OPSCC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.55; P = .04). The results were similar with p16. In contrast, for non-OP HNSCCs, HPV positivity, p16 positivity, and sex were not associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS:

For OPSCC, there are differences in survival by sex, even after the tumor HPV status has been taken into account. For non-OP HNSCC, the HPV status and the p16 status are not of prognostic significance.

p16 immunohistochemistry in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison of antibody clones using patient outcomes and high-risk human papillomavirus RNA status.

Mod Pathol.

2017 Jun 16

Shelton J, Purgina BM, Cipriani NA, Dupont WD, Plummer D, Lewis JS Jr.
PMID: 28621317 | DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.31

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas have a more favorable prognosis than HPV-negative ones. p16 immunohistochemistry has been recommended as a prognostic test in clinical practice. Several p16 antibodies are available, and their performance has not been directly compared. We evaluated three commercially available p16 antibody clones (E6H4, JC8 and G175-405) utilizing 199 cases of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma from a tissue microarray, read by three pathologists with three different cutoffs for positivity: any staining, >50% and >75%. Positive predictive values for high-risk HPV status by RNA in situ hybridization for the E6H4, JC8 and G175-405 clones were 98%, 100% and 99% at the 75% cutoff, but negative predictive values were much more variable at 86%, 69% and 56%, respectively. These improved using the 50% cutoff, becoming similar for all three antibodies. Intensity varied substantially, with 85% of E6H4, 72% of JC8 and 67% of G175-405 showing strong (3+) intensity. With Kaplan-Meier survival plots at the 75% cutoff, the E6H4 clone showed the largest differential in disease specific and overall survival between p16-positive and -negative results. Decreasing the cutoff to 50% increased correlation with HPV in situ hybridization and improved the survival differential for the JC8 and G175-405 clones without worsening of performance for the E6H4 clone. Interobserver agreement was also assessed by kappa scores and was highest for the E6H4 clone. Overall, these study results show modest but important performance differences between the three different p16 antibody clones, suggesting that the E6H4 clone performs best because of strongest staining intensity, greatest differential in outcomes between positive and negative results, lowest interobserver variability, and lowest background, nonspecific staining. The results also suggest that a 75% cutoff is very functional but that, in this patient population with high HPV incidence, 50% and any staining cutoffs may be more effective, particularly for the non-E6H4 clones.

The role of human papillomavirus in p16 positive oral cancers.

J Oral Pathol Med.

2017 Oct 11

Belobrov S, Cornall AM, Young RJ, Koo K, Angel C, Wiesenfeld D, Rischin D, Garland SM, McCullough M.
PMID: 29024035 | DOI: 0.1111/jop.12649

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to identify the presence and frequency of human papillomavirus (HPV) nucleic acid in p16-positive oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs), to assess whether the virus was transcriptionally active and to assess the utility of p16 overexpression as a surrogate marker for HPV in OSCC.

METHODS:

Forty-six OSCC patients treated between 2007 and 2011 with available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens were included. Twenty-three patients were positive for p16 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and these were matched with 23 patients with p16-negative tumours. Laser capture microdissection of the FFPE OSCC tissues was undertaken to isolate invasive tumour tissue. DNA was extracted and tested for high-risk HPV types using a PCR-ELISA method based on the L1 SPF10 consensus primers, and a real-time PCR method targeting HPV-16 and HPV-18 E6 region. Genotyping of HPV-positive cases was performed using a reverse line blot hybridization assay (Inno-LiPA). RNAScope® (a chromogenic RNA in situ hybridization assay) was utilized to detect E6/E7 mRNA of known high-risk HPV types for detection of transcriptionally active virus.

RESULTS:

HPV DNA was found in 3 OSCC cases, all of which were p16 IHC-positive. Two cases were genotyped as HPV-16 and one as HPV-33. Only one of the HPV-16 cases was confirmed to harbour transcriptionally active virus via HPV RNA ISH.

CONCLUSION:

We have shown that the presence of transcriptionally active HPV rarely occurs in OSCC and that p16 is not an appropriate surrogate marker for HPV in OSCC cases. We propose that non-viral mechanisms are responsible for the majority of IHC p16 overexpression in OSCC.

Anal verrucous carcinoma is not related to infection with human papillomaviruses and should be distinguished from giant condyloma (Buschke-Löwenstein tumor).

Histopathology.

2016 Dec 24

Zidar N, Langner C, Odar K, Hošnjak L, Kamarádová K, Daum O, Pollheimer MJ, Košorok P, Poljak M.
PMID: 28012208 | DOI: 10.1111/his.13158

AIMS:

Verrucous carcinoma (VC) is a variant of well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma and is in the anal region regarded as synonymous with giant condyloma (Buschke-Löwenstein tumor) (BLT). Etiology, diagnostic criteria and clinical behavior of both lesions are controversial. Recent studies suggest that VC at other sites is not associated with human papillomaviruses (HPV). We hypothesized that anal VC is also not related to HPV, while BLT is a HPV-induced lesion.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

Ten cases of VC and 4 cases of BLT were included. Several techniques were used for HPV detection: in situ hybridization for HPV6, 11, 16 and 18, six different PCR protocols for detection of at least 89 HPV types from Alpha-, Beta-, Gamma- and Mu-PV genera, and in situ hybridization for high risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA. p16 immunohistochemistry and morphometric analysis were also performed. Alpha-, Gamma- and Mu-PVs were not found in any case of VC, while HPV6 was detected in all cases of BLT. p16 overexpression was not present in any of the lesions. Among microscopic features, only the absence of koilocytosis and enlarged spinous cells seem to be useful to distinguish VC from BLT.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that anal VC, similarly to VC at other sites, is not associated with HPV infection and must be distinguished from BLT which is associated with low risk HPV. Only with well-set diagnostic criteria will it be possible to ascertain clinical behavior and optimal treatment for both lesions. 

Human Papillomavirus-related Carcinoma with Adenoid Cystic-like Features of the Sinonasal Tract: Clinical and Morphological Characterization of 6 New Cases.

Histopathology.

2016 Dec 30

Andreasen S, Bishop J, Hansen TV, Westra WH, Bilde A, von Buchwald C, Kiss K.
PMID: 28035703 | DOI: 10.1111/his.13162

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is known as causative for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx, but is also not infrequently found in carcinomas of the sinonasal tract. Recently, a subset of these carcinomas was recognized to harbour HPV33 and have a significant morphological overlap with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), a rare and aggressive carcinoma originating in the minor salivary glands. Termed HPV-related carcinoma with ACC-like features, only 9 cases have been reported. To clarify the occurrence of these tumours we screened a large material for presence of HPV-related ACC-like carcinoma. The identified tumours were characterized immunohistochemically and with fluorescence in situ hybridization and clinicopathologic information for all cases is presented.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

Forty-seven candidate cases were screened for presence of HPV. Six cases were identified and genotyped as HPV types 33, 35 and 56. All six cases had areas of dysplastic mucosal lining and showed remarkable heterogeneous morphologies. MYB, MYBL1, and NFIB genes were intact and, interestingly, staining for MYB protein was largely negative in contrast to what was found in ACC. One patient experienced a local recurrence 11 years after initial treatment and the remaining five patients were alive without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION:

We report six new cases of HPV-related ACC-like carcinoma and found that, although in a small material, the prognosis for these patients seems more favourable than for ACC. For the distinction between ACC and HPV-related ACC-like carcinoma, p16, MYB immunohistochemistry, or investigation of MYB, MYBL1, and NFIB gene status are valuable. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Increasing prevalence of human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancers among older adults.

Cancer.

2018 Apr 30

Windon MJ, D'Souza G, Rettig EM, Westra WH, van Zante A, Wang SJ, Ryan WR, Mydlarz WK, Ha PK, Miles BA, Koch W, Gourin C, Eisele DW, Fakhry C.
PMID: 29710393 | DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31385

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasing among older adults. It is unknown whether these trends can be explained by human papillomavirus (HPV) and whether HPV-related tumors remain associated with an improved prognosis among older patients.

METHODS:

In a retrospective study of OPSCCs diagnosed from 1995 to 2013 at 2 National Comprehensive Cancer Network-designated cancer centers, p16 immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization (ISH) for HPV-16, high-risk DNA, and/or E6/E7 RNA were performed. The median age at diagnosis was compared by p16 and ISH tumor status. Trends in age were analyzed with nonparametric trends. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS:

Among 239 patients, 144 (60%) were p16-positive. During 1998-2013, the median age increased among p16-positive patients (Ptrend = .01) but not among p16-negative patients (Ptrend = .71). The median age of p16-positive patients increased from 53 years (interquartile range [IQR] in 1995-2000, 45-65 years) to 58 years (IQR for 2001-2013, 53-64 years). Among patients ≥ 65 years old, the proportion of OPSCCs that were p16-positive increased from 41% during 1995-2000 to 75% during 2007-2013 (Ptrend = .04). Among all age groups, including older patients, a p16-positive tumor status conferred improved overall survival in comparison with a p16-negative status.

CONCLUSIONS:

The median age at diagnosis for HPV-related OPSCC is increasing as the proportion of OPSCCs caused by HPV rises among older adults. The favorable survival conferred by an HPV-positive tumor status persists in older adults. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Exclusive to the Shaft, with a Proposal for a Novel Staging System

Human pathology

2022 Dec 22

Tekin, B;Guo, R;Cheville, JC;Canete-Portillo, S;Sanchez, DF;Fernandez-Nestosa, MJ;Dasari, S;Menon, S;Herrera Hernandez, L;Jimenez, RE;Erickson, LA;Cubilla, AL;Gupta, S;
PMID: 36566905 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.12.012

Penile squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) originating in the shaft are rare. pT1/pT2 categories in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual (8th edition) are poorly defined for SCCs arising in the dorsal shaft as anatomic structures differ between the glans and dorsal shaft (corpus spongiosum vs dartos/Buck's fascia, respectively). We reviewed six penile SCC cases exclusive to the shaft, an unusual presentation, identified amongst 120 patients treated with penectomy. We propose a novel pT staging system for dorsal shaft tumors tailored to its anatomic landmarks, where tumors extending to Buck's fascia are considered pT2 instead of pT1. The mean age at penectomy, average duration of follow-up, and mean depth of invasion were 64 years, 45 months, and 9.8 mm, respectively. Four cases were moderately differentiated, HPV-negative SCCs of the usual type and two cases were HPV-positive basaloid and warty-basaloid carcinomas. Three cases had nodal or distant metastasis at the time of penectomy, and histologic assessment in these cases showed invasion into the Buck's fascia or deeper. According to the current AJCC system, only one of these three cases would be staged as ≥pT2. In contrast, all three metastatic tumors would be staged as ≥pT2 in the proposed model. At last follow-up, one patient died of disease-related complications. Based on this limited series, the proposed staging model appears to suggest better patient stratification for pT1/pT2 stages. This model incorporates Buck's fascia, which has been postulated as a pathway of tumor infiltration. Additional studies are needed to validate this model.
Validation of a novel diagnostic standard in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

British journal of cancer, 108(6):1332–1339.

Schache AG, Liloglou T, Risk JM, Jones TM, Ma XJ, Wang H, Bui S, Luo Y, Sloan P, Shaw RJ, Robinson M (2013).
PMID: 23412100 | DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.63.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is now advocated. Demonstration of transcriptionally active high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) in fresh tumour tissue is considered to be the analytical 'gold standard'. Clinical testing has focused on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue at the expense of sensitivity and specificity. Recently, a novel RNA in situ hybridisation test (RNAscope) has been developed for the detection of HR-HPV in FFPE tissue; however, validation against the 'gold standard' has not been reported. METHODS: A tissue microarray comprising FFPE cores from 79 OPSCC was tested using HR-HPV RNAscope. Analytical accuracy and prognostic capacity were established by comparison with the reference test; qRT-PCR for HR-HPV on matched fresh-frozen samples. RESULTS: High-risk HPV RNAscope had a sensitivity and specificity of 97 and 93%, respectively, against the reference test. Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-specific survival (DSS, P=0.001) and overall survival (OS, P<0.001) by RNAscope were similar to the reference test (DSS, P=0.003, OS, P<0.001) and at least, not inferior to p16 immunohistochemistry +/- HR-HPV DNA-based tests. CONCLUSION: HR-HPV RNAscope demonstrates excellent analytical and prognostic performance against the 'gold standard'. These data suggest that the test could be developed to provide the 'clinical standard' for assigning a diagnosis of HPV-related OPSCC.
Diagnosis of HPV-driven head and neck cancer with a single test in routine clinical practice.

Mod Pathol.

2015 Sep 25

Mirghani H, Casiraghi O, Amen F, He M, Ma XJ, Saulnier P, Lacroix L, Drusch F, Ben Lakdhar A, Saint Guily JL, Badoual C, Scoazec JY, Vielh P.
PMID: 26403782 | DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.113

Abstract

Accurate screening of HPV-driven head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is a critical issue. Although there are commercial direct and indirect assays for HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, none are ideal. Recently, a novel RNA in situ hybridization test (the RNAscope HPV-test) has been developed for the detection of high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. However, validation of this assay against the 'gold standard' (identification of high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA in fresh-frozen tissue by quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR) has only been reported by one team. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from 50 patients with tonsil or tongue base carcinoma were tested using the RNAscope HPV-test, p16 immunohistochemistry, and chromogenic in situ hybridization for high-risk HPV-DNA. The results were compared with those of qRT-PCR on matched fresh-frozen samples. Compared with the reference test, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of the RNAscope HPV-test and of p16 immunohistochemistry were 93%, 94%, 96%, 88% and 96%, 93%, 96%, and 93%, respectively. Five cases were discrepant between the RNAscope HPV-test and p16-immunohistochemisrty. The RNAscope HPV-test demonstrated excellent analytical performance against the 'gold standard' and is easier to interpret than chromogenic in situ hybridization. p16-immunohistochemistry also performed very well, however its main weakness is that it is an indirect marker of the presence of HPV. These data suggest that the RNAscope HPV-test is a promising test that could be developed as a clinical standard for the precise identification of HPV-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

HPV RNA CISH score identifies two prognostic groups in a p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma population

Modern Pathology

2018 Jun 20

Augustin J, Mandavit M, Outh-Gauer S, Grard O, Gasne C, Lépine C, Mirghani H, Hans S, Bonfils P, Denize T, Bruneval P, Bishop JA, Fontugne J, Péré H, Tartour E, Badoual C.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0090-y

HPV-related and HPV-unrelated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are two distinct entities according to the Union for International Cancer Control, with a better prognosis conferred to HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. However, variable clinical outcomes are observed among patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, which is a surrogate marker of HPV infection. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of RNA CISH against E6 and E7 transcripts (HPV RNA CISH) to predict such variability. We retrospectively included 50 histologically confirmed p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (p16 positive immunostaining was defined by a strong staining in 70% or more of tumor cells). HPV RNA CISH staining was assessed semi-quantitatively to define two scores: RNA CISH “low” and RNA CISH “high”. Negative HPV RNA CISH cases were scored as RNA CISH “low”. This series contained 29 RNA CISH low cases (58%) and 21 RNA CISH high cases (42%). Clinical and pathologic baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. RNA CISH high staining was associated with a better overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.033 and p = 0.042, respectively). Other recorded parameters had no prognostic value. In conclusion, HPV RNA CISH might be an independent prognostic marker in p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas and might help guide therapeutics.

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • next ›
  • last »
X
Description
sense
Example: Hs-LAG3-sense
Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe.
Intron#
Example: Mm-Htt-intron2
Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection
Pool/Pan
Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G)
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts
No-XSp
Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm
Does not cross detect with the species (Sp)
XSp
Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm
designed to cross detect with the species (Sp)
O#
Example: Mm-Islr-O1
Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms
CDS
Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS
Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only
EnEmProbe targets exons n and m
En-EmProbe targets region from exon n to exon m
Retired Nomenclature
tvn
Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1
Designed to target transcript variant n
ORF
Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF
Probe targets open reading frame
UTR
Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3
Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only
5UTR
Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR
Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only
3UTR
Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR
Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only
Pan
Example: Pool
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts

Enabling research, drug development (CDx) and diagnostics

Contact Us
  • Toll-free in the US and Canada
  • +1877 576-3636
  • 
  • 
  • 
Company
  • Overview
  • Leadership
  • Careers
  • Distributors
  • Quality
  • News & Events
  • Webinars
  • Patents
Products
  • RNAscope or BaseScope
  • Target Probes
  • Controls
  • Manual assays
  • Automated Assays
  • Accessories
  • Software
  • How to Order
Research
  • Popular Applications
  • Cancer
  • Viral
  • Pathways
  • Neuroscience
  • Other Applications
  • RNA & Protein
  • Customer Innovations
  • Animal Models
Technology
  • Overview
  • RNA Detection
  • Spotlight Interviews
  • Publications & Guides
Assay Services
  • Our Services
  • Biomarker Assay Development
  • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
  • Clinical Assay Development
  • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
  • Image Analysis
  • Your Benefits
  • How to Order
Diagnostics
  • Diagnostics
  • Companion Diagnostics
Support
  • Getting started
  • Contact Support
  • Troubleshooting Guide
  • FAQs
  • Manuals, SDS & Inserts
  • Downloads
  • Webinars
  • Training Videos

Visit Bio-Techne and its other brands

  • bio-technie
  • protein
  • bio-spacific
  • rd
  • novus
  • tocris
© 2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.
  • Terms and Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • Email Preferences
  • 
  • 
  • 

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic use. Refer to appropriate regulations. RNAscope is a registered trademark; and HybEZ, EZ-Batch and DNAscope are trademarks of Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. ©2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.

 

Contact Us / Request a Quote
Download Manuals
Request a PAS Project Consultation
Order online at
bio-techne.com
OK
X
Contact Us

Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.

For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below

  • Contact Sales
  • Contact Support
  • Contact Services
  • Offices

Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:

7707 Gateway Blvd.  
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798

 

Bio-Techne

19 Barton Lane  
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420

 

Advanced Cell Diagnostics China

20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051

021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn

For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com

See Distributors
×

You have already Quick ordered an Item in your cart . If you want to add a new item , Quick ordered Item will be removed form your cart. Do You want to continue?

OK Cancel
Need help?

How can we help you?