ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
PLoS One.
2016 Aug 04
Damasceno KA, Ferreira E, Estrela-Lima A, Gamba Cde O, Miranda FF, Alves MR, Rocha RM, de Barros AL, Cassali GD.
PMID: 27490467 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160419
Versican expression promotes tumor growth by destabilizing focal cell contacts, thus impeding cell adhesion and facilitating cell migration. It not only presents or recruits molecules to the cell surface, but also modulates gene expression levels and coordinates complex signal pathways. Previously, we suggested that the interaction between versican and human epidermal growth factor receptors may be directly associated with tumor aggressiveness. Thus, the expression of EGFR and HER-2 in these neoplasms may contribute to a better understanding of the progression mechanisms in malignant mammary tumors. The purpose of this study was to correlate the gene and protein expressions of EGFR and HER2 by RNA In Situ Hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively, and their relationship with the versican expression in carcinomas in mixed tumors and carcinosarcomas of the canine mammary gland. The results revealed that EGFR mRNA expression showed a significant difference between in situ and invasive carcinomatous areas in low and high versican expression groups. Identical results were observed in HER-2 mRNA expression. In immunohistochemistry analysis, neoplasms with low versican expression showed greater EGFR immunostaining in the in situ areas than in invasive areas, even as the group presenting high versican expression displayed greater EGFR and HER-2 staining in in situ areas. Significant EGFR and HER-2 mRNA and protein expressions in in situ carcinomatous sites relative to invasive areas suggest that these molecules play a role during the early stages of tumor progression.
Cancer Immunology Research
2018 Mar 27
Wing A, Fajardo CA, Posey AD, Shaw C, Da T, Young R, Alemany R, June CH, Guedan S.
PMID: 29588319 | DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0314
T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CART) have shown significant promise in clinical trials to treat hematologic malignancies, but their efficacy in solid tumors has been limited. Oncolytic viruses have the potential to act in synergy with immunotherapies due to their immunogenic oncolytic properties and the opportunity of incorporating therapeutic transgenes in their genomes. Here, we hypothesized that an oncolytic adenovirus armed with an EGFR-targeting, bispecific T-cell engager (OAd-BiTE) would improve the outcome of CART-cell therapy in solid tumors. We report that CART cells targeting the folate receptor alpha (FR-α) successfully infiltrated preestablished xenograft tumors but failed to induce complete responses, presumably due to the presence of antigen-negative cancer cells. We demonstrated that OAd-BiTE-mediated oncolysis significantly improved CART-cell activation and proliferation, while increasing cytokine production and cytotoxicity, and showed an in vitro favorable safety profile compared with EGFR-targeting CARTs. BiTEs secreted from infected cells redirected CART cells toward EGFR in the absence of FR-α, thereby addressing tumor heterogeneity. BiTE secretion also redirected CAR-negative, nonspecific T cells found in CART-cell preparations toward tumor cells. The combinatorial approach improved antitumor efficacy and prolonged survival in mouse models of cancer when compared with the monotherapies, and this was the result of an increased BiTE-mediated T-cell activation in tumors. Overall, these results demonstrated that the combination of a BiTE-expressing oncolytic virus with adoptive CART-cell therapy overcomes key limitations of CART cells and BiTEs as monotherapies in solid tumors and encourage its further evaluation in human trials.
Cancers
2022 Dec 26
Nikitin, P;Musina, G;Pekov, S;Kuzin, A;Popov, I;Belyaev, A;Kobyakov, G;Usachev, D;Nikolaev, V;Mikhailov, V;
| DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010145
Eur J Cancer.
2016 Jul 28
Wartenberg M, Centeno I, Haemmig S, Vassella E, Zlobec I, Galván JA, Neuenschwander M, Schlup C, Gloor B, Lugli A, Perren A, Karamitopoulou E.
PMID: 27475963 | DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.013
Human Pathology
2017 May 10
Ronen S, Abbott DW, Kravtsov O, Abdelkader A, Xub Y, Banerjee A, Iczkowski KA.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.024
The presence and extent of cribriform pattern of prostate cancer portend recurrence and cancer death. Therelative expressions within this morphology of the prognostically adverse loss of PTEN, and the downstream inactivation of cell cycle inhibitor p27/Kip1 had been uncertain. In this study, we examined 52 cases of cribriform cancer by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PTEN, p27, and CD44 variant (v)7/8, and a subset of 17 casesby chromogenic in situ hybridization (ISH) using probe for PTEN or CDKN1B (gene for p27). The fractions of epithelial pixels positive by IHC and ISH were digitally assessed for benign acini, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and 8 morphological patterns of cancer. Immunostaining results demonstrated that: 1. PTEN loss was significant for fused small acini, cribriform-central cells, small cribriform acini, and Gleason grade 5 cells in comparison with other acini. 2. p27 loss was significant only for cribriform-peripheral cells; and borderline-significant for fused small acini in comparison with benign acini. 3. CD44v7/8 showed expression loss in cribriform-peripheral cells; other comparisons were not significant. ISH showed thatcribriform cancer had significant PTEN loss normalized to benign acini (P < .02), while Gleason 3 cancer or fused small acini did not. With CDKN1B, the degree of signal loss among various cancer morphologies was insignificant. In conclusion, molecular disparities emerged between the fused small acini and cribriform patterns of Gleason 4 cancer. PTEN or p27 loss as prognostic factors demand distinct assessment in the varieties of Gleason 4 cancer, and in the biphenotypic peripheral versus central populations in cribriform structures.
Oncotarget.
2016 Apr 20
Deevi RK, McClements J, McCloskey KD, Fatehullah A, Tkocz D, Javadi A, Higginson R, Marsh Durban V, Jansen M, Clarke A, Loughrey MB, Campbell FC.
PMID: 27119498 | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8863
Development of cribriform morphology (CM) heralds malignant change in human colon but lack of mechanistic understanding hampers preventive therapy. This study investigated CM pathobiology in three-dimensional (3D) Caco-2 culture models of colorectal glandular architecture, assessed translational relevance and tested effects of 1,25(OH)2D3,theactive form of vitamin D. CM evolution was driven by oncogenic perturbation of the apical polarity (AP) complex comprising PTEN, CDC42 and PRKCZ (phosphatase and tensin homolog, cell division cycle 42 and protein kinase C zeta). Suppression of AP genes initiated a spatiotemporal cascade of mitotic spindle misorientation, apical membrane misalignment and aberrant epithelial configuration. Collectively, these events promoted "Swiss cheese-like" cribriform morphology (CM) comprising multiple abnormal "back to back" lumens surrounded by atypical stratified epithelium, in 3D colorectal gland models. Intestinal cancer driven purely by PTEN-deficiency in transgenic mice developed CM and in human CRC, CM associated with PTEN and PRKCZ readouts. Treatment of PTEN-deficient 3D cultures with 1,25(OH)2D3 upregulated PTEN, rapidly activated CDC42 and PRKCZ, corrected mitotic spindle alignment and suppressed CM development. Conversely, mutationally-activated KRAS blocked1,25(OH)2D3 rescue of glandular architecture. We conclude that 1,25(OH)2D3 upregulates AP signalling to reverse CM in a KRAS wild type (wt), clinically predictive CRC model system. Vitamin D could be developed as therapy to suppress inception or progression of a subset of colorectal tumors.
Genes Dev. 2014 Dec 29.
Li N, Zhang Y, Han X, Liang K, Wang J, Feng L, Wang W, Songyang Z, Lin C, Yang L, Yu Y, Chen J.
PMID: 25547115
Human Pathology.
2015 Sep 23
Bingham B, Ong CW, James J, Maxwell P, Waugh D, Salto-Tellez M, McQuaid S.
PMID: - | DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2015.09.009
Immunohistochemical staining for Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) does not have either an acceptable standard protocol or concordance of scoring between pathologists. Evaluation of PTEN mRNA with a unique and verified sequence probe may offer a realistic alternative providing a robust and reproducible protocol. In this study we have evaluated an in situ hybridization (ISH) protocol for PTEN mRNA using RNAScope technology and compared it with a standard protocol for PTEN immunohistochemistry (IHC). PTEN mRNA expression by ISH was consistently more sensitive than PTEN IHC with 56% of samples on a mixed tumour tissue microarray (TMA) showing high expressionby ISH compared to 42% by IHC. On a prostate TMA 49% of cases showed high expression by ISH compared to 43% by IHC. Variations in PTEN mRNA expression within malignant epithelium were quantifiable using image analysis on the prostate TMAs. Within tumours clear over expression of PTEN mRNA on malignant epithelium compared to benign epithelium was frequently observed and quantified. The use of Spot Studio software in the mixed tumour TMA allowed for clear demonstration of varying levels of PTEN mRNA between tumour samples by the mRNA methodology. This was evident by the quantifiable differences between distinct oropharyngeal tumours (upto 3 fold increase in average number of spots per cell between 2 cases). mRNA detection of PTEN or other biomarkers, for which optimal or standardized immunohistochemical techniques are not available, represents a means by which heterogeneity of expression within focal regions of tumour can be explored with more confidence.
Molecular and Cellular Biology/Genetics
2021 Jul 01
Wang, L;Tondnevis, F;Todorov, C;Gaspar, J;Sahajan, A;Murlidhar, V;Zhang, B;Ma, X;
| DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-lb190
Science translational medicine
2021 Sep 01
Eser, PÖ;Paranal, RM;Son, J;Ivanova, E;Kuang, Y;Haikala, HM;To, C;Okoro, JJ;Dholakia, KH;Choi, J;Eum, Y;Ogino, A;Missios, P;Ercan, D;Xu, M;Poitras, MJ;Wang, S;Ngo, K;Dills, M;Yanagita, M;Lopez, T;Lin, M;Tsai, J;Floch, N;Chambers, ES;Heng, J;Anjum, R;Santucci, AD;Michael, K;Schuller, AG;Cross, D;Smith, PD;Oxnard, GR;Barbie, DA;Sholl, LM;Bahcall, M;Palakurthi, S;Gokhale, PC;Paweletz, CP;Daley, GQ;Jänne, PA;
PMID: 34516823 | DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb3738
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com