ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Elife
2020 Feb 11
Wallace ML, Huang KW, Hochbaum D, Hyun M, Radeljic G, Sabatini BL
PMID: 32043968 | DOI: 10.7554/eLife.51271
Cell reports methods
2022 Dec 19
Conforti, P;Bocchi, VD;Campus, I;Scaramuzza, L;Galimberti, M;Lischetti, T;Talpo, F;Pedrazzoli, M;Murgia, A;Ferrari, I;Cordiglieri, C;Fasciani, A;Arenas, E;Felsenfeld, D;Biella, G;Besusso, D;Cattaneo, E;
PMID: 36590694 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100367
Nature neuroscience
2022 Aug 18
Maza, N;Wang, D;Kowalski, C;Stoveken, HM;Dao, M;Sial, OK;Giles, AC;Grill, B;Martemyanov, KA;
PMID: 35982154 | DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01135-0
eNeuro
2018 Jan 24
McCullough KM, Morrison FG, Hartmann J, Carlezon WA, Ressler KJ.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0010-18.2018
Molecular identification and characterization of fear controlling circuitries is a promising path towards developing targeted treatments of fear-related disorders. Three-color in situ hybridization analysis was used to determine whether somatostatin (Sst), neurotensin (Nts), corticotropin releasing factor (Crf), tachykinin 2 (Tac2), protein kinase c delta (Prkcd), and dopamine receptor 2 (Drd2) mRNA co-localize in male mouse amygdala neurons. Expression and co-localization was examined across capsular (CeC), lateral (CeL), and medial (CeM) compartments of the central amygdala. The greatest expression of Prkcd and Drd2 were found in CeC and CeL. Crf was expressed primarily in CeL while Sst, Nts, and Tac2 expressing neurons were distributed between CeL and CeM. High levels of co-localization were identified between Sst, Nts, Crf, and Tac2 within the CeL while little co-localization was detected between any mRNAs within the CeM. These findings provide a more detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate the development and maintenance of fear and anxiety behaviors.
Significance Statement Functional and behavioral analysis of central amygdala microcircuits has yielded significant insights into the role of this nucleus in fear and anxiety related behaviors. However, precise molecular and locational description of examined populations is lacking. This publication provides a quantified regionally precise description of the expression and co-expression of six frequently examined central amygdala population markers. Most revealing, within the most commonly examined region, the posterior CeL, four of these markers are extensively co-expressed suggesting the potential for experimental redundancy. This data clarifies circuit interaction and function and will increase relevance and precision of future cell-type specific reports.
Science Translational Medicine
2022 Jun 07
Frere, J;Serafini, R;Pryce, K;Zazhytska, M;Oishi, K;Golynker, I;Panis, M;Zimering, J;Horiuchi, S;Hoagland, D;Møller, R;Ruiz, A;Kodra, A;Overdevest, J;Canoll, P;Borczuk, A;Chandar, V;Bram, Y;Schwartz, R;Lomvardas, S;Zachariou, V;tenOever, B;
| DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abq3059
Cell reports
2022 Mar 01
Jeon, H;Lee, H;Kwon, DH;Kim, J;Tanaka-Yamamoto, K;Yook, JS;Feng, L;Park, HR;Lim, YH;Cho, ZH;Paek, SH;Kim, J;
PMID: 35235786 | DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110439
Neuron.
2017 Jan 04
Tejeda HA, Wu J, Kornspun AR, Pignatelli M, Kashtelyan V, Krashes MJ, Lowell BB, Carlezon WA Jr, Bonci A.
PMID: 28056342 | DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.005
Endogenous dynorphin signaling via the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) powerfully mediates negative affective states and stress reactivity. Excitatory inputs from the hippocampus and amygdala play a fundamental role in shaping the activity of both NAcc D1 and D2 MSNs, which encode positive and negative motivational valences, respectively. However, a circuit-based mechanism by which KOR modulation of excitation-inhibition balance modifies D1 and D2 MSN activity is lacking. Here, we provide a comprehensive synaptic framework wherein presynaptic KOR inhibition decreases the excitatory drive of D1 MSN activity by the amygdala, but not the hippocampus. Conversely, presynaptic inhibition by KORs of inhibitory synapses on D2 MSNs enhances integration of excitatory drive by the amygdala and hippocampus. In conclusion, we describe a circuit-based mechanism showing differential gating of afferent control of D1 and D2 MSN activity by KORs in a pathway-specific manner.
Transl Psychiatry
2018 Aug 22
McCullough KM, Daskalakis NP, Gafford G, Morrison FG, Ressler KJ.
PMID: 30135420 | DOI: 10.1038/s41398-018-0190-y
Behavioral and molecular characterization of cell-type-specific populations governing fear learning and behavior is a promising avenue for the rational identification of potential therapeutics for fear-related disorders. Examining cell-type-specific changes in neuronal translation following fear learning allows for targeted pharmacological intervention during fear extinction learning, mirroring possible treatment strategies in humans. Here we identify the central amygdala (CeA) Drd2-expressing population as a novel fear-supporting neuronal population that is molecularly distinct from other, previously identified, fear-supporting CeA populations. Sequencing of actively translating transcripts of Drd2 neurons using translating ribosome affinity purification (TRAP) technology identifies mRNAs that are differentially regulated following fear learning. Differentially expressed transcripts with potentially targetable gene products include Npy5r, Rxrg, Adora2a, Sst5r, Fgf3, Erbb4, Fkbp14, Dlk1, and Ssh3. Direct pharmacological manipulation of NPY5R, RXR, and ADORA2A confirms the importance of this cellpopulation and these cell-type-specific receptors in fear behavior. Furthermore, these findings validate the use of functionally identified specific cell populations to predict novel pharmacological targets for the modulation of emotional learning.
The Journal of experimental medicine
2022 Sep 05
Kaiser, FMP;Gruenbacher, S;Oyaga, MR;Nio, E;Jaritz, M;Sun, Q;van der Zwaag, W;Kreidl, E;Zopf, LM;Dalm, VASH;Pel, J;Gaiser, C;van der Vliet, R;Wahl, L;Rietman, A;Hill, L;Leca, I;Driessen, G;Laffeber, C;Brooks, A;Katsikis, PD;Lebbink, JHG;Tachibana, K;van der Burg, M;De Zeeuw, CI;Badura, A;Busslinger, M;
PMID: 35947077 | DOI: 10.1084/jem.20220498
Cell research
2021 Nov 30
Liu, Z;Le, Q;Lv, Y;Chen, X;Cui, J;Zhou, Y;Cheng, D;Ma, C;Su, X;Xiao, L;Yang, R;Zhang, J;Ma, L;Liu, X;
PMID: 34848869 | DOI: 10.1038/s41422-021-00588-5
Neuron
2021 May 21
Pribiag, H;Shin, S;Wang, EH;Sun, F;Datta, P;Okamoto, A;Guss, H;Jain, A;Wang, XY;De Freitas, B;Honma, P;Pate, S;Lilascharoen, V;Li, Y;Lim, BK;
PMID: 34048697 | DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.002
Cell Rep.
2018 Jan 09
Chevée M, Robertson JJ, Cannon GH, Brown SP, Goff LA.
PMID: 29320739 | DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.046
Single-cell RNA sequencing has generated catalogs of transcriptionally defined neuronal subtypes of the brain. However, the cellular processes that contribute to neuronal subtype specification and transcriptional heterogeneity remain unclear. By comparing the gene expression profiles of single layer 6 corticothalamic neurons in somatosensory cortex, we show that transcriptional subtypes primarily reflect axonal projection pattern, laminar position within the cortex, and neuronal activity state. Pseudotemporal ordering of 1,023 cellular responses to sensory manipulation demonstrates that changes in expression of activity-induced genes both reinforced cell-type identity and contributed to increased transcriptional heterogeneity within each cell type. This is due to cell-type biased choices of transcriptional states following manipulation of neuronal activity. These results reveal that axonal projection pattern, laminar position, and activity state define significant axes of variation that contribute both to the transcriptional identity of individual neurons and to the transcriptional heterogeneity within each neuronal subtype.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com