Contact Us / Request a Quote Download Manuals
Advanced Cell Diagnostics Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Search form

Please sign in
  • Log In
  • Register
  • How to Order
  • What to Buy
0 My Cart
X

You have no items in your shopping cart.

Menu
X
  • Products +
    RNAscope™/BaseScope™/ miRNAscope™
    +
    • Assay Selection Guide
    Target Probes
    +
    • All About Probes
    • Catalog Probes
    • Probe Sets
    • New Probe Request
    Manual Assays
    +
    RNAscope™ Chromogenic
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Duplex Assay
    RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex v2 Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent V2
    BaseScope™
    • Overview
    • BaseScope™ Assay Red
    • BaseScope™ Duplex Assay
    miRNAscope™
    • Overview
    • miRNAscope™ Assay red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA Assay
    DNAscope™
    • Overview
    • DNAscope™ Duplex Assay
    Automated Assays
    +
    For Lunaphore COMET™
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex Pro for COMET™
    For Leica systems
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Duplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiomic LS Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Fluorescent Multiplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-BROWN
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-RED
    • BaseScope™ LS Reagent Kit – RED
    • miRNAscope LS Reagent Kit Red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA LS Assay
    Roche DISCOVERY ULTRA system
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal HRP
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal AP
    • RNAscope™ VS Duplex Assay
    • BaseScope™ VS Reagent Kit – RED
    RNA-Protein Co-Detection Assay
    +
    • RNAscope HiPlex-IMC™ Co-Detection
    • Integrated Codetection Assay
    • Sequential RNA Protein Detection
    Software
    +
    • Overview
    • Aperio RNA ISH Algorithm
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Controls & Accessories
    +
    • RNAscope™
    • BaseScope™
    • miRNAscope™
    • Accessories
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Instructions
    • What to Buy
  • Services +
    Professional Assay Services
    +
    • Our Services
    • Multiomic Services
    • Biomarker Assay Development
    • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
    • Clinical Assay Development
    • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
    • Image Analysis
    Benefits
    +
    • Your Benefits
    • Certified Providers
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Process
    • Contact Services
  • Areas of Research +
    Most Popular
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Whole-Mount
    • Anatomic Pathology Panels
    • Neuroscience
    • Inflammation
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • Stem Cell
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Liver Research
    • Cardiovascular & Skeletal Muscle Research
    Cell & Gene Therapy
    +
    • Gene Therapy
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • siRNA/ASO
    • Cell Therapy
    Cancer
    +
    • Breast Cancer
    • EGFRvIII Splice Variant
    • HPV Related Cancer
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Lung Cancer
    • PDx
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Point Mutation
    • CDR3 for TCR
    Viral
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • HIV & SIV
    • Infectious Disease
    • Zika Virus
    Pathways
    +
    • AKT
    • JAK STAT
    • WNT B-Catenin
    Neuroscience
    +
    Neuroscience
    • Neural Development
    • Neuronal Cell Types
    • Learning and Memory
    • G-protein-coupled Receptors & Ion Channels
    • Post-mortem Brain Tissue
    Other
    +
    • Circular RNA
    • Gene Fusions
    • HT Transcript Validation
    • Long Non-coding RNA
    • RNAseq Validation
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Splice Variant
    • miRNA
    RNA & Protein
    +
    • Antibody Challenges
    • Dual ISH + IHC Methods
    • No Antibodies
    • RNA & Protein Analysis
    Customer Innovations
    +
    • Dual RNA+DNA ISH
    • Very old FFPE ISH
    • Wholemount ISH
    Animal Models
    +
    • Any Species
    • Mouse Model
    • Preclincal Safety
  • Technology +
    Overview
    +
    • How it Works
    • Data Image Gallery
    • Technology Video
    • Webinars
    RNA Detection
    +
    • Why RNA?
    • RNA ISH and IHC
    Pretreatment Options
    +
    • RNAscope™ Pretreatment
    • PretreatPro™
    Spotlights
    +
    • Researchers Spotlights
    • RNA & DNA
    • WISH
    • FFPE
    • Testimonials
    Publications, Guides & Posters
    +
    • Search publications
    • RNAscope™ Reference Guide
    • RNAscope™ Data Analysis Guide
    • Download RNAscope™ Posters
  • Support +
    Overview
    +
    • Get Started
    • How to Order
    • Distributors
    • Contact Support
    Troubleshooting
    +
    • Troubleshooting Guide
    • FAQs
    • User Manuals, SDS and Product Inserts
    • Documents and Downloads
    Imaging Resource
    +
    • Image Analysis
    • Image Registration Software
    • QuPath
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Learn More
    +
    • Webinars
    • Training Videos
  • Partners +
    Partners
    +
    • Overview
    Partners Directory
    +
    Automation Partners
    • Leica Biosystem
    • Roche Diagnostics
    Workflow Partners
    • NanoString
    Software Partners
    • indica labs
    Become a Partner
    +
    • Learn How
  • Diagnostics +
    Diagnostics
    +
    • Diagnostics
    • Literature
    • Diagnostics ASR Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Detection
    • Companion Diagnostics
  • Image Calendar +
    Image Calendar
    +
    • Image Contest
    • Data Image Gallery
Search

Probes for INS

ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.

  • Probes for INS (0)
  • Kits & Accessories (0)
  • Support & Documents (0)
  • Publications (9)
  • Image gallery (0)
Refine Probe List

Content for comparison

Gene

  • TBD (108) Apply TBD filter
  • HPV E6/E7 (75) Apply HPV E6/E7 filter
  • Lgr5 (61) Apply Lgr5 filter
  • PD-L1 (25) Apply PD-L1 filter
  • HPV-HR18 (20) Apply HPV-HR18 filter
  • Axin2 (19) Apply Axin2 filter
  • HPV (19) Apply HPV filter
  • GLI1 (15) Apply GLI1 filter
  • HER2 (15) Apply HER2 filter
  • FGFR1 (13) Apply FGFR1 filter
  • MALAT1 (12) Apply MALAT1 filter
  • CD68 (11) Apply CD68 filter
  • Ifng (10) Apply Ifng filter
  • MYC (10) Apply MYC filter
  • CXCL10 (9) Apply CXCL10 filter
  • OLFM4 (9) Apply OLFM4 filter
  • AR-V7 (8) Apply AR-V7 filter
  • EBER1 (8) Apply EBER1 filter
  • CD274 (7) Apply CD274 filter
  • ETV1 (7) Apply ETV1 filter
  • GREM1 (7) Apply GREM1 filter
  • HOTAIR (7) Apply HOTAIR filter
  • OLFM4 (7) Apply OLFM4 filter
  • TERT (7) Apply TERT filter
  • HPV HR18 (7) Apply HPV HR18 filter
  • AR (6) Apply AR filter
  • BRCA1 (6) Apply BRCA1 filter
  • CD3E (6) Apply CD3E filter
  • CD4 (6) Apply CD4 filter
  • MET (6) Apply MET filter
  • CSF1 (6) Apply CSF1 filter
  • Ccl2 (6) Apply Ccl2 filter
  • Ptch1 (6) Apply Ptch1 filter
  • FGFR2 (6) Apply FGFR2 filter
  • Vegfa (6) Apply Vegfa filter
  • PDGFRA (6) Apply PDGFRA filter
  • CXCL12 (6) Apply CXCL12 filter
  • HPV18 (6) Apply HPV18 filter
  • Il-6 (6) Apply Il-6 filter
  • CD3 (6) Apply CD3 filter
  • SOX2 (5) Apply SOX2 filter
  • EGFR (5) Apply EGFR filter
  • (-) Remove ESR1 filter ESR1 (5)
  • DUSP6 (5) Apply DUSP6 filter
  • MDM2 (5) Apply MDM2 filter
  • MKI67 (5) Apply MKI67 filter
  • NOTUM (5) Apply NOTUM filter
  • PTEN (5) Apply PTEN filter
  • Cxcl1 (5) Apply Cxcl1 filter
  • HPV16 (5) Apply HPV16 filter

Product

  • RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay (2) Apply RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay filter
  • RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay (2) Apply RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay filter
  • RNAscope (1) Apply RNAscope filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Brown Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 LS Assay (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 LS Assay filter
  • RNAscope HiPlex v2 assay (1) Apply RNAscope HiPlex v2 assay filter

Research area

  • (-) Remove Cancer filter Cancer (9)
  • therapeutics (1) Apply therapeutics filter

Category

  • Publications (9) Apply Publications filter
Lymph/angiogenesis contribute to sex differences in lung cancer through ERalpha signalling.

Endocr Relat Cancer.

2018 Nov 01

Dubois C, Rocks N, Blacher S, Primac I, Gallez A, García-Caballero M, Gérard C, Brouchet L, Noel A, Lenfant F, Cataldo D, Péqueux C.
PMID: 30444717 | DOI: 10.1530/ERC-18-0328

Estrogen signalling pathways are emerging targets for lung cancer therapy. Unravelling the contribution of estrogens in lung cancer development is a pre-requisite to support the development of sex-based treatments and to identify patients who could potentially benefit from anti-estrogen treatments. In this study, we highlight the contribution of lymphatic and blood endothelia in the sex-dependent modulation of lung cancer. The orthotopic graft of syngeneic lung cancer cells into immunocompetent mice showed that lung tumours grew faster in female mice than in males. Moreover, estradiol (E2) promoted tumour development in female mice and increased lymph/angiogenesis and levels of VEGFA and bFGF in lung tumours of females through an estrogen receptor (ER) alpha-dependent pathway. Furthermore, while treatment with ERbeta antagonist was inefficient, ERalpha antagonist (MPP) and tamoxifen decreased lung tumour volumes, altered blood and lymphatic vasculature and reduced VEGFA and bFGF levels in females, but not in males. Finally, the quantification of lymphatic and blood vasculature of lung adenocarcinoma biopsies from patients aged between 35 to 55 years old revealed more extensive lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in tumour samples issued from women than from men. In conclusion, our findings highlight an E2/ERalpha-dependent modulation of lymphatic and blood vascular components of lung tumour microenvironment. Our study has potential clinical implication in a personalised medicine perspective by pointing to the importance of estrogen status or supplementation on lung cancer development that should be considered to adapt therapeutic strategies.

CXCL13-producing CD4+ T cells accumulate in early phase of tertiary lymphoid structures in ovarian cancer

JCI insight

2022 May 12

Ukita, M;Hamanishi, J;Yoshitomi, H;Yamanoi, K;Takamatsu, S;Ueda, A;Suzuki, H;Hosoe, Y;Furutake, Y;Taki, M;Abiko, K;Yamaguchi, K;Nakai, H;Baba, T;Matsumura, N;Yoshizawa, A;Ueno, H;Mandai, M;
PMID: 35552285 | DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.157215

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are transient ectopic lymphoid aggregates whose formation might be caused by chronic inflammation states, such as cancer. However, how TLSs are induced in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and how they affect patient survival are not well understood. We investigated TLS distribution in relation to tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and related gene expression in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) specimens. CXCL13 gene expression correlated with TLS presence and the infiltration of T cells and B cells, and was a favorable prognostic factor for HGSC patients. Coexistence of CD8+ T cells and B-cell lineages in the TME significantly improved the prognosis of HGSC and was correlated with the presence of TLSs. CXCL13 expression was predominantly coincident with CD4+ T cells in TLSs and CD8+ T cells in TILs, and shifted from CD4+ T cells to CD21+ follicular dendritic cells as TLS matured. In a mouse ovarian cancer model, recombinant CXCL13 induced TLSs and enhanced survival by the infiltration of CD8+ T cells. These results suggest that TLS formation was associated with CXCL13-producing CD4+ T cells and that TLSs facilitated the coordinated antitumor response of cellular and humoral immunity in ovarian cancer.
Pancreatic Cancer Chemotherapy Is Potentiated by Induction of Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Mice

Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology

2021 Jul 09

Delvecchio, FR;Fincham, REA;Spear, S;Clear, A;Roy-Luzarraga, M;Balkwill, FR;Gribben, JG;Bombardieri, M;Hodivala-Dilke, K;Capasso, M;Kocher, HM;
PMID: 34252585 | DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.06.023

The presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) may confer survival benefit to patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), in an otherwise immunologically inert malignancy. Yet, the precise role in PDAC has not been elucidated. Here, we aim to investigate the structure and role of TLSs in human and murine pancreatic cancer.Multicolor immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry were used to fully characterize TLSs in human and murine (transgenic [KPC (KrasG12D, p53R172H, Pdx-1-Cre)] and orthotopic) pancreatic cancer. An orthotopic murine model was developed to study the development of TLSs and the effect of the combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy on tumor growth.Mature, functional TLSs are not ubiquitous in human PDAC and KPC murine cancers and are absent in the orthotopic murine model. TLS formation can be induced in the orthotopic model of PDAC after intratumoral injection of lymphoid chemokines (CXCL13/CCL21). Coadministration of systemic chemotherapy (gemcitabine) and intratumoral lymphoid chemokines into orthotopic tumors altered immune cell infiltration ,facilitating TLS induction and potentiating antitumor activity of chemotherapy. This resulted in significant tumor reduction, an effect not achieved by either treatment alone. Antitumor activity seen after TLS induction is associated with B cell-mediated dendritic cell activation.This study provides supportive evidence that TLS induction may potentiate the antitumor activity of chemotherapy in a murine model of PDAC. A detailed understanding of TLS kinetics and their induction, owing to multiple host and tumor factors, may help design personalized therapies harnessing the potential of immune-oncology.
Multiplexed imaging mass cytometry of the chemokine milieus in melanoma characterizes features of the response to immunotherapy

Science immunology

2022 Apr 01

Hoch, T;Schulz, D;Eling, N;Gómez, JM;Levesque, MP;Bodenmiller, B;
PMID: 35363540 | DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abk1692

Intratumoral immune cells are crucial for tumor control and antitumor responses during immunotherapy. Immune cell trafficking into tumors is mediated by binding of specific immune cell receptors to chemokines, a class of secreted chemotactic cytokines. To broadly characterize chemokine expression and function in melanoma, we used multiplexed mass cytometry-based imaging of protein markers and RNA transcripts to analyze the chemokine landscape and immune infiltration in metastatic melanoma samples. Tumors that lacked immune infiltration were devoid of most of the profiled chemokines and exhibited low levels of antigen presentation and markers of inflammation. Infiltrated tumors were characterized by expression of multiple chemokines. CXCL9 and CXCL10 were often localized in patches associated with dysfunctional T cells expressing the B lymphocyte chemoattractant CXCL13. In tumors with B cells but no B cell follicles, T cells were the sole source of CXCL13, suggesting that T cells play a role in B cell recruitment and potentially in B cell follicle formation. B cell patches and follicles were also enriched with TCF7+ naïve-like T cells, a cell type that is predictive of response to immune checkpoint blockade. Our data highlight the strength of targeted RNA and protein codetection to analyze tumor immune microenvironments based on chemokine expression and suggest that the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures may be accompanied by naïve and naïve-like T cell recruitment, which may contribute to antitumor activity.
Quantitative in situ measurement of estrogen receptor mRNA predicts response to tamoxifen.

PLoS One, 7(5):e36559.

Bordeaux JM, Cheng H, Welsh AW, Haffty BG, Lannin DR, Wu X, Su N, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Rimm DL. (2012).
PMID: 22606272 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036559.

PURPOSE: Quantification of mRNA has historically been done by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Recently, a robust method of detection of mRNA utilizing in situ hybridization has been described that is linear and shows high specificity with low background. Here we describe the use of the AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) for measuring mRNA in situ using ESR1 (the estrogen receptor alpha gene) in breast cancer to determine its predictive value compared to Estrogen Receptor α (ER) protein. METHODS: Messenger RNA for ER (ESR1) and Ubiquitin C (UbC) were visualized using RNAscope probes and levels were quantified by quantitative in situ hybridization (qISH) on two Yale breast cancer cohorts on tissue microarrays. ESR1 levels were compared to ER protein levels measured by QIF using the SP1 antibody. RESULTS: ESR1 mRNA is reproducibly and specifically measurable by qISH on tissue collected from 1993 or later. ESR1 levels were correlated to ER protein levels in a non-linear manner on two Yale cohorts. High levels of ESR1 were found to be predictive of response to tamoxifin. CONCLUSION: Quantification of mRNA using qISH may allow assessment of large cohorts with minimal formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue. Exploratory data using this method suggests that measurement of ESR1 mRNA levels may be predictive of response to endocrine therapy in a manner that is different from the predictive value of ER.
Pin1 modulates ERα levels in breast cancer through inhibition of phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination and degradation.

Oncogene. 2014 Mar 13;33(11):1438-47.

Rajbhandari P, Schalper KA, Solodin NM, Ellison-Zelski SJ, Ping Lu K, Rimm DL, Alarid ET (2013).
PMID: 23542176 | DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.78.

Estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα) is an important biomarker used to classify and direct therapy decisions in breast cancer (BC). Both ERα protein and its transcript, ESR1, are used to predict response to tamoxifen therapy, yet certain tumors have discordant levels of ERα protein and ESR1, which is currently unexplained. Cellular ERα protein levels can be controlled post-translationally by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway through a mechanism that depends on phosphorylation at residue S118. Phospho-S118 (pS118-ERα) is a substrate for the peptidyl prolyl isomerase, Pin1, which mediates cis-trans isomerization of the pS118-P119 bond to enhance ERα transcriptional function. Here, we demonstrate that Pin1 can increase ERα protein without affecting ESR1 transcript levels by inhibiting proteasome-dependent receptor degradation. Pin1 disrupts ERα ubiquitination by interfering with receptor interactions with the E3 ligase, E6AP, which also is shown to bind pS118-ERα. Quantitative in situ assessments of ERα protein, ESR1, and Pin1 in human tumors from a retrospective cohort show that Pin1 levels correlate with ERα protein but not to ESR1 levels. These data show that ERα protein is post-translationally regulated by Pin1 in a proportion of breast carcinomas. As Pin1 impacts both ERα protein levels and transactivation function, these data implicate Pin1 as a potential surrogate marker for predicting outcome of ERα-positive BC.
Estrogen Receptor-α Quantification in Breast Cancer: Concordance Between Immunohistochemical Assays and mRNA-In Situ Hybridization for ESR1 Gene.

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol.

2019 Mar 27

Thomsen C, Nielsen S, Nielsen BS, Pedersen SH, Vyberg M.
PMID: 30920963 | DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000760

Immunohistochemical (IHC) quantification of estrogen receptor-α (ER) is used for assessment of treatment regimen in breast cancer. Different ER IHC assays may produce diverging results, because of different antibody clones, protocols, and stainer platforms. Objective tissue-based techniques to assess sensitivity and specificity of IHC assays are therefore needed. We tested the usability of ER mRNA-in situ hybridization (mRNA-ISH) in comparison with assays based on clones SP1 and 6F11. We selected 56 archival specimens according to their reported ER IHC positivity, representing a wide spectrum from negative to strongly positive cases. The specimens were used to prepare 4 TMAs with 112 cores. Serial sections of each TMA were stained for ER and pan-cytokeratin (PCK) by IHC and ESR1 (ER gene) by mRNA-ISH. Digital image analysis (DIA) was used to determine ER IHC H-score. ESR1 mRNA-ISH was scored both manually and by DIA. DIA showed a nonlinear correlation between IHC and ESR1 mRNA-ISH with R-values of 0.80 and 0.78 for the ER antibody clones SP1 and 6F11, respectively. Comparison of manual mRNA-ISH scoring categories and SP1 and 6F11 IHC H-scores showed a highly significant relationship (P<0.001). In conclusion, the study showed good correlation between mRNA-ISH and IHC, suggesting that mRNA-ISH can be a valuable tool in the assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of ER IHC assays.

Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Estrogen Signaling Coordinately Augments One-Carbon, Polyamine, and Purine Synthesis in Breast Cancer.

Cell Rep.

2018 Nov 20

Zhu D, Zhao Z, Cui G, Chang S, Hu L, See YX, Lim MGL, Guo D, Chen X, Robson P, Luo Y, Cheung E.
PMID: 30463022 | DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.093

Estrogen drives breast cancer (BCa) progression by directly activating estrogen receptor α (ERα). However, because of the stochastic nature of gene transcription, it is important to study the estrogen signaling pathway at the single-cell level to fully understand how ERα regulates transcription. Here, we performed single-cell transcriptome analysis on ERα-positive BCa cells following 17β-estradiol stimulation and reconstructed the dynamic estrogen-responsive transcriptional network from discrete time points into a pseudotemporal continuum. Notably, differentially expressed genes show an estrogen-stimulated metabolic switch that favors biosynthesis but reduces estrogen degradation. Moreover, folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism is reprogrammed through the mitochondrial folate pathway and polyamine and purine synthesis are upregulated coordinately. Finally, we show AZIN1 and PPAT are direct ERα targets that are essential for BCa cell survival and growth. In summary, our study highlights the dynamic transcriptional heterogeneity in ERα-positive BCa cells upon estrogen stimulation and uncovers a mechanism of estrogen-mediated metabolic switch.

Spatially organized multicellular immune hubs in human colorectal cancer

Cell

2021 Aug 24

Pelka, K;Hofree, M;Chen, JH;Sarkizova, S;Pirl, JD;Jorgji, V;Bejnood, A;Dionne, D;Ge, WH;Xu, KH;Chao, SX;Zollinger, DR;Lieb, DJ;Reeves, JW;Fuhrman, CA;Hoang, ML;Delorey, T;Nguyen, LT;Waldman, J;Klapholz, M;Wakiro, I;Cohen, O;Albers, J;Smillie, CS;Cuoco, MS;Wu, J;Su, MJ;Yeung, J;Vijaykumar, B;Magnuson, AM;Asinovski, N;Moll, T;Goder-Reiser, MN;Applebaum, AS;Brais, LK;DelloStritto, LK;Denning, SL;Phillips, ST;Hill, EK;Meehan, JK;Frederick, DT;Sharova, T;Kanodia, A;Todres, EZ;Jané-Valbuena, J;Biton, M;Izar, B;Lambden, CD;Clancy, TE;Bleday, R;Melnitchouk, N;Irani, J;Kunitake, H;Berger, DL;Srivastava, A;Hornick, JL;Ogino, S;Rotem, A;Vigneau, S;Johnson, BE;Corcoran, RB;Sharpe, AH;Kuchroo, VK;Ng, K;Giannakis, M;Nieman, LT;Boland, GM;Aguirre, AJ;Anderson, AC;Rozenblatt-Rosen, O;Regev, A;Hacohen, N;
PMID: 34450029 | DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.003

Immune responses to cancer are highly variable, with mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors exhibiting more anti-tumor immunity than mismatch repair-proficient (MMRp) tumors. To understand the rules governing these varied responses, we transcriptionally profiled 371,223 cells from colorectal tumors and adjacent normal tissues of 28 MMRp and 34 MMRd individuals. Analysis of 88 cell subsets and their 204 associated gene expression programs revealed extensive transcriptional and spatial remodeling across tumors. To discover hubs of interacting malignant and immune cells, we identified expression programs in different cell types that co-varied across tumors from affected individuals and used spatial profiling to localize coordinated programs. We discovered a myeloid cell-attracting hub at the tumor-luminal interface associated with tissue damage and an MMRd-enriched immune hub within the tumor, with activated T cells together with malignant and myeloid cells expressing T cell-attracting chemokines. By identifying interacting cellular programs, we reveal the logic underlying spatially organized immune-malignant cell networks.
X
Description
sense
Example: Hs-LAG3-sense
Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe.
Intron#
Example: Mm-Htt-intron2
Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection
Pool/Pan
Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G)
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts
No-XSp
Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm
Does not cross detect with the species (Sp)
XSp
Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm
designed to cross detect with the species (Sp)
O#
Example: Mm-Islr-O1
Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms
CDS
Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS
Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only
EnEmProbe targets exons n and m
En-EmProbe targets region from exon n to exon m
Retired Nomenclature
tvn
Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1
Designed to target transcript variant n
ORF
Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF
Probe targets open reading frame
UTR
Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3
Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only
5UTR
Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR
Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only
3UTR
Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR
Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only
Pan
Example: Pool
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts

Enabling research, drug development (CDx) and diagnostics

Contact Us
  • Toll-free in the US and Canada
  • +1877 576-3636
  • 
  • 
  • 
Company
  • Overview
  • Leadership
  • Careers
  • Distributors
  • Quality
  • News & Events
  • Webinars
  • Patents
Products
  • RNAscope or BaseScope
  • Target Probes
  • Controls
  • Manual assays
  • Automated Assays
  • Accessories
  • Software
  • How to Order
Research
  • Popular Applications
  • Cancer
  • Viral
  • Pathways
  • Neuroscience
  • Other Applications
  • RNA & Protein
  • Customer Innovations
  • Animal Models
Technology
  • Overview
  • RNA Detection
  • Spotlight Interviews
  • Publications & Guides
Assay Services
  • Our Services
  • Biomarker Assay Development
  • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
  • Clinical Assay Development
  • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
  • Image Analysis
  • Your Benefits
  • How to Order
Diagnostics
  • Diagnostics
  • Companion Diagnostics
Support
  • Getting started
  • Contact Support
  • Troubleshooting Guide
  • FAQs
  • Manuals, SDS & Inserts
  • Downloads
  • Webinars
  • Training Videos

Visit Bio-Techne and its other brands

  • bio-technie
  • protein
  • bio-spacific
  • rd
  • novus
  • tocris
© 2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.
  • Terms and Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • Email Preferences
  • 
  • 
  • 

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic use. Refer to appropriate regulations. RNAscope is a registered trademark; and HybEZ, EZ-Batch and DNAscope are trademarks of Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. ©2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.

 

Contact Us / Request a Quote
Download Manuals
Request a PAS Project Consultation
Order online at
bio-techne.com
OK
X
Contact Us

Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.

For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below

  • Contact Sales
  • Contact Support
  • Contact Services
  • Offices

Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:

7707 Gateway Blvd.  
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798

 

Bio-Techne

19 Barton Lane  
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420

 

Advanced Cell Diagnostics China

20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051

021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn

For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com

See Distributors
×

You have already Quick ordered an Item in your cart . If you want to add a new item , Quick ordered Item will be removed form your cart. Do You want to continue?

OK Cancel
Need help?

How can we help you?