Contact Us / Request a Quote Download Manuals
Advanced Cell Diagnostics Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Search form

Please sign in
  • Log In
  • Register
  • How to Order
  • What to Buy
0 My Cart
X

You have no items in your shopping cart.

Menu
X
  • Products +
    RNAscope™/BaseScope™/ miRNAscope™
    +
    • Assay Selection Guide
    Target Probes
    +
    • All About Probes
    • Catalog Probes
    • Probe Sets
    • New Probe Request
    Manual Assays
    +
    RNAscope™ Chromogenic
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Duplex Assay
    RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex v2 Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent V2
    BaseScope™
    • Overview
    • BaseScope™ Assay Red
    • BaseScope™ Duplex Assay
    miRNAscope™
    • Overview
    • miRNAscope™ Assay red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA Assay
    DNAscope™
    • Overview
    • DNAscope™ Duplex Assay
    Automated Assays
    +
    For Lunaphore COMET™
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex Pro for COMET™
    For Leica systems
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Duplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiomic LS Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Fluorescent Multiplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-BROWN
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-RED
    • BaseScope™ LS Reagent Kit – RED
    • miRNAscope LS Reagent Kit Red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA LS Assay
    Roche DISCOVERY ULTRA system
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal HRP
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal AP
    • RNAscope™ VS Duplex Assay
    • BaseScope™ VS Reagent Kit – RED
    RNA-Protein Co-Detection Assay
    +
    • RNAscope HiPlex-IMC™ Co-Detection
    • Integrated Codetection Assay
    • Sequential RNA Protein Detection
    Software
    +
    • Overview
    • Aperio RNA ISH Algorithm
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Controls & Accessories
    +
    • RNAscope™
    • BaseScope™
    • miRNAscope™
    • Accessories
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Instructions
    • What to Buy
  • Services +
    Professional Assay Services
    +
    • Our Services
    • Multiomic Services
    • Biomarker Assay Development
    • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
    • Clinical Assay Development
    • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
    • Image Analysis
    Benefits
    +
    • Your Benefits
    • Certified Providers
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Process
    • Contact Services
  • Areas of Research +
    Most Popular
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Whole-Mount
    • Anatomic Pathology Panels
    • Neuroscience
    • Inflammation
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • Stem Cell
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Liver Research
    • Cardiovascular & Skeletal Muscle Research
    Cell & Gene Therapy
    +
    • Gene Therapy
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • siRNA/ASO
    • Cell Therapy
    Cancer
    +
    • Breast Cancer
    • EGFRvIII Splice Variant
    • HPV Related Cancer
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Lung Cancer
    • PDx
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Point Mutation
    • CDR3 for TCR
    Viral
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • HIV & SIV
    • Infectious Disease
    • Zika Virus
    Pathways
    +
    • AKT
    • JAK STAT
    • WNT B-Catenin
    Neuroscience
    +
    Neuroscience
    • Neural Development
    • Neuronal Cell Types
    • Learning and Memory
    • G-protein-coupled Receptors & Ion Channels
    • Post-mortem Brain Tissue
    Other
    +
    • Circular RNA
    • Gene Fusions
    • HT Transcript Validation
    • Long Non-coding RNA
    • RNAseq Validation
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Splice Variant
    • miRNA
    RNA & Protein
    +
    • Antibody Challenges
    • Dual ISH + IHC Methods
    • No Antibodies
    • RNA & Protein Analysis
    Customer Innovations
    +
    • Dual RNA+DNA ISH
    • Very old FFPE ISH
    • Wholemount ISH
    Animal Models
    +
    • Any Species
    • Mouse Model
    • Preclincal Safety
  • Technology +
    Overview
    +
    • How it Works
    • Data Image Gallery
    • Technology Video
    • Webinars
    RNA Detection
    +
    • Why RNA?
    • RNA ISH and IHC
    Pretreatment Options
    +
    • RNAscope™ Pretreatment
    • PretreatPro™
    Spotlights
    +
    • Researchers Spotlights
    • RNA & DNA
    • WISH
    • FFPE
    • Testimonials
    Publications, Guides & Posters
    +
    • Search publications
    • RNAscope™ Reference Guide
    • RNAscope™ Data Analysis Guide
    • Download RNAscope™ Posters
  • Support +
    Overview
    +
    • Get Started
    • How to Order
    • Distributors
    • Contact Support
    Troubleshooting
    +
    • Troubleshooting Guide
    • FAQs
    • User Manuals, SDS and Product Inserts
    • Documents and Downloads
    Imaging Resource
    +
    • Image Analysis
    • Image Registration Software
    • QuPath
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Learn More
    +
    • Webinars
    • Training Videos
  • Partners +
    Partners
    +
    • Overview
    Partners Directory
    +
    Automation Partners
    • Leica Biosystem
    • Roche Diagnostics
    Workflow Partners
    • NanoString
    Software Partners
    • indica labs
    Become a Partner
    +
    • Learn How
  • Diagnostics +
    Diagnostics
    +
    • Diagnostics
    • Literature
    • Diagnostics ASR Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Detection
    • Companion Diagnostics
  • Image Calendar +
    Image Calendar
    +
    • Image Contest
    • Data Image Gallery
Search

Probes for INS

ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for INS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.

  • Probes for INS (0)
  • Kits & Accessories (0)
  • Support & Documents (0)
  • Publications (12)
  • Image gallery (0)
Refine Probe List

Content for comparison

Gene

  • TBD (108) Apply TBD filter
  • HPV E6/E7 (75) Apply HPV E6/E7 filter
  • Lgr5 (61) Apply Lgr5 filter
  • PD-L1 (25) Apply PD-L1 filter
  • HPV-HR18 (20) Apply HPV-HR18 filter
  • Axin2 (19) Apply Axin2 filter
  • HPV (19) Apply HPV filter
  • GLI1 (15) Apply GLI1 filter
  • HER2 (15) Apply HER2 filter
  • FGFR1 (13) Apply FGFR1 filter
  • MALAT1 (12) Apply MALAT1 filter
  • CD68 (11) Apply CD68 filter
  • Ifng (10) Apply Ifng filter
  • MYC (10) Apply MYC filter
  • CXCL10 (9) Apply CXCL10 filter
  • OLFM4 (9) Apply OLFM4 filter
  • AR-V7 (8) Apply AR-V7 filter
  • EBER1 (8) Apply EBER1 filter
  • CD274 (7) Apply CD274 filter
  • ETV1 (7) Apply ETV1 filter
  • GREM1 (7) Apply GREM1 filter
  • HOTAIR (7) Apply HOTAIR filter
  • OLFM4 (7) Apply OLFM4 filter
  • TERT (7) Apply TERT filter
  • HPV HR18 (7) Apply HPV HR18 filter
  • AR (6) Apply AR filter
  • (-) Remove BRCA1 filter BRCA1 (6)
  • CD3E (6) Apply CD3E filter
  • CD4 (6) Apply CD4 filter
  • MET (6) Apply MET filter
  • CSF1 (6) Apply CSF1 filter
  • Ccl2 (6) Apply Ccl2 filter
  • Ptch1 (6) Apply Ptch1 filter
  • (-) Remove FGFR2 filter FGFR2 (6)
  • Vegfa (6) Apply Vegfa filter
  • PDGFRA (6) Apply PDGFRA filter
  • CXCL12 (6) Apply CXCL12 filter
  • HPV18 (6) Apply HPV18 filter
  • Il-6 (6) Apply Il-6 filter
  • CD3 (6) Apply CD3 filter
  • SOX2 (5) Apply SOX2 filter
  • EGFR (5) Apply EGFR filter
  • ESR1 (5) Apply ESR1 filter
  • DUSP6 (5) Apply DUSP6 filter
  • MDM2 (5) Apply MDM2 filter
  • MKI67 (5) Apply MKI67 filter
  • NOTUM (5) Apply NOTUM filter
  • PTEN (5) Apply PTEN filter
  • Cxcl1 (5) Apply Cxcl1 filter
  • HPV16 (5) Apply HPV16 filter

Product

  • RNAscope 2.0 Assay (5) Apply RNAscope 2.0 Assay filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Red assay (2) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Red assay filter
  • RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay (2) Apply RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay filter
  • RNAscope (1) Apply RNAscope filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 VS Assay (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 VS Assay filter

Research area

  • (-) Remove Cancer filter Cancer (12)

Category

  • Publications (12) Apply Publications filter
BRCA1 germline mutation and glioblastoma development: report of cases

BMC Cancer 15.1 (2015): 1-7.

Boukerroucha M, Josse C, Segers K, El-Guendi S, Frères P, Jerusalem G, Bours V.

Background Germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers. However, no association between BRCA1 germline mutation and glioblastoma malignancy has ever been highlighted. Here we report two cases of BRCA1 mutated patients who developed a glioblastoma multiform (GBM). Cases presentation: Two patients diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were screened for BRCA1 germline mutation. They both carried a pathogenic mutation introducing a premature STOP codon in the exon 11 of the BRCA1 gene. Few years later, both patients developed a glioblastoma and a second breast cancer. In an attempt to clarify the role played by a mutated BRCA1 allele in the GBM development, we investigated the BRCA1 mRNA and protein expression in breast and glioblastoma tumours for both patients. The promoter methylation status of this gene was also tested by methylation specific PCR as BRCA1 expression is also known to be lost by this mechanism in some sporadic breast cancers. Conclusion: Our data show that BRCA1 expression is maintained in glioblastoma at the protein and the mRNA levels, suggesting that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) did not occur in these cases. The protein expression is tenfold higher in the glioblastoma of patient 1 than in her first breast carcinoma, and twice higher in patient 2. In agreement with the high protein expression level in the GBM, BRCA1 promoter methylation was not observed in these tumours. In these two cases, despite of a BRCA1 pathogenic germline mutation, the tumour-suppressor protein expression is maintained in GBM, suggesting that the BRCA1 mutation is not instrumental for the GBM development.
Preclinical efficacy of the auristatin-based antibody-drug conjugate BAY 1187982 for the treatment of FGFR2-positive solid tumors

Cancer Res.

2016 Aug 19

Sommer A, Kopitz C, Schatz CA, Nising CF, Mahlert C, Lerchen HG, Stelte-Ludwig B, Hammer S, Greven S, Schumacher J, Braun M, Zierz R, Wittemer-Rump S, Harrenga A, Dittmer F, Reetz F, Apeler H, Jautelat R, Huynh H, Ziegelbauer K, Kreft B.
PMID: 27543601 | DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0180

The fibroblast growth factor receptor FGFR2 is overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors, including breast, gastric and ovarian tumors, where it offers a potential therapeutic target. In this study, we present evidence of the preclinical efficacy of BAY 1187982, a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). It consists of a fully human FGFR2 monoclonal antibody (mAb BAY 1179470), which is specific for the FGFR2 isoforms FGFR2-IIIb and FGFR2-IIIc, conjugated through a non-cleavable linker to a novel derivative of the microtubule-disrupting cytotoxic drug auristatin (FGFR2-ADC). In FGFR2-expressing cancer cell lines, this FGFR2-ADC exhibited potency in the low nM to sub-nM range and was more than 100-fold selective against FGFR2-negative cell lines. High expression levels of FGFR2 in cells correlated with efficient internalization, efficacy and cytotoxic effects in vitro. Pharmacokinetic analyses in mice bearing FGFR2-positive NCI-H716 tumors indicated that the toxophore metabolite of FGFR2-ADC was enriched more than 30-fold in tumors compared to healthy tissues. Efficacy studies demonstrated that FGFR2-ADC treatment leads to a significant tumor growth inhibition or tumor regression of cell line-based or patient-derived xenograft models of human gastric or breast cancer. Further, FGFR2 amplification or mRNA overexpression predicted high efficacy in both of these types of in vivo model systems. Taken together, our results strongly support the clinical evaluation of BAY 1187982 in cancer patients, and a Phase I study (NCT02368951) has been initiated.

Evaluation of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression, Heterogeneity and Clinical Significance in Gastric Cancer.

Pathobiology.

2015 Oct 31

Han N, Kim MA, Lee HS, Kim WH.
PMID: 26516773 | DOI: -

Abstract

BACKGROUND:
We aimed to evaluate the protein and mRNA expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH), respectively, and to assess the heterogeneity of FGFR2 expression in gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS:
A tissue microarray containing 362 surgically resected GC tissues and 135 matched metastatic lymph nodes was evaluated using FGFR2b IHC and FGFR2 ISH. FGFR2 fluorescence ISH was also performed in 188 cases.

RESULTS:
All FGFR2-amplified cases (5 of 188) showed FGFR2b protein and FGFR2 mRNA overexpression (p < 0.001), and FGFR2 amplification was not identified in FGFR2b IHC- and FGFR2 mRNA ISH-negative cases. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that FGFR2b protein and FGFR2 mRNA overexpression was significantly associated with a poor overall survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively), and multivariate analyses showed that FGFR2 mRNA overexpression was an independent biomarker of a poor overall survival. Intratumoral heterogeneity of FGFR2b protein and FGFR2 mRNA overexpression was observed in 5 of 9 (55.5%) and 18 of 21 (85.7%) cases, respectively. Discordant FGFR2b and FGFR2 expression results between primary and matched metastatic lymph nodes were observed in 5 of 9 (55.5%) and 4 of 14 (28.6%) cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:
Intratumoral heterogeneity and discordant FGFR2b expression in primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes are common in GC.

Evaluation of BRCA1-related molecular features and microRNAs as prognostic factors for triple negative breast cancers.

BMC Cancer.

2015 Oct 21

Boukerroucha M, Josse C, ElGuendi S, Boujemla B, Frères P, Marée R, Wenric S, Segers K, Collignon J, Jerusalem G, Bours V.
PMID: 26490435 | DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1740-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:
The BRCA1 gene plays a key role in triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs), in which its expression can be lost by multiple mechanisms: germinal mutation followed by deletion of the second allele; negative regulation by promoter methylation; or miRNA-mediated silencing. This study aimed to establish a correlation among the BRCA1-related molecular parameters, tumor characteristics and clinical follow-up of patients to find new prognostic factors.

METHODS:
BRCA1 protein and mRNA expression was quantified in situ in the TNBCs of 69 patients. BRCA1 promoter methylation status was checked, as well as cytokeratin 5/6 expression. Maintenance of expressed BRCA1 protein interaction with BARD1 was quantified, as a marker of BRCA1 functionality, and the tumor expression profiles of 27 microRNAs were determined.

RESULTS:
miR-548c-5p was emphasized as a new independent prognostic factor in TNBC. A combination of the tumoral expression of miR-548c and three other known prognostic parameters (tumor size, lymph node invasion and CK 5/6 expression status) allowed for relapse prediction by logistic regression with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.96. BRCA1 mRNA and protein in situ expression, as well as the amount of BRCA1 ligated to BARD1 in the tumor, lacked any associations with patient outcomes, likely due to high intratumoral heterogeneity, and thus could not be used for clinical purposes.

CONCLUSIONS:
In situ BRCA1-related expression parameters could be used for clinical purposes at the time of diagnosis. In contrast, miR-548c-5p showed a promising potential as a prognostic factor in TNBC.

Comparison of Fibroblast Growth-factor Receptor Gene Alterations at the DNA versus Messenger RNA Level in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: Insights for Clinical Research.

Eur Urol Focus.

2017 Aug 27

Necchi A, Raggi D, Volpi CC, Giannatempo P, Colecchia M, Gloghini A.
PMID: 28855072 | DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.08.002

Pan-fibroblast growth-factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors hold promise in FGFR-altered patients, but such alterations are rare in advanced urothelial carcinoma. In order to assess whether we may increase the number of eligible patients by using different molecular techniques for detecting alterations, we pooled the results of the centralised FGFR mutation/translocation assays that were performed in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratories within multiple phase 2 trials. At our centre, the same tissue blocks were used to analyse FGFR1-3 messenger RNA expression through messenger RNA in situ hybridisation (ISH; RNAscope 2.5 assay). From October 2016 to March 2017, 52 cases were analysed. Seventeen patients (32.7%) had an upper tract primary tumour. Ten patients (19.2%) had FGFR DNA alterations. Twenty-nine (55.8%) had positive ISH analysis: N=17 score 3, N=12 score 4. Of note, concordance between the two tests was obtained in seven out of 10 patients. Sixty percent of mutated patients had an upper tract primary tumour versus 31% of ISH-positive patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY:

We found three-fold higher frequency of fibroblast growth-factor receptor alterations at the RNA versus DNA level in advanced urothelial carcinoma, with a different distribution according to the method used and the site of the primary tumour. The evaluation of the therapeutic response to pan-fibroblast growth-factor receptor inhibitors according to the method of assessment is warranted.

FGF-Receptors and PD-L1 in Anaplastic and Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Evaluation of the Preclinical Rationale

Frontiers in endocrinology

2021 Aug 12

Adam, P;Kircher, S;Sbiera, I;Koehler, VF;Berg, E;Knösel, T;Sandner, B;Fenske, WK;Bläker, H;Smaxwil, C;Zielke, A;Sipos, B;Allelein, S;Schott, M;Dierks, C;Spitzweg, C;Fassnacht, M;Kroiss, M;
PMID: 34475850 | DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.712107

Treatment options for poorly differentiated (PDTC) and anaplastic (ATC) thyroid carcinoma are unsatisfactory and prognosis is generally poor. Lenvatinib (LEN), a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) 1-4 is approved for advanced radioiodine refractory thyroid carcinoma, but response to single agent is poor in ATC. Recent reports of combining LEN with PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (PEM) are promising.Primary ATC (n=93) and PDTC (n=47) tissue samples diagnosed 1997-2019 at five German tertiary care centers were assessed for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry using Tumor Proportion Score (TPS). FGFR 1-4 mRNA was quantified in 31 ATC and 14 PDTC with RNAscope in-situ hybridization. Normal thyroid tissue (NT) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) served as controls. Disease specific survival (DSS) was the primary outcome variable.PD-L1 TPS≥50% was observed in 42% of ATC and 26% of PDTC specimens. Mean PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in ATC (TPS 30%) than in PDTC (5%; p<0.01) and NT (0%, p<0.001). 53% of PDTC samples had PD-L1 expression ≤5%. FGFR mRNA expression was generally low in all samples but combined FGFR1-4 expression was significantly higher in PDTC and ATC compared to NT (each p<0.001). No impact of PD-L1 and FGFR 1-4 expression was observed on DSS.High tumoral expression of PD-L1 in a large proportion of ATCs and a subgroup of PDTCs provides a rationale for immune checkpoint inhibition. FGFR expression is low thyroid tumor cells. The clinically observed synergism of PEM with LEN may be caused by immune modulation.
In situ analysis of FGFR2 mRNA and comparison with FGFR2 gene copy number by dual‑color in situ hybridization in a large cohort of gastric cancer patients

Gastric Cancer

2017 Aug 29

Kuboki Y, Schatz CA, Koechert K, Schubert S, Feng J, Wittemer-Rump S, Ziegelbauer K, Krahn T, Kawano Nagatsuma A, Ochiai A.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1007/s10120-017-0758-x

Abstract

Background

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR2) has been proposed as a target in gastric cancer. However, appropriate methods to select patients for anti-FGFR2 therapies have not yet been established.

Methods

We used in situ techniques to investigate FGFR2 mRNA expression and gene amplification in a large cohort of 1036 Japanese gastric cancer patients. FGFR2 mRNA expression was determined by RNAscope. FGFR2 gene amplification was determined by dual-color in situ hybridization (DISH).

Results

We successfully analyzed 578 and 718 samples by DISH and RNAscope, respectively; 2% (12/578) showed strong FGFR2 gene amplification (FGFR2:CEN10 >10); moderate FGFR2gene amplification (FGFR2:CEN10 <10; ≥2) was detected in 8% (47/578); and high FGFR2 mRNA expression of score 4 (>10 dots/cell and >10% of positive cells with dot clusters under a 20× objective) was seen in 4% (29/718). For 468 samples, both mRNA and DISH data were available. FGFR2 mRNA expression levels were associated with gene amplification; FGFR2 mRNA levels were highest in the highly amplified samples (n = 12). All highly amplified samples showed very strong FGFR2 mRNA expression (dense clusters of the signal visible under a 1× objective). Patients with very strong FGFR2 mRNA expression showed more homogeneous FGFR2 mRNA expression compared to patients with lower FGFGR2 mRNA expression. Gastric cancer patients with tumors that had an FGFR2 mRNA expression score of 4 had shorter RFS compared with score 0–3 patients.

Conclusion

RNAscope and DISH are suitable methods to evaluate FGFR2 status in gastric cancer. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue slides allowed evaluation of the intratumor heterogeneity of these FGFR2 biomarkers.

Functional ex vivo assay reveals homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer beyond BRCA gene defects

Clin Cancer Res.

2018 Aug 23

Meijer TG, Verkaik NS, Sieuwerts AM, van Riet J, Naipal KAT, van Deurzen CHM, den Bakker M, Sleddens HFBM, Dubbink HJ, den Toom TD, Dinjens WNM, Lips EH, Nederlof PM, Smid M, van de Werken HJG, Kanaar R, Martens JWM, Jager A, van Gent DC.
PMID: 30139880 | DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0063

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Tumors of germline BRCA1/2 mutated carriers show homologous recombination (HR) deficiency (HRD), resulting in impaired DNA double strand break (DSB) repair and high sensitivity to Poly-(ADP-Ribose)-Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Although this therapy is expected to be effective beyond germline BRCA1/2 mutated carriers, a robust validated test to detect HRD tumors is lacking. In the present study we therefore evaluated a functional HR assay exploiting the formation of RAD51 foci in proliferating cells after ex vivo irradiation of fresh breast cancers (BrC) tissue: the RECAP test.

METHODS:

Fresh samples of 170 primary BrC were analyzed using the RECAP test. The molecular explanation for the HRD phenotype was investigated by exploring BRCA deficiencies, mutational signatures, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and microsatellite instability (MSI).

RESULTS:

RECAP was completed successfully in 148 out of 170 samples (87%). 24 tumors showed HRD (16%), while 6 tumors were HR intermediate (HRi) (4%). HRD was explained by BRCA deficiencies (mutations, promoter hypermethylation, deletions) in 16 cases, whereas 7 HRD tumors were non-BRCA related. HRD tumors showed an increased incidence of high TIL counts (p=0.023) compared to HR proficient (HRP) tumors and MSI was more frequently observed in the HRD group (2/20, 10%) than expected in BrC (1%) (p=0.017).

CONCLUSION:

RECAP is a robust functional HR assay detecting both BRCA1/2 deficient and BRCA1/2 proficient HRD tumors. Functional assessment of HR in a pseudo-diagnostic setting is achievable and produces robust and interpretable results.

FGFR3 mRNA overexpression defines a subset of oligometastatic colorectal cancers with worse prognosis

Oncotarget.

2018 Aug 14

Fromme JE, Schmitz K, Wachter A, Grzelinski M, Zielinski D, Koppel C, Conradi LC, Homayounfar K, Hugo T, Hugo S, Lukat L, Rüschoff J, Ströbel P, Ghadimi M, Beißbarth T, Reuter-Jessen K, Bleckmann A, Schildhaus HU.
PMID: 30181810 | DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25941

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer related deaths. Patients with oligometastatic liver disease represent a clinical subgroup with heterogeneous course. Until now, biomarkers to characterize outcome and therapeutic options have not been fully established.

METHODS:

We investigated the prevalence of FGFR alterations in a total of 140 primary colorectal tumors and 63 liver metastases of 55 oligometastatic CRC patients. FGF receptors (FGFR1-4) and their ligands (FGF3, 4 and 19) were analyzed for gene amplifications and rearrangements as well as for RNA overexpression in situ. Results were correlated with clinico-pathologic data and molecular subtypes.

RESULTS:

Primary tumors showed FGFR1 (6.3%) and FGF3,4,19 (2.2%) amplifications as well as FGFR1 (10.1%), FGFR2 (5.5%) and FGFR3 (16.2%) overexpression. In metastases, we observed FGFR1 amplifications (4.8%) as well as FGFR1 (8.5%) and FGFR3 (14.9%) overexpression. Neither FGFR2-4 amplifications nor gene rearrangements were observed. FGFR3 overexpression was significantly associated with shorter overall survival in metastases (mOS 19.9 vs. 47.4 months, HR=3.14, p=0.0152), but not in primary CRC (HR=1.01, p=0.985). Although rare, also FGFR1 amplification was indicative of worse outcome (mOS 12.6 vs. 47.4 months, HR=8.83, p=0.00111).

CONCLUSIONS:

We provide the so far most comprehensive analysis of FGFR alterations in primary and metastatic CRC. We describe FGFR3 overexpression in 15% of CRC patients with oligometastatic liver disease as a prognosticator for poor outcome. Recently FGFR3 overexpression has been shown to be a potential therapeutic target. Therefore, we suggest focusing on this subgroup in upcoming clinical trials with FGFR-targeted therapies.

Quantifying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA Isoform Expression Levels in Single Cells

Int J Mol Sci.

2019 Feb 06

Lattimore VL, Pearson JF, Morley-Bunker AE, Investigators kConFab, Spurdle, Robinson AB, Currie BA, Walker MJ, Logan C.
PMID: 30736279 | DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030693

BRCA1 and BRCA2 spliceogenic variants are often associated with an elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancers. Analyses of BRCA1 and BRCA2 splicing patterns have traditionally used technologies that sample a population of cells but do not account for the variation that may be present between individual cells. This novel proof of concept study utilises RNA in situ hybridisation to measure the absolute expression of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA splicing events in single lymphoblastoid cells containing known spliceogenic variants (BRCA1c.671-2 A>G or BRCA2c.7988 A>T). We observed a large proportion of cells (>42%) in each sample that did not express mRNA for the targeted gene. Increased levels (average mRNA molecules per cell) of BRCA2 ∆17_18 were observed in the cells containing the known spliceogenic variant BRCA2c.7988 A>T, but cells containing BRCA1c.671-2 A>G were not found to express significantly increased levels of BRCA1 ∆11, as had been shown previously. Instead, we show for each variant carrier sample that a higher proportion of cells expressed the targeted splicing event compared to control cells. These results indicate that BRCA1/2 mRNA is expressed stochastically, suggesting that previously reported results using RT-PCR may have been influenced by the number of cells with BRCA1/2 mRNA expression and may not represent an elevation of constitutive mRNA expression. Detection of mRNA expression in single cells allows for a more comprehensive understanding of how spliceogenic variants influence the expression of mRNA isoforms. However, further research is required to assess the utility of this technology to measure the expression of predicted spliceogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in a diagnostic setting.

Functional ex vivo assay to select Homologous Recombination deficient breast tumors for PARP inhibitor treatment

Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 24

Naipal KA, Verkaik NS, Ameziane N, van Deurzen CH, Ter Brugge P, Meijers M, Sieuwerts AM, Martens J, O'Connor MJ, Vrieling H, Hoeijmakers JH, Jonkers J, Kanaar R, de Winter J, Vreeswijk M, Jager A, van Gent DC.
PMID: 24963051

Purpose: Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are promising targeted treatment options for hereditary breast tumors with a Homologous Recombination (HR) deficiency caused by BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. However, the functional consequence of BRCA gene mutations is not always known and tumors can be HR deficient for other reasons than BRCA gene mutations. Therefore, we aimed to develop a functional test to determine HR activity in tumor samples to facilitate selection of patients eligible for PARP inhibitor treatment. Experimental design: We obtained 54 fresh primary breast tumor samples from patients undergoing surgery. We determined their HR capacity by studying the formation of ionizing radiation induced foci (IRIF) of the HR protein RAD51 after ex vivo irradiation of these organotypic breast tumor samples. Tumors showing impaired RAD51 IRIF formation were subjected to genetic and epigenetic analysis. Results: Five out of 45 primary breast tumors with sufficient numbers of proliferating tumor cells were RAD51 IRIF formation deficient (11%, 95%CI: 5%-24%). This HR defect was significantly associated with Triple Negative Breast Cancer (OR:57, 95%CI: 3.9-825, p=0.003). Two out of five HR deficient tumors were not caused by mutations in the BRCA genes, but by BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation. Conclusion: The functional RAD51 IRIF assay faithfully identifies HR deficient tumors and has clear advantages over gene sequencing. It is a relatively easy assay that can be performed on biopsy material, making it a powerful tool to select patients with an HR-deficient cancer for PARP inhibitor treatment in the clinic.
Clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA and protein expression in patients with sporadic gastric cancer

Oncology Letters

2019 Mar 08

Kim H, Hwang I, Min H, Bang Y and Kim W
| DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10132

X
Description
sense
Example: Hs-LAG3-sense
Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe.
Intron#
Example: Mm-Htt-intron2
Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection
Pool/Pan
Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G)
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts
No-XSp
Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm
Does not cross detect with the species (Sp)
XSp
Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm
designed to cross detect with the species (Sp)
O#
Example: Mm-Islr-O1
Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms
CDS
Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS
Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only
EnEmProbe targets exons n and m
En-EmProbe targets region from exon n to exon m
Retired Nomenclature
tvn
Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1
Designed to target transcript variant n
ORF
Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF
Probe targets open reading frame
UTR
Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3
Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only
5UTR
Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR
Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only
3UTR
Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR
Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only
Pan
Example: Pool
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts

Enabling research, drug development (CDx) and diagnostics

Contact Us
  • Toll-free in the US and Canada
  • +1877 576-3636
  • 
  • 
  • 
Company
  • Overview
  • Leadership
  • Careers
  • Distributors
  • Quality
  • News & Events
  • Webinars
  • Patents
Products
  • RNAscope or BaseScope
  • Target Probes
  • Controls
  • Manual assays
  • Automated Assays
  • Accessories
  • Software
  • How to Order
Research
  • Popular Applications
  • Cancer
  • Viral
  • Pathways
  • Neuroscience
  • Other Applications
  • RNA & Protein
  • Customer Innovations
  • Animal Models
Technology
  • Overview
  • RNA Detection
  • Spotlight Interviews
  • Publications & Guides
Assay Services
  • Our Services
  • Biomarker Assay Development
  • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
  • Clinical Assay Development
  • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
  • Image Analysis
  • Your Benefits
  • How to Order
Diagnostics
  • Diagnostics
  • Companion Diagnostics
Support
  • Getting started
  • Contact Support
  • Troubleshooting Guide
  • FAQs
  • Manuals, SDS & Inserts
  • Downloads
  • Webinars
  • Training Videos

Visit Bio-Techne and its other brands

  • bio-technie
  • protein
  • bio-spacific
  • rd
  • novus
  • tocris
© 2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.
  • Terms and Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • Email Preferences
  • 
  • 
  • 

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic use. Refer to appropriate regulations. RNAscope is a registered trademark; and HybEZ, EZ-Batch and DNAscope are trademarks of Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. ©2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.

 

Contact Us / Request a Quote
Download Manuals
Request a PAS Project Consultation
Order online at
bio-techne.com
OK
X
Contact Us

Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.

For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below

  • Contact Sales
  • Contact Support
  • Contact Services
  • Offices

Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:

7707 Gateway Blvd.  
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798

 

Bio-Techne

19 Barton Lane  
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420

 

Advanced Cell Diagnostics China

20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051

021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn

For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com

See Distributors
×

You have already Quick ordered an Item in your cart . If you want to add a new item , Quick ordered Item will be removed form your cart. Do You want to continue?

OK Cancel
Need help?

How can we help you?