Probes for INS

We have proposed that KNDy (kisspeptin/neurokinin B/dynorphin) neurons contribute to hot flushes via projections to neurokinin 3 receptor (NK3R) expressing neurons in the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO). To characterize the thermoregulatory role of MnPO NK3R neurons in female mice, we ablated these neurons using injections of saporin toxin conjugated to a selective NK3R agonist. Loss of MnPO NK3R neurons increased core temperature (TCORE) during the light phase, with frequency distributions indicating a regulated shift in the balance point. The rise in TCORE in ablated mice occurred despite changes in ambient temperature (TAMBIENT) and regardless of estrogen status. We next determined if an acute increase in TAMBIENT or higher TCORE would induce Fos in preoptic EGFP-immunoreactive neurons in Tacr3-EGFP mice. Fos-activation was increased in the MnPO, but there was no induction of Fos in NK3R (EGFP-immunoreactive) neurons. Thus, MnPO NK3R neurons are not activated by warm thermosensors in the skin or viscera and are not warm-sensitive neurons. Finally, RNAscope was used to determine if Tacr3 (NK3R) mRNA was co-expressed with VGLUT2 or VGAT mRNA, markers of glutamatergic or GABAergic neurotransmission, respectively. Interestingly, 94% of NK3R neurons in the MnPO were glutamatergic, whereas in the adjacent MPA, 97% of NK3R neurons were GABAergic. Thus, NK3R neurons in the MnPO are glutamatergic and play a role in reducing TCORE, but they are not activated by warm thermal stimuli (internal or external). These studies suggest that KNDy neurons modulate thermosensory pathways for heat-defense indirectly, via a subpopulation of glutamatergic MnPO neurons that express NK3R.

In the brain, purines such as ATP and adenosine can function as neurotransmitters and co-transmitters, or serve as signals in neuron-glial interactions. In thalamocortical (TC) projections to sensory cortex, adenosine functions as a negative regulator of glutamate release via activation of the presynaptic adenosine A1 receptor (A1 R). In the auditory forebrain, restriction of A1 R-adenosine signaling in medial geniculate (MG) neurons is sufficient to extend LTP, LTD, and tonotopic map plasticity in adult mice for months beyond the critical period. Interfering with adenosine signaling in primary auditory cortex (A1) does not contribute to these forms of plasticity, suggesting regional differences in the roles of A1 R-mediated adenosine signaling in the forebrain. To advance understanding of the circuitry, in situ hybridization was used to localize neuronal and glial cell types in the auditory forebrain that express A1 R transcripts (Adora1), based on co-expression with cell-specific markers for neuronal and glial subtypes. In A1, Adora1 transcripts were concentrated in L3/4 and L6 of glutamatergic neurons. Subpopulations of GABAergic neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia expressed lower levels of Adora1. In MG, Adora1 was expressed by glutamatergic neurons in all divisions, and subpopulations of all glial classes. The collective findings imply that A1 R-mediated signaling broadly extends to all subdivisions of auditory cortex and MG. Selective expression by neuronal and glial subpopulations suggests that experimental manipulations of A1 R-adenosine signaling could impact several cell types, depending on their location. Strategies to target Adora1 in specific cell types can be developed from the data generated here.

The ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) constitutes a major descending pain modulatory system and is a crucial site for opioid-induced analgesia. A number of previous studies have demonstrated that glutamate and GABA play critical opposing roles in nociceptive processing in the vlPAG. It has been suggested that glutamatergic neurotransmission exerts antinociceptive effects, whereas GABAergic neurotransmission exert pro-nociceptive effects on pain transmission, through descending pathways. The inability to exclusively manipulate subpopulations of neurons in the PAG has prevented direct testing of this hypothesis. Here we demonstrate the different contributions of genetically-defined glutamatergic and GABAergic vlPAG neurons in nociceptive processing by employing cell type-specific chemogenetic approaches in mice. Global chemogenetic manipulation of vlPAG neuronal activity suggests that vlPAG neural circuits exert tonic suppression of nociception, consistent with previous pharmacological and electrophysiological studies. However, selective modulation of GABAergic or glutamatergic neurons demonstrates an inverse regulation of nociceptive behaviors by these cell populations. Selective chemogenetic activation of glutamatergic neurons, or inhibition of GABAergic neurons, in vlPAG suppresses nociception. In contrast, inhibition of glutamatergic neurons, or activation of GABAergic neurons, in vlPAG facilitates nociception. Our findings provide direct experimental support for a model in which excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the PAG bidirectionally modulate nociception.

Significance Statement The PAG is a midbrain region critical for the modulation of pain. However, the roles played by the distinct cell types within the PAG in nociceptive processing are poorly understood. This work addresses the divergent roles of glutamatergic and GABAergic PAG neuronal subpopulations in nociceptive processing. We demonstrate that activation of glutamatergic neurons or inhibition of GABAergic neurons suppresses nociception. Whereas inhibition of glutamatergic neuronal activity or activation of GABAergic neuronal activity potentiates nociception. This report identifies distinct roles for these neuronal populations in modulating nociceptive processing.

Stress is a precipitating agent in neuropsychiatric disease and initiates relapse to drug-seeking behavior in addicted patients. Targeting the stress system in protracted abstinence from drugs of abuse with anxiolytics may be an effective treatment modality for substance use disorders. α2A-adrenergic receptors (α2A-ARs) in extended amygdala structures play key roles in dampening stress responses. Contrary to early thinking, α2A-ARs are expressed at non-noradrenergic sites in the brain. These non-noradrenergic α2A-ARs play important roles in stress-responses, but their cellular mechanisms of action are unclear. In humans, the α2A-AR agonist guanfacine reduces overall craving and uncouples craving from stress yet minimally affects relapse, potentially due to competing actions in the brain. Here we show that heteroceptor α2A-ARs postsynaptically enhance dorsal BNST (dBNST) neuronal activity in mice of both sexes. This effect is mediated by hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation (HCN) channels, as inhibition of these channels is necessary and sufficient for excitatory actions. Finally, this excitatory action is mimicked by clozapine-N-oxide activation of the Gi-coupled DREADD hM4Di in dBNST neurons, and its activation elicits anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze. Together, this data provides a framework for elucidating cell-specific actions of GPCR signaling and provides a potential mechanism whereby competing anxiogenic and anxiolytic actions of guanfacine may affect its clinical utility in the treatment of addiction.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTStress impacts the development of neuropsychiatric disorders including anxiety and addiction. Guanfacine is an α2A-adrenergic receptor (α2A-AR) agonist with actions in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) that produces antidepressant actions and uncouples stress from reward-related behaviors. Here we show that guanfacine increases dBNST neuronal activity through actions at postsynaptic α2A-ARs via a mechanism that involves hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated cation (HCN) channels. This action is mimicked by activation of the designer receptor hM4Di expressed in the BNST, which also induces anxiety-like behaviors. Together, these data suggest 1) that postsynaptic α2A-ARs in BNST have excitatory actions on BNST neurons, and 2) these actions can be phenocopied by the so-called "inhibitory" DREADDs, suggesting care must be taken regarding interpretation of data obtained with these tools.