ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for HPV for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Hum Pathol.
2018 Jul 30
Hsieh MS, Lee YH, Jin YT, Huang WC.
PMID: 30071233 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.07.026
HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma (HMSC) is associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Using HR-HPV mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH), we reported six new HMSC cases and compared their histopathology with that of sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Using p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HR-HPV ISH, we retrospectively identified six HMSC cases. All HMSC cases were positive for HR-HPV mRNA ISH and p16 IHC. Two HMSC cases had overlying atypical squamous epithelium and one also had invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). All HMSC were SOX10-positive whereas the overlying atypical squamous epithelium and the SCC were SOX10-negative. One atypical HMSC-like case was also identified which was positive for HR-HPV mRNA ISH, HR-HPV DNA ISH, SOX10 IHC, but negative for p16 IHC. This study showed that HR-HPV mRNA ISH was a useful tool to diagnose HMSC and had stronger signals than HR-HPV DNA ISH. HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA could be identified in the overlying atypical squamous epithelium as well as the invasive SCC. A combination of p16 and SOX10 IHC will be a useful screening panel for HMSC followed by confirmatory HR-HPV mRNA ISH test.
Am J Pathol. 2015 Jan 5. pii: S0002-9440(14)00688-9.
Miller DL, Davis JW, Taylor KH, Johnson J, Shi Z, Williams R, Atasoy U, Lewis JS Jr, Stack MS.
PMID: 25572154 | DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.018.
Histopathology. May; 60(6):982-91.
Lewis JS Jr1, Ukpo OC, Ma XJ, Flanagan JJ, Luo Y, Thorstad WL, Chernock RD (2012)
PMID: 22360821 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04169.x.
Human pathology
2022 Aug 01
Tekin, B;Kundert, P;Yang, HH;Guo, R;
PMID: 35926811 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.07.013
J Virol.
2017 May 17
Jiang RT, Wang JW, Peng S, Huang TC, Wang C, Cannella F, Chang YN, Viscidi RP, Best SRA, Hung CF, Roden RBS.
PMID: 28515303 | DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00699-17
Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies
2021 Aug 30
Sato, K;Nishiyama, K;Taguchi, K;Jiromaru, R;Yamamoto, H;Matsunaga, A;Nagata, R;Rikimaru, F;Toh, S;Higaki, Y;Oda, S;Nakagawa, T;Masuda, M;
PMID: 34462366 | DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a006102
Head Neck Pathol.
2017 Nov 30
Lewis JS Jr, Shelton J, Kuhs KL, K Smith D.
PMID: 29190003 | DOI: 10.1007/s12105-017-0871-5
Routine testing for p16 immunohistochemistry (with selective HPV-specific test use) has been recommended for clinical practice in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Data suggests that the E6H4 clone performs best for this purpose, yet no studies have evaluated the optimal antibody concentration for OPSCC testing. We evaluated three concentrations (undiluted, 1:5, and 1:10) of the primary antibody solution for E6H4 using tissue microarrays from a cohort of 199 OPSCC patients with a > 70% staining cutoff for positivity. Concordance was evaluated using percent agreement and Cohen's kappa. The concentrations were evaluated for sensitivity and specificity using high risk HPV RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) and also correlated with Kaplan-Meier overall survival analysis. Inter-rater agreement was very high between p16 results at each concentration and also with RNA in situ hybridization (p < 0.0001 for all). Agreement between p16 undiluted and 1:5 dilution (agreement 98.2%; Kappa 0.943; p < 0.0001) was very high and between p16 undiluted and 1:10 dilution (agreement 79.2%; Kappa 0.512; p < 0.0001) much lower. Intensity of the staining did decrease with the 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions compared to undiluted, but not in a manner that obviously would change test interpretation or performance. Results suggest that the E6H4 antibody performs well at dilutions of up to 1:5 fold with a minor decrease in staining intensity, minimum loss of sensitivity, and no loss of specificity in OPSCC patients. This could result in reagent and cost savings.
Mod Pathol.
2018 Sep 26
Stolnicu S, Hoang L, Hanko-Bauer O, Barsan I, Terinte C, Pesci A, Aviel-Ronen S, Kiyokawa T, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Oliva E, Park KJ, Soslow RA.
PMID: 30258209 | DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0123-6
Although 2014 World Health Organization criteria require unequivocal glandular and squamous differentiation for a diagnosis of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma, in practice, adenosquamous carcinoma diagnoses are often made in tumors that lack unequivocal squamous and/or glandular differentiation. Considering the ambiguous etiologic, morphological, and clinical features and outcomes associated with adenosquamous carcinomas, we sought to redefine these tumors. We reviewed slides from 59 initially diagnosed adenosquamous carcinomas (including glassy cell carcinoma and related lesions) to confirm an adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. Select cases underwent immunohistochemical profiling as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by in situ hybridization. Of the 59 cases originally classified as adenosquamous carcinomas, 34 retained their adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis, 9 were reclassified as pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas, 10 as invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with other components (such as HPV-associated mucinous, usual-type, or adenosquamous carcinomas), and 4 as HPV-associated usual or mucinous adenocarcinomas with benign-appearing squamous metaplasia. Two glassy cell carcinomas were reclassified as poorly differentiated usual-type carcinomas based on morphology and immunophenotype. There were significant immunophenotypic differences between adenosquamous carcinomas and pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with regard to HPV (p < 0.0001), PAX8 (p = 0.038; more in adenosquamous carcinoma), p40 (p < 0.0001; more in adenosquamous carcinoma), p63 (p = 0.0018; more in adenosquamous carcinoma) and MUC6 (p < 0.0001; less in adenosquamous carcinoma), HNF-1beta (p = 0.0023), vimentin (p = 0.0003), p53 (p = 0.0004), and CK7 (p = 0.0002) expression. Survival outcomes were similar between all groups. Adenosquamous carcinomas should be diagnosed only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. The two putative glassy cell carcinomas studied did not meet our criteria for adenosquamous carcinoma, and categorizing them as such should be reconsidered.
American Journal of Otolaryngology
2018 Nov 22
Malm IJ, Rooper LM, Bishop JA, Ozgursoy SK, Hillel AT, Akst LM, Best SR.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.11.009
Abstract
Background
Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is strongly associated with tobacco use, but recent reports suggest an increasing incidence of LSCC in patients without traditional risk factors, suggesting an alternative etiology of tumorigenesis. The purpose of this study is to characterize this non-smoking population and to compare immunohistochemical markers in tumor specimens from non-smokers and smokers with LSCC.
Methods
A retrospective chart review of patients with LSCC at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) was performed. A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed with tumor specimen from non-smokers with stage and age-matched smokers and stained for a variety of immunologic and molecular targets.
Results
In the JHH cohort of 521 patients, 12% (n = 63) were non-smokers. Non-smokers were more likely to be <45 years old at time of diagnosis (OR 4.13, p = 0.001) and to have glottic tumors (OR 2.46, p = 0.003). The TMA was comprised of tumors from 34 patients (14 non-smokers, 20 smokers). Only 2 patients (6%) were human-papillomavirus (HPV) positive by high-risk RNA in situ hybridization (ISH). There was no correlation between smoking status and p16 (p = 0.36), HPV-ISH positivity (p = 0.79), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN, p = 0.91), p53 (p = 0.14), or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1, p = 0.27) expression.
Conclusions
Non-smokers with LSCC are more likely to be younger at the time of diagnosis and have glottic tumors than smokers with LSCC. In TMA analysis of stage and age-matched specimens from smoker and non-smokers with LSCC, the pattern of expression for common molecular and immunologic markers is similar. Further, HPV does not appear to be a major causative etiology of LSCC in either smokers or non-smokers in our cohort of patients.
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 14(1), 22–29.
Wang, F, Flanagan, J, Su N, Wang LC, Bui S, Nielson A, Wu X, Vo HT, Ma XJ, Luo Y. (2012).
PMID: 22166544 | DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.08.002.
Human pathology, 44(8):1672–1680.
Scantlebury JB, Luo J, Thorstad WL, El-Mofty SK, Lewis JS Jr (2013).
PMID: 23566410 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.01.021.
Am J Surg Pathol.
2018 Aug 04
Stolnicu S, Barsan I, Hoang L, Patel P, Chiriboga L, Terinte C, Pesci A, Aviel-Ronen S, Kiyokawa T, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Pike MC, Oliva E, Park KJ, Soslow RA.
PMID: 29851704 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001090
The International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification was developed to separate endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs) into 2 main categories on the basis of morphology such as human papilloma virus-associated (HPVA) and non-human papilloma virus-associated adenocarcinomas. We aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification by performing a comprehensive immunohistochemical evaluation and constructing objective immunohistochemical-based algorithms for the classification of these tumors. Tissue microarrays were constructed from 297 of 409 cases used to develop the original classification. Immunostains included p16, p53, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, androgen receptor, Vimentin, CK7, CK20, HER2, HIK1083, MUC6, CA-IX, SATB2, HNF-1beta, napsin A, PAX8, CDX2, GATA3, p63, p40, and TTF-1. High-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) was detected by in situ hybridization (ISH) using probes against E6 and E7 mRNA expressed in 18 different virus types. Vimentin, ER, and progesterone receptor were expressed in a significant minority of ECAs, mostly HPVAs, limiting their use in differential diagnosis of endometrioid carcinoma when unaccompanied by HPV-ISH or p16. HR-HPV ISH had superior sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values compared with p16, as published previously. HNF-1beta did not have the anticipated discriminatory power for clear cell carcinoma, nor did MUC6 or CA-IX for gastric-type carcinoma. HNF-1beta and napsin A were variably expressed in clear cell carcinoma, with HNF-1beta demonstrating less specificity, as it was ubiquitously expressed in gastric-type carcinoma and in the majority of HPV-associated mucinous (predominantly intestinal-type and invasive ECA resembling stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion [iSMILE]) and usual-type carcinomas. HIK1083 was expressed in nearly half of gastric-type carcinomas, but not in the vast majority of other subtypes. GATA3 was positive in 10% of usual-type adenocarcinomas and in single examples of other subtypes. Rare gastric-type and HPVA mucinous carcinomas displayed HER2 overexpression. Androgen receptor was positive in 6% of usual-type adenocarcinomas. Aberrant p53 expression was found in only 3.6% of usual-type HPVA carcinomas, but it was more prevalent in mucinous (intestinal type and iSMILE) HPVAs and non-human papilloma virus-associates (particularly in gastric-type carcinoma, >50% of cases). The following diagnostic classification algorithms were developed with the above data. Carcinomas without overt cytoplasmic mucin (endometrioid, usual-type endocervical, clear cell, and mesonephric carcinomas) can be subclassified using HR-HPV ISH, ER, and GATA3, whereas carcinomas with easily appreciated cytoplasmic mucin (endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous features, HPVA mucinous, and gastric-type carcinomas) can be subclassified with HR-HPV ISH and ER.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com