Probes for HPV

HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma (HMSC) is associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Using HR-HPV mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH), we reported six new HMSC cases and compared their histopathology with that of sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Using p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HR-HPV ISH, we retrospectively identified six HMSC cases. All HMSC cases were positive for HR-HPV mRNA ISH and p16 IHC. Two HMSC cases had overlying atypical squamous epithelium and one also had invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). All HMSC were SOX10-positive whereas the overlying atypical squamous epithelium and the SCC were SOX10-negative. One atypical HMSC-like case was also identified which was positive for HR-HPV mRNA ISH, HR-HPV DNA ISH, SOX10 IHC, but negative for p16 IHC. This study showed that HR-HPV mRNA ISH was a useful tool to diagnose HMSC and had stronger signals than HR-HPV DNA ISH. HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA could be identified in the overlying atypical squamous epithelium as well as the invasive SCC. A combination of p16 and SOX10 IHC will be a useful screening panel for HMSC followed by confirmatory HR-HPV mRNA ISH test.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma is a peculiar sinonasal tract tumor that demonstrates features of both a surface-derived and salivary gland carcinoma. Implicit in its name, this tumor has a consistent association with high-risk HPV, particularly type 33. It was first described in 2013 under the designation of HPV-related carcinoma with adenoid cystic carcinoma-like features. However, since its initial description additional cases have emerged which demonstrate a wide morphologic spectrum and relatively indolent clinical behavior. Herein we report our experience with a case of HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma that was initially classified as adenoid cystic carcinoma in the 1980s. The patient recurred after a 30-year disease free interval. RNA in situ hybridization confirmed the presence of high-risk HPV in both her recurrence and her initial tumor in the 1980s, which allowed for reclassification as HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma. Our case adds to the literature of this relatively newly described entity and supports the indolent clinical behavior of this neoplasm but also demonstrates a potential for very late local recurrence.

Abstract

We sought to classify endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs) based on morphologic features linked to etiology (ie, human papillomavirus [HPV] infection), unlike the World Health Organization 2014 classification. The International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC criteria), described herein, distinguishes between human papillomavirus-associated adenocarcinoma (HPVA), recognized by the presence of luminal mitoses and apoptosis seen at scanning magnification, and no or limited HPVA features (nonhuman papillomavirus-associated adenocarcinoma [NHPVA]). HPVAs were then subcategorized based on cytoplasmic features (mostly to provide continuity with preexisting classification schemes), whereas NHPVAs were subclassified based on established criteria (ie, gastric-type, clear cell, etc.). Complete slide sets from 409 cases were collected from 7 institutions worldwide. Tissue microarrays representing 297 cases were constructed; immunohistochemistry (p16, p53, vimentin, progesterone receptor) and chromogenic in situ hybridization using an RNA-based probe set that recognizes 18 varieties of high-risk HPV were performed to validate IECC diagnoses. The 5 most common IECC diagnoses were usual-type (HPVA) (73% of cohort), gastric-type (NHPVA) (10%), mucinous adenocarcinoma of HPVA type, including intestinal, mucinous not otherwise specified, signet-ring, and invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma categories (9%), clear cell carcinoma (NHPVA) (3%) and adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (2%). Only 3 endometrioid carcinomas were recognized and all were NHPVA. When excluding cases thought to have suboptimal tissue processing, 90% and 95% of usual-type IECC cases overexpressed p16 and were HPV, whereas 37% and 3% of NHPVAs were p16 and HPV, respectively. The 1 HPV gastric-type carcinoma was found to have hybrid HPVA/NHPVA features on secondary review. NHPVA tumors were larger and occurred in significantly older patients, compared with HPVA tumors (P<0.001). The high-risk HPV chromogenic in situ hybridization probe set had superior sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (0.955, 0.968, 0.992, 0.833, respectively) compared with p16 immunohistochemistry (0.872, 0.632, 0.907, 0.545, respectively) to identify HPV-related usual carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma. IECC reliably segregates ECAs into HPVA and NHPVA types using morphology alone. This study confirms that usual-type ECAs are the most common type worldwide and that mucinous carcinomas comprise a mixture of HPVA and NHPVA, with gastric-type carcinoma being the major NHPVA type. Endometrioid and serous carcinomas of the endocervix are extraordinarily rare. Should clinical outcomes and genomic studies continue to support these findings, we recommend replacement of the World Health Organization 2014 criteria with the IECC 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The Silva invasion pattern-based classification system stratifies endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs) into 3 categories corresponding to risk of metastasis and recurrence, but has only been evaluated for HPV-associated ECAs of usual type. We examined whether the Silva system is applicable to all endocervical adenocarcinomas, especially those not associated with HPV.

METHODS:

Complete slide sets from 341 surgical specimens of ECA were collected from 7 institutions worldwide. All specimens were associated with clinical records covering at least 5 years of follow-up. Tumors were classified as HPV-associated (HPVA) or not (NHPVA) by both morphology and detection of HPV using in situ hybridization. Recurrence and survival were analyzed by multivariate Mantel-Haenszel methods.

RESULTS:

Most specimens (292; 85.6%) were HPVA, while 49 (14.3%) were NHPVA. All NHPVAs were Silva pattern C, while 76.0% of HPVAs were pattern C, 14.7% pattern A, and 9.3% pattern B. Including both HPVAs and NHPVAs, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was detected in 0% of pattern A, 18.5% of pattern B and 62.6% of pattern C cases (p < 0.001). None of the pattern A or B cases were associated with lymph node metastases (LNM), in contrast to pattern C cases (21.8%). Among patients with Silva pattern C ECA, those with HPVA tumors had a lower recurrence rate and better survival than those with NHPVA; however, when adjusted for stage at diagnosis, the difference in recurrence and mortality was small and not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Application of the Silva system is only relevant in HPVA cervical adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION:

Little is known regarding how human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) patient goals change with treatment. This study evaluates whether patient ranking of non-oncologic priorities relative to cure and survival shift after treatment as compared to priorities at diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This is a prospective study of HPV-OPC patient survey responses at diagnosis and after treatment. The relative importance of 12 treatment-related priorities was ranked on an ordinal scale (1 as highest). Median rank (MR) was compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. Prevalence of high concern for 11 treatment-related issues was compared using paired t-test. The effect of patient characteristics on change in priority rank and concern was evaluated using linear regression.

RESULTS:

Among 37 patients, patient priorities were generally unchanged after treatment compared with at diagnosis, with cure and survival persistently ranked top priority. Having a moist mouth uniquely rose in importance after treatment. Patient characteristics largely did not affect change in priority rank. Concerns decreased after treatment, except concern regarding recurrence.

DISCUSSION:

Treatment-related priorities are largely similar at diagnosis and after treatment regardless of patient characteristics. The treatment experience does not result in a shift of priorities from cure and survival to non-oncologic domains over cure and survival. The rise in importance of moist mouth implies that xerostomia may have been underappreciated as a sequelae of treatment. A decrease in most treatment-related concerns is encouraging, whereas the persistence of specific areas of concern may inform patient counseling