ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for HPV for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Oral oncology, 50(1):1–9.
Mirghani H1, Amen F2, Moreau F3, Guigay J4, Ferchiou M5, Melkane AE6, Hartl DM7, Lacau St Guily J (2014).
PMID: 24169585 | DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.10.008.
Genome Instability & Disease
2021 Apr 01
Abboodi, F;Delva, N;Emmel, J;Renrick, A;Buckhaults, P;Banister, C;Creek, K;Pirisi, L;
| DOI: 10.1007/s42764-021-00038-x
Virchows Arch. 2015 Jul 31.
Laco J, Sieglová K, Vošmiková H, Dundr P, Němejcová K, Michálek J, Čelakovský P, Chrobok V, Mottl R, Mottlová A, Tuček L, Slezák R, Chmelařová M, Sirák I, Vošmik M, Ryška A.
PMID: 26229021
Cancer Cytopathol.
2018 Jul 05
Coppock JD, Willis BC, Stoler MH, Mills AM.
PMID: 29975461 | DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22027
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
In situ hybridization for human papillomavirus (HPV) messenger RNA (HPV RNA ISH) recently was introduced as an ancillary tool in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions, and can aid in the distinction between low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) versus reactive/negative biopsies. Prior work has shown that up to one-half of cases originally diagnosed as LSIL are reclassified as negative/reactive by expert consensus review of morphology, and negative HPV RNA ISH results most often correlate with an expert diagnosis of negative/reactive. Given that LSIL overdiagnoses on biopsy may result in the erroneous clinical impression that a cervical lesion has been sampled appropriately, the authors proposed that HPV RNA ISH can inform cytology-histology correlation for challenging LSIL biopsies.
METHODS:
A total of 92 cervical biopsies originally diagnosed as LSIL were reviewed by 3 gynecologic pathologists and reclassified based on consensus opinion of morphology. ISH was performed for high-risk and low-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA. Prior/concurrent cytology results were collected.
RESULTS:
Based on expert consensus morphologic review, 49% of biopsies (45 of 92 biopsies) originally diagnosed as LSIL were reclassified as negative, 6.5% (6 of 92 biopsies) were reclassified as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and 44.5% (41 of 92 biopsies) were maintained as LSIL. The majority of LSIL biopsies reclassified as negative (80%; 36 of 45 biopsies) were HPV RNA negative, whereas 93% of LSIL biopsies (39 of 41 biopsies) and 100% of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion biopsies were HPV RNA positive.
CONCLUSIONS:
LSIL often is overdiagnosed by morphology on biopsy, potentially leading to the false impression that a lesion identified on cytology has been sampled. Performing RNA ISH on biopsies decreases histologic LSIL overdiagnosis, and potentially can prompt further sampling when there is cytology-histology discordance.
Head & Neck Pathology, 5(2):108–116.
Masand RP, El-Mofty SK, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Flanagan JJ, Lewis JS Jr (2011).
PMID: 21305368 | DOI: 10.1007/s12105-011-0245-3.
Cancer
2016 Feb 16
McDowell LJ, Young RJ, Johnston ML, Tan TJ, Kleid S, Liu CS, Bressel M, Estall V, Rischin D, Solomon B, Corry J.
PMID: 26881928 | DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29901.Abstract BACKGROUND: The incidence of p16 overexpression and the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (cHNSCC) are unclear. METHODS: One hundred forty-three patients with cHNSCC lymph nod
The incidence of p16 overexpression and the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (cHNSCC) are unclear.
One hundred forty-three patients with cHNSCC lymph node metastases involving the parotid gland were evaluated for p16 expression by immunohistochemistry. The detection of 18 high-risk HPV subtypes was performed with HPV RNA in situ hybridization for a subset of 59 patients. The results were correlated with clinicopathological features and outcomes.
The median follow-up time was 5.3 years. No differences were observed in clinicopathological factors with respect to the p16 status. p16 was positive, weak, and negative in 45 (31%), 21 (15%), and 77 cases (54%), respectively. No high-risk HPV subtypes were identified, regardless of the p16 status. The p16 status was not prognostic for overall (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.36; P = .528), cancer-specific (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77-1.64; P = .542), or progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.83-1.29; P = .783). Distant metastasis-free survival, freedom from locoregional failure, and freedom from local failure were also not significantly associated with the p16 status.
p16 positivity is common but not prognostic in cHNSCC lymph node metastases. High-risk HPV subtypes are not associated with p16 positivity and do not appear to play a role in this disease. HPV testing, in addition to the p16 status in the unknown primary setting, may provide additional information for determining a putative primary site.
Hum Pathol.
2018 Apr 20
Augustin J, Outh-Gauer S, Mandavit M, Gasne C, Grard O, Denize T, Nervo M, Mirghani H, Laccourreye O, Bonfils P, Bruneval P, Veyer D, Péré H, Tartour E, Badoual C.
PMID: 29684499 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.006
It is now established that HPV plays a role in the development of a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), notably oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). However, it is not clear which test one should use to detect HPV in oropharyngeal (OP) and non-OP SCCs. In this study, using 348 HNSCCs (126 OP SCCs and 222 non-OP SCCs), we evaluated diagnostic performances of different HPV tests in OP and non-OP SCCs: PCR, p16 immunostaining, in situ hybridization targeting DNA (DNA-CISH) and RNA (RNA-CISH), combined p16 + DNA-CISH, and combined p16 + RNA-CISH. HPV DNA (PCR) was detected in 26% of all tumors (44% of OP SCCs and 17% of non-OP SCCs). For OP SCCs, RNA-CISH was the most sensitive standalone test (88%), but p16 + RNA-CISH was even more sensitive (95%). Specificities were the same for RNA-CISH and DNA-CISH (97%) but it was better for p16 + RNA-CISH (100%). For non-OP SCCs, all tests had sensitivities below 50%, and RNA-CISH, DNA-CISH and p16 + DNA-CISH had respectively 100%, 97% and 99% specificities. As a standalone test, RNA-CISH is the most performant assay to detect HPV in OP SCCs, and combined p16 + RNA-CISH test slightly improves its performances. However, RNA-CISH has the advantage of being one single test. Like p16 and DNA-CISH, RNA-CISH performances are poor in non-OP SCCs to detect HPV, and combining tests does not improve performances.
Oral oncology
2023 Jan 24
de Sousa, LG;Lazar Neto, F;Dal Lago, EA;Sikora, A;Hanna, E;Moreno, A;Phan, J;Glisson, BS;Bell, D;Ferrarotto, R;
PMID: 36702015 | DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106311
Log In to see price
Log In to see price
Log In to see price
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com