ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for HPV for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology
2016 Oct 21
Ma Y, Patil N, Gagner JP, Miles BA.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2016.09.010
Increased testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) in oropharyngeal carcinomas has broadened the range of HPV-associated malignancies identified at this site. While HPV-related oropharyngeal non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) are known to have a better prognosis than their non-HPV counterparts, HPV positivity may not alter the aggressive nature of HPV-associated small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCNEC). We report a unique case of a mixed non-keratinizing type HPV-associated tonsillar SCC with SCNEC differentiation, and provide a comparison with the rare reported cases of such mixed carcinomas in the literature. Our patient is only the second such case positive for HPV genotype 18 and the only case in which this HPV-related mixed tonsillar tumor occurred in a patient with small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (SLL/CLL). The case discussion supports the concept that HPV positivity does not confer a better prognosis in such mixed non-keratinizing type SCC with SCNEC. Our report also alerts pathologists to the need to evaluate for the possibility of a coexisting neuroendocrine component when oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is diagnosed, as its presence will affect the patients’ clinical management and prognosis
Human Pathology
Morbini P , Alberizzi P, Tinelli C, Paglino C, Bertino G, Comoli P, Pedrazzoli P, Benazzo M.
PMID: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.12.014
Modern Pathology
2018 Jun 20
Augustin J, Mandavit M, Outh-Gauer S, Grard O, Gasne C, Lépine C, Mirghani H, Hans S, Bonfils P, Denize T, Bruneval P, Bishop JA, Fontugne J, Péré H, Tartour E, Badoual C.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0090-y
HPV-related and HPV-unrelated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are two distinct entities according to the Union for International Cancer Control, with a better prognosis conferred to HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. However, variable clinical outcomes are observed among patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, which is a surrogate marker of HPV infection. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of RNA CISH against E6 and E7 transcripts (HPV RNA CISH) to predict such variability. We retrospectively included 50 histologically confirmed p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (p16 positive immunostaining was defined by a strong staining in 70% or more of tumor cells). HPV RNA CISH staining was assessed semi-quantitatively to define two scores: RNA CISH “low” and RNA CISH “high”. Negative HPV RNA CISH cases were scored as RNA CISH “low”. This series contained 29 RNA CISH low cases (58%) and 21 RNA CISH high cases (42%). Clinical and pathologic baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. RNA CISH high staining was associated with a better overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.033 and p = 0.042, respectively). Other recorded parameters had no prognostic value. In conclusion, HPV RNA CISH might be an independent prognostic marker in p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas and might help guide therapeutics.
Human pathology
2022 Dec 22
Tekin, B;Guo, R;Cheville, JC;Canete-Portillo, S;Sanchez, DF;Fernandez-Nestosa, MJ;Dasari, S;Menon, S;Herrera Hernandez, L;Jimenez, RE;Erickson, LA;Cubilla, AL;Gupta, S;
PMID: 36566905 | DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.12.012
The American journal of surgical pathology, 37(9):1349–1356.
Mehrad M, Carpenter DH, Chernock RD, Wang H, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Luo J, Lewis JS Jr, El-Mofty SK. (2013).
PMID: 23797720 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318290427d.
American J of Surgical Pathology, 35(9):1343–1350.
Ukpo OC, Flanagan JJ, Ma XJ, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Thorstad WL, Lewis JS Jr (2011).
PMID: 21836494 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318220e59d.
Histopathology.
2016 Dec 24
Zidar N, Langner C, Odar K, Hošnjak L, Kamarádová K, Daum O, Pollheimer MJ, Košorok P, Poljak M.
PMID: 28012208 | DOI: 10.1111/his.13158
Am J Surg Pathol.
2017 May 01
Mills AM, Dirks DC, Poulter MD, Mills SE, Stoler MH.
PMID: 28403015 | DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000800
Dysregulated expression of oncogenic types of E6 and E7 is necessary for human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven carcinogenesis. An HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) assay covering 18 common high-risk types ("HR-RISH," aka HR-HPV RNA18 ISH) has not been extensively studied in the anogenital tract or validated on automated technology. We herein compare HR-RISH to DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR), p16 immunohistochemistry, and a previously available HPV DNA ISH assay in HPV-related anogenital and head and neck (H&N) neoplasia. A total of 102 squamous intraepithelial lesions (16 CIN1, 25 CIN3, 3 AIN1, 12 AIN3, 9 VIN3)/invasive squamous cell carcinomas (17 cervical, 2 anal, 18 H&N) as well as 10 normal and 15 reactive cervix samples were collected. HR-RISH, DNA ISH, and p16 immunohistochemistry were performed on whole formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. RNA ISH for 6 low-risk HPV types (LR-RISH) was also performed. RNA and DNA ISH assays used automated systems. HR-HPV PCR was performed on morphology-directed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded punches. HR-RISH was ≥97% sensitive for PCR+ and p16+ neoplasia, as well as morphologically defined anogenital high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/invasive squamous cell carcinoma. HR-RISH was also positive in 78% of anogenital low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, including 81% of CIN1. Furthermore, a subset of PCR-negative/invalid and p16-negative lesions was positive for HR-RISH. Only 1 problematic reactive cervix sample and no normal cervix samples stained. These results demonstrate that HR-RISH is a robust method for the detection of HR-HPV-related neoplasia and provides insight into HPV pathobiology. Performance meets or exceeds that of existing assays in anogenital and H&N lesions and may play a role in resolving diagnostically challenging CIN1 versus reactive cases.
Infectious Agents and Cancer
2019 Mar 05
Kiyuna A, Ikegami T, Uehara T, Hirakawa H, Agena S, Uezato J, Kondo S, Yamashita Y, Deng Z, Maeda H, Suzuki M, Ganaha A.
PMID: - | DOI: 10.1186/s13027-019-0224-y
Background
Oropharyngeal cancers associated with high-risk type human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection have better prognosis than virus negative cancers. Similarly, the HPV status in laryngeal cancer (LC) may be associated with better outcome.
Methods
Samples from 88 patients with LC were investigated using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and p16 immunohistochemistry for HR-HPV analysis. The cut-off point for p16 overexpression was diffuse (≥75%) tumor expression with at least moderate (+ 2/3) staining intensity.
Results
The 5-year cumulative survival (CS) rate was 80.7% in all patients with LC. According to a combination of HR-HPV DNA status and p16 overexpression, subjects with LC were divided into four groups: HR-HPV DNA-positive/p16 overexpression-positive (n = 5, 5.7%; CS = 100%), HR-HPV DNA-positive/p16 overexpression-negative (n = 11, 12.5%; CS =81.8%), HR-HPV DNA-negative/p16 overexpression-positive (n = 0), and HR-HPV DNA-negative/p16 overexpression-negative (n = 72, 81.8%; CS = 79.5%). HR-HPV DNA-positive/p16-positive cases tended to have integrated HPV infection and high viral load, compared with HR-HPV DNA-positive/p16 overexpression-negative cases.
Conclusions
LC patients with HPV infection and high levels of p16 expression might have an improved survival outcome; however, it is necessary to recruit additional LC cases with HPV infection to determine the definitive characteristics of HPV-mediated LC and estimate survival outcome. These results may contribute to the development of a useful method for selecting patients with a potentially fair response to treatment and ensure laryngeal preservation.
Cancers
2022 Apr 12
Burassakarn, A;Phusingha, P;Yugawa, T;Noguchi, K;Ekalaksananan, T;Vatanasapt, P;Kiyono, T;Pientong, C;
PMID: 35454851 | DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081944
Head and neck pathology, 1–7.
Chernock RD, Nussenbaum B, Thorstad WL, Luo Y, Ma XJ, El-Mofty SK, Lewis JS Jr (2013).
PMID: 24151062.
British journal of cancer, 108(6):1332–1339.
Schache AG, Liloglou T, Risk JM, Jones TM, Ma XJ, Wang H, Bui S, Luo Y, Sloan P, Shaw RJ, Robinson M (2013).
PMID: 23412100 | DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.63.
Description | ||
---|---|---|
sense Example: Hs-LAG3-sense | Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe. | |
Intron# Example: Mm-Htt-intron2 | Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection | |
Pool/Pan Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G) | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts | |
No-XSp Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm | Does not cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
XSp Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm | designed to cross detect with the species (Sp) | |
O# Example: Mm-Islr-O1 | Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms | |
CDS Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS | Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only | |
EnEm | Probe targets exons n and m | |
En-Em | Probe targets region from exon n to exon m | |
Retired Nomenclature | ||
tvn Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1 | Designed to target transcript variant n | |
ORF Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF | Probe targets open reading frame | |
UTR Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3 | Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only | |
5UTR Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR | Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only | |
3UTR Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR | Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only | |
Pan Example: Pool | A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts |
Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.
For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below
Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:
7707 Gateway Blvd.
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798
19 Barton Lane
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420
20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051
021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn
For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com