Probes for GNRHR

This study aimed to undertake a multidisciplinary characterization of the phenotype associated with SOX11 variants.Individuals with protein altering variants in SOX11 were identified through exome and genome sequencing and international data sharing. Deep clinical phenotyping was undertaken by referring clinicians. Blood DNA methylation was assessed using Infinium MethylationEPIC array. The expression pattern of SOX11 in developing human brain was defined using RNAscope.We reported 38 new patients with SOX11 variants. Idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism was confirmed as a feature of SOX11 syndrome. A distinctive pattern of blood DNA methylation was identified in SOX11 syndrome, separating SOX11 syndrome from other BAFopathies.SOX11 syndrome is a distinct clinical entity with characteristic clinical features and episignature differentiating it from BAFopathies.

The chromatin organization of the gonadotropin gene promoters in the pituitary gonadotropes plays a major role in determining how these gene are activated, but is difficult to study because of the low numbers of these cells in the pituitary gland. Here, we set out to create a cell model to study gonadotropin chromatin, and found that by optimizing cell culture conditions, we can maintain stable proliferating cultures of primary non-transformed gonadotrope cells over weeks to months. Although expression of the gonadotropin genes drops very low, these cells are enriched in gonadotrope markers and respond to GnRH. Furthermore, >85% of the cells contained Lhb and/or Fshb mature transcripts; though these were virtually restricted to the nuclei. The gonadotropes were harvested initially due to expression of dTOMATO, following activation of Cre recombinase by the Gnrhr promoter. Over 6 mo in culture, a similar proportion of the recombined DNA was maintained (i.e. cells derived from the original gonadotropes or having acquired Gnrhr-promoter activity), together with cells of a distinct origin. The cells are enriched with markers of proliferating pituitary and stem cells, including Sox2, suggesting that multipotent precursor cells might have proliferated and differentiated into gonadotrope-like cells. These cell cultures offer a new and versatile methodology for research in gonadotrope differentiation and function, and can provide enough primary cells for chromatin immunoprecipitation and epigenetic analysis, while our initial studies also indicate a possible regulatory mechanism that might be involved in the nuclear export of gonadotropin gene mRNAs.

Chemical castration in prostate cancer can be achieved with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or antagonists. Their effects differ by the initial flare of gonadotropin and testosterone secretion with agonists and the immediate pituitary-testicular suppression by antagonists. While both suppress luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) initially, a rebound in FSH levels occurs during agonist treatment. This rebound is potentially harmful, taken the expression of FSH receptors (R) in prostate cancer tissue. We herein assessed the role of FSH in promoting the growth of androgen-independent (PC-3, DU145) and androgen-dependent (VCaP) human prostate cancer cell line xenografts in nude mice. Gonadotropins were suppressed with the GnRH antagonist degarelix, and effects of add-back human recombinant FSH were assessed on tumor growth. All tumors expressed GnRHR and FSHR, and degarelix treatment suppressed their growth. FSH supplementation reversed the degarelix-evoked suppression of PC-3 tumors, both in preventive (degarelix and FSH treatment started upon cell inoculation) and therapeutic (treatments initiated 3 weeks after cell inoculation) setting. A less marked, though significant FSH effect occurred in DU145, but not in VCaP xenografts. FSHR expression in the xenografts supports direct FSH stimulation of tumor growth. Testosterone supplementation, to maintain the VCaP xenografts, apparently masked the FSH effect on their growth. Treatment with the LH analogue hCG did not affect PC-3 tumor growth despite their expression of luteinizing hormone/choriongonadotropin receptor. In conclusion, FSH, but not LH, may directly stimulate the growth of androgen-independent prostate cancer, suggesting that persistent FSH suppression upon GnRH antagonist treatment offers a therapeutic advantage over agonist.