Contact Us / Request a Quote Download Manuals
Advanced Cell Diagnostics Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Search form

Please sign in
  • Log In
  • Register
  • How to Order
  • What to Buy
0 My Cart
X

You have no items in your shopping cart.

Menu
X
  • Products +
    RNAscope™/BaseScope™/ miRNAscope™
    +
    • Assay Selection Guide
    Target Probes
    +
    • All About Probes
    • Catalog Probes
    • Probe Sets
    • New Probe Request
    Manual Assays
    +
    RNAscope™ Chromogenic
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 HD Duplex Assay
    RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex v2 Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiplex Fluorescent V2
    BaseScope™
    • Overview
    • BaseScope™ Assay Red
    • BaseScope™ Duplex Assay
    miRNAscope™
    • Overview
    • miRNAscope™ Assay red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA Assay
    DNAscope™
    • Overview
    • DNAscope™ Duplex Assay
    Automated Assays
    +
    For Lunaphore COMET™
    • RNAscope™ HiPlex Pro for COMET™
    For Leica systems
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Brown
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Assay-Red
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Duplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ Multiomic LS Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Fluorescent Multiplex Assay
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-BROWN
    • RNAscope™ 2.5 LSx Reagent Kit-RED
    • BaseScope™ LS Reagent Kit – RED
    • miRNAscope LS Reagent Kit Red
    • RNAscope™ Plus smRNA-RNA LS Assay
    Roche DISCOVERY ULTRA system
    • Overview
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal HRP
    • RNAscope™ VS Universal AP
    • RNAscope™ VS Duplex Assay
    • BaseScope™ VS Reagent Kit – RED
    RNA-Protein Co-Detection Assay
    +
    • RNAscope HiPlex-IMC™ Co-Detection
    • Integrated Codetection Assay
    • Sequential RNA Protein Detection
    Software
    +
    • Overview
    • Aperio RNA ISH Algorithm
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Controls & Accessories
    +
    • RNAscope™
    • BaseScope™
    • miRNAscope™
    • Accessories
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Instructions
    • What to Buy
  • Services +
    Professional Assay Services
    +
    • Our Services
    • Multiomic Services
    • Biomarker Assay Development
    • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
    • Clinical Assay Development
    • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
    • Image Analysis
    Benefits
    +
    • Your Benefits
    • Certified Providers
    How to Order
    +
    • Ordering Process
    • Contact Services
  • Areas of Research +
    Most Popular
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Whole-Mount
    • Anatomic Pathology Panels
    • Neuroscience
    • Inflammation
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • Stem Cell
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Liver Research
    • Cardiovascular & Skeletal Muscle Research
    Cell & Gene Therapy
    +
    • Gene Therapy
    • Gene Therapy/AAV
    • siRNA/ASO
    • Cell Therapy
    Cancer
    +
    • Breast Cancer
    • EGFRvIII Splice Variant
    • HPV Related Cancer
    • Immuno-oncology
    • Lung Cancer
    • PDx
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Point Mutation
    • CDR3 for TCR
    Viral
    +
    • COVID-19 Coronavirus
    • HIV & SIV
    • Infectious Disease
    • Zika Virus
    Pathways
    +
    • AKT
    • JAK STAT
    • WNT B-Catenin
    Neuroscience
    +
    Neuroscience
    • Neural Development
    • Neuronal Cell Types
    • Learning and Memory
    • G-protein-coupled Receptors & Ion Channels
    • Post-mortem Brain Tissue
    Other
    +
    • Circular RNA
    • Gene Fusions
    • HT Transcript Validation
    • Long Non-coding RNA
    • RNAseq Validation
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Splice Variant
    • miRNA
    RNA & Protein
    +
    • Antibody Challenges
    • Dual ISH + IHC Methods
    • No Antibodies
    • RNA & Protein Analysis
    Customer Innovations
    +
    • Dual RNA+DNA ISH
    • Very old FFPE ISH
    • Wholemount ISH
    Animal Models
    +
    • Any Species
    • Mouse Model
    • Preclincal Safety
  • Technology +
    Overview
    +
    • How it Works
    • Data Image Gallery
    • Technology Video
    • Webinars
    RNA Detection
    +
    • Why RNA?
    • RNA ISH and IHC
    Pretreatment Options
    +
    • RNAscope™ Pretreatment
    • PretreatPro™
    Spotlights
    +
    • Researchers Spotlights
    • RNA & DNA
    • WISH
    • FFPE
    • Testimonials
    Publications, Guides & Posters
    +
    • Search publications
    • RNAscope™ Reference Guide
    • RNAscope™ Data Analysis Guide
    • Download RNAscope™ Posters
  • Support +
    Overview
    +
    • Get Started
    • How to Order
    • Distributors
    • Contact Support
    Troubleshooting
    +
    • Troubleshooting Guide
    • FAQs
    • User Manuals, SDS and Product Inserts
    • Documents and Downloads
    Imaging Resource
    +
    • Image Analysis
    • Image Registration Software
    • QuPath
    • HALO® image analysis platform
    Learn More
    +
    • Webinars
    • Training Videos
  • Partners +
    Partners
    +
    • Overview
    Partners Directory
    +
    Automation Partners
    • Leica Biosystem
    • Roche Diagnostics
    Workflow Partners
    • NanoString
    Software Partners
    • indica labs
    Become a Partner
    +
    • Learn How
  • Diagnostics +
    Diagnostics
    +
    • Diagnostics
    • Literature
    • Diagnostics ASR Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Probes
    • Diagnostics CE-IVD Detection
    • Companion Diagnostics
  • Image Calendar +
    Image Calendar
    +
    • Image Contest
    • Data Image Gallery
Search

Probes for FOS

ACD can configure probes for the various manual and automated assays for FOS for RNAscope Assay, or for Basescope Assay compatible for your species of interest.

  • Probes for FOS (1032)
  • Kits & Accessories (0)
  • Support & Documents (0)
  • Publications (73)
  • Image gallery (0)
Refine Probe List

Content for comparison

RNAscope™ 2.5 LS Probe - Mm-Braf-C3
RNAscope™ HiPlex CS Probe - Hs-WNT10A-O1-T6
RNAscope™ 2.5 VS Probe - Rn-Nod2-C1
Compare SelectedClear

Gene

  • (-) Remove FOS filter FOS (73)
  • DRD2 (14) Apply DRD2 filter
  • DRD1 (11) Apply DRD1 filter
  • Crh (10) Apply Crh filter
  • SLC32A1 (9) Apply SLC32A1 filter
  • AGRP (8) Apply AGRP filter
  • vGlut2 (8) Apply vGlut2 filter
  • Gad1 (7) Apply Gad1 filter
  • TH (6) Apply TH filter
  • Slc17a6 (6) Apply Slc17a6 filter
  • Prkcd (5) Apply Prkcd filter
  • Sst (5) Apply Sst filter
  • Penk (5) Apply Penk filter
  • Pomc (5) Apply Pomc filter
  • Slc17a7 (5) Apply Slc17a7 filter
  • CCK (4) Apply CCK filter
  • GLP1R (4) Apply GLP1R filter
  • Drd1a (4) Apply Drd1a filter
  • TAC1 (4) Apply TAC1 filter
  • Adcyap1 (4) Apply Adcyap1 filter
  • Pdyn (4) Apply Pdyn filter
  • tdTomato (4) Apply tdTomato filter
  • VGAT (4) Apply VGAT filter
  • Npy (3) Apply Npy filter
  • Gad2 (3) Apply Gad2 filter
  • Nts (3) Apply Nts filter
  • ZsGreen (3) Apply ZsGreen filter
  • TBD (3) Apply TBD filter
  • ADRA2A (2) Apply ADRA2A filter
  • Dbh (2) Apply Dbh filter
  • AVP (2) Apply AVP filter
  • CALCA (2) Apply CALCA filter
  • Avpr1a (2) Apply Avpr1a filter
  • CNR1 (2) Apply CNR1 filter
  • GCG (2) Apply GCG filter
  • Oxt (2) Apply Oxt filter
  • Oxtr (2) Apply Oxtr filter
  • Phox2b (2) Apply Phox2b filter
  • Egr2 (2) Apply Egr2 filter
  • Calb2 (2) Apply Calb2 filter
  • MBP (2) Apply MBP filter
  • Chat (2) Apply Chat filter
  • OPRM1 (2) Apply OPRM1 filter
  • Trpv1 (2) Apply Trpv1 filter
  • Npas4 (2) Apply Npas4 filter
  • CARTPT (2) Apply CARTPT filter
  • Crhr2 (2) Apply Crhr2 filter
  • mCherry (2) Apply mCherry filter
  • Slc17a8 (2) Apply Slc17a8 filter
  • Nr4a1 (2) Apply Nr4a1 filter

Product

  • RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay (27) Apply RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Assay filter
  • RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay (23) Apply RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay filter
  • RNAscope (8) Apply RNAscope filter
  • RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent v2 (7) Apply RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent v2 filter
  • RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex (1) Apply RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex filter
  • RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Reagent kit (1) Apply RNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex Reagent kit filter
  • TBD (1) Apply TBD filter

Research area

  • Neuroscience (62) Apply Neuroscience filter
  • Development (5) Apply Development filter
  • Metabolism (4) Apply Metabolism filter
  • behavioral (3) Apply behavioral filter
  • Addiction (2) Apply Addiction filter
  • Behavior (2) Apply Behavior filter
  • Cancer (2) Apply Cancer filter
  • Endocrinology (2) Apply Endocrinology filter
  • Exercise (2) Apply Exercise filter
  • Other: Metabolism (2) Apply Other: Metabolism filter
  • Sleep (2) Apply Sleep filter
  • Albinism (1) Apply Albinism filter
  • Allergy Response (1) Apply Allergy Response filter
  • Anesthesia (1) Apply Anesthesia filter
  • Autism spectrum disorder (1) Apply Autism spectrum disorder filter
  • Feeding (1) Apply Feeding filter
  • Gender Bias (1) Apply Gender Bias filter
  • Gut Mirobiome (1) Apply Gut Mirobiome filter
  • Hunger (1) Apply Hunger filter
  • Infant directed behvaior (1) Apply Infant directed behvaior filter
  • Injury (1) Apply Injury filter
  • Lung (1) Apply Lung filter
  • Metabolic (1) Apply Metabolic filter
  • Neuroscince (1) Apply Neuroscince filter
  • Opioid Consumption (1) Apply Opioid Consumption filter
  • Other: Behavior (1) Apply Other: Behavior filter
  • Other: Cell Biology (1) Apply Other: Cell Biology filter
  • Other: Endocrinology (1) Apply Other: Endocrinology filter
  • Other: Obesity (1) Apply Other: Obesity filter
  • Other: Skin (1) Apply Other: Skin filter
  • Photoperiod (1) Apply Photoperiod filter
  • Psychology (1) Apply Psychology filter
  • Sickness Behaviors (1) Apply Sickness Behaviors filter
  • Social Trauma (1) Apply Social Trauma filter
  • Stem cell (1) Apply Stem cell filter
  • Stress (1) Apply Stress filter
  • vasopressin (1) Apply vasopressin filter
  • Weight Loss (1) Apply Weight Loss filter

Category

  • Publications (73) Apply Publications filter
Incubation of methamphetamine craving is associated with selective increases in expression of BDNF and trkb, glutamate receptors, and epigenetic enzymes in cue-activated fos-expressing dorsal striatal neurons.

J Neurosci. 2015 May 27;35(21):8232-44.

Li X, Rubio FJ, Zeric T, Bossert JM, Kambhampati S, Cates HM, Kennedy PJ, Liu QR, Cimbro R, Hope BT, Nestler EJ, Shaham Y.
PMID: 26016895 | DOI: 10.1038/jid.2015.200.

Cue-induced methamphetamine seeking progressively increases after withdrawal (incubation of methamphetamine craving), but the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. We determined whether this incubation is associated with alterations in candidate genes in dorsal striatum (DS), a brain area implicated in cue- and context-induced drug relapse. We first measured mRNA expression of 24 candidate genes in whole DS extracts after short (2 d) or prolonged (1 month) withdrawal in rats following extended-access methamphetamine or saline (control condition) self-administration (9 h/d, 10 d). We found minimal changes. Next, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we compared gene expression in Fos-positive dorsal striatal neurons, which were activated during "incubated" cue-induced drug-seeking tests after prolonged withdrawal, with nonactivated Fos-negative neurons. We found significant increases in mRNA expression of immediate early genes (Arc, Egr1), Bdnf and its receptor (Trkb), glutamate receptor subunits (Gria1, Gria3, Grm1), and epigenetic enzymes (Hdac3, Hdac4, Hdac5, GLP, Dnmt3a, Kdm1a) in the Fos-positive neurons only. Using RNAscope to determine striatal subregion and cell-type specificity of the activated neurons, we measured colabeling of Fos with Drd1 and Drd2 in three DS subregions. Fos expression was neither subregion nor cell-type specific (52.5 and 39.2% of Fos expression colabeled with Drd1 and Drd2, respectively). Finally, we found that DS injections of SCH23390 (C17H18ClNO), a D1-family receptor antagonist known to block cue-induced Fos induction, decreased incubated cue-induced methamphetamine seeking after prolonged withdrawal. Results demonstrate a critical role of DS in incubation of methamphetamine craving and that this incubation is associated with selective gene-expression alterations in cue-activated D1- and D2-expressing DS neurons.
Role of dorsomedial striatum neuronal ensembles in incubation of methamphetamine craving after voluntary abstinence.

J Neurosci.

2016 Dec 15

Caprioli D, Venniro M, Zhang M, Bossert JM, Warren BL, Hope BT, Shaham Y.
PMID: 27980115 | DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3091-16.2016

We recently developed a rat model of incubation of methamphetamine craving after choice-based voluntary abstinence. Here, we studied the role of dorsolateral and dorsomedial striatum (DLS, DMS) in this incubation.We trained rats to self-administer palatable food pellets (6 days, 6-h/d) and methamphetamine (12 days, 6-h/d). We then assessed relapse to methamphetamine seeking under extinction conditions after 1 and 21 abstinence days. Between tests, the rats underwent voluntary abstinence (using a discrete choice procedure between methamphetamine and food; 20 trials/day) for 19 days. We used in situ hybridization to measure co-labeling of the activity marker Fos with Drd1 and Drd2 in DMS and DLS after the tests. Based on the in situ hybridization co-labeling results, we tested the causal role of DMS D1- and D2-family receptors, and DMS neuronal ensembles in 'incubated' methamphetamine seeking, using selective dopamine receptor antagonists (SCH39166 or raclopride) and the Daun02 chemogenetic inactivation procedure, respectively.Methamphetamine seeking was higher after 21 days of voluntary abstinence than after 1 day (incubation of methamphetamine craving). The 'incubated' response was associated with increased Fos expression in DMS but not DLS; Fos was co-labeled with both Drd1 and Drd2 DMS injections of SCH39166 or raclopride selectively decreased methamphetamine seeking after 21 abstinence days. In Fos-lacZ transgenic rats, selective inactivation of relapse test-activated Fos neurons in DMS on abstinence day 18 decreased incubated methamphetamine seeking on day 21.Results demonstrate a role of DMS dopamine D1 and D2-receptors in incubation of methamphetamine craving after voluntary abstinence and that DMS neuronal ensembles mediate this incubation.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT:

In human addicts, abstinence is often self-imposed and relapse can be triggered by exposure to drug-associated cues that induce drug craving. We recently developed a rat model of incubation of methamphetamine craving after choice-based voluntary abstinence. Here, we used classical pharmacology, in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and the Daun02 inactivation procedure to demonstrate a critical role of dorsomedial striatum neuronal ensembles in this new form of incubation of drug craving.

Role of Dorsomedial Striatum Neuronal Ensembles in Incubation of Methamphetamine Craving after Voluntary Abstinence.

J Neurosci.

2017 Jan 25

Caprioli D, Venniro M, Zhang M, Bossert JM, Warren BL, Hope BT, Shaham Y.
PMID: 28123032 | DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3091-16.2017

Abstract

We recently developed a rat model of incubation of methamphetamine craving after choice-based voluntary abstinence. Here, we studied the role of dorsolateral striatum (DLS) and dorsomedial striatum (DMS) in this incubation. We trained rats to self-administer palatable food pellets (6 d, 6 h/d) and methamphetamine (12 d, 6 h/d). We then assessed relapse to methamphetamine seeking under extinction conditions after 1 and 21 abstinence days. Between tests, the rats underwent voluntary abstinence (using a discrete choice procedure between methamphetamine and food; 20 trials/d) for 19 d. We used in situ hybridization to measure the colabeling of the activity marker Fos with Drd1 and Drd2 in DMS and DLS after the tests. Based on the in situ hybridization colabeling results, we tested the causal role of DMS D1 and D2family receptors, and DMS neuronal ensembles in "incubated" methamphetamine seeking, using selective dopamine receptor antagonists (SCH39166 or raclopride) and the Daun02 chemogenetic inactivation procedure, respectively. Methamphetamine seeking was higher after 21 d of voluntary abstinence than after 1 d (incubation of methamphetamine craving). The incubated response was associated with increased Fos expression in DMS but not in DLS; Fos was colabeled with both Drd1 and Drd2 DMS injections of SCH39166 or raclopride selectively decreased methamphetamine seeking after 21 abstinence days. In Fos-lacZ transgenic rats, selective inactivation of relapse test-activated Fos neurons in DMS on abstinence day 18 decreased incubated methamphetamine seeking on day 21. Results demonstrate a role of DMS dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the incubation of methamphetamine craving after voluntary abstinence and that DMS neuronal ensembles mediate this incubation.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT:

In human addicts, abstinence is often self-imposed and relapse can be triggered by exposure to drug-associated cues that induce drug craving. We recently developed a rat model of incubation of methamphetamine craving after choice-based voluntary abstinence. Here, we used classical pharmacology, in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and the Daun02 inactivation procedure to demonstrate a critical role of dorsomedial striatum neuronal ensembles in this new form of incubation of drug craving.

Nucleus accumbens Drd1-expressing neurons control aggression self-administration and aggression seeking in mice.

J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 17.

2019 Jan 17

Golden SA, Jin M, Heins C, Venniro M, Michaelides M, Shaham Y.
PMID: PMID: 30655356 | DOI: DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2409-18.2019

We recently developed a mouse model of appetitive operant aggression and reported that adult male outbred CD-1 mice lever-press for the opportunity to attack subordinate male mice and relapse to aggression seeking during abstinence. Here we studied the role of nucleus accumbens (NAc) dopamine D1- and D2-receptor (Drd1 and Drd2) expressing neurons in aggression self-administration and aggression seeking. We trained CD-1 mice to self-administer intruders (9 d, 12 trials/d) and tested them for aggression self-administration and aggression seeking on abstinence day 1. We used immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to measure the neuronal activity marker Fos in the NAc, and cell-type specific colocalization of Fos with Drd1- and Drd2-expressing neurons. To test the causal role of Drd1- and Drd2-expressing neurons, we validated a transgenic hybrid breeding strategy crossing inbred Drd1-Cre and Drd2-Cre transgenic mice with outbred CD-1 mice and used cell-type specific Cre-DREADD (hM4Di) to inhibit NAc Drd1- and Drd2-expressing neuron activity. We found that that aggression self-administration and aggression seeking induced higher Fos expression in NAc shell than in core, that Fos colocalized with Drd1 and Drd2 in both subregions, and that chemogenetic inhibition of Drd1-, but not Drd2-, expressing neurons decreased aggression self-administration and aggression seeking. Results indicate a cell-type specific role of Drd1-expressing neurons that is critical for both aggression self-administration and aggression seeking. Our study also validates a simple breeding strategy between outbred CD-1 mice and inbred C57-based Cre lines that can be used to study cell-type and circuit mechanisms of aggression reward and relapse.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTAggression is often comorbid with neuropsychiatric diseases, including drug addiction. One form, appetitive aggression, exhibits symptomatology that mimics that of drug addiction and is hypothesized to be due to dysregulation of addiction-related reward circuits. However, our mechanistic understanding of the circuitry modulating appetitive operant aggression is limited. Here we use a novel mouse model of aggression self-administration and relapse, in combination with immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and chemogenetic manipulations to examine how cell-types in the nucleus accumbens are recruited for, and control, operant aggression self-administration and aggression seeking on abstinence day 1. We found that one population, dopamine receptor 1-expressing neurons, act as a critical modulator of operant aggression reward and aggression seeking.
Prelimbic cortex is a common brain area activated during cue‐induced reinstatement of cocaine and heroin seeking in a polydrug self‐administration rat model

Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 11.

2018 Oct 11

Rubio FJ, Quintana-Feliciano R, Warren BL, Li X, Witonsky KFR, Soto Del Valle F, Selvam PV, Caprioli D, Venniro M, Bossert JM, Shaham Y, Hope BT.
PMID: 30307667 | DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14203

Many preclinical studies examined cue-induced relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking in animal models, but most of these studies examined only one drug at a time. In human addicts, however, polydrug use of cocaine and heroin is common. We used a polydrug self-administration relapse model in rats to determine similarities and differences in brain areas activated during cue-induced reinstatement of heroin and cocaine seeking. We trained rats to lever press for cocaine (1.0 mg/kg/infusion, 3-h/d, 18 d) or heroin (0.03 mg/kg/infusion) on alternating days (9 d for each drug); drug infusions were paired with either intermittent or continuous light cue. Next, the rats underwent extinction training followed by tests for cue-induced reinstatement where they were exposed to either heroin- or cocaine-associated cues. We observed cue-selective reinstatement of drug seeking: the heroin cue selectively reinstated heroin seeking and the cocaine cue selectively reinstated cocaine seeking. We used Fos immunohistochemistry to assess cue-induced neuronal activation in different subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), dorsal striatum (DS), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and amygdala. Fos expression results indicated that only the prelimbic cortex (PL) was activated by both heroin and cocaine cues; in contrast, no significant cue-induced neuronal activation was observed in other brain areas. RNA in situ hybridization indicated that the proportion of glutamatergic and GABAergic markers in PL Fos-expressing cells were similar for the heroin and cocaine cue-activated neurons. Overall the results indicate that PL may be a common brain area involved in both heroin and cocaine seeking during polydrug use.
Isoflurane rapidly modifies synaptic and cytoskeletal phosphoproteomes of the supraoptic nucleus of the hypothalamus and the cortex

Neuroendocrinology

2023 Jun 02

Bárez-López, S;Gadd, GJ;Pauža, AG;Murphy, D;Greenwood, MP;
PMID: 37271138 | DOI: 10.1159/000531352

Despite the widespread use of general anaesthetics, the mechanisms mediating their effects are still not understood. Although suppressed in most parts of the brain, neuronal activity, as measured by FOS activation, is increased in the hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus (SON) by numerous general anaesthetics, and evidence points to this brain region being involved in the induction of general anaesthesia and natural sleep. Posttranslational modifications of proteins, including changes in phosphorylation, enable fast modulation of protein function which could be underlying the rapid effects of general anaesthesia. In order to identify potential phosphorylation events in the brain mediating general anaesthesia effects, we have explored the phosphoproteome responses in the rat SON, and compared these to cingulate cortex (CC) which displays no FOS activation is response to general anaesthetics.Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with isoflurane for 15 minutes. Proteins from the CC and SON were extracted and processed for Nano-LC Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Phosphoproteomic determinations were performed by LC-MS/MS.We found many changes in the phosphoproteomes of both the CC and SON in response to 15 minutes of isoflurane exposure. Pathway analysis indicated that proteins undergoing phosphorylation adaptations are involved in cytoskeleton remodelling and synaptic signalling events. Importantly, changes in protein phosphorylation appeared to be brain region-specific suggesting that differential phosphorylation adaptations might underlie the different neuronal activity responses to general anaesthesia between the CC and SON.In summary, these data suggest that rapid posttranslational modifications in proteins involved in cytoskeleton remodelling and synaptic signalling events might mediate the central mechanisms mediating general anaesthesia.S. Karger AG, Basel.
Lack of Causal Roles of Cannabinoid and Dopamine Neurotransmitter Systems in Orbitofrontal and Piriform Cortex in Fentanyl Relapse in Rats

eNeuro

2022 Jul 20

Claypool, SM;Behdin, S;Applebey, SV;Orihuel, J;Ma, Z;Reiner, DJ;
PMID: 35768212 | DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0496-21.2022

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and piriform cortex (Pir) play a role in fentanyl relapse after food choice-induced voluntary abstinence, a procedure mimicking abstinence because of availability of alternative nondrug rewards. We used in situ hybridization and pharmacology to determine the role of OFC and Pir cannabinoid and dopamine receptors in fentanyl relapse. We trained male and female rats to self-administer food pellets for 6 d (6 h/d) and intravenous fentanyl (2.5 µg/kg/infusion) for 12 d (6 h/d). We assessed fentanyl relapse after 12 discrete choice sessions between fentanyl and food (20 trials/d), in which rats voluntarily reduced fentanyl self-administration. We used RNAscope to determine whether fentanyl relapse is associated with activity (indicated by Fos) in OFC and Pir cells expressing Cnr1 [which encodes cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors] or Drd1 and Drd2 (which encode dopamine D1 and D2 receptors). We injected a CB1 receptor antagonist or agonist (0.3 or 1.0 µg AM251 or WIN55,212-2/hemisphere) into OFC or a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (1.0 or 3.0 µg SCH39166/hemisphere) into Pir to determine the effect on fentanyl relapse. Fentanyl relapse was associated with OFC cells co-expressing Fos and Cnr1 and Pir cells co-expressing Fos and Drd1 However, injections of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 or agonist WIN55,212-2 into OFC or the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH39166 into Pir had no effect on fentanyl relapse. Fentanyl relapse is associated with activation of Cnr1-expressing OFC cells and Drd1-expressing Pir cells, but pharmacological manipulations do not support causal roles of OFC CB1 receptors or Pir dopamine D1 receptors in fentanyl relapse.
Behavior and Fos activation reveal that male and female rats differentially assess affective valence during CTA learning and expression

PloS one

2021 Dec 13

Bernanke, A;Burnette, E;Murphy, J;Hernandez, N;Zimmerman, S;Walker, QD;Wander, R;Sette, S;Reavis, Z;Francis, R;Armstrong, C;Risher, ML;Kuhn, C;
PMID: 34898621 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260577

Females are more affected by psychiatric illnesses including eating disorders, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder than males. However, the neural mechanisms mediating these sex differences are poorly understood. Animal models can be useful in exploring such neural mechanisms. Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is a behavioral task that assesses how animals process the competition between associated reinforcing and aversive stimuli in subsequent task performance, a process critical to healthy behavior in many domains. The purpose of the present study was to identify sex differences in this behavior and associated neural responses. We hypothesized that females would value the rewarding stimulus (Boost ) relative to the aversive stimulus (LiCl) more than males in performing CTA. We evaluated behavior (Boost intake, LiCl-induced behaviors, ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), CTA performance) and Fos activation in relevant brain regions after the acute stimuli [acute Boost (AB), acute LiCl (AL)] and the context-only task control (COT), Boost only task (BOT) and Boost -LiCl task (BLT). Acutely, females drank more Boost than males but showed similar aversive behaviors after LiCl. Females and males performed CTA similarly. Both sexes produced 55 kHz USVs anticipating BOT and inhibited these calls in the BLT. However, more females emitted both 22 kHz and 55 kHz USVs in the BLT than males: the latter correlated with less CTA. Estrous cycle stage also influenced 55 kHz USVs. Fos responses were similar in males and females after AB or AL. Females engaged the gustatory cortex and ventral tegmental area (VTA) more than males during the BOT and males engaged the amygdala more than females in both the BOT and BLT. Network analysis of correlated Fos responses across brain regions identified two unique networks characterizing the BOT and BLT, in both of which the VTA played a central role. In situ hybridization with RNAscope identified a population of D1-receptor expressing cells in the CeA that responded to Boost and D2 receptor-expressing cells that responded to LiCl. The present study suggests that males and females differentially process the affective valence of a stimulus to produce the same goal-directed behavior.
Social trauma engages lateral septum circuitry to occlude social reward

Nature

2022 Nov 30

Li, L;Durand-de Cuttoli, R;Aubry, AV;Burnett, CJ;Cathomas, F;Parise, LF;Chan, KL;Morel, C;Yuan, C;Shimo, Y;Lin, HY;Wang, J;Russo, SJ;
PMID: 36450985 | DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05484-5

In humans, traumatic social experiences can contribute to psychiatric disorders1. It is suggested that social trauma impairs brain reward function such that social behaviour is no longer rewarding, leading to severe social avoidance2,3. In rodents, the chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) model has been used to understand the neurobiology underlying stress susceptibility versus resilience following social trauma, yet little is known regarding its impact on social reward4,5. Here we show that, following CSDS, a subset of male and female mice, termed susceptible (SUS), avoid social interaction with non-aggressive, same-sex juvenile C57BL/6J mice and do not develop context-dependent social reward following encounters with them. Non-social stressors have no effect on social reward in either sex. Next, using whole-brain Fos mapping, in vivo Ca2+ imaging and whole-cell recordings, we identified a population of stress/threat-responsive lateral septum neurotensin (NTLS) neurons that are activated by juvenile social interactions only in SUS mice, but not in resilient or unstressed control mice. Optogenetic or chemogenetic manipulation of NTLS neurons and their downstream connections modulates social interaction and social reward. Together, these data suggest that previously rewarding social targets are possibly perceived as social threats in SUS mice, resulting from hyperactive NTLS neurons that occlude social reward processing.
Brainstem Dbh + Neurons Control Chronic Allergen-Induced Airway Hyperreactivity

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology

2023 Feb 05

Su, Y;Xu, J;Zhu, Z;Yu, H;Nudell, V;Dash, B;Moya, EA;Ye, L;Nimmerjahn, A;Sun, X;
PMID: 36778350 | DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.04.527145

Chronic exposure of the lung to irritants such as allergen is a primary cause of asthma characterized by exaggerated airway constriction, also called hyperreactivity, which can be life-threatening. Aside from immune cells, vagal sensory neurons are important for airway hyperreactivity 1â€"4 . However, the identity and signature of the downstream nodes of this adaptive circuit remains poorly understood. Here we show that a single population of Dbh + neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (nTS) of the brainstem, and downstream neurons in the nucleus ambiguous (NA), are both necessary and sufficient for chronic allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity. We found that repeated exposures of mice to inhaled allergen activates nTS neurons in a mast cell-, interleukin 4 (IL-4)- and vagal nerve-dependent manner. Single-nucleus RNA-seq of the nTS at baseline and following allergen challenges reveals that a Dbh + population is preferentially activated. Ablation or chemogenetic inactivation of Dbh + nTS neurons blunted, while chemogenetic activation promoted hyperreactivity. Viral tracing indicates that Dbh + nTS neurons, capable of producing norepinephrine, project to the NA, and NA neurons are necessary and sufficient to relay allergen signals to postganglionic neurons that then directly drive airway constriction. Focusing on transmitters, delivery of norepinephrine antagonists to the NA blunted allergen-induced hyperreactivity. Together, these findings provide molecular, anatomical and functional definitions of key nodes of a canonical allergen response circuit. The knowledge opens the possibility of targeted neural modulation as an approach to control refractory allergen-induced airway constriction.
Choice for drug or natural reward engages largely overlapping neuronal ensembles in the infralimbic prefrontal cortex

Journal of Neuroscience

2018 Feb 26

Pfarr S, Schaaf L, Reinert JK, Paul E, Herrmannsdörfer F, Roßmanith M, Kuner T, Hansson AC, Spanagel R, Körber C, Sommer WH.
PMID: - | DOI: Fos Bcl11b Rgs8

Cue-reward associations form distinct memories that can drive appetitive behaviors and are involved in craving for both drugs and natural rewards. Distinct sets of neurons, so called neuronal ensembles, in the infralimbic area (IL) of the medial prefrontal cortex play a key role in alcohol seeking. Whether this ensemble is specific for alcohol or controls reward seeking in general remains unclear. Here, we compared IL ensembles formed upon recall of drug (alcohol) or natural reward (saccharin) memories in male Wistar rats. Using an experimental framework that allows identification of two distinct reward-associated ensembles within the same animal, we found that cue-induced seeking of either alcohol or saccharin activated ensembles of similar size and organization, whereby these ensembles consist of largely overlapping neuronal populations. Thus, the IL seems to act as a general integration hub for reward seeking behavior, but also contains subsets of neurons that encode for the different rewards.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Cue-reward associations form distinct memories that can act as drivers of appetitive behaviors and are involved in craving for natural rewards as well as for drugs. Distinct sets of neurons, so called neuronal ensembles, in the infralimbic area of the medial prefrontal cortex play a key role in cue-triggered reward seeking. However, it is unclear whether these ensembles act as broadly tuned controllers of approach behavior or represent the learned associations between specific cues and rewards. Using an experimental framework that allows identification of two distinct reward-associated ensembles within the same animal we find largely overlapping neuronal populations. Repeated activation by two distinct events could reflect the linking of the two memory traces within the same neuron.

Constitutive and conditional PACAP deletion reveals distinct phenotypes driven by developmental versus neurotransmitter actions of PACAP

Journal of Neuroendocrinology

2023 May 02

Bakalar, D;Gavrilova, O;Jiang, S;Zhang, H;Roy, S;Williams, S;Liu, N;Wisser, S;Usdin, T;Eiden, L;
| DOI: 10.1111/jne.13286

Neuropeptides may exert trophic effects during development, and then neurotransmitter roles in the developed nervous system. One way to associate peptide-deficiency phenotypes with either role is first to assess potential phenotypes in so-called constitutive knockout mice, and then proceed to specify, regionally and temporally, where and when neuropeptide expression is required to prevent these phenotypes. We have previously demonstrated that the well-known constellation of behavioral and metabolic phenotypes associated with constitutive PACAP knockout mice are accompanied by transcriptomic alterations of two types: those that distinguish the PACAP-null phenotype from wild-type in otherwise quiescent mice (cPRGs), and gene induction that occurs in response to acute environmental perturbation in wild-type mice that do not occur in knock-out mice (aPRGs). Comparing constitutive PACAP knock-out mice to a variety of temporally and regionally specific PACAP knock-outs, we show that the prominent hyperlocomotor phenotype is a consequence of early loss of PACAP expression, is associated with Fos overexpression in hippocampus and basal ganglia, and that a thermoregulatory effect previously shown to be mediated by PACAP-expressing neurons of medial preoptic hypothalamus is independent of PACAP expression in those neurons in adult mice. In contrast, PACAP dependence of weight loss/hypophagia triggered by restraint stress, seen in constitutive PACAP knock-out mice, is phenocopied in mice in which PACAP is deleted after neuronal differentiation. Our results imply that PACAP has a prominent role as a trophic factor early in development determining global central nervous system characteristics, and in addition a second, discrete set of functions as a neurotransmitter in the fully developed nervous system that support physiological and psychological responses to stress.

Pages

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›
  • last »
X
Description
sense
Example: Hs-LAG3-sense
Standard probes for RNA detection are in antisense. Sense probe is reverse complent to the corresponding antisense probe.
Intron#
Example: Mm-Htt-intron2
Probe targets the indicated intron in the target gene, commonly used for pre-mRNA detection
Pool/Pan
Example: Hs-CD3-pool (Hs-CD3D, Hs-CD3E, Hs-CD3G)
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts
No-XSp
Example: Hs-PDGFB-No-XMm
Does not cross detect with the species (Sp)
XSp
Example: Rn-Pde9a-XMm
designed to cross detect with the species (Sp)
O#
Example: Mm-Islr-O1
Alternative design targeting different regions of the same transcript or isoforms
CDS
Example: Hs-SLC31A-CDS
Probe targets the protein-coding sequence only
EnEmProbe targets exons n and m
En-EmProbe targets region from exon n to exon m
Retired Nomenclature
tvn
Example: Hs-LEPR-tv1
Designed to target transcript variant n
ORF
Example: Hs-ACVRL1-ORF
Probe targets open reading frame
UTR
Example: Hs-HTT-UTR-C3
Probe targets the untranslated region (non-protein-coding region) only
5UTR
Example: Hs-GNRHR-5UTR
Probe targets the 5' untranslated region only
3UTR
Example: Rn-Npy1r-3UTR
Probe targets the 3' untranslated region only
Pan
Example: Pool
A mixture of multiple probe sets targeting multiple genes or transcripts

Enabling research, drug development (CDx) and diagnostics

Contact Us
  • Toll-free in the US and Canada
  • +1877 576-3636
  • 
  • 
  • 
Company
  • Overview
  • Leadership
  • Careers
  • Distributors
  • Quality
  • News & Events
  • Webinars
  • Patents
Products
  • RNAscope or BaseScope
  • Target Probes
  • Controls
  • Manual assays
  • Automated Assays
  • Accessories
  • Software
  • How to Order
Research
  • Popular Applications
  • Cancer
  • Viral
  • Pathways
  • Neuroscience
  • Other Applications
  • RNA & Protein
  • Customer Innovations
  • Animal Models
Technology
  • Overview
  • RNA Detection
  • Spotlight Interviews
  • Publications & Guides
Assay Services
  • Our Services
  • Biomarker Assay Development
  • Cell & Gene Therapy Services
  • Clinical Assay Development
  • Tissue Bank & Sample Procurement
  • Image Analysis
  • Your Benefits
  • How to Order
Diagnostics
  • Diagnostics
  • Companion Diagnostics
Support
  • Getting started
  • Contact Support
  • Troubleshooting Guide
  • FAQs
  • Manuals, SDS & Inserts
  • Downloads
  • Webinars
  • Training Videos

Visit Bio-Techne and its other brands

  • bio-technie
  • protein
  • bio-spacific
  • rd
  • novus
  • tocris
© 2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.
  • Terms and Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • Email Preferences
  • 
  • 
  • 

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic use. Refer to appropriate regulations. RNAscope is a registered trademark; and HybEZ, EZ-Batch and DNAscope are trademarks of Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. ©2025 Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.

 

Contact Us / Request a Quote
Download Manuals
Request a PAS Project Consultation
Order online at
bio-techne.com
OK
X
Contact Us

Complete one of the three forms below and we will get back to you.

For Quote Requests, please provide more details in the Contact Sales form below

  • Contact Sales
  • Contact Support
  • Contact Services
  • Offices

Advanced Cell Diagnostics

Our new headquarters office starting May 2016:

7707 Gateway Blvd.  
Newark, CA 94560
Toll Free: 1 (877) 576-3636
Phone: (510) 576-8800
Fax: (510) 576-8798

 

Bio-Techne

19 Barton Lane  
Abingdon Science Park
Abingdon
OX14 3NB
United Kingdom
Phone 2: +44 1235 529449
Fax: +44 1235 533420

 

Advanced Cell Diagnostics China

20F, Tower 3,
Raffles City Changning Office,
1193 Changning Road, Shanghai 200051

021-52293200
info.cn@bio-techne.com
Web: www.acdbio.com/cn

For general information: Info.ACD@bio-techne.com
For place an order: order.ACD@bio-techne.com
For product support: support.ACD@bio-techne.com
For career opportunities: hr.ACD@bio-techne.com

See Distributors
×

You have already Quick ordered an Item in your cart . If you want to add a new item , Quick ordered Item will be removed form your cart. Do You want to continue?

OK Cancel
Need help?

How can we help you?